Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: The Socialist Delusion

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, April 26th, 2010 @ 04:05 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    646
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    The Socialist Delusion

    In contemporary politics, there are two competing ideologies which are broken down into various degrees of capitalism and socialism, both of which are entirely modern. In the first, the means of production is owned privately by the bourgeois, and in the second, collectively by the proletariat as representative of the state. Although, it may seem like these two ideologies are diametrically opposed, they are really just two sides of the same coin, stemming from an egalitarian, secular, and parliamentarian democracy. Whereas scientism was at the heart of progressivism, mercantilism served as the deathblow to a traditional civilization, which was organized by a hierarchy of castes. Mercantilism reduces life to work and wealth, having for its main tenets that all raw materials be exploited and that manufacturing, markets, exports, wealth, and the working population constantly increase. Thus was atheism born with its worship of the economy, which characterizes both capitalism and socialism.

    In the Communist Manifesto, Marx wrongly views humanity as nothing more than a history of class struggles between oppressor and oppressed, ruler and ruled. But if that were so one must also state that such is an inescapable law of the universe, since in everything there is an object and subject, a thought and action, a cause and effect, a will and act. So too is there a truth and falsehood, and a consequence for our actions. It is wrong to say, however, that the upper castes in traditional civilizations were merely lawgivers, for they too were in conformity with such laws which were not their own, since spiritual law has a nonhuman origin, just as cause and effect is independent of the human will. Caste, moreover, is a vocation, which is in every way the natural ability that a person is born with, and is therefore nothing more than skill and virtue. True oppression comes from an unnatural usurpation or from a rebellion against the true and rightful laws of the universe so as to surrender to one’s own vice and temptation. The performance of any thought or act—indeed, very consciousness—is a struggle within itself, and to refuse this reality is to fall into the trap of the mediocre and of spiritual slavery.

    Thus the bourgeoisie and proletariat, or businessman and worker, did not exist before the modern age and only came about through an anomaly, that is, a wholly material civilization, which is no longer ordered by universal principles. It is only here where we see a class struggle between two camps which are concerned only with production and money.

    After the French Revolution, conservatism appears in opposition to liberalism but only illusorily, for conservatism only seeks to conserve those poisons, such as capitalism, which destroyed the spiritual and monarchical powers, and liberalism is only a liberation from those two traditional authorities. From this point, the idea of caste is dissolved and a superficial system of classes takes its place; the highest truth comes no longer from God, from the sacerdotal and regal authorities, but from money, the economy, work, and the means of production. The center is no longer that immutable unmanifested point at the summit, but rather at the circumference and the accidents, in materialism and the economy.

    The fallacy of conservatism is therefore pointed out by Marx who refers to a conservative or bourgeois socialism which appeared and which is not unlike today’s conservatism, of so-called reformers of every kind. This likewise went hand-in-hand with a Christian socialism. In the words of Marx, “A part of the bourgeoisie is desirous of redressing social grievances in order to secure the continued existence of bourgeois society. To this section belong economists, philanthropists, humanitarians, improvers of the condition of the working class, organizers of charity, members of societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, temperance fanatics, hole-and-corner reformers of every imaginable kind. This form of socialism has, moreover, been worked out into complete systems.”

    Acknowledging the destructiveness of industrialism and free trade, Marx deems the problem as the solution, by demanding a proletarian supremacy, by transforming everyone into a proletariat and thereby dissolving all class distinctions and all political power. Theoretically, communism is indistinguishable from anarchy, individualism, and ultimately, the involution or devolution of man into that of a man-ape. All forms of social democracy inevitably lead to lower and lower forms of humanity. In practice, however, social democracy is inherently tyrannical. Democracy, socialism, conservatism, and communism are all just various revolutions against tradition of which there can be no substitute. It must then follow that all of these forms are false in various degrees for the purpose of usurpation of power and therefore must be treated as such, that is, as hostile and propagandistic illusions that cannot be trusted, but which must be denounced as intolerable frauds.


    Against Social Democracy

    The first and foremost problem with politics today is not the quality of the candidates or lack thereof, but the very structure of democracy itself, which is to say, a system which destroys diversity and integrity by forcing everything either into a centrism or into a shadow government in which rule by secrecy and deception is involved. In either case, we have a people who are treated as useful idiots, where ideas take on a life of their own and control the masses as if by demonic possession, even as pawns are led along the chessboard by orchestrated events and propaganda.

    In just over a century we have witnessed a convergence of political ideologies into a collectivism which has become sacrosanct, which may be known by two virtually interchangeable terms: Marxism or social democracy.

    Marxism has for its ultimate goal the elimination of tradition, of which its greatest custodians have been the Aryan race. Whereas adherence to tradition is a genetic trait inherent in the European, it must then follow that the elimination of European racial identity would intrinsically abolish the sacred tradition. And this is the conflict which Marxism has brought unto the world. Anyone who opposes, who resists the genocide and complete eradication of his own kind and heritage, is called by the Marxist minions such meaningless words as “racist,” “hatemonger,” and the like. He is hindered by legislation which furthers the ultimate goal of Marxism, thus removing the legal right for a man to defend himself and his land.

    Marxism, moreover, seeks to abolish the natural order of mankind, including: tradition, religion, race, caste, empire, nation, culture, family, property, etc.—all of which are integral components of a natural human civilization, as opposed to a subhuman or animal (indeed, Marxist) civilization in which the lower passions are the ruling factor.

    Whereas the natural human tendency compels one to positive action, Marxism is entirely negative and can only be drawn to those poisons which dissolve, destroy, and disrupt the fabric of our civilization. This includes: global trade, global finance, global governing bodies, international military and policing, multiracialism, multiculturalism, miscegenation, feminism, foreign aid, open borders, mass immigration, and the global redistribution of wealth, in the hope that one day the Marxist may come to rule over all the earth of which all inhabitants have now become “equalized.”

    Now all of these policies have wreaked havoc on the West where the European has quickly become a minority in the world population. Among the African, Asian, Semitic (Jewish, Arab), and Mixed races, the European comprises a measly fraction of the overall percentage, well below the proportionate ratio. In only the last sixty years the percentage of global white population has been cut in half while the African and Asian populations have quadrupled. This Eastern and Southern population explosion has resulted in food and water shortages, greater pollution, destruction of land and natural habitats, loss of species, mass migrations, and high demand for fossil fuels. Even though overpopulation is clearly at the heart of the most severe problems today, the cowardly and brainwashed politicians refuse to recognize it and propose instead a sentimental program to save all of the world’s poor and diseased and to significantly increase industrialization of less developed areas.

    It is painfully obvious that an ideology based on destruction and the lower passions can only end in total destruction and irrational subhuman behavior, until finally there is no more life on this planet. One may combat this evil only with a reconstruction of tradition, which obviously presupposes a sufficient traditional knowledge realized by a valid chain of initiation. This means that a real hierarchy must be formed, one that is rid of all the usurpers. Tradition is counterrevolutionary and resistant to limited systems of any kind, as must needs be, since it was a series of revolutions which further degenerated civilization, many of which were led and organized by a foreign population, as is the case with communism, as promulgated by Marx and Engels, which is essentially Jewish. Rather than continue this delusion that Europe, and indeed the world, is under a so-called “white rule,” we must realize that Europe is being dominated by foreign masters, and that, if any rights exist it would start and end with the right for a people to be ruled by their own traditions and those possessing the right qualifications thereof. Until this happens there can be no talk of rights and humanity, which are everywhere as nothing more than sad and appalling counterfeits.


    Against Christian Liberalism

    The Catholic Church, which has been radically transformed from within by liberals from at least the 19th century on, regards migration as a holy sacrament, which they justify by an improper reading of scripture; for the “way of the pilgrim” is spiritual, though incompatible with this age, and is entirely different from economic migration or immigration as a means of conquering a land. What the church supports, however, is clearly the latter, as is evident by the policies and propaganda of the recent popes. This dumbing-down of religious doctrine is nothing new; it was from the Catholic liberals also that we heard the call for a “defense of the West” by which they meant to isolate the people away from any esoteric knowledge of which modern Christianity has lost. Acting from a point of complete distortion of exoteric doctrine it became possible to politicize religion, that is to say, a falsification of doctrine by an alteration of symbols in order to further progressive political agendas.

    On the one hand, the church condemns class warfare, greed, and the destructive waste that goes along with industry and development, and on the other, it echoes Marxism by supporting globalism, mass immigration, and more industrialization of underdeveloped nations, even claiming that it is our duty to do everything in our power to help immigrants. The church fails to condemn democracy and modernism, and rather than laying blame on immigration for multiculturalism, bankruptcy, violence, and high crime rates, the popes blame white societies— who are the victims!—for some imaginary “exploitation, blackmail, and abuse” of immigrants. Shockingly, legal and illegal immigrants are even compared to Joseph, Mary, and Jesus who the church claims were all “refugees.” This gross distortion of the truth comes from a church which has no moral standing on which to speak, since it has enabled and covered up the disgusting pedophile scandal for decades, if not centuries.


    Against Colonialism

    Whereas the West had been a colonial power in earlier times, the Islamic East is attempting to assume this function today with the assistance of European socialists. According to a hadith, “Whoever takes a piece of the land of others unjustly, he will sink down the seven earths on the Day of Resurrection.” Again, “Whoever usurps the land of somebody unjustly, his neck will be encircled with it down the seven earths (on the Day of Resurrection).” It may easily be argued that the massive Islamic migration into Europe is an unjust theft of land, since it displaces the native population and since the intent of most of the immigrants, according to the clerics, is to conquer and convert the non-Muslims and to gain control over Europe. Islamic colonialism, moreover, is fueled by radicals who often resort to criminal and terrorist acts which have no justification in the Quran. According to a hadith, “The most hated person in the sight of Allah is the most quarrelsome person.” And while, “Whoever is killed protecting his property is a martyr,” Muslims have no claim to Europe which has forever been a homeland to whites.

    The response, in turn, comes from the Western conservative socialists, who forcefully seek to replace Islamic governments in the East with modern, semi-secular democracies which would undermine the Islamic tradition.

    In light of the above, it must be concluded that the only real conflict was invented by socialism as a devilish hatred for mankind, and it is only on the deathbed of social democracy that the world may find a lasting peace.

  2. #2
    Senior Member rainman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    Sunday, February 28th, 2010 @ 05:34 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    Scotch-Irish, Welsh, English, Dutch, German, French
    Subrace
    Alpine-Nordic mix
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Ohio Ohio
    Location
    ohio
    Gender
    Family
    Single, looking
    Politics
    Libertarian/Tribalist
    Religion
    Asatru
    Posts
    1,310
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Seems like weak arguments. Reminds me of a lot of other stuff I've read and even the discussion we had on "liberalism" at this ultra conservative catholic church I have to go to.

    What is the solution? To kill the current system and replace it with what? A caste system? I'm not for it.

  3. #3
    Senior Member triedandtru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Online
    Wednesday, June 6th, 2012 @ 02:45 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Germany
    Subrace
    Alpinid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    North Carolina North Carolina
    Location
    Southeastern Coast
    Gender
    Family
    Engaged
    Politics
    Not liberal
    Religion
    Blut und Boden
    Posts
    828
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Ew. Why do you have to go to an ultra conservative Catholic Church? We do live in a 'free' country.

  4. #4
    Senior Member rainman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    Sunday, February 28th, 2010 @ 05:34 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    Scotch-Irish, Welsh, English, Dutch, German, French
    Subrace
    Alpine-Nordic mix
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Ohio Ohio
    Location
    ohio
    Gender
    Family
    Single, looking
    Politics
    Libertarian/Tribalist
    Religion
    Asatru
    Posts
    1,310
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    I'm staying with my uncle he forces me to go. I would go to a church voluntarily but everyone I've been into is really a cult that teaches that every church but there's is wrong and that whatever the church tells you to do or believe is the "will of god". It really is alarming.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, April 26th, 2010 @ 04:05 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    646
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rainman View Post
    Seems like weak arguments.
    What is the solution? To kill the current system and replace it with what? A caste system? I'm not for it.
    Nature is the author of the castes.

    And the article calls for a complete return to tradition not just the caste system.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Angelcynn Beorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, March 1st, 2012 @ 07:34 PM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Subrace
    Anglo-Saxon
    Country
    England England
    State
    Essex Essex
    Location
    London
    Gender
    Politics
    National Capitalist
    Religion
    Protestant
    Posts
    868
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by exit View Post
    Nature is the author of the castes.
    Yet there are no castes in the natural world.

    Castes are a creation of man, and thus can be used or discarded as needs be.
    I am Ripper... Tearer... Slasher... Gouger.
    I am the Teeth in the Darkness, the Talons in the Night.
    Mine is Strength... and Lust... and Power!
    I AM BEOWULF!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, April 26th, 2010 @ 04:05 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Gender
    Posts
    646
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Angelcynn Beorn View Post
    Yet there are no castes in the natural world.

    Castes are a creation of man, and thus can be used or discarded as needs be.
    Of course I mean what is natural for man. Comparing man to an animal is absurd. Caste has been in place for most of man's history until recently when progressive reformers rebelled against nature.

  8. #8
    Senior Member velvet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last Online
    14 Minutes Ago @ 10:35 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Northern Germany
    Subrace
    Faelid
    Country
    Germany Germany
    State
    North Rhine-Westphalia North Rhine-Westphalia
    Gender
    Age
    45
    Zodiac Sign
    Sagittarius
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Pestilent Supremacy
    Politics
    Blut und Boden
    Religion
    Fimbulwinter
    Posts
    4,868
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1,141
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,262
    Thanked in
    535 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Angelcynn Beorn View Post
    Yet there are no castes in the natural world.

    Castes are a creation of man, and thus can be used or discarded as needs be.
    Nature is full of castes (social ranks, no valuation), have a look inside an anthill, servants, soldiers, queen, attendants and chambermaids, construction workers, 'cooks', suppliers... That it their natural social system.
    Meerkats, not that complex, but a leader, guards, kindergarten moms (what a great social achievement, they organise pauses and freetime for other members of their group!).

    Actually, you will find one form or another of a natural social hierarchy within each herd of gregarious animals, and however hard humans will try to deny it, also humans are just gregarious animals. That illusion, that everyone within a social structure can or should have a voice (ending in all shouting as loud as possible and noone actually does anything), was the beginning of the end of a social structure, that was made to give everyone his place in accordance with his natural abilities, talents or the absense of those.

    I would agree with the hostility against castes, if they'd always look like the ones in India with their uncrossable borders. But that is not the natural form of castes, that is the result, when british (sorry) conquerors adapt the system to ensure their power with only economical interests. Before that India suffered islamistic invasions which had perverted the system too.

    Ranks are actually not made to ensure power, but to structure small groups of people, it doesnt even need an external impulse (ie a leader/king), that structure originates automatically, because it is the default system. Not everyone finds serving unpleasant (just ask a british butler), or hard fieldwork, not everyone is made to lead others. But to lead others, you need to have honour, wisdom and a consciousness about your responsibilites. Characteristics missing in any form of modern social systems.

    It is not a question of owner or being owned, or to be a sadist and tantalize your servants, but much more an interacting system, in which everyone plays a role, in one way or another, just not everyone with the same voting rights (that the most dont want anyway). It doesnt make anyone superior or inferior, not in the form of assessment implied from today's point of view.

    This system is highly social, without constructing the negative attributes of a social dictatorship like today. A problem in returning to this natural order of men is clearly the overpopulation, this structures work best in small groups (villages, small cities). The functionality is disproportional to the number of members of the group.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Last Online
    Tuesday, August 21st, 2012 @ 11:02 PM
    Status
    On Holiday
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    New York New York
    Location
    in a valley between two lakes
    Gender
    Family
    Devoted father & husband
    Politics
    E Pluribus Unum
    Religion
    Ascension
    Posts
    585
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    The only thing we can be sure of is this, these systems set up by man have failed miserably in their task. Even with the most noble, and righteous of intent, they both can only serve to compel man. Only a man who is incapable of motion needs such compulsion. So it follows that both systems establish themselves when man no longer has the capacity to advance.

    I would be wrong to blame Socialism because Socialism is not the problem, only an effect of a decaying culture. Like wise, I refuse to blame the Capitalist system as well, as it is only the evidence of a spiritless people. But to replace the current system with the caste system and a return to tradition. Well, this I have to argue, is potentially far more restrictive and oppressive than either. Not to mention such a system in turn always leads to dis-content. As it has in India generation after generation. This in itself, the only redeeming quality of the caste system. Those who suffer from it are not disillusioned.

    Are we the victims of fate then? Unable to control our own destinies. Condemned forever to live and re-live our meager and fruitless lives. Devoid of justice, unable to identify truth. Or do we simply lack the proper perspective to do so? We are blind though we can see. We are given a perfect model of Socialism in our own bodies, at least that is what some have thought. But the world is not perfect, nor are our bodies. People get sick, grow old, and die. Nations, and cultures do the same. And so it would also appear to be evident that all systems must be finite. This is true every where, the universe is constantly becoming, being and then ceasing. The process is infinite, it's systems are not.

    Why does Socialism fail? It seems to work in the Natural world, yet man's attempt at mimicking it does not. We watch bees, ants, and other natural organisms. We reason that because these social constructs seem to work in Nature, then perhaps they should in our realm. But we are not ants, nor are we bees, instead we are men and we are restless. Not only are we men but we are the descendants of the Aryan. And as such we are riddled with insecurity and wanton of fellowship. Driven to conquer, land and blood alike, but too blind to for-see our own end. The main difference between man and the rest of the natural world is we have consciously separated ourselves from Nature. Instead of glorifying the All we focus on the I. We differ little from yeast in this regard and mere growth has become the extent of our progress. So we eat or are eaten.

    Capitalism has thrived because at this stage, we operate only as individuals driven by material wants. As a whole, or as an organism we are unable to function. Not because of our inability, but because these systems are only restrictive. And our nature is to overcome such restrictions. This is why every attempt to construct mankind into such has ended violently. It is my understanding that the Germanic spirit is such that it will not tolerate involuntary or voluntary servitude in any form. As long as man issues force in the form of government the Germanic spirit is always compelled to resist it.

    Our attempts at Socialism in the past, have been met with little success. The National Socialist era had the potential of success, but left the Fatherland torn and decimated. The political fanaticism and imperialistic policies was the herald of death for true revival in Germany. America has blindly followed in these same footsteps. More, it has destroyed all that was truly common among the people and in it's wake left a divided and conglomerate dis-unity.

    Some men have turned to the human body as a model for Socialism. They perceive that it alone is made up of individual cells, cells make up tissues, tissues make up organs, and the organs are part of a larger vital system. These systems cooperate together and sustain life for us. And it is highly efficient. At least this is man's narrow interpretation. His attempt at Science is to catalog and classify all the various organisms that exist on this planet. But what do we know of them, truly? We should not presume that we are the only species capable of thought. Something must compel the cells of all beings to perform their task. They must be instilled with some sort of consciousness. They must have an understanding of the common goal. It can hardly be coincidence, that all of these seemingly individual cells all organize and perform their task not only successfully but without error. Chance?

    As an outsider, one may conclude, that the biological system within man is Communist in nature. In fact some will say it is perfect Communism'. Furthermore it is the Utopia. This is fine if we can see an example of Communism evolving to such, but we can not. The only example we have of any Communistic system always tends to grow more monstrous and oppressive as it waxes in power. Quite opposite of the 'Utopian vision.' The Communists in return blame their own failure on man's incapacity toward his fellow man. But who can doubt that man's very creation was for anything but war? Take conflict away from man and he will find conflict within himself. Take the spiritual away and man has only material purpose. Since purpose is the basis of all action we are left with the question. What prevents the individual components, that make up the whole, from experiencing the same shortcomings that befall man? Especially, if we are to reason that under such a system; obedience comes from compulsion and compulsion is driven by law. Law in turn serves the State. The State then can only serve the purpose of the inducer. As it is the State's interest to induce obedience. But what worth is left in a people who must be coerced to do what is expected of them? Especially when it is under penalty of Law. Such men can only be hollow inside as they have never developed any true convictions. They only recoil because they fear the whip.

    You are right to conclude that both Capitalism and Communism are not that different. In fact, the only difference being the method of compulsion. One uses force the other property. As force becomes more and more evident in Government, it should be clear that the growth is moving toward Communism. Such systems must always self implode. And such systems are evidence of the final stage of a degenerate culture and the de-evolution of a people. Since such a people can no longer evolve mentally and spiritually, the Socialists devise systems and laws that control every function of society. In short, Communism is life support for a brain dead culture. Hence, growth and movement can only occur due to State induction. I find it hard to believe that the systems that our Creator has endowed within us operate under such duress and so efficiently at that.

    The Socialist sees man as an experiment. He works tirelessly at his grand task, which in his mind is to improve upon man's condition'. But all of the restraints that are put upon man do nothing but agitate. For every philanthropic advance the succeeding retreat is two fold. Every time he steals from one to give to another he reasons 'it is for the greater good'. But what of the good of the individual? Surely the individual is just as much a part of the group. What justification is there for the exploitation of some in the group for the benefit of others? No group can exist functionally, without the full co-operation of its constituents. In order for there to be complete compliance there must be a sense of mission. The individuals must see themselves as both the All and the All can only work through them. When we take from the individual, we in turn damage the All.

    Perhaps this thing that man has missed and overlooked through the ages is indeed Liberty. Not false or delegated liberty, but true liberty. Liberty that only needs one law. The law that the group is no more or no less than the sum of the individual. And in turn the individual is equal to the sum of the group. To me, this would instill a sense of much needed duty for our people. We would awaken to the un-faltering realization that the individual is responsible for the survival of the group. A group which only exists because of the individuals who make it up. And when the individual slows to the task, or perishes, so too does the group in proportion to the importance of the individual's task. The life of the individual is bound to the life of the group. A mission that needs no force to ensure it's completion, only reason. If the individual fails in their part, the group will perish and so to does the individual. Thus: 'All for one and one for all.'

    We will not advance in this world until we understand that the root of the problem is in man's narrow mindedness. It is in our inability to identify with the natural world. It is our insane dream that we can use law to compel man's behavior, yet in every instance the more mankind is compelled towards morality, the more immoral we become. The more base our actions, and the more criminal our warfare the more we spiral towards extinction. In an age where heroes are few and cowards are many, time grows short.

  10. #10
    Senior Member rainman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last Online
    Sunday, February 28th, 2010 @ 05:34 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Ancestry
    Scotch-Irish, Welsh, English, Dutch, German, French
    Subrace
    Alpine-Nordic mix
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Ohio Ohio
    Location
    ohio
    Gender
    Family
    Single, looking
    Politics
    Libertarian/Tribalist
    Religion
    Asatru
    Posts
    1,310
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Anytime in history where there have been a lot of castes in society or slavery for instance the lower classes have eventually replaced the upper crust. Look at South Africa right now. We have the decline of Greece and Rome. Rome had over 90% slaves and servants. They couldn't take care of themselves and though it worked for a long time abuses against the slaves caused rifts in society and also helped the incoming Germanic invaders to rip apart their society. Their army was mostly foriegners and mercenaries (actually a lot of Germans were in the Roman army those were the ones who then later turned against Rome and destroyed it!). These people had little motivation to fight to protect Rome which often had screwed them anyway.

    It's too dangerous. That's why modern racial organizations like the National Alliance have abandoned these notions. The foriegn element in a society should never be 10% or more. One blood- one nation. Even ants for example which were mentioned- they are all sisters. They aren't genetically different and therefore one caste can't replace another or intermingle with another genetically.

    If we look at the biggest success story- India's caste system. Originally meant to keep the Aryans pure. It worked relatively well considering the thousands of years involved but that small trickle adds up. Modern Indians are for the most part all mixed! With the lower classes almost always outbreeding the higher classes this leads historically to the decline of a civilization.

    Yes diversity can be beneficial in small communities of different groups within a nation so long as they remain a very small and easily controlled minority. They can never be citizens though but only subjects of the state.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Socialist Vikings?
    By Adalheid Friunt in forum Cultural & Linguistic Anthropology
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Tuesday, November 8th, 2011, 03:15 PM
  2. The Socialist Phenomenon
    By Renwein in forum Political Theory
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Wednesday, May 6th, 2009, 12:31 AM
  3. A critique of Dawkins' "The God Delusion"
    By Taras Bulba in forum Metaphysics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Thursday, November 9th, 2006, 09:40 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Wednesday, December 31st, 2003, 06:52 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •