Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Due Process before Banning??

  1. #1

  2. #2
    Member
    Awar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, October 21st, 2005 @ 11:04 PM
    Subrace
    Corded/Balkanoid UP
    Country
    Confederate States Confederate States
    Location
    Olympus
    Gender
    Age
    42
    Politics
    Nutzi
    Religion
    Agnostic!!!
    Posts
    4,952
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11
    Thanked in
    10 Posts

    Post Re: Due Process before Banning??

    Interesting. It would take a lot of time though.

  3. #3
    Freethinker
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Skadi Funding Member
    Thorburn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Last Online
    Thursday, August 13th, 2020 @ 04:24 PM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Subrace
    Europid
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    Location
    Midgård
    Gender
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    Reason, Freedom, Justice
    Religion
    Truth, Greatness, Beauty
    Posts
    1,326
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    134
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    296
    Thanked in
    93 Posts

    Post Re: Due Process before Banning??

    cosmocreator agrees: I like the idea.
    Hmmm ... the new comment option circumvents shuns to a certain extent.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Solar Wolff
    The Adminsitration has the say on how things are run and that is that. But just for fun, and perhaps to influence the powers that be, why not have a cyber-trial for someone accused of a transgression? Or perhaps instead of just complaining about someone who is offending you, a complaint could be lodged with a judge or grand jury and if the complaint warrented a hearing, a cyber-trial could take place. The Final Judge would remain the same in any case. The accused might defend himself or have someone else defend him as in a court. The idea seems like fun to me and everyone would learn what is acceptable and what is not.
    Considerable for long-standing members (one orange dot) i. m. h. o. but not for every occasional newbie and troll.

    Quote Originally Posted by AWAR
    Interesting. It would take a lot of time though.
    Since when do you have a life?

    This is a placeholder for a signature.

  4. #4
    Member
    Awar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, October 21st, 2005 @ 11:04 PM
    Subrace
    Corded/Balkanoid UP
    Country
    Confederate States Confederate States
    Location
    Olympus
    Gender
    Age
    42
    Politics
    Nutzi
    Religion
    Agnostic!!!
    Posts
    4,952
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    11
    Thanked in
    10 Posts

    Post Re: Due Process before Banning??

    Quote Originally Posted by Thorburn
    Since when do you have a life?
    You'll hear from my lawyer!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Mistress Klaus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, March 15th, 2012 @ 05:54 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Australian
    Country
    Australia Australia
    Gender
    Posts
    1,024
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    3
    Thanked in
    3 Posts

    Post Re: Due Process before Banning??

    Hmmm...Yes Njord's attempt at a humor spiked insult, is annoying.

  6. #6

  7. #7

  8. #8

  9. #9

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Ewergrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Last Online
    Thursday, February 28th, 2019 @ 02:57 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Northwestern European Ancestry
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Zodiac Sign
    Gemini
    Posts
    3,556
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    18
    Thanked in
    18 Posts

    Post Re: Due Process before Banning??

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Solar Wolff
    Two more thoughts:

    1. Restrict repeat offenders to a probation period in the Lowbrow Section.

    2. We are all now familiar with the comment made to Frans_Josef which caused a banning. There is a difference between discussing a particular ethnic or racial group in a Highbrow manner and making negative comments about a Member's ancestry. How about making any such personal references a cause, prima facia, for dicipline, always. Do we really want to be associated with anybody who would stoop that low?

    There's a highbrow section here? jk

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •