Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Celts have been a breed apart for 10,000 years

  1. #1
    Senior Member Vetinari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Last Online
    Friday, June 15th, 2012 @ 04:40 AM
    Subrace
    Other
    Country
    United States United States
    Gender
    Politics
    Nationalist
    Religion
    Lovecraftian
    Posts
    244
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Celts have been a breed apart for 10,000 years

    For Celts who have long felt they are a breed apart from the English, help is at hand from an Oxford University academic.

    In a new book, The Real Eve: Modern Man's Journey Out of Africa, Professor Stephen Oppenheimer suggests the distinction between the two peoples goes back 10,000 years - far further than thought.

    Traditionally the difference between the English and Scots, Welsh, Irish and Cornish was attributed to the influence of invaders such as
    the Anglo-Saxons, Celts and Vikings settling in the UK hundreds of years ago.

    But Professor Oppenheimer says the Celts are descended from an ancient people living on the Atlantic coast when Britain was attached to Europe. The English are more closely related to the Germanic peoples of the interior.

    "The English ... are more linked to continental Europe. The Scots, the Irish, the Welsh and the Cornish are similar in their genetic pattern to the Basque."

    http://news.independent.co.uk/world/...p?story=510742

    http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/13789.html

    http://icperthshire.icnetwork.co.uk/...name_page.html

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3618613.stm

    http://news.scotsman.com/education.cfm?id=411802004

    http://news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2767300

  2. #2
    Senior Member Vestmannr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    Thursday, June 16th, 2011 @ 10:39 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Oklahoma Oklahoma
    Gender
    Age
    47
    Posts
    727
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    8 Posts

    Post Re: Celts have been a breed apart for 10,000 years

    Here's tae us. Wha's like us?

    Damn few, and they're a' deid,

    I dont think we should be that surprised. However, I seriously doubt that the Anglo-Saxon invasions were the first time that I Y-STR haplotypes had entered Britain.

  3. #3
    Member Strengthandhonour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Thursday, February 10th, 2005 @ 09:15 PM
    Subrace
    Galician/Lombardian/Genoese
    Country
    European Union European Union
    Location
    my secret base
    Gender
    Age
    31
    Occupation
    Student
    Politics
    what does Politics mean?
    Religion
    Religion of Romans
    Posts
    320
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Post Re: Celts have been a breed apart for 10,000 years

    Sure is interesting. I always thoughtt he saxons and the celts had some sort of connection to one another. But I guess I was wrong..

  4. #4
    Senior Member Vestmannr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    Thursday, June 16th, 2011 @ 10:39 PM
    Ethnicity
    Anglo-American
    Subrace
    Nordid
    Country
    United States United States
    State
    Oklahoma Oklahoma
    Gender
    Age
    47
    Posts
    727
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    8
    Thanked in
    8 Posts

    Post Re: Celts have been a breed apart for 10,000 years

    Well, sure we have a connection: incessant warfare

    Seriously now, note it is a difference of 10,000 years. Heck, many 'Celts' and 'Saxons' share the Atlantic Modal Haplotype male lineage, IOW a good number of us had the same ancestors back during the last Ice Age. 8,000 years was enough time for divergence enough that there was conflict when we came back into contact.

    'Celts' had such a diversity depending upon the place ... so I'm not so sure that every Anglo-Saxon was so foreign looking, and might not have looked similar to Britons, or even Gaels of certain tribes. Of course, it is a mistake to confuse modern Welsh with ancient Britons. The idea that Wales was populated by refugees from the east is pretty well debunked... whole parts of England are still far more 'Celtic' than the valleys of Wales: ie, Devonshire, Cornwall, Wiltshire, Somerset, Cumbria, Westmoreland, Lancashire, etc. I have a tendency to think that the Viking settlement was far more 'foreign' to those already in Britain, than were the Anglo-Saxon settlements.

Similar Threads

  1. 2,000 Years of German Defiance
    By Elessar in forum The German Countries
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Sunday, September 12th, 2010, 04:25 AM
  2. Tools 'may be 250,000 years old'
    By Blutwölfin in forum Paleoanthropology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Wednesday, March 8th, 2006, 10:05 AM
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: Saturday, December 17th, 2005, 07:41 PM
  4. Stone Age Columbus: "The first migration was 20,000 to 30,000 years ago"
    By Peeps in forum Anthropogeny & Ethnogenesis
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Saturday, November 12th, 2005, 07:09 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Saturday, May 15th, 2004, 06:52 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •