PDA

View Full Version : Mini-Cattle: Deforming Nature to make it fit Men's Requests



Blutwölfin
Wednesday, January 4th, 2006, 05:30 PM
Don't have a back 40? Try mini-cattle

Smaller-sized animals need less feed, land and cause less damage

TRAPPE, Md. - If you’re a suburban cowboy hankering to raise a herd and short on ranch land, mini cattle may be for you.

New breeds of pint-sized heifers and bulls are making it easier for small farmers to raise cattle for milk, meat or just fun.

On Bill Bryan’s 50-acre spread on Maryland’s Eastern Shore, he has sold seven calves this year.

“We’ve sold the vast majority of our calves to people who have these little three- to five-acre farmettes and they’ll fence in an acre, buy a calf and more or less keep ’em for pets,” Bryan said. Two mini cattle calves stood nearby, contentedly munching on grass in a small fenced-in area, skittering away if visitors got to close.

Bryan is among a group of pioneering breeders raising miniature cattle that can be as little as a third of the size of the larger breeds.

The reasons are many, they say. You don’t need the back 40 acres to raise these breeds; the back four will do. Mini cattle eat about a third as much as a full-sized steer, are less destructive of pasture land and fencing, and are easier to handle.

“I’m 56 years old, and you want to know something? I can handle them better,” Bryan said, recounting a struggle the winter before with a full-size steer who got his horns caught in a hay rack.

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Components/Art/BUSINESS/060103/Chart_MiniCattle.gif

While each animal may be smaller, more meat can be produced overall from each acre, breeders say. And the smaller size of each animal also has its benefits.

While some people look to save money by buying an entire cow or a side of beef, it can be difficult to store the hundreds of pounds of meat from a 1,200- to 1,500-pound steer, of which about 40 percent makes it to the freezer.

Miniature cattle, which often are between 500 and 700 pounds, provide enough meat to last a family of four six months. That’s just about the freezer shelf life of beef, said Bryan. And the meat tastes the same, depending on how the cattle has been raised and fed.

Bryan, who runs a construction business, said his wife, Donna, does most of the farm work, spending about two hours a day taking care of their animals.

“Women can raise these steers just as well as men can,” Bryan said.

Bryan said most of his calves will die “of old age” because buyers are usually looking to breed the smaller cows themselves or keep them as pets.

Miniature cattle calves are more expensive than the standard size because they are still relatively rare. Bryan said he is getting $1,600 for female calves and $1,000 for bulls, compared to $500 to $600 for normal calves. But he expects prices to drop as the mini varieties become more common.

Richard H. Gradwohl, who has developed a number of small breeds at his Happy Mountain Miniature Cattle Farm in Covington, Wash., said six niche markets have developed for the miniature breeds.

Miniature cattle are primarily sold for use as pets, for small-scale milk production, breeding, showing, organic beef production or for the farm-grown market, which produces cattle on smaller farms, Gradwohl said. Sixty to 70 percent are sold as pets, he estimated.

Full miniature cattle are defined as those below 42 inches at the hip when fully grown, while mid-size miniatures are up to 48 inches, said Gradwohl, who registers 26 miniature breeds.

Another factor driving the popularity is that most people don’t have enough land for full-sized cattle, which need five acres for two cattle, compared to an acre for a pair of miniature cattle.

“The years where we had people with three, four, five hundred acres are gone,” Gradwohl said. “If you have five acres with miniature cattle the concentration is about two per acre, so you can raise 10 miniature cattle on five acres quite well.”

Those 10 mini cows will provide about 6,000 pounds on the hoof, compared to as much as 3,000 pounds that could come from two full-size cattle, Gradwohl said.

“That’s true because of the feed efficiency of the animals, and their hooves are smaller so they won’t tear up the pasture,” which helps maintain the grass they feed on, he said.

Cattle that can be raised easier on grass only is also an increasingly desirable trait because grass-fed beef is said to contain higher levels of heart-healthy Omega 3 fatty acids, breeders say.

However, finding growers who raise miniature cattle for beef is still fairly difficult because of the rarity of the breeds and the fact most are raised as pets.

In Felton, Del., Charles Warren has a half dozen Zebus — miniature humpbacked Brahmans — which he says are the only true miniatures because they are naturally small and have not been bred down to their size.

Warren, who works for Kraft Foods in Dover, Del., keeps the five cows and one bull as a hobby, along with a variety of other small animals on his 25-acre property.

“They’re like a pet more than anything. I like them because they’re neat looking, they’re oddities,” Warren said.

Warren said he hasn’t eaten any or sold any for slaughter, with most going to breeders and some to a rodeo outfit.

“My wife won’t eat anything we grow on the farm. She says if it doesn’t come on a Styrofoam tray we don’t eat it.”


Source (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10697287/page/2/)

freya3
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 07:03 PM
Makes you wonder what science will change next to "better" suit us...

Alizon Device
Monday, January 9th, 2006, 05:44 PM
I think 'Deforming Nature' is a bit harsh in this case, B.
From what I gathered from the article, these creatures have been bred to be this size, rather than any blatant genetic modification having taken place.

Breeding naturally smaller cattle with only other naturally small cattle (the smaller the better) over generations to obtain these curious animals can be seen as eccentric, but Nature is taking its course... you end up with small cattle.

What scientists are doing with our plant life, especially GM crops, is a far more serious, sinister matter.

RedJack
Sunday, January 15th, 2006, 08:54 PM
I think 'Deforming Nature' is a bit harsh in this case, B.
From what I gathered from the article, these creatures have been bred to be this size, rather than any blatant genetic modification having taken place.

I agree. Farmers have been breeding animals for various characteristics for thousands of years. Remember that horses used to be quite small and had to be bred for size and strength until they created the huge draft horses of today. Not to mention the concerted breeding program to create the thoroughbred racehorse. The extraordinary variety of breeds of dogs is another example.

Ragnar Lodbrok
Friday, February 10th, 2006, 04:47 PM
I agree. Farmers have been breeding animals for various characteristics for thousands of years. Remember that horses used to be quite small and had to be bred for size and strength until they created the huge draft horses of today. Not to mention the concerted breeding program to create the thoroughbred racehorse. The extraordinary variety of breeds of dogs is another example.

I agree, if one is not using nuclear waste,genetic mutation or something like the t-virus to breed the animals then what the cowboys are doing really does not violate the virtue of preservation