Search:

Type: Posts; User: Tribunale Dei Minore; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.03 seconds.

  1. Replies
    42
    Views
    2,874

    Poll! Re: Is this woman a racial tragedy?

    Her prominent and broad cheekbones (attractive to me) are certain indicator of her turanid (semi-mongoloid) blood (esp. in the 2 pic). Typical nordid has narrow and not that prominent and high...
  2. Replies
    13
    Views
    1,323

    Re: How did depigmentation develop?

    The earliest members of the hominid lineage probably had a mostly unpigmented or lightly pigmented integument covered with dark black hair, similar to that of the modern chimpanzee. The evolution of...
  3. Replies
    13
    Views
    1,323

    Re: How did depigmentation develop?

    A very significant phases of the human evolution occurred during the numerous ice ages.The most recent humanoid - Neanderthal man living in caves and cold climate was more likely rather depigmented....
  4. Classify Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

    Arguably Johann Wolfgang von Goethe is the greatest german ever. (Or at least according to sociological research among modern germans)
    What is his sub-race?
    ...
  5. Re: Nordic Stature vs. East-Baltic Stature

    The Racial Characters of the Swedish Nation, Lundborg-Linders, 1926
    Published in Rassenkunde des deutschen Volkes by Hans F.K. Günther

    Hilarious indeed.
  6. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    Under the rule Kubilai Khan, Mongol empire was perfectly governed, reached its height and the authorities of the great khan were recognized in all corners of the empire.

    quote:

    '' Despite the...
  7. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    do not "post" here any more, thus no one (even you) will feel sorry.
  8. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    Nonsense, British empire had nearly 30 million sq. km. maximum, Mongol empire was 36 million sq. km. at its zenith.
    And, Spammer, is there any human empire that is not land ???
    "The larger"...
  9. Replies
    55
    Views
    6,017

    Poll! Re: Are cats superior to dogs?

    Cats were sacred animals in ancient Egypt. They were so important that even were mummified!

    http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/prehistory/egypt/religion/cats.html
  10. Replies
    55
    Views
    6,017

    Poll! Re: Are cats superior to dogs?

    In cats white coloration is dominant genetically (in humans it is recessive).
    Interesting white-coated cats with blue eyes are mostly deaf.

    Cats

    The white (W) pigment gene in cats is...
  11. Replies
    55
    Views
    6,017

    Poll! Re: Are cats superior to dogs?

    Cats are stupid, but have strong sense of self-respect, unlike dogs.
    Dogs are intellectualy superior, but most of the breeds are lickspittles.
  12. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    Mongols conquered and ruled for 100 years most of the civilized world.
    Europeans conquered Africa, Australia and America most of which were retarded weakly populated territories. India and...
  13. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    Mongols were very skilled and capable warriors and people who managed to conquer half of the world. If they were incable or insignificant they wouldn't
    achieve so much. They were capable to learn...
  14. Replies
    55
    Views
    6,017

    Poll! Re: Are cats superior to dogs?

    No
  15. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    evidence?

    link?
    nonsense. however, evidence?
    But lead and ruled by mongols. like a livestock.

    mostly true.
  16. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    It cannot. And mongols lead the only major army that manged to conquer half of the World population.


    Do you have any more reliable, not politically oriented, link?
    ChristianRetards.com?
  17. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    German and polish knights were totaly incapble of stoping the mongolians. Unfortunately they were rather military inferior. See above.
    Simply the Khan incidentally died and the mongol military...
  18. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    evidence? (not that it matters)
    The important here, idiot, is that mongolians were the leaders and rulers of the army and the empire. Got it?

    Just like Roman, Spanish, French and British empires...
  19. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    The main reason why mongols expanded so far is that they were brave and skilled warriors and used military innovations. They were simply military superior.
    See my previous post.

    wikipedia. more...
  20. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    Correct observation.

    Militery Innovations:

    The western expansion was a success for the empire until 1241. As they encountered the peoples of Europe, the Mongols with their advanced way of...
  21. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    Mongol Empire was perfectly 'an empire' in the same sense of which the Roman and British Empires were.


    As the Mongols grew more powerful, advisers convinced Genghis Khan to start building a...
  22. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    Please keep your ignorance outside my thread.
    Ghengis Khan (means 'Universal Ruler') was certainly one of the most remarkable leaders in history, that's right.
    However, all of his successors on...
  23. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    The only principal difference between the British and Mongolian empires is that the British lasted three times more (probably because, british had the demographical potenial to inhabit their colonies...
  24. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    The critiques coming from "despotic militarist, atheist" himself!
    How old are you?
  25. Re: Mongols - the Ultimate Superiority?

    The Mongolian Empire lasted little more than 100 years.

    The mongols were about 0,2 million people. They had knowledge of war, discipline and bravery. One can not expect of 0,2 million nomads...
Results 1 to 25 of 319
Page 1 of 13 1 2 3 4