I just pointed out a historical fact. You're the one who said you have affinities with NS. But let's analyze it for a minute.
Are you going to seriously tell me that this race
is more progressive than (or equally progressive as) this race?
Would you rather that the future Germanic look more like the first, or more like the second? And I am not only talking about aesthetics. Think well.
But they did exactly that, they made a division along sub-racial lines, except that the NS didn't consider them sub-races, instead they referred to them as different races. If the NS wanted a classless, egalitarian society, they wouldn't have exalted the Nordic race before other races nor sought to increase the preponderance of this type of race through special breeding programs and elite organizations like the SS. Their aim was to produce as many Nordics as possible, while the other races had less or no priority at all. Some of the races that were lower on the scale were sought to be ideally reduced or bred out. So obviously, there was a hierarchy and value system where some races were considered to be better than (or superior to) other races.
Bookmarks