PDA

View Full Version : Francis Parker Yockey Quote on Pan-Europeanism



Ederico
Thursday, July 3rd, 2003, 02:04 PM
Here lies a quote by Francis Parker Yockey closely linked to the subject of Pan-Europeanism. I do not know the exact book from where it was taken as I took it from a National Anarchist website. The link is the following :

http://www.rosenoire.org/articles/elf.php

The quotation is as follows:

“English, German, French, Italian, Spanish - these are now mere place-names and linguistic variations. Like all of the other rich products of our great Culture, they will continue, but they are no longer political terms. Local cultures in Europe may be as diversified as they wish, and they will enjoy a perfect autonomy in the European imperium, now that the oppression of vertical nationalism is dead. Anyone who seeks to perpetuate petty-statism or old-fashioned nationalism is the inner enemy of Europe. He is playing the game of the extra-European forces; he is dividing Europe and committing treason. Treason now has only one meaning to Europe: it means serving any other force than Europe. There is only one treason now, treason to Europe. The nations are dead, for Europe is born.”

What are your opinions on this quotation and how do you stand in relation to it?

Jack
Thursday, July 3rd, 2003, 02:47 PM
I'm quite sure that quote was from Imperium, I was reading it earlier today and I'm sure that's either from Imperium or the Proclamation of London.

I'm certainly in support of it. As I mentioned in another thread, I find it difficult to hold loyalty to what "Australia" represents. If anything can be Australian then Australian means nothing. Born on a chunk of turf, given a birth certificate and declared citizen of a country whose Government is constantly working against my personal identity, I can't hold alleigence to it. Not as it stands. I'd much prefer to consider myself a Citizen of the West than a Citizen of the Commonwealth of "Australia" (whatever that is). Vertical (i.e. state orientated) Nationalism is certainly dead. The Governing Systems of Control which have established themselves cross Europe and the West serve nothing to preserve our personal identity. Instead, I hold true to Horizontal Nationalism - nationalism built on blood and culture - that is, Magna Europa. I live around people of European descent who do not consider themselves Australian - in youth street definition, being Australian means having your parents born here. My parents were born here, I'm Irish/English/Spanish mixture I can trace back to the colonist ships who arrived 200+ years ago, but now the Australian Government has "redefined" itself post-1960's/70's, and because of the essential cultural unity of the West, being a Westerner means more to me than being Australian could.

I am in firm support of Pan-Europeanism, though it is probably worth mentioning that Yockey limits his definition of Europe to everything west of the German-Polish border. My definition of Europe covers all people of European descent from Moscow to Ireland, Scandinavia to Cyprus - and, of course, the ex-British colonies such as Australia, New Zealand, the United States, Canada and white South Africa (I do know that the Afrikaners are not British descendents, yet their country was at one point part of the British Empire).

The Ideal of Imperium Magna Europa stands stronger in my mind than any petty alleigence to an artificial State that's hellbent on destroying my cultural and racial identity.

Ederico
Thursday, July 3rd, 2003, 03:18 PM
I agree wholeheartedly brother. I am having some PC problems at the moment, I constantly get disconnected, so I won't add much, but basically I agree with you.

Vigilant
Thursday, July 3rd, 2003, 09:16 PM
Originally posted by Anarch
The Ideal of Imperium Magna Europa stands stronger in my mind than any petty alleigence to an artificial State that's hellbent on destroying my cultural and racial identity. The Irish state is pursuing the failed multicultural model too.Brussels has bought and paid for the political class here. However,ten or fifteen years ago things were different. Before European integration asylum seekers were frogmarched back onto planes without further ado.Today they're housed,fed and held up as wonderful additions to the country.Most are gypsies and Nigerians.

So for me Pan-Europeanism is a menace.

Ederico
Thursday, July 3rd, 2003, 09:41 PM
Originally posted by Vigilant
So for me Pan-Europeanism is a menace.
We are talking about Pan-European Nationalism/Racialism and not the Transnational Progressivism and Liberal Dictatorship of the European Union, no one wants that.

Druid
Tuesday, July 15th, 2003, 11:03 PM
Does anyone know where I could obtain a copy of Imperium? The pieces I have read from this work are great.

cosmocreator
Wednesday, July 16th, 2003, 02:59 AM
Originally posted by Druid
Does anyone know where I could obtain a copy of Imperium? The pieces I have read from this work are great.


Noontide press has it.

http://www.noontidepress.com/catalog/0009.html


I've read it and thought it excellent. Very insightful.


Here is the Table of Contents:

http://www.noontidepress.com/toc.html

They have some good stuff.

NatRev
Monday, July 28th, 2003, 12:42 PM
I think we have to compromise our situations slightly, Internationalism is a menace if it is seen as TAKING AWAY from National identity. Yet pan Europeanism can be seen as a good thing and in fact an essential thing is it ADDS to the National identity. If I go to Dublin for a vacation and meet like minded patriots, I feel that personally my Identity has been added to, not my National Identity but my Personal identity.

I am not talking about the jew inspired plutocratic capitalist abortion of the EU, but the mutual exchange of ideas and understanding of European volk. I am English yet most of my e-friends are non English, I freely speak openly with them about the problems facing Europa and how we can sort them out.

I think we have to have both our feet in two ranks, nationalist, (what is good for Ireland, Spain, Sweden etc..) and European, (what is good for Europa). Most of the time you will find that the two camps are not incompatable and are mutually progressive to teh betterment of our species.

Besides we have to consider WHAT is Nationalism? I mean England has changed over the last 5 years, I agree with our Irish comrade about the asylum seekers 100%. I can't think when they first started to come over her in droves, maybe it was 5 years ago, I'm not sure.

But I feel my *nation* or my governemnet is letting it's people down, surely I must be a *patriot* first, this is one that has loyalty to the People rather than the State or Nation?

Governments come and go, nations can rise and fall (Yugoslavia etc.) yet the VOLK is eternal. Rather than follow an antiquated flag, I will follow the will of the People.

Stríbog
Tuesday, July 29th, 2003, 07:10 PM
So are you advocating a European super-state? I don't buy the White=White model, and I don't believe in forcing vastly different European populations to live under one label. If a Swede does not care for Italians, that does not make him a 'traitor.' If a Russian dislikes the French, he is not a 'traitor.' That is his right. Scathach is correct when she advocates Ireland for the Irish, not for any other groups, white OR non-white.

NatRev
Wednesday, July 30th, 2003, 11:50 AM
Oh yeah, I'm not bothered about a United European Nation as a whole mass, rather more a more United Front of Europa.

But I am more interested in a greater concept of understanding and cooperation within the European sphere of influence.

I am a nationalist not an internationalist.

The EU is nothing more than a European wing of the Yankee-ZOG NWO.

Nordgau
Wednesday, July 30th, 2003, 12:13 PM
Everyone who really feels as a true European can only say: Rip the EU system!

Masterman
Sunday, August 24th, 2003, 01:17 AM
So are you advocating a European super-state? I don't buy the White=White model, and I don't believe in forcing vastly different European populations to live under one label. If a Swede does not care for Italians, that does not make him a 'traitor.' If a Russian dislikes the French, he is not a 'traitor.' That is his right. Scathach is correct when she advocates Ireland for the Irish, not for any other groups, white OR non-white.

I agree only to a limited extent. We must not lose sight of the fact that as Europeans we must stand together. In-fighting only helps the Jews in their quest for global domination. Is that what you want? Your Nordicist obsession is counterproductive and I oppose it vehemently; Whites ARE Whtes and must stick together or die.

I believe in a Confederate (not a Federal) Europe, in which most decisions are decentralised to individual nations, but important decisions that affect all are taken centrally by a strong leader and his government.

George
Sunday, May 16th, 2004, 03:13 PM
I think that Yockey has gone too far, too fast with that paragraph. It will not become true for many years. We must cooperate fully to defeat the non-Whites, although still in a hierarchy, but after that there will again be free competition, and probably the White nations will coalesce into a handful of blocs - Anglo-Normans led by the U.S.A., Western Europeans led by Germany, Slavs led by Russia, etc.

Prince Eugen
Sunday, May 16th, 2004, 07:11 PM
Everyone who really feels as a true European can only say: Rip the EU system!Yes say no to JU!No to his multiculti policy!
HAIL THE EUROPE OF 100 FLAGS!
And the "European" politics want Turkey,Israel, and Maroco as members of EU!
Damn!