PDA

View Full Version : Victory for Arthur and Rights for Whites



Loki
Thursday, August 11th, 2005, 10:41 AM
http://www.bnp.org.uk/news_detail.php?newsId=458

On the 27th July 2005 history was made in Britain. For the first time in modern history the Race Relations Acts were held to cover the racial rights of White people who are members of the British National Party. This now means that any organisations or companies that discriminate against a member of the British National Party are guilty of anti-white racism. This includes the Police and the Government.

In the Employment Appeals Tribunal, the Embankment, London before the President of the Appeals Tribunals in Britain Mr.Justice Burton the case of Arthur Redfearn v Serco was heard and history was made.

Incompetent tribunal

After suffering the debacle of an incompetent preliminary tribunal who initially ruled against him, Mr.Redfearn took his case to the Employment Appeals Tribunal. Arthur, a sitting councillor for the BNP and a driver for disabled children who is disabled himself, was sacked from his job by minions of the organisation Serco who employ 25,000 people across the country, under the duplicitous pretext of ' Health and Safety ', as far-left thugs linked to the Trade Union Council and Unison trade union, had threatened to throw bricks at his van as he was driving the children to work.

The Serco company then dismissed him from his employment. This set a very dangerous precedent. If this ruling had been allowed to stand it would have allowed companies with a white work force to dismiss ethnic minority people from employment if members of that white work force had threatened to cause violence at work or attack the property of the company itself if they did not dismiss the ethnic minority employees. White employers who did not want to employ ethnic minority people could then dismiss from employment ethnic minority employees from their companies on the grounds of Health and Safety and thereby bypass thirty years of the Race Relations Acts. This ruling could have been used by Muslim employers forced by law to hire white people to sack all white employees on the grounds that other Muslim employees had threatened to attack them. White employers could have said that a threat to them or their company justified sacking all black and Asian workers from the company.

The permutations of possibilities and problems were vast. Yet the initial tribunal, in an act of colossal incompetence, not only misunderstood the existing law but also failed to understand the import of allowing this decision to stand. The fact is that the initial tribunal failed to understand that even White people, as well as ethnic minorities, in this Multi-Cultural state have civil rights protecting them from racism.

The full judgement is listed; here (http://www.employmentappeals.gov.uk/judge_fr.htm)

European Commission “witness”

What was very alarming to myself as an witness to the Tribunal proceedings was the presence of a 'representative' of the European Commission sitting on the Tribunal panel as a witness. This was an indirect way of putting pressure on the Tribunal to give a judgement that the European Commission wanted, and represents an unprecedented attempt to interfere in the democratic legal process of a British Tribunal. It is of immense credit to the Tribunal panel that they resisted this disgusting attempt to interfere in the British legal process.

In the Judgment from the Tribunal you will also notice that the so called 'independent witness' from the European Commission may have actually briefed the legal team for Serco on how the European Commission wished to see the European Race Directive interpreted before the case began that morning. The legal team of Serco then introduced this information and legal reasoning into their case as an late addendum to their final skeleton argument that can only have been passed to them on the morning of the Tribunal case itself from the European Commission representative. This suggested to me that the so called ' independent witness ' from the European Commission had been assisting Serco's legal team with suggestions of legal reasoning and interpretation of the Directive, in order to assist their case against Mr. Redfearn. If this is true then this was an attempt by the European Commission to interfere in the independent actions of British Tribunal that smacks of Stalinism.

The decision of this tribunal was that the initial tribunal were incompetent in their deliberation of the case, that the case must go before a new tribunal who are competent to hear it, and that the legal rules and reasoning within the Appeal Tribunal decision must be adhered to by the new tribunal. We will of course let readers know when the new hearing is going to be held.

Ethno-specific organisation

The British National Party is a political organisation dedicated to representing the rights of the indigenous White British people and the preservation of our culture, environment, religious and social interests. The BNP is an essential organisation for indigenous whites in Britain as under Multi-Culturalism the only ethnic group that does not have ethno-specific representation within the government and state structures are indigenous whites. Whilst Muslims, Asians, Blacks, Jews and all other religious and racial groups have unelected 'community leaders' invited in by government and the Police to promote the interests of their communities, only indigenous Whites are denied this right to racial representation. With indigenous White people expected to become a minority in Britain by 2050, and in many of our towns and cities whites already have minority status, then the necessity for an ethno-specific White indigenous political party to be able to represent the specific interests of the White indigenous people is of paramount importance as our society grows increasingly more multi-cultural.

The fact that indigenous whites in this country are now the primary victims of racist attacks by ethnic minority groups in this country and are suffering ever extreme forms of racism such as suicide bombings by immigrants, but have no right of direct ethnic representation in liaison with the government or the Police, cannot be allowed to continue. The British National Party, unlike the so called ethnic minority ' community leaders ' that infest the echelons of government and police community representation boards, has a direct democratic mandate from the indigenous people of this land to represent their ethnic interests within the democratic political process. We are voted into power, no-one elected any of the community leaders who liaise with the Government and the Police. The fact that everyone knows when they vote for the BNP that they are voting for an ethno-specific political organisation means that the percentage of votes we get in elections is a direct democratic mandate from those people for us to represent their political and social interests in their communities.

Community leaders

The fact that the Police and the Government still refuse to allow BNP representatives the right, as all other races have in this country, to act as ' community leaders ' of the White indigenous people of Britain even though they, unique amongst all racial groups, have a democratic electoral mandate to do so, is an example of Institutionalised Racism by the Government, Councils and the Police. The Police have also in place a policy of institutional racism against indigenous White people barring members of the BNP from joining the police whilst also having a recruitment policy that allows members of Sinn Fein, the PLO, Saddam Hussein’s Baathist Party, ETA and various Islamic groups to join the Police. This is an example of anti-White racism that the BNP will be taking to court when the Police seek to use this draconian order from David Blunkett. The fact that Sir Ian Blair of the Metropolitan Police was found guilty of racism against White Police officers only a few weeks ago shows how the Police have become an institutionally racist organisation and are out of control.

The mainstream political parties are more interested in promoting ' inclusiveness and diversity ' and representing the political, economic and social interests of ethnic minority groups rather than representing the interests of the indigenous White British people of these Islands. In a country such as ours where White people are being swamped by mass immigration and their rights being removed in the name of Political Correctness, then the need for the BNP to represent the interests of indigenous Britons in the political process has to be regarded as an essential foundation for the future social and political development of the White Community itself. If we do not have a political voice and a political party that speaks up for our people in the Modern Multi-Cultural State, then we as White Britons will be ignored and marginalised both socially and politically and others, from immigrant groups who do have a political voice within the establishment parties, will be able to impose their will upon us.

The process of Multi-Culturalism is, we are constantly being told, permanent and irrevocable. Therefore the time has come for White British people to participate fully in that process and not stand impotent outside it. As we are now suffering the horrors of Multi-Culturalism in our lives and communities such as ever escalating anti-White racism, then we must start to organise to ensure our Group Rights and collective social and political interests are protected within the Multi-Cultural State itself.

Constantinus
Thursday, August 11th, 2005, 11:11 AM
bravo

RedJack
Friday, August 12th, 2005, 07:46 PM
This set a very dangerous precedent. If this ruling had been allowed to stand it would have allowed companies with a white work force to dismiss ethnic minority people from employment if members of that white work force had threatened to cause violence at work or attack the property of the company itself if they did not dismiss the ethnic minority employees. White employers who did not want to employ ethnic minority people could then dismiss from employment ethnic minority employees from their companies on the grounds of Health and Safety and thereby bypass thirty years of the Race Relations Acts.

And this would have been undesirable because...? :scratch:

Sigel
Friday, August 12th, 2005, 08:59 PM
And this would have been undesirable because...? :scratch:
Why? because it would have upset our racially harmonious apple cart.

The only people who are permitted to be legitimate targets of racism in our country are white natives and other European Germanics.

It's called self-hate and it needs sorting out IMHO.