View Full Version : Ernst Zündel's Defense and the 2nd Reich

Tuesday, January 31st, 2006, 03:29 PM
There is an interesting article at the following link: http://www.solargeneral.com/index.php?subaction=showfull&id=1138613033&archive=&start_from=&ucat=&
It provides a defense for Ernst Zundel on the basis of the illegitimacy of the present German government. It argues that the Second Reich is now the legitimate government in Germany. I cite here only part of it. If there are any constitutional lawyers among us, I'd like to hear their opinion of it--or, for that matter, any one else's opinion.

So now that we have the enemy, the master manipulators behind the European Union, firmly in our sights, with which questions should we pull the trigger? Would it not be true to say that if even one of the signatories of the founding Treaty of Rome represented an unconstitutional government, then the entire European project would be illegal, having no substance in international and local law? Having spent many months studying the German constitution and the framework governing its relations with the rest of Europe, the United States and the United Nations, I can now reveal an amazing little secret that the Zionists and architects of the European Union don't want you to know.
The modern Federal Republic of Germany is illegal. It does not exist in real constitutional terms. It isn't even recognised by international institutions as the legitimate nation state of Germany.
On 5 June 1945, the Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) accepted Germany's declaration of defeat and quickly moved to recognise the legitimacy of the Zweite Deutsche Reich (Second German Reich), which had been illegally displaced by Hitler's Third Reich. The SHAEF laws underpinned a treaty between the occupation authorities and the Second German Reich, in which the latter was invested with full administrative rights and governmental sovereignty throughout most of Berlin and in all of the German states. A parallel state, founded by ambitious lawyers and Zionist activists and still known as the Federal Republic of Germany (BRD), competed with the Second German Reich for legitimacy but officially lost its right to grant citizenship and issue passports in 1954, just as was the case with East Germany (DDR) thirty-six years later. Technically, any German with a passport issued by the BRD is now stateless: around 70 million of them.
Following the collapse of the DDR, a treaty known as the "2 Plus 4" confirmed that only the Second German Reich, now led by Reichskanzler (Prime Minister) Dr Wolfgang Gerhard Guenter Ebel, represented the legitimate German State. In July 1990, the Secretary of the US Department of State, James Baker, confirmed in writing to German Chancellor Helmut Kohl that the BRD had come to the end of its lifetime and should be dissolved. From that moment on, the United Nations destroyed all of its stationery and placards that carried the words "Federal Republic of Germany" or BRD and replaced them with use of the broader term "Germany" in lieu of the anticipated "German Reich". Almost everyone in diplomatic circles around the world expected the re-emergent German Reich to take over where the BRD had left off. Yet the government in Bonn, and later in Berlin, continued and still continues to act and behave as if nothing really happened: a sort of disembodied ghost that has no idea that its corpse perished many years ago.
Despite this highly unusual situation, the Second German Reich continues to issue its own passports and driving licences. Over the last two or three years there has been a sharp increase in the number of motorists who have been acquitted for speeding or parking offences, simply on the strength of their having produced a German Reich driving licence. The illegal German government in Berlin is so worried about the publicity, it has leaned heavily on newspapers not to report on such matters and it has instructed judges to dismiss cases where a defendant is likely to prove that his citizenship of the German Reich permits him not to recognise the BRD and its courts as legitimate administrative constructs. They are horrified at the publicity each of these cases brings. Quite clearly, the Zionist German elite and their fellow conspirators in Brussels and Tel Aviv and in every major bank and insurance company in the western hemisphere are terrified lest the people come to know the truth, for it would presage the unravelling not only of a dogma reinforced by secular excommunication, but of two major administrative constructs built on lies and subterfuge: the Federal Republic of Germany and the European Union.
The very real fact of the matter is this: Not one of the judges responsible for the arraignment, prosecution and imprisonment of Ernst Zundel is a legal office-holder under true constitutional German law. They are fakes. They are entitled to practise federal law no more and no less than a teenage student flipping hamburgers at McDonald's.
Mr Zundel has every right to instruct his lawyers to submit a deposition to the state attorney, outlining in clear language his decision not to recognise the writ of the court on the grounds that it has never had the constitutional authority to try domestic or foreign citizens, ceased to exist as a constitutionally validated regulator of citizenship in 1954 and became absolutely and irrevocably illegal on the same day that the already unconstitutional Federal Republic of Germany (formerly West Germany, BRD) merged with the German Democratic Republic (East Germany, DDR), automatically reverting to its true constitutional status as the Second German Reich under the legitimate Chancellorship of Dr Wolfgang Gerhard Guenter Ebel.
Zundel may also wish to point out that United Nations protocols still define Germany as "the enemy state". That's because no peace treaty was ever ratified between the Second German Reich and the occupation authorities. The United Nations, by its own admission, thus recognises the Federal Republic for what it was always meant to be: nothing more than a temporary holding operation for the central banks and private banking cartels until a competent body representing the Second German Reich would be in a position to conclude a peace deal. The BRD was never granted the constitutional instruments necessary to conclude a peace treaty, and as long as it pretends to exist, Germany is still considered to be an occupied nation at war with the "international community".
On 31 July 1973, the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court) was forced to concede the following ruling in regard to an upcoming treaty between the BRD and the communist DDR: "It remains the case that the German Reich survived the collapse of 1945 and did not cease to exist, neither through capitulation nor the exercise of foreign power in Germany on the part of the allies; it possesses today, as it always has, legal and judicial sovereignty, although as a State it is lacking in organisation. The BRD is not the legal successor of the German Reich."
Please allow me to re-state the ruling handed down by the Federal Republic's own Supreme Constitutional Court in 1973. It deserves to be written large and draped from every official building, monument and highway bridge in Germany: THE BRD IS NOT THE LEGAL SUCCESSOR OF THE GERMAN REICH.
And here's the really nice part.
Since the Second German Reich is not liable for the banking debts accrued by the BRD or for any legislation enacted by the BRD, including obligations attendant to every EEC and EU treaty signed by "government" representatives of the BRD since 25 March 1957, the German people, if only they would pay attention, are being offered a clean slate to start over: free of debt, free of the United Nations, free of the European Union, free of "reparations" to Israel and free of repressive Zionist legislation such as the notorious "holocaust" laws. All they have to do is learn about the fraudulent nature of the state in which they live and issue an immediate Cease and Desist Order requiring the expeditious stand-down of the illegal Berlin government. Incredible though that may sound, it really is just that simple.
Happily, more and more Germans are coming to learn about their true constitutional rights and are renouncing citizenship of the fictitious BRD in ever greater numbers. Year on year, the offices of the Second German Reich are increasingly inundated with applications for Reich passports and driving licences. With passports selling for 100 euros a piece, some are being deliberately scammed by online pretenders. The Zionists will make sure that those stories are given the widest publicity in the press with the intention of discrediting by association Dr Wolfgang Gerhard Guenter Ebel and the living reality of the Second German Reich. But their mischief is driving curious minds to learn more about their secret, hidden history and the wealth of opportunities that awaits them and their children should they decide to bail out of the New World Order and its globalist nightmare.

fms panzerfaust
Friday, May 12th, 2006, 05:58 PM
And the Second Reich already have a army?

Dr. Solar Wolff
Saturday, May 13th, 2006, 06:07 AM
We all know how far this defense is going to get Ernst. Maybe his lawyers should try another strategy. Maybe they should try to convince Ernst that he is a martyr and if he goes to the gallows like the other Nazis did, then he will receive 72 virgins in the next life for his trouble. This might not be as hard a sell as first envisioned. Have you ever seen Ingrid?

Convincing Ernst of this is just as likely as convincing a sitting government that they are illegitimate. Saddam is trying this and getting nowhere even though the sitting government conducting his trial actually is illegitimate.

fms panzerfaust
Saturday, May 13th, 2006, 06:09 PM
The legitimacy of a government is defined by force of arms.

Without this, any rethoric based just on laws and rights means nothing.

Sad, but true.

Dr. Solar Wolff
Thursday, May 18th, 2006, 06:18 AM
The legitimacy of a government is defined by force of arms.

Without this, any rethoric based just on laws and rights means nothing.

Sad, but true.

This is true. So, regardless of the type of government, communism, capitalism, monarchism, democracy, etc., what matters in the final analysis is how the government treats its citizens. Any type of government can be heaven or hell depending on its treatment of its citizens.