View Poll Results: Which system would you prefer?

Voters
82. You may not vote on this poll
  • Democracy

    15 18.29%
  • Hereditary Monarcy

    20 24.39%
  • Autocracy

    6 7.32%
  • Dictatorship (specify which type)

    8 9.76%
  • Theocracy (specify which type)

    8 9.76%
  • Socialist

    15 18.29%
  • Conservative

    13 15.85%
  • Fascist

    18 21.95%
  • Liberal

    9 10.98%
  • other/s

    29 35.37%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 60

Thread: The Ideal Political System?

  1. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Last Online
    Saturday, August 25th, 2012 @ 07:37 AM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Country
    Vinland Vinland
    Gender
    Age
    33
    Religion
    odinist
    Posts
    147
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    2
    Thanked in
    2 Posts
    All the arguments here against the northwest homeland seem to be based on hearsay and arguing semantics.

    The north west homeland does not exist yet. As of now it is a movement.
    In order for there to actually be a northwest republic the system will have to have a soviet style collapse.
    As of now the north west front is about having large numbers of white people come together
    across the massive place known as the pacific northwest so that they may change the world for the sake the 14 words.

    The republic will be a place where you can finally have individual rights protected by the right to bear arms, freedom of speech, the right to raise your children the way you see fit and so on and so forth for freedom and the 14 words.

    The northwest republic constitution gives you all the tools you need for individual rights. However you should remember like all documents it's just a piece of paper. In order to make it mean something white people are going to have to work, struggle and sacrifice.

    Freedom and the 14 words are my ideal.

  2. #42
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Last Online
    Wednesday, August 22nd, 2012 @ 11:44 PM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Subrace
    Europid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Washington Washington
    Location
    Yelm
    Gender
    Age
    37
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Polity capitated per constituent
    Religion
    a priori dialectic thelema/odal
    Posts
    285
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Nagelfar View Post
    I have a complex idea for a capitated-federalism; meaning a personalized legal contract for each individual using a complex bureaucracy, absolute transparency and totalitarian structure with every constituency forming it's own polity and yet having to answer to the office which holds those prerogative rights for the clustered groups of individuals and-down-to-individuals as the multicameralism bifurcates. Pretty much a state-totalitarian & anomie-anarchism fusion. It's a reciprocal absolute government, it would be very circular but I believe work itself out much as the concept of negarchy. A statist form of 'polycentric law'.
    I've taken this 'Federtarian' or "Pillar Federalism" approach and annotated it over the past few years. Note that "federal" does not mean federal as it is translated from a lot of languages back into English as "Federal", such as German 'Bundesrepublik'. What I am conferring with is what would in German be 'Foederativrepublik', for example.

    My concept runs thusly:

    To the American ear the name of Federalist implies simultaneously a devolved and evolved power structure, both centralization and decentralization. The difference between Federalism and every other political orientation is that, while they reject enumerating what they do not adhere to & reduce all constituencies down unilaterally to their own, being a Federalist means supporting the proliferation of ever more constituencies.

    So does this mean letting everyone do their own thing? Isn't this just libertarianism or liberalism? laissez faire? No, for it is a official support of all retained selective retention of rules and coercive government practices within spheres of articulation and influence to the choosing of those who assemble under those pretenses. In fact, it would be the inverted opposite to libertarianism as communism is the contrasted opposite of libertarianism (between public & private spheres); meaning Federalism is not standardized deregulation as libertarianism is, rather, Federalism is regulated destandardization. Acquiring the benefits of refining man as a social animal in every mode of socialization as a polity; acquiring the strengths of every conservative viewpoint without the restrictive conventions of any one of them sullying the potential of all others.

    An unconventional conservatism, that is liberal insofar as it is universal & free, even unto the degree which it sets its limits internally as determinate: even if unto the level of libertarianism or communism. Federalism is the supreme dialectical politic; concretely as well as empirically; being totalitarian in the manner of Panunzio & Gentile and anarchistic in the idea of Bakunin & Kropotkin; with the benefits of both the multiplying of strengths for the individual through the state as an infrastructure of confluent wills, and the voluntary self assertion of the atomisticly divergent will of a person spontaneously as meaningful and nonmarginalized in regard to any state.

    Pillarization (the 'vertical' or non-territoral but ideological Federalism) is of course included in the sweeping use of the word Federalism, as well as consociation type developing states. If 'state' is understood in its Gentilean inevitability then Polycentric law, as an apparatus of statism in what the natural law & Hobbesians consider of a social contract that exists empirically considered, is also a form of true Federalism.

    Federalism is the only constituency which accepts, and in fact affirms, all other constituencies. Every other constituency can do naught other than deny every other constituency by condition of its very existence; except insofar as accepting Federalism is accepting itself while appeasing all other demographics relegated to the ability to do the same without negating the other. Mankind has proven itself to be a political animal; well then, this is the only political politic; and therefore humanism par excellence. Majoritarian democracy is too mechanically leveled at simple standardizing for everything toward the most conventional and mundane, so too is every purely singular methodology to governance.

  3. #43
    Senior Member Eccardus Teutonicus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last Online
    Thursday, April 12th, 2012 @ 11:48 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Austro-British
    Ancestry
    Lothian, Cork, Donegal, Austria
    Subrace
    Paleo-Atlantid
    Country
    Confederate States Confederate States
    Location
    The Wasteland
    Gender
    Family
    Engaged
    Occupation
    Scholar
    Politics
    Elitism
    Religion
    Medieval Catholicism
    Posts
    268
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Looking back, I rather wish there was a way I could have my votes removed from this poll; I've really changed my mind since I originally responded. Today I'd vote for Hereditary Monarchy and Theocracy as a combination to express an Elite society dominated by Priest-Kings.
    οὐκ ἐμοῦ, ἀλλὰ τοῦ λόγου ἀκούσαντας ὁμολογεῖν σοφόν ἐστιν ἓν πάντα εἶναί.
    Heraclitus

  4. #44
    Funding Member
    "Friend of Germanics"
    Skadi Funding Member

    Žoreišar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Online
    7 Hours Ago @ 02:46 AM
    Ethnicity
    Scandinavian
    Ancestry
    East Norwegian + distant Finnish
    Subrace
    Nordid + reduced CM
    Y-DNA
    I1a1
    Country
    Norway Norway
    Location
    Sweden
    Gender
    Age
    29
    Occupation
    Traditional Craftsman
    Politics
    Family, Nation & Nature
    Religion
    Heathen Worldview
    Posts
    2,235
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    2,085
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,240
    Thanked in
    599 Posts
    Tribalism.
    A nation is an organic thing, historically defined.
    A wave of passionate energy which unites past, present and future generations

  5. #45
    New Member EuropeiskFrihet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Last Online
    Monday, December 5th, 2011 @ 12:11 AM
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian
    Ancestry
    87,5% Norwegian, 6,25% Swedish, 6,25% Finnish
    Country
    Norway Norway
    State
    Sogn og Fjordane Sogn og Fjordane
    Location
    Leikanger
    Gender
    Family
    In a steady relationship
    Occupation
    Study, Journalism
    Politics
    National-Anarchism
    Religion
    Secular Neopaganism
    Posts
    1
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    A society run on the core principles of Anarchism, Nationalism, Decentralization, Ethnopluralism and Libertarianism.

  6. #46
    Member Scania's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Online
    Friday, February 8th, 2019 @ 12:10 AM
    Ethnicity
    Swedish
    Ancestry
    Scanian/Swedish/Danish
    mtDNA
    h4a1a4b
    Country
    Sweden Sweden
    State
    Scania Scania
    Gender
    Age
    30
    Zodiac Sign
    Taurus
    Family
    Single adult
    Politics
    Ethnonationalism
    Religion
    Nordic Pagan
    Posts
    24
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by EuropeiskFrihet View Post
    A society run on the core principles of Anarchism, Nationalism, Decentralization, Ethnopluralism and Libertarianism.
    Very interesting.
    Could you please elaborate on your position and how you would like it to apply in Scandinavia?

  7. #47
    Senior Member Fredericus Rex's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Last Online
    Sunday, January 22nd, 2017 @ 10:52 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Ancestry
    America
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    California California
    Location
    Anaheim
    Gender
    Family
    Youth
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    Conservative
    Religion
    Presbyterian
    Posts
    188
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    A constitutional republic

  8. #48
    Senior Member cupper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Online
    Monday, July 30th, 2012 @ 07:17 AM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Prussia
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Canada Canada
    State
    Alberta Alberta
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    self
    Politics
    Libertarian - conservative
    Religion
    Nature based spirituality
    Posts
    32
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Žoreišar View Post
    Tribalism.
    That's not working out real well in the Middle East.

  9. #49
    Senior Member Olavssųnn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Last Online
    Saturday, August 25th, 2012 @ 05:38 PM
    Status
    Available
    Ethnicity
    Norwegian-Scandinavian
    Ancestry
    My known ancestry is Norwegian
    State
    Nordic Union Nordic Union
    Location
    Västra Värmland
    Gender
    Age
    26
    Politics
    Identitarian
    Religion
    Germanic & Indo-European Heathen
    Posts
    374
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by cupper View Post
    That's not working out real well in the Middle East.
    Please explain.
    "Man evolved in cooperating groups united by common cultural and genetic ties, and it is only in such a setting that the individual can feel truly free, and truly protected. Men cannot live happily alone and without values or any sense of identity…" - Alain de Benoist
    Motpol.nu - Alternative Right - Arktos.com
    Click here for a sound-track to my posts.

  10. #50
    Senior Member cupper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Online
    Monday, July 30th, 2012 @ 07:17 AM
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Prussia
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    Canada Canada
    State
    Alberta Alberta
    Gender
    Family
    Single adult
    Occupation
    self
    Politics
    Libertarian - conservative
    Religion
    Nature based spirituality
    Posts
    32
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Olavssųnn View Post
    Please explain.
    The whole Middle East is based on tribalism. The Arabs in particular see family first, then tribe, then religion, and then maybe, just maybe, country. Been that way for 1000's of years. The existing borders are virtually all as a result of the British drawing lines at Versailles.

    A most interesting book you may want to read is Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World [Paperback]

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Your Perfect Political System?
    By Maryland in forum Political Theory
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: Sunday, August 20th, 2017, 08:58 PM
  2. Colorado Senator: The Political System Is Rigged
    By SaxonPagan in forum The United States
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Saturday, December 4th, 2010, 04:28 AM
  3. EU Voting System Could Axe Political Parties
    By Nachtengel in forum Politics & Geopolitics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: Friday, June 12th, 2009, 05:41 PM
  4. The Only Political System that REALLY Matters
    By cosmocreator in forum Political Theory
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Monday, January 2nd, 2006, 06:24 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •