Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Reviving old threads

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, April 3rd, 2009 @ 10:10 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian
    Ancestry
    Maternal: Norway, Paternal: Massachusetts
    Subrace
    I don't know Lundman's taxonomy.
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Connecticut Connecticut
    Location
    South Glastonbury, Connecticut
    Gender
    Age
    89
    Family
    Single, not looking
    Occupation
    Nothing (retired)
    Politics
    monarchist
    Religion
    agnostic
    Posts
    1,701
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Reviving old threads

    If there seems to be renewed interest in the subject, I see no harm in reviving an old thread for further discussion. However, if this is to be done, I think that there ought to be some way of dating the posts so that readers can see at a glance that this represents the poster's views as of the date of the post,e.g. January 12, 2005, not necessarily his/her present view.

    Some of us are stubborn old coots who never change our minds. Others are more amenable to persuasion.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    Sunday, January 4th, 2009 @ 05:32 AM
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian
    Ancestry
    Scandinavia
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Norway Norway
    State
    Hedmark Hedmark
    Location
    Hamar
    Gender
    Age
    29
    Family
    Having a longtime compani
    Occupation
    I'm a parasite, I sell stuff.
    Politics
    Man marks the Earth with ruin.
    Religion
    Nature shall prevail!
    Posts
    1,951
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    It is a good idea, and I will discuss this with the rest of staff. First of all, we must figure if there even is a feature such as that.

    As for the reason why you want this feature is more questionable. For people can change their opinions, as you say, but the old discussion still remains the same, and whether or not the subscribing member(s) have changed their minds about that subject, doesn't matter to the member that is interested in that certain thread.

    But the feature is a good idea, nonetheless, although a bit unnecessary except to those who thinks the dates certain posts are posted are important.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, April 3rd, 2009 @ 10:10 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian
    Ancestry
    Maternal: Norway, Paternal: Massachusetts
    Subrace
    I don't know Lundman's taxonomy.
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Connecticut Connecticut
    Location
    South Glastonbury, Connecticut
    Gender
    Age
    89
    Family
    Single, not looking
    Occupation
    Nothing (retired)
    Politics
    monarchist
    Religion
    agnostic
    Posts
    1,701
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Why date posts ?

    If I have changed my position on an issue, I don't want people reading an old post in a revived thread thinking that that's where I stand on that issue now.
    Of course, I could post a disclaimer of my former opinion, and, occasionally, I have done just that, but usually while the thread was still running the first time.

  4. #4
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Blood_Axis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Last Online
    Monday, March 18th, 2019 @ 11:58 AM
    Ethnicity
    Hellenic
    Ancestry
    75% Hellenic. 25% Anglosaxon
    Subrace
    Noric
    Country
    Other Other
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Family
    In a steady relationship
    Religion
    Still searching
    Posts
    5,158
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    31
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    57
    Thanked in
    19 Posts
    Well, there's no restriction about reviving old threads if the interest is renewed, but I don't see how the interest should be focused on how the opinions of individual members have changed over the years, but rather how the collective outlook of the board has been changing.
    Besides, many of the members who were participating, let's say, in 2005, are not here anymore.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Last Online
    Sunday, January 4th, 2009 @ 05:32 AM
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian
    Ancestry
    Scandinavia
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Norway Norway
    State
    Hedmark Hedmark
    Location
    Hamar
    Gender
    Age
    29
    Family
    Having a longtime compani
    Occupation
    I'm a parasite, I sell stuff.
    Politics
    Man marks the Earth with ruin.
    Religion
    Nature shall prevail!
    Posts
    1,951
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Blood_Axis
    Besides, many of the members who were participating, let's say, in 2005, are not here anymore.
    :eek
    I am still here!



    But you are right, if the interest is there, I see no problem about renewing old threads. In fact, I encourage people to discuss old threads! But if there are no collective interest in discussing it, why bother?

    It's all up to you guys and ladies. But to specifically date every post seems kind of unnecessary.

Similar Threads

  1. Reviving Old Rituals Vs. Developing New Ones
    By Feyn in forum Customs & Rituals
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: Friday, June 28th, 2019, 06:31 PM
  2. Reviving Old Threads
    By Nachtengel in forum Help & Suggestions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: Monday, June 20th, 2016, 01:52 AM
  3. Arya Samaj: Reviving Pure Vedic Religion
    By Torquil in forum Indo-Germanic Spirituality
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Sunday, April 1st, 2007, 03:10 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •