Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Editing on Wikipedia?

  1. #11
    Keeps your Whites Whiter.
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    SuuT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    Germanic
    Subrace
    SkandoNordid/Nordicised Faelid
    Gender
    Politics
    Pan-Germanic MeritAristocracy
    Religion
    Heiðinn
    Posts
    1,465
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    5
    Thanked in
    5 Posts
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race...African features have been considered less desirable; Blacks have been considered socially inferior, and Whites superior...
    Interesting how this is a constant amongst every single perception of Race across the entire Earth, including sub-saharan Africa. One sees it every time, in every study, in every discussion, and in every field that enters the orbit of Race.

    Certainly, there is no reasonable explaination. Certainly there is no Scientific basis...

    ...There are times when even the most rigourous 'Science' must be taken much less seriously than the most banal intuition.
    "...The moral man is a lower species than the immoral, a weaker species; indeed - he is a type in regard to morality, but not a type in himself; a copy...the measure of his value lies outside him. ... I assess the power of a will by how much resistance, pain, torture it endures and knows how to turn to its advantage; I do not account the evil and painful character of existence a reproach to it, but hope rather that it will one day be more evil and painful than hitherto..." (Nietzsche)

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Rassenpapst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, February 18th, 2008 @ 05:49 AM
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    I made a contribution to the "Race" article which was promptly reverted by a Marxist Jew. (A real Marxist Jew, not joking)

    Could somebody go to the article, write to talk page that he agrees with Moritz and revert the article back to Moritz's version?

    I can also give advice if you can't yourself figure out how to edit there.

    Thank you.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race

  3. #13
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, October 8th, 2007 @ 06:23 PM
    Gender
    Age
    40
    Posts
    76
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    9
    Thanked in
    9 Posts
    It's a waste of time to edit Wikipedia. eyes:

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Rassenpapst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, February 18th, 2008 @ 05:49 AM
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Frigg View Post
    It's a waste of time to edit Wikipedia. eyes:
    Not if you know what you are doing. I have alone added a huge amount of text to articles related to eugenics, race and intelligence etc.

    I have over 1000 edits.

  5. #15
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    Saturday, July 4th, 2009 @ 09:41 PM
    Ethnicity
    Icelandic, 1/4 Eng
    Subrace
    Keltic-Nordic
    Gender
    Posts
    504
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    I find Wikpedia's articles to be well-written and enlightening but with the exception of the political and social ones, they have have very biased under-tones. I've seen some radical changes to the race article on wikipedia, last year it featured Coon's selected "5 races of man" portraits, quite suitable for that article but it was quickly removed. The editors of Wikipedia strike me as being overwhelmingly liberal(in the modern sense) and anti-racist even it's neo-con users are quite anti-racist. Most articles concerning biological/physical anthropology are PC, often stating that the concept of race is fictitious but contradict themselves by stating that physical differences are caused by environmental adaptation and micro-evolution, yeah well that is race.

    So don't bother altering something maintained by people who care more about opinion than fact.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Flash Voyager For This Useful Post:


  7. #16
    Moderator
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Online
    Wednesday, September 30th, 2020 @ 10:35 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Bavarii, Saxones, Suebi, Alamanni
    Subrace
    Borreby + Atlantonordoid
    Country
    Germany Germany
    Location
    Einöde in den Alpen
    Gender
    Age
    32
    Zodiac Sign
    Libra
    Family
    Engaged
    Politics
    Tradition & Homeland
    Religion
    Odinist
    Posts
    9,129
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    77
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    390
    Thanked in
    277 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Frigg View Post
    It's a waste of time to edit Wikipedia. eyes:
    Is it really? REmember that most people, if they want to look up something they don't know much about, nowadays will visit Wikipedia to find information about this. Yes, the information always has to be treated with caution, but many people don't take that caution and believe everything that is in there. And considering that the internet is starting to become the main source for common people (i.e. people who don't necessarily spend a lot of time in libraries) when it comes to gathering knowledge, correct information, or at least not entirely unfavourable information on Wikipedia is one major thing one can do when it comes to "online activism". So I wouldn't call it a "waste of time", really.

  8. #17
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Last Online
    Tuesday, August 22nd, 2017 @ 12:37 AM
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Illinois Illinois
    Gender
    Posts
    857
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    4 Posts
    Wikipedia has alot of potential, but the only problem is that people will edit entries out of bias or just to corrupt knowledge. Wiki will just be another battleground of views and opinions rather than another Library of Alexandria.

  9. #18
    Senior Member
    Rassenpapst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, February 18th, 2008 @ 05:49 AM
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    4
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Could everybody go to Wikipedia and say that they agree with Moritz?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Race#I_support_Moritz

    Richard kindly did so already. A veteran Arab editor also gave me his support. It is rather sad that most honest editors on Wikipedia seem to be Middle Easterners. Please register an account and start editing.

  10. #19
    Funding Member
    „Friend of Germanics”
    Funding Membership Inactive
    Leofric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    Friday, March 13th, 2020 @ 03:18 AM
    Ethnicity
    English
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    California California
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Zodiac Sign
    Aquarius
    Family
    Married
    Occupation
    Telecommunications
    Politics
    Libertarian/Neo-Imperialist
    Religion
    Heathen
    Posts
    1,193
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    11
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    19
    Thanked in
    18 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sigurd View Post
    Remember that most people, if they want to look up something they don't know much about, nowadays will visit Wikipedia to find information about this. Yes, the information always has to be treated with caution, but many people don't take that caution and believe everything that is in there. And considering that the internet is starting to become the main source for common people (i.e. people who don't necessarily spend a lot of time in libraries) when it comes to gathering knowledge, correct information, or at least not entirely unfavourable information on Wikipedia is one major thing one can do when it comes to "online activism".
    Too true.

    It reminds me of an episode of Stargate: SG-1 where an entire cilvilzation is slowly being destroyed by a computer program run amok because they rely on that same computer program for all their understanding of the past (even to the extent of letting it reprogram their memories).

    You can learn about the episode here:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revisio...argate_SG-1%29

  11. #20
    Account Inactive

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Online
    Saturday, February 23rd, 2008 @ 04:48 PM
    Posts
    5
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    I wouldn't waste my time trying to edit Wikipedia. They won't let there be any articles that are critical of Is-a-lie (Israel).

    I think that Wikipedia may be a subtle attempt to portray Israel in a more positive light. It won't work. Eventually it will backfire. The backfire is already starting.

    Try this one instead:
    http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
    It's called Metapedia. There are currently 600 articles. There have been about 200 articles added just within the past couple of weeks. It's starting to grow.
    (They have got a link to this one on StormFront.)

    Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales was/is a pornographer:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales
    From 1994–2000, Wales served as research director at Chicago Options Associates, a futures and options trader in Chicago. By "speculating on interest rate and foreign-currency fluctuations" he had soon earned enough to "support himself and his wife for the rest of their lives" (comment - I'm not disputing this but it sure sounds odd.), according to Daniel Pink of Wired Magazine. During this time one of the projects Wales undertook was the creation of a dot-com erotic search engine, Bomis, that later helped in the initial funding for Wikipedia. The nature of Bomis is disputed—Wales describes Bomis as a "guy-oriented search engine" that often sold erotic materials similar in nature to "Maxim" magazine's scantily clad women. Wales disputes the statement that Bomis dealt in "soft-core pornography," preferring the term "adult content."
    I read somewhere that Wales is also a Zionist.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Course: Zionist Editing on Wikipedia
    By Bittereinder in forum Parties, Organizations, & Activism
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Friday, August 7th, 2020, 04:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •