PDA

View Full Version : Are Whites cleverer than Blacks?



Loki
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 01:13 AM
http://www.spectator.co.uk/article.php3?table=old&section=current&issue=2003-05-24&id=3128

Excellent article from the mainstream British media. This is something to be saved, and used whenever the egalitarians tell us everyone is the same.

Chinaman
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 01:39 AM
I'm surprised a mainstream media would publish that. Also, does anybody know if one of the Bell Curve authors, Herrnstein, is Jewish? I've been wondering about that for a while. I don't think there is any doubt in the rational person that blacks are not as clever as whites. Sub-saharan Africans in general have created mostly primitive civilizations, with their art being crude in comparison to other cultures' art. Also, never at any point in history have sub-saharan African civilizations dominated over others in technical brilliance.

Reno
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 02:25 AM
Originally posted by Chinaman
I'm surprised a mainstream media would publish that. Also, does anybody know if one of the Bell Curve authors, Herrnstein, is Jewish? I've been wondering about that for a while. I don't think there is any doubt in the rational person that blacks are not as clever as whites. Sub-saharan Africans in general have created mostly primitive civilizations, with their art being crude in comparison to other cultures' art. Also, never at any point in history have sub-saharan African civilizations dominated over others in technical brilliance.

I get the impression you're not Chinese.

Tore
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 05:12 AM
The happy result of the Flynn Effect is that in about 100 years there won’t, in terms of IQ, be many notably less intelligent peoples at all. And then the Department for Education will have real cause for bien-pensant complacency.

Here, the author concludes that eventually, the IQ's of Blacks and other Inferiors will rise to the extent in which there is disparity between races concerning intelligence test performances.

I'm somewhat skeptical regarding the lack the egalitarianism this article withholds.

Chinaman
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 08:58 AM
Originally posted by Reno
I get the impression you're not Chinese.

I am Chinese.

Glenlivet
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 03:08 PM
A Chinese who live in the USA, or where? So let's assume you're Chinese. What made you join this board?

Vincent Sarvich of the University of California at Berkeley, Michael Levin of City College of New York and Richard Hernstein at Harvard are among the most prominent Jewish scientists and scholars who maintain that African-Americans are intellectually deficient.

The Spectator, the British magazine (is the oldest continuously published magazine in the English language since 1828) which published that espouse the causes of progressive Conservatism. It got a Tory tinge. The magazine produce a wide-ranging title, but the The New Statesman for the intellectual Left would never publish such an article.

The science which study disparities based on inherited (as opposed of culturally acquired behavioural differences) traits being number one is sociobiology, and it's a subject the PC sociologist shun at. Edward O. Wilson, the naturalist, was the greatest participants of this field. Read his Wilson's book published by Harvard University Press, "Sociobiology: The New Synthesis". The most interesting and controversial chapter is the last one on human behaviour.

RACE DIFFERENCES IN BEHAVIOUR: A REVIEW AND EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS by J.PHILIPPE RUSHTON:

http://www.mugu.com/cgi-bin/Upstream/People/Rushton/rushtonr_k.html










Originally posted by Chinaman
I'm surprised a mainstream media would publish that. Also, does anybody know if one of the Bell Curve authors, Herrnstein, is Jewish? I've been wondering about that for a while. I don't think there is any doubt in the rational person that blacks are not as clever as whites. Sub-saharan Africans in general have created mostly primitive civilizations, with their art being crude in comparison to other cultures' art. Also, never at any point in history have sub-saharan African civilizations dominated over others in technical brilliance.

Vlad
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 05:15 PM
Good info. They are not as smart as we are. Of course there are exceptions and there are some smart blacks, but on average they are considerably beneath us. Remember that while our ancestors were discovering mathematical formulas and composing music and making technological advancements, their ancestors were dancing around fires and flinging their crap at each other, and they'd probably still be doing that if it wasn't for us.

Chinaman
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 09:40 PM
Originally posted by Vlad
... their ancestors were dancing around fires and flinging their crap at each other, and they'd probably still be doing that if it wasn't for us.

Actually, despite contact with other civilizations, mainly Europeans, they still behave like that. A quick glance at current events reveals a startling dietary preference among the Congolese.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/africa/05/22/congo.un.pygmy.ap/ :axe

We Chinese have always boasted of eating funny stuff, but that really takes the cake. Perhaps the overpopulation problem in Africa will solve itself through cannibalism.

Chinaman
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 09:45 PM
Originally posted by volksdeutsche
[B]A Chinese who live in the USA, or where? So let's assume you're Chinese. What made you join this board?


I joined because I hold some beliefs in common with many of the forum members. I am not really a "racialist," at least not in the strict sense, and certainly not a White Nationalist, but some topics I would probably find interesting. I already know several people on this board, so from time to time I drop in to see what's being discussed. I am in the United States.

Reno
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 10:57 PM
Originally posted by Chinaman
I joined because I hold some beliefs in common with many of the forum members. I am not really a "racialist," at least not in the strict sense, and certainly not a White Nationalist, but some topics I would probably find interesting. I already know several people on this board, so from time to time I drop in to see what's being discussed. I am in the United States.

Why would a Chinese-American call himself "Chinaman"? It seems degrading...

Chinaman
Thursday, May 29th, 2003, 10:01 AM
Originally posted by Reno
Why would a Chinese-American call himself "Chinaman"? It seems degrading...

Depends on the intent and the way it is used. You people call yourself white men or white man, so Chinaman isn't really that weird. It's just a username anyway, I was just trying to have a little fun.

NatRev
Friday, May 30th, 2003, 12:53 AM
I wholeheartedly agree with you all in saying that blacks are less intelligent than whites however, we must not underestimate their influence in our childrens 'culture'.

I posted an article earlier about the brilliant book 'Planet of the Apes', I'd recommend this book to any one interested in the preservation of the White race.

In the book, it was through white (Human) apathy and lack of resistance that allowed the blacks (Apes) to take control.

Food for thought?

firwol
Friday, October 24th, 2003, 07:53 AM
I wholeheartedly agree with you all in saying that blacks are less intelligent than whites however, we must not underestimate their influence in our childrens 'culture'.

I posted an article earlier about the brilliant book 'Planet of the Apes', I'd recommend this book to any one interested in the preservation of the White race.

In the book, it was through white (Human) apathy and lack of resistance that allowed the blacks (Apes) to take control.

Food for thought?
Assuming that it is a difference in genes, evolution also tells us that genetics can change over time.
If a race has been exploited for centuries or more, and their brains underused, or not used, the consequence could be that a few generations could be affected in a negative way by this.
What if we tried to enslave British for 1,000 years and send all Afro-Caribbeans to school and educate them the same way it happens today?
Could British people become stupid? Could their genes cause them to grow and "less smart" brain?