Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Is Religion Strictly a Personal Matter? Should It Be?

  1. #1
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Siebenbürgerin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Transylvanian Saxon
    Subrace
    Alpinid/Baltid
    State
    Transylvania Transylvania
    Location
    Hermannstadt
    Gender
    Age
    33
    Family
    Married
    Politics
    Ethno-Cultural
    Religion
    Lutheran
    Posts
    2,736
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    216
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    414
    Thanked in
    204 Posts

    Is Religion Strictly a Personal Matter? Should It Be?

    Do you think religion is stricty a personal issue? Should it be? Or should it be enforced by the state or encouraged in some way, like by having an official religion? Should it be taught in schools? Should it have any bearing on what is considered a crime? If you had your state, what role would you give to religion there? Would you leave it up to each person and their families to choose living according to the religious ways they wish, or would you impose a certain religion on the population? Please discuss anything else relevant to this theme.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Mrs. Lyfing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last Online
    Sunday, March 21st, 2010 @ 11:21 PM
    Ethnicity
    Old Stock American
    Subrace
    Bruenn
    Country
    Confederate States Confederate States
    State
    Alabama Alabama
    Location
    Where the mountains are
    Gender
    Age
    38
    Family
    I Love Him!
    Occupation
    Women-ness.
    Politics
    Liberal/Traditional
    Religion
    Spiritual
    Posts
    1,278
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Siebenbürgerin View Post
    Do you think religion is stricty a personal issue?
    Absolutely.

    Should it be?
    Absolutely.

    Or should it be enforced by the state or encouraged in some way, like by having an official religion?
    I wouldn't like that very much.

    Should it be taught in schools?
    No, school is for education and activities. Church is not in school.

    Would you leave it up to each person and their families to choose living according to the religious ways they wish, or would you impose a certain religion on the population?
    One thing I have learned, is ya can't make someone do something they just don't wanna. You couldn't force religion on people in my opinion.
    "We've become a nation of strangers. There seems to be very little in common to bond us to our fellow Americans outside of our immediate families,some don't even have that to fall back on."

  3. #3
    Senior Member BeornWulfWer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last Online
    Friday, February 8th, 2019 @ 11:19 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-Celt
    Ancestry
    West Country Zider 'ead.
    Subrace
    Brünn/Keltic-Nordic
    Country
    England England
    State
    Wessex Wessex
    Location
    Brycзstow,Sumorsǣte
    Gender
    Age
    39
    Family
    Engaged
    Occupation
    Slinger
    Politics
    Uncer Dæg Willa Becuman
    Religion
    Pagan
    Posts
    1,144
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Siebenbürgerin View Post
    Do you think religion is strictly a personal issue? Should it be? Or should it be enforced by the state or encouraged in some way, like by having an official religion?
    Religion is a good thing. It binds people together and instills a sense of common culture and collective purpose.

    Religion should never come into politics, or law and order, but I can see it being a healthy part of children's lives as long as it is presented as only a cultural entity instead of a dogmatic certainty.

    I am not a Christian (I was raised CofE for goodness sake), but I do see a lot of great things in the teachings of the character which is Jesus.
    Those stories and fables have a lot to teach us and our children, and can come a long way in making our children understand our basic laws and customs.

    I believe that our children should not be taught that 'God is dead, long live Science' as it is destroying something which science just fails terribly to replace. I am never amazed when people who hold liberal or socialist values also declare being atheist.

    It seems they do not have the capability to be human anymore, but that is another thread.

    But with me saying all of this, I do not suggest that it should just be the teachings of Christ which dominate our children's curriculum. I also understand the great worth of being taught about our 'pagan' past.

    So, the question of whether religion is a private matter? I don't think it can be. I certainly think everyone has their own intimate ideas and hopes about their religious beliefs, but they all had to start somewhere, and perhaps schools could be the ones to instil the basics of religion to subsidise what their families are also discussing with them.
    "The only way to get smarter is to play a smarter opponent."

    _________________

  4. #4
    Schimmelreiter
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Hauke Haien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Online
    Monday, September 4th, 2017 @ 09:59 AM
    Ethnicity
    Deutsch
    Location
    Land der Deutschen
    Gender
    Posts
    1,841
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    22
    Thanked in
    19 Posts
    Folk, nation state and religion should be mutually reinforcing and the role religion should play here is to reinforce group consciousness in very much the same way common rituals did in close-knit tribes.

    This means that, ideally, religion should be coextensive with folk and nation, forming a perfect three-fold unity without external loyalties. This also means that it should be taught in schools. It should not include hard definitions of crime since that would deny the state the opportunity to commit such crimes if necessary and, more generally, the religion should be sufficiently vague in its political implications to allow for dynamic manipulation according to present needs.

    What would be strictly necessary is nothing more than unconditional commitment to folk and nation enshrined in this religion in such a way that their authority over individual lives is seen as divinely just. Branching off from there, a plurality of religious expressions should exist in order to account for the vast complexity of modern societies as well as basic differences in human quality. For example, an individual with boundless will power and creative energy can not be chained to the same spiritual concepts as a lazybones who will do nothing at all without being compelled.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Thrymheim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last Online
    Thursday, October 15th, 2009 @ 09:32 PM
    Ethnicity
    Welsh/Scandinavian
    Country
    Scotland Scotland
    Location
    Aberdeen
    Gender
    Occupation
    student/Bar supervisor
    Politics
    mixed
    Religion
    Heathen
    Posts
    613
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Siebenbürgerin View Post
    Do you think religion is stricty a personal issue?
    It isn't and has never been, as organised religion is a very easy way of controlling illiterate masses.

    Quote Originally Posted by Siebenbürgerin View Post
    Should it be?
    Yes it should

    Quote Originally Posted by Siebenbürgerin View Post
    Or should it be enforced by the state or encouraged in some way, like by having an official religion?
    Enforced no as that only takes away the true meaning, you can't force people to believe, and it is pretty pointless to force people to do rituals they don't believe in, however an official religion is good and the following of that religion should be encouraged.

    Quote Originally Posted by Siebenbürgerin View Post
    Should it be taught in schools?
    No, too much chance to meddle

    Quote Originally Posted by Siebenbürgerin View Post
    Should it have any bearing on what is considered a crime?
    Difficult here the state religion's ethics and morals should form the backbone of the judicial system but no dispensation should be given for people of other religions.

    Quote Originally Posted by Siebenbürgerin View Post
    If you had your state, what role would you give to religion there? Would you leave it up to each person and their families to choose living according to the religious ways they wish, or would you impose a certain religion on the population? Please discuss anything else relevant to this theme.
    I would not impose but I would strongly encourage. Also I think it is very important to keep the state and church separate.
    Cattle die, kinsmen die,
    the self must also die;
    but glory never dies,
    For the one who is able to achieve it.

    Sayings of the High One.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Leonhardt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    Monday, August 20th, 2012 @ 05:28 AM
    Ethnicity
    Germanic American
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Posts
    518
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Do you think religion is stricty a personal issue?
    I think it should be a personal issue. It is the encouraged installation of a set of values, but the question is, who's? The children do not have the experience to make a good decision yet. These days they teach the liberal values at school also.
    It would be better if all Germanics were in the same religion which focused on preserving its own community. However, it is not realistic to think that all the Germanics will join the same religion.

    Or should it be enforced by the state or encouraged in some way, like by having an official religion?
    It could be an official religion for a Germanic country, but it leaves opportunity for power abuse. It would only be official, not mandatory.

    Should it be taught in schools?
    It could be an optional part of schools in a Germanic country as mild reinforcement. It could be home or private schooling elsewhere.

    Should it have any bearing on what is considered a crime?
    No. It should only concern morals and group identity. The moral values would then reinforce state punishment.

    Would you leave it up to each person and their families to choose living according to the religious ways they wish, or would you impose a certain religion on the population?
    There would be no imposing, since government only needs a 50% approval, or the media appearance of it.

    Please discuss anything else relevant to this theme.
    Most Protestant organizations in the US follow the New World liberal ideology. People need to pay close attention to the objectives of the organization, and not blindly follow the religion.

    Bush helped his conservative election chances by being seen attending church every week. Palin is also strongly religious.
    It is the liberals (socialists) like Lennon, who tend to be atheist.

    The earliest religions in Babylon were made so that people would not protest their 10% taxes by giving them some general moral laws. Later on, some countries in Europe used this same ideology for state religions and 10% taxation with fewer rebellions.
    Last edited by Leonhardt; Monday, October 6th, 2008 at 04:28 PM. Reason: grammar

  7. #7
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Ulf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Online
    Saturday, June 12th, 2010 @ 08:23 PM
    Ethnicity
    Deitsch
    Gender
    Posts
    775
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Stay out of my head unless you're invited.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Psychonaut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Last Online
    Wednesday, May 18th, 2016 @ 02:34 AM
    Ethnicity
    Acadian
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Pennsylvania Pennsylvania
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Politics
    Old Stock Nativism
    Religion
    Heathen Theosophy
    Posts
    928
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Siebenbürgerin View Post
    Do you think religion is stricty a personal issue? Should it be?
    Not at all. Our word 'religion' comes from the Old French religion, meaning "religious community." Historically religion has always been an integral part of a community. Modern attempts to turn every person into a religiously autonomous entity are, in my opinion, just a symptom of the social atomization that is tearing the West apart.

    Or should it be enforced by the state or encouraged in some way, like by having an official religion?
    Should it be taught in schools?
    Should it have any bearing on what is considered a crime?
    I would only be in favor of any of these if the 'state' were synonymous with a people and the state religion was the people's folk religion.

    If you had your state, what role would you give to religion there?
    If I had a state it would be a feudal Heathen kingdom, of course.
    "Ocean is more ancient than the mountains, and freighted with the memories and the dreams of Time."
    -H.P. Lovecraft

  9. #9
    Senior Member Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Last Online
    Tuesday, May 5th, 2009 @ 07:17 AM
    Ethnicity
    Son of the Empire
    Ancestry
    English, Scottish
    Subrace
    Alpinised Bruenn altered by Med.
    Country
    New Zealand New Zealand
    Gender
    Religion
    Heathenry
    Posts
    352
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Religion is not a individual thing, nor should it be to a certain extent.

    Take me for an example: I'm an Odinist and identify with other Odinists and Asatruar though my individual interpretation of the lore my slightly differ to that of others.

    Heathenry was not anti-social and should not be in this day and age either. A Blot is never as good without other folk present, the more the merrier!

    There should be no state religion, especially if it's multinational. Once things turn multinational it interfers in international relations eg Jihads and Crusades. Loyalty then lies not with the state, but in a universal faith.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Last Online
    Friday, April 3rd, 2009 @ 10:10 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian
    Ancestry
    Maternal: Norway, Paternal: Massachusetts
    Subrace
    I don't know Lundman's taxonomy.
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Connecticut Connecticut
    Location
    South Glastonbury, Connecticut
    Gender
    Age
    89
    Family
    Single, not looking
    Occupation
    Nothing (retired)
    Politics
    monarchist
    Religion
    agnostic
    Posts
    1,701
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts

    Is Religion Strictly...Personal......? Should it Be ?

    The state can mandate practises and always has, but it has no power to mandate beliefs. The Roman persecution of Christians was not directed at the Christian FAITH, but at the refusal of the Christians to sacrifice to the deified Roman emperor. The Romans tolerated all kinds of alien religions as long as their adherents made the socially accepted gesture of sacrificing to the Emperor.

    Once the Christians got into the saddle, they decided to go the Romans one better and force the people not merely to practise the devotions of Christianity, but to BELIEVE only certain doctrines. This was enforced by various means, the auto da fé being only the most notorious.

    All religious conflicts have arisen from the efforts of one church or another to enforce not merely certain practises, but also certain beliefs. In the name of this enforcement, hideous abominations have been perpetrated. Nothing is too horrible to do to a person who refuses to believe as you do.

    I have often said, and I truly think that it is true, that the worst thing that can happen to a religion is the establishment of a church. The more organised a church is, the more it possesses a hierarchical structure, the more it becomes a self-aggrandising power structure.

    I think that everyone here who knows me knows that I an an agnostic. I became one by the application of reason to the world about me and to the teachings of several religions. Religions have too many facile answers to embarrassing questions, such as, "If God had wanted us to know that, He would have told us." or "Don't try to second-guess God."

    If I were to find the doctrines of some religion acceptable, I would consider the fact to be my own business and no one else's. No one can compel me to believe ANYTHING. Nor can I be compelled to recant anything of the truth of which I am convinced , save by a statement made pro forma (and with my fingers crossed behind my back).

    It is alleged that, after being forced to recant the Copernican theory that the Earth revolves about the Sun, Galileo, as he left the trial, muttered "E pur si muove." (It does too move.), illustrating the old adage "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still."

    The eternal truths of religion and the doctrines which have grown up about them are two very different things. The latter have often justified monstrous behaviour toward those who think or believe otherwise. The inculcation of religious values at an early age is perilous. If done, it must be done by those who have no "axe to grind".

    We have seen in the news the consequences of the inculation of evil doctrines in the very young. We have seen a 12-year-old boy urged to behead a western journalist and praised for doing so. Catch them young and brainwash them. This is the recipe for making fanatics and good cannon fodder.

    This is what I fear if religion be anything but individual and personal.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: Thursday, July 4th, 2019, 05:07 AM
  2. Is an Ethnic Religion Necessarily a Racist Religion?
    By Blutwölfin in forum Comparative Religion
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: Thursday, January 3rd, 2008, 09:36 AM
  3. The Nature of Folk-Religion / Earth-Religion
    By Siegfried in forum Germanic Heathenry
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Saturday, October 29th, 2005, 12:05 AM
  4. Replies: 18
    Last Post: Saturday, January 24th, 2004, 04:38 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •