PDA

View Full Version : Are You A Nordishist or a Nordicist?



SouthernBoy
Wednesday, January 12th, 2005, 04:25 AM
Are you a nordishist or a nordicist? :scratch:

-- I am a nordicist. :viking1:

Von Braun
Wednesday, January 12th, 2005, 06:11 AM
I am a nordicist. :viking1:

Good for you. Are you going to leave this board and start your own board called "The Nordic Portal?"

Loki
Wednesday, January 12th, 2005, 06:56 AM
What's the difference? And why can't one be both? :scratch:

Aistulf
Wednesday, January 12th, 2005, 09:44 AM
I voted "Nordicist", because it's better sounding. I'm not even sure if "Nordish" can be used like that (Nord -ic, -icism/-icist, -ish ..)

Guest22
Wednesday, January 12th, 2005, 09:59 AM
You ought to add Nordist to that poll...

because there really is Nordifference at all...

Nordgau
Wednesday, January 12th, 2005, 03:23 PM
I'm a 'Nordischist'. :tongue:

Naggaroth
Wednesday, January 12th, 2005, 03:29 PM
What's the difference? And why can't one be both? :scratch:
I do agree Loki. I voted for the nordicist but I'm not sure if that was correct of me. I'd rather say that I'm both.

jcs
Wednesday, January 12th, 2005, 09:35 PM
I suppose I'm both, but I fall closer to the Nordicist end of the spectrum.
Nordics are the master race and should be valued above all other races. Nordish preservation comes second to Nordic preservation.

Loki
Wednesday, January 12th, 2005, 09:42 PM
I suppose I'm both, but I fall closer to the Nordicist end of the spectrum.
Nordics are the master race and should be valued above all other races. Nordish preservation comes second to Nordic preservation.
Agreed 100%!

This is what I have said: Nordic (1st) and Nordish (2nd) preservation is what we are about on this forum. We value Nordic pureness above all, since they are the core of our entire race. The vast majority of Germanic peoples originated in Scandinavia. Even the Alemanni of Switzerland had their origin in Sweden...

SouthernBoy
Thursday, January 13th, 2005, 12:21 AM
Why not... I'll high-jack Tiwaz's. LOL.

Von Braun
Thursday, January 13th, 2005, 03:48 AM
Agreed 100%!

This is what I have said: Nordic (1st) and Nordish (2nd) preservation is what we are about on this forum. We value Nordic pureness above all, since they are the core of our entire race. The vast majority of Germanic peoples originated in Scandinavia. Even the Alemanni of Switzerland had their origin in Sweden...

Should it be

1) Nordic racialists work to preseve Nordics

or

2) all Nordish (perhaps all White?) racialists work to preserve Nordics in lieu of preserving their own types?

The Horned God
Thursday, January 13th, 2005, 02:48 PM
Like many White people my phenotype could be described as Nordish. My opinion, is, that on the matter of Scando-Nordic-preservation a Nordishist must be a Nordicist as well, or else his position on Nordish-perservation, becomes untenable.
That makes me a Nordishist (and a Nordicist).
BTW, I am also a Nationalist, and there may be a couple of other ists that could apply to me as well..

Nordhammer
Thursday, January 13th, 2005, 04:16 PM
Both. Add blonde fetishist to that too. :D

I am for all Nords.

cosmocreator
Thursday, January 13th, 2005, 07:35 PM
I'm a Nordist.

Siegfried
Thursday, January 13th, 2005, 08:21 PM
Germanicist, rather. If Germanic people would only breed with other members of their meta-ethnicity, the Nordish physiology would most likely also be preserved.

Loki
Thursday, January 13th, 2005, 08:24 PM
Germanicist, rather. If Germanic people would only breed with other members of their meta-ethnicity, the Nordish physiology would most likely also be preserved.
Good point. There is a very close correlation between Germanicness and Nordicness, with some notable exceptions.

Aistulf
Thursday, January 13th, 2005, 09:20 PM
Good point. There is a very close correlation between Germanicness and Nordicness, with some notable exceptions.
Germanics derived from the ancient "Northland", which is an undisputed fact...

Loki
Thursday, January 13th, 2005, 09:33 PM
Germanics derived from the ancient "Northland", which is an undisputed fact...
True. They great majority of Germanic tribes had their origin in Scandinavia - mostly Sweden. The remainder possibly just futher to the south, in far northern Germany. Sweden is our ancestral homeland, and the land of the original, pure Nordic and Germanic race. Sweden needs to be treasured above all.

Son of a gun
Thursday, January 13th, 2005, 11:02 PM
I'm progressivist. Progressive features should be preserved and improved, even if it's at the expense of sub-racial preservation

Von Braun
Friday, January 14th, 2005, 07:47 AM
I suppose I'm both, but I fall closer to the Nordicist end of the spectrum.
Nordics are the master race and should be valued above all other races. Nordish preservation comes second to Nordic preservation.

Speak for yourself. How about pure Nordics value their sub-race above all others, pure Alpines value their sub-race above all others, and so on, and people who are a mix of sub-types should value their sub-races above all others? Better yet, how about every person values his or her own genotype and those close to it above all others?

Regarding the master race part, how do you explain the fact that the vast majority of great European philosophers, scientists, artists, leaders, and so on, were not sub-racially pure? Granted, many, if not most of these men were partially Nordic (Isaac Newton, Adolf Hitler, etc.). However, these partial Nordic great men outnumber pure Nordic great men, in absolute numbers, and probably even on a per capita basis as well.

I should and will elaborate on this more in another post, but I can breifly summarize by saying I am entirely for Nordic preservation because not only is it a Europid sub-race (and I value all Europid sub-races), but also because I have some Nordic ancestry. On the other hand, I am adamantly against people who are pure Europid and not 100% Nordic being second-class citizens in a future all-White homeland. As far as I know, this board is about preservation and NOT about an enforced hierarchy amongst Whites in general or Nordish Whites in particular, so until I am told otherwise, my views are compatible with the mission of this board. The interesting thing is that the vast majority of Whites all over the Western world are sub-racially mixed, and the people esposuing ideas which seem very close to the advocacy of second-class citizenship are almost certainly not pure aything (on a sub-racial level), and thus not zeros on the McCulloch scale. If people are for a future all-White homeland which is divided up into sections for the pure types [Read < 10% of Whites] who want to reman pure plus additional sections for mixed types [Read: > 90% of Whites] as well as pure types who do not mind mixing, then I have no quarrel with this, because no one is being made into a second-class citizen.

jcs, you have brown hair, so I'd think that excludes you from being a 0 on the McCulloch scale. Maybe you're central Nordish, I don't know, but I'd think very light hair would be a prerequisite for being a zero. Should you drop down on your knees for every nigger-fucking zero that passes you by?

P.S.: I find it interesting that this board is called "The Northern European forum" and people don't seem to value people who are Nordish yet not overwhelmingly Nordic all that much (even if they happen to fall into that category :P ). Are people who are partially Nordic expected to help preserve pure Nordics, defeat the Jews, and then remain humble second class citizens for all time? Fuck that. Again, preservation of Europid subtypes in their pure forms is great, preservation of "stabilized blends" therof is great, but I will not stand for being used. :icon_arro Either we're all in it together, as equals, or else the people being used should quit and let the few pure types who care about racialism fend for themselves against the Jewish onslaught.

Guest22
Friday, January 14th, 2005, 10:32 AM
I definitely voted "Nordishist" because all the Nordish types must be preserved. The term "Nordish" was coined by Richard McCulloch to match the anthropological classifications that used the term "Nordic" in a broader sense because they ignored the existence of the Borreby and Brünn subraces.
Whoa! If that's the difference, I'm Nordishist... because Brünn girls are the hottest! :icon_bigg

jcs
Friday, January 14th, 2005, 09:13 PM
How about pure Nordics value their sub-race above all others, pure Alpines value their sub-race above all others, and so on, and people who are a mix of sub-types should value their sub-races above all others? Better yet, how about every person values his or her own genotype and those close to it above all others?
All higher cultures were fathered by Nordics. For even having a taste of grandeur, the lesser peoples are indebted to Nordics. That is not to say that every Alpinid or Borreby should bow before every Nordid, but they should realize that without the Master Race, their highest cultural achievement would be the invention of the spear, with no art to speak of.
Nordics, specifically, should be somewhere on everyone's list of sub-races to protect.


Regarding the master race part, how do you explain the fact that the vast majority of great European philosophers, scientists, artists, leaders, and so on, were not sub-racially pure? Granted, many, if not most of these men were partially Nordic (Isaac Newton, Adolf Hitler, etc.). However, these partial Nordic great men outnumber pure Nordic great men, in absolute numbers, and probably even on a per capita basis as well.
Sounds more like an argument for sub-racial miscegenation than anything.
I did not say, nor imply, that genius occurs only in Nordics (genius not being mere intelligence, but creative will).


On the other hand, I am adamantly against people who are pure Europid and not 100% Nordic being second-class citizens in a future all-White homeland.
I would say that one should judge on an individual level. Obviously, not all Nordics are intelligent, strong, capable people, and there are many exceptional non-Nordics. Races and sub-races do have different capacities, however--and Nordics seem to have higher capacities than other races.


The interesting thing is that the vast majority of Whites all over the Western world are sub-racially mixed, and the people esposuing ideas which seem very close to the advocacy of second-class citizenship are almost certainly not pure aything (on a sub-racial level), and thus not zeros on the McCulloch scale.
Right, because people cannot espouse an idea when they are not sub-racially pure.--wait, no. Some may advocate some form of racial hierarchy because it seems reasonable. If anything, this shows that such ideas are typically unbiased, as the individuals promoting the concepts do not do so to create a sense of superiority.


jcs, you have brown hair, so I'd think that excludes you from being a 0 on the McCulloch scale.
McCulloch's "Nordish" theory is just that--a theory. Subraces we know exist, but the concept of the Nordish race, though accurate and most likely correct, is not absolute. Likewise, McCulloch's scale is only arbitrary.


Should you drop down on your knees for every nigger-fucking zero that passes you by?
As I said, I judge on an individual level. I have also said elsewhere that the majority of whites--and a significant amount of Nordics--are unworthy of life. This includes race-mixers, retards, etc.
So, to answer your question: no, obviously.


Either we're all in it together, as equals, or else the people being used should quit and let the few pure types who care about racialism fend for themselves against the Jewish onslaught.
Equality is a disgusting idea regardless of the context in which it is used. Surely there exists an alternative to your statement. Perhaps everyone working toward preserving sub-racial purity, Nordic purity especially?

EAEric
Saturday, January 15th, 2005, 02:13 PM
I am a Nordishist; I fully encourage Nordic peoples to be Nordicist. I will not, however, bow to some Nord just because I'm of mixed Nordic/Alpine extraction. :annoysigr

SouthernBoy
Saturday, January 15th, 2005, 06:17 PM
Your bias lies toward sub-racially mixed people, and sub-racial mixing all together. The only reason you are whinning is because you aren't a single sub-race, and you are angry because people want to preserve them. Why don't you stop being so childish?

SouthernBoy
Saturday, January 15th, 2005, 06:19 PM
I am reminded of the "noone is pure anyway" statements I have heard from mulattoes.

EAEric
Saturday, January 15th, 2005, 06:27 PM
Your bias lies toward sub-racially mixed people, and sub-racial mixing all together.

What makes you believe this?


The only reason you are whinning is because you aren't a single sub-race, and you are angry because people want to preserve them.

What makes you believe this?


Why don't you stop being so childish?

Your desire to ascribe positions you yourself have created to me is, what, mature?

:confused:

SouthernBoy
Saturday, January 15th, 2005, 06:45 PM
Are you intentionally defending Kepler, or did you think I was criticizing you?

Loki
Saturday, January 15th, 2005, 06:51 PM
This thread is silly. Closed.