PDA

View Full Version : Censoring? Why are Posts and Threads being deleted?



Saoirse
Saturday, May 24th, 2003, 10:07 AM
Why are posts and threads getting deleted? This is another board I'm leaving. Thats three.

Evolved
Saturday, May 24th, 2003, 11:29 AM
Yeah I've noticed it too. I can understand deleting posts if someone is spamming or posting pointless/off topic crap. I was looking foward to the myriad of replies to the thread about Anal Sex only to find it deleted. :eek:

People have very different opinions as to what constitutes vulgarity, it seems. :)

Ederico
Saturday, May 24th, 2003, 01:47 PM
It all depends on what you posted.

Azdaja
Saturday, May 24th, 2003, 01:56 PM
We're just trying to 'clean up' the board a little. We'd like to be a haven for serious discussion, and the old chaotic 'anything goes' mentality this board had as AD is not conducive to our current designs.
However, I don't want PE to become an SF clone. Religious discussions are allowed. Sub-racial discussions are allowed. And honestly, I personally would like to see a certain level of 'flaming' and such allowed. It can make for a humorous read, but that's just me.
Also, I don't ever want the mods to become so authoritarian that they do not allow the posters to question them. If you don't like me as a person - take it to a PM. But if I say something stupid in one of my posts, you can say "Hey Steve, that was pretty stupid". I'm not going to ban anyone for that, and I'm not going to delete the 'insulting' post (At the same time, I don't want to see 3 or 4 different threads about what a shitty moderator I am. Keep it to one thread, please).

I know right now it seems like we've become way too strict way too fast. But keep in mind that we (the mods) are still trying to 'iron out' our 'game plan' so far as running PE goes. Things should be a bit better soon.

Sigrun Christianson
Saturday, May 24th, 2003, 02:33 PM
I am not going to allow a thread about anal sex unless it's clinical, but the members on this board will no doubt see it as an opportunity to make stupid sophmoric jokes. What the Hell does anal sex have to do with Nationalism?

Phlegethon
Monday, May 26th, 2003, 11:46 AM
Originally posted by Sigrun
I am not going to allow a thread about anal sex unless it's clinical, but the members on this board will no doubt see it as an opportunity to make stupid sophmoric jokes. What the Hell does anal sex have to do with Nationalism?

I am afraid Ernst Röhm took that secret to his grave. ;)

Sigrun Christianson
Monday, May 26th, 2003, 04:37 PM
We want the exchange and expression of ideas and information, not the arbitrary expression of any silly notion that crosses one of your minds.

Von Braun
Tuesday, May 27th, 2003, 09:19 AM
What the Hell does anal sex have to do with Nationalism?

I shall answer your question as a disinterested third party who neither started that thread nor one who has much interest in that subject.

I can see how one could make the case that the promotion of deviant sexual acts even amongst white heterosexual couples can be attributed to jewish genocidal strategy. Consider the jew howard stern. He is certainly one of their top men for poisoning the minds of young white people. When I had a televsion set over a year ago and was living in California, with no school work to keep me busy at night, I would occasionaly change channels and come across his show. There have been an extremely high number of episodes in which he would have one or more attractive white women on his show, and he would ask one or all of the following:

1) If they ever had sex with a black man

2) If they were bisexual or at least "bicurious." Often this was accompanied by pressure to engage in lip-to-lip kissing with one of the other female guests

3) If they have ever had anal sex

Now many lemmings may shrug this off as analagous to the "bread and circuses" of ancient Rome, but which came first, the chicken or the egg? I think the fascination with these perversions amongst white men in particular and white people in general was largely put in those minds by the jewish mainstream media and entertainment industry. Then seemingly fringe elements like howard stern (that's the other point---the jews who run the media pretend to be at first against stern's perverse content---the film about his life is hilarious in how it promotes this lie).

What is the common denominator between these three perversions that the jews promote amongst white people? They all entail forgoing conception of white children.

The jews have used a multi-pronged approach. Liberals like howard stern contribute to white genocide via advocation of perversions. There are "family-values" conservatives like dr. laura whose efforts support the whole zionist infrastructure via the massive numbers of fundementalist christian votes that are secured via the alliance between them and zionists. The "country club" republicans are enticed with monetary bribes from jews. There are jews in the libertarian camp who convince white people that their own personal self-interests are the most important in order that they do not become White Nationalists (racial collectivists who are concerned about the good of the group).

Evolved
Tuesday, May 27th, 2003, 11:43 AM
The subject of anal sex is not relevant to this forum as a whole, but relevant to the sub-forum the thread was located in. :)

Von Braun makes some good points. Although I do have a sex guide which recommends couples don't even try anal sex due to the health risks.

People should have to get a "parenting license" before they are even allowed to procreate. :eek:

Von Braun
Tuesday, May 27th, 2003, 04:55 PM
I meant "perverse" and "perversions" with negative connotations for numbers one and two, but not necessarily for number three (as long as they are consenting white adults of the opposite sex). I also had the following meaning for all three: they are all perverse in the sense that they have not been selected by nature to have any specific advantages (not that this sort of thing is always wrong, although it can be). The first one undoes evolutionary progress (miscegenation between new starins inhibits the radiation of new forms from a common ancestor), and the second and third involve acts that are solely recreational.

Evolved
Tuesday, May 27th, 2003, 06:58 PM
I don't think every time a white couple has sex they should be trying to procreate, especially if they are young. A couple should take at least 5 years to enjoy each other's company before they start having children. You're only young once. :)

Von Braun
Tuesday, May 27th, 2003, 07:05 PM
Originally posted by ladygoeth33
I don't think every time a white couple has sex they should be trying to procreate, especially if they are young. A couple should take at least 5 years to enjoy each other's company before they start having children. You're only young once. :)

I agree. Such recreational sex would be "perverse" only in the morally neutral sense.

Evolved
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 04:02 PM
I don't care to debate the topic of anal sex. Any man who chooses anal sex with a woman when he has a perfectly good vagina right in front of him is not quite right in the head. I never did it and never would want to. It's unhealthy and unappealing. That's all I want to say on the subject. :)

I just find it annoying to get a mail notice for a post/thread that has been deleted before I can even look at it. It is really annoying.

I like the fun side of this message board almost as much as the serious/scientific side. If the occasional joking around is totally banned, I don't see a point to doing that. I don't want to be serious or pissed off all the time it is boring, unhealthy and I can't relax. I'd feel like I'm stuck in some algebra class instead of anthropology or art class. :confused:

For some people humor and sarcasm is a primary part of their personality. I hope we can still be a little silly in the Lounge - if other people want to have totally sterile political discussions (might as well send it my way in binary code, that's how boring economics is to me x_zzz) that is their cup of tea. I'm more interested in the discussion of anthropology, history, religion and current events.

Ederico
Wednesday, May 28th, 2003, 04:09 PM
The fun aspect of the Message Board will not be removed. We will remove uncivil behaviour though, and I know that to some acting like a savage is entertaining, but that will not be tolerated. I want to see people that can be serious and joke around at the same time, that is how a good community is created.

The Lounge won't be removed, but we strongly suggest that the other Forums are used mainly for debates, and I mean serious debates. The board's main purpose is to discuss Racialist and Nationalist matters, and spread awareness and share knowledge, at least that is how I see it, I see no point in joking all the time, that is equal to a waste of time to me. More importantly I prefer to see quality in a post, so that myself and others learn.

Von Braun
Wednesday, June 4th, 2003, 09:53 PM
I don't care to debate the topic of anal sex. Any man who chooses anal sex with a woman when he has a perfectly good vagina right in front of him is not quite right in the head. I never did it and never would want to. It's unhealthy and unappealing. That's all I want to say on the subject.

Sarah, many women express thoughts and feelings similar to these and end up reconsidering them during pregnancy. :eek:

Sigrun Christianson
Friday, June 6th, 2003, 01:46 AM
What the Hell are you talking about, Von Braun?

Phlegethon
Friday, June 6th, 2003, 01:57 AM
It's called the Poor Man's Contraception (classical Greco-Roman style). ;)

Von Braun
Friday, June 6th, 2003, 04:10 AM
What the Hell are you talking about, Von Braun?

Which post are you referring to? I will address your question with the assumtion that you were referring to my last post.

First, pregnancy, as I'm sure you know, induces emotional changes for the woman in question. Some things change: diet, sleep, hobbies, etc. I have heard some women want to try exotic new sex acts during pregnancy, just as they want to try exotic new food combinations during this time.

Second, there is the issue of comfort and taboo for the husband and wife: vaginal intercourse during pregnancy almost could be perceived as akward (especially for the man) when one's offspring is in close proximity to the man's penis and when the purpose of the act is love and pleasure. It is analagous to not wanting your child in the room when you're being intimate with your spouse. Anal intercourse partially avoids this akwardness, for obvious reasons.

Of course, not all pregnant women will have these urges. However, apparently it is a big enough trend that it is seemingly reflected in hard core pornography spam emails (I have heard of aquaintances of mine getting spam pertaining to "pregant sluts" having anal sex). But who knows how reliable this is: it *could* be just an urban myth, just as one friend told me one time that he saw a reliable source that indicated that red haired women are more likely to enjoy anal sex, but I expressed skepticism when he told me. He told me that it has something to do with their unique, unpredictable personas.

:wtf

Sigrun Christianson
Friday, June 6th, 2003, 01:13 PM
You are wrong and digusting at the same time.

Phlegethon
Friday, June 6th, 2003, 01:42 PM
Originally posted by Von Braun

Of course, not all pregnant women will have these urges. However, apparently it is a big enough trend that it is seemingly reflected in hard core pornography spam emails (I have heard of aquaintances of mine getting spam pertaining to "pregant sluts" having anal sex). But who knows how reliable this is: it *could* be just an urban myth, just as one friend told me one time that he saw a reliable source that indicated that red haired women are more likely to enjoy anal sex, but I expressed skepticism when he told me. He told me that it has something to do with their unique, unpredictable personas.
:wtf

Apparently you failed to realize that porn is aimed at men and their fantasies. Do your reliable sources come in brown paper bags or on Pay-TV?

Von Braun
Friday, June 6th, 2003, 03:43 PM
You are wrong and digusting at the same time.

I used proper terminology. Not once did I use any crude or demeaning terms (save for what I put in quotes), not only because that is how I am, but also out of respect for the men and the ladies here. As for being wrong, I *humbly* admitted that I could be mistaken due to faulty sources.

Are you implying that the discussion of certain topics always makes the individual disgusting, no matter how careful and sensitive the individual discussing the topic is?

I am just trying to get at the truth in an area that I have already established (see several posts back) relates to WN (and ladygoeth33 seemed to agree). I care about my people and want them to reproduce and have happy, loving relationships. By the way, I mailed a check to the WAU baby drive today, as I promised. :)

Evolved
Friday, June 6th, 2003, 04:27 PM
I have heard some women want to try exotic new sex acts during pregnancy, just as they want to try exotic new food combinations during this time.

Some women get extra horny when they're pregnant, others are the total opposite. Luck of the draw, I guess. :)


Second, there is the issue of comfort and taboo for the husband and wife: vaginal intercourse during pregnancy almost could be perceived as akward (especially for the man) when one's offspring is in close proximity to the man's penis and when the purpose of the act is love and pleasure.

:erm There are sexual positions that decrease awkwardness. Look up these 2 words in the Hungarian dictionary (http://dict.sztaki.hu/english-hungarian): kutya póz. :ultrawink

There's usually a 4-7 day period each month when couples avoid intercourse. What does a good girlfriend/wife do during that time? :naughty


However, apparently it is a big enough trend that it is seemingly reflected in hard core pornography spam emails (I have heard of aquaintances of mine getting spam pertaining to "pregant sluts" having anal sex).

Yeah, because hardcore pornography reflects accurately the sex lives of common people. :rolleyes:

People who watch porn to get lessons on how to please their partner are doing it all wrong. Men and women should not watch porn to learn how to make love, and people shouldn't watch TV and movies to know how to behave! Porn is all about what looks good for the camera, or what some lonely perverts want to jack off to. It's better to get a sex guide and some knowledge about anatomy, so you can find the special places and know how to handle them with care. :D

Most embarrassing bookstore purchases I've ever made: x_blush

The Guide to Getting It On! (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1885535104/qid=1054911915/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_1/103-9980185-5270261)

Complete Idiot's Guide to the Kama Sutra (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0028639006/qid=1054912124/sr=1-8/ref=sr_1_8/103-9980185-5270261?v=glance&s=books)

Stríbog
Friday, June 6th, 2003, 04:54 PM
There's usually a 4-7 day period each month when couples avoid intercourse. What does a good girlfriend/wife do during that time?
Have her man go down on her.


Most embarrassing bookstore purchases I've ever made:

What?? An Indian-hater like you, reading the Kama Sutra? I'm shocked!!! :P

Von Braun
Friday, June 6th, 2003, 05:15 PM
Have her man go down on her.


Trust me, that should only be done right after she has taken a shower (and she should not have any blood flow either). It all comes down to whether you experience a good taste/make a healthy decision ( :popcorn ) or a bad taste/make an unhealthy decision ( :mcd ).

Ominous Lord Spoonblade
Friday, June 6th, 2003, 07:46 PM
PRUDES :P

x_rofl

just kiddin!

Sigrun Christianson
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 05:37 AM
WHORE.

Just kidding. :)

cosmocreator
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 06:37 AM
Originally posted by Von Braun
Trust me, that should only be done right after she has taken a shower (and she should not have any blood flow either). It all comes down to whether you experience a good taste/make a healthy decision ( :popcorn ) or a bad taste/make an unhealthy decision ( :mcd ).


How can you call yourself part French? I don't know, there's something about a shower that reduces that sexual energy -- unless you have sex in the shower.:ultrawink

A shower is good after sex not before.

Evolved
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 06:41 AM
I must warn against Fionn mac Cumhaill's suggestion of men parting the Red Sea. If your woman likes to see her blood on your face, run away- she's a freak. :nut

Instead, this is a special time for the man's special areas to get extra special attention. :Estell

Also, women need to stay away from douche, feminine deodorants and scented feminine hygiene products. It is these types of things which cause any foul odors, as the chemicals disrupt the fragile PH balance of the vagina.

Stríbog
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 06:55 AM
Also, women need to stay away from douche, feminine deodorants and scented feminine hygiene products. It is these types of things which cause any foul odors, as the chemicals disrupt the fragile PH balance of the vagina.

Please pardon my uncharacteristic crudeness, but I can't resist this wise saying:
"If it smells like cologne, leave it alone. If it smells like fish, it's a dish... " :halo

Ominous Lord Spoonblade
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 09:31 PM
Originally posted by Sigrun
WHORE.

Just kidding. :)

heeeeeeeeeey!!! LOL :Bouncing

Evolved
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 09:42 PM
A woman's privates aren't supposed to smell like fish, that is an indication of poor vaginal hygiene. :eek: It's not really supposed to smell like anything, a guy's weiner shouldn't either. :D

Keep your privates clean, no one likes a smelly crotch. x_nono

Grimr
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 10:13 PM
Too much freedom is dangerous! Long live censorship! Long live Stalin!

Evolved
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 10:32 PM
Originally posted by cosmocreator
unless you have sex in the shower.:ultrawink

Nothing better than a couple bathing each other. As long as it isn't one of those ice cold post-sauna Viking showers. Kind of cancels the love plans.. :erm

Hair conditioner has other purposes. :ultrawink Slippery, bubbly, wet and wild x_love :naughty

Grimr
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 10:42 PM
Nothing better than a couple bathing each other. As long as it isn't one of those ice cold post-sauna Viking showers. Kind of cancels the love plans..

Sex and sexual implications equals thought crime and thought crime equals death!

cosmocreator
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 10:47 PM
Originally posted by ladygoeth33
A woman's privates aren't supposed to smell like fish, that is an indication of poor vaginal hygiene. :eek: It's not really supposed to smell like anything, a guy's weiner shouldn't either. :D

Keep your privates clean, no one likes a smelly crotch. x_nono

Of course a vagina is supposed to have a smell (as does a man's groin area). There are scent glands there. Even the skin on your arm has a smell. If a woman spends a couple hours in the sun sweating, to me she smells nice. I don't think anyone is suggesting you shouldn't shower every day.

cosmocreator
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 10:48 PM
Originally posted by ladygoeth33
Hair conditioner has other purposes. :ultrawink Slippery, bubbly, wet and wild x_love :naughty

A pair of woman's hands, a bar of soap, my tool.:naughty

cosmocreator
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 10:50 PM
Originally posted by Apothecary
Sex and sexual implications equals thought crime and thought crime equals death!


You're starting to sound wierd. What's with the commie stuff?

Grimr
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 10:50 PM
The ministry of Love will deal with you now!:axe

Von Braun
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 10:55 PM
How can you call yourself part French?

I appear more like my mom's side of the family.

Evolved
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 10:56 PM
Commies need to do it too. :hi

They have all those military parades with tons of phallic symbols.

http://community.the-underdogs.org/smiley/people/launcher.gif

And the ladies loved Che Guevara.

Von Braun
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 10:57 PM
You're starting to sound wierd. What's with the commie stuff?

Don't you get it? He's ridiculing Big Sister. In my opinion, he's doing a good job, especially for his age.

Grimr
Saturday, June 7th, 2003, 11:24 PM
I just read 1984, thats about all the thought I have put behind it...

Scáthach
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 12:07 PM
excellent book Apothecary! you should read Burmese Days and Homage to Catalonia when you get a chance,Orwell was a fine author...i guess Animal Farm goes without saying? great book.

Sigrun Christianson
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 05:49 PM
Big Sister, Von Braun?

Grimr
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 05:51 PM
Why not big sister? You sexist!x_nono

Sigrun Christianson
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 05:54 PM
I'm pretty sure he was referring to me with the 'Big Sister' comment, he just didn't have the balls to state it directly. Typical.

BTW, I hate that finger-waving icon. Don't use it with me.

Von Braun
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 06:06 PM
Big Sister, Von Braun?

"He loved Big Sister."

:hug :Estell

Sigrun Christianson
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 06:07 PM
I have no idea what you're talking about.

Von Braun
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 06:10 PM
The last sentence of that great novel plus artistic license plus genuine mixed feelings. :)

Sigrun Christianson
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 06:13 PM
I've never read the book. Now **** off.

Von Braun
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 06:21 PM
I've never read the book.

You should. I think you would find it interesting.


Now **** off.

What exactly do you mean?

Sigrun Christianson
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 06:23 PM
I mean: f-u-c-k off.

Von Braun
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 06:26 PM
I mean: f-u-c-k off.

Please clarify.

Ominous Lord Spoonblade
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 06:44 PM
this is too funny x_rofl

Grimr
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 06:56 PM
EDITED.

Sigrun Christianson
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 08:30 PM
*sigh*

I have to apologize for using the f-word. We're not supposed to swear anymore.

-Sig

Von Braun
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 09:07 PM
I have to apologize for using the f-word. We're not supposed to swear anymore.

Apology accepted.

Sigrun Christianson
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 09:17 PM
Bah.

Ominous Lord Spoonblade
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 09:49 PM
Sigrun you should watch your language
:lol



Originally posted by Sigrun

BTW, I hate that finger-waving icon. Don't use it with me.

Thorburn
Monday, June 9th, 2003, 12:25 PM
Originally posted by Sigrun
*sigh*

I have to apologize for using the f-word. We're not supposed to swear anymore.

-Sig
Wow! I wish everyone would have the greatness in character to remedy such things so readily.

You have my deep respect, Sigrun! ;)


@Von Braun: Stop pushing and provoking her. And don't ask me now impeccantly to "clarify" what you did wrong and where, or I might lose my patience rather quickly. With your high intelligence you could be a much better influence on this board. — Don't you want to give it a try?

Kind regards,

- Thorburn

Evolved
Monday, June 9th, 2003, 08:16 PM
Are swear words automatically replaced by asteriks now? Hm. Let's try this out..

****
damn
****
*******
bitch
****
*****

Azdaja
Monday, June 9th, 2003, 08:18 PM
It won't let me type C-O-O-N-S, as in Carlton.
Look:
*****

Scáthach
Monday, June 9th, 2003, 08:19 PM
something similar happened to me on a criminology board,they censored the word ''******'' (has this board? i dont know.) well i cant say it was a word i used often but if i tried to say *s******* and laugh it came out as *sblack* LOL! it was funny at the time :D

ps LG,i loved your old cat avatar,it was adorable! :)


EDIT -this board have censored the same word,you all know that word some people use for negroes and i use it for sarcastic laughing ;) :)

Azdaja
Monday, June 9th, 2003, 08:22 PM
Scathach:

LOL - yes, apparently this board has censored your mystery word.
Here's what's odd. I can type Coon, but not *****.

Scáthach
Monday, June 9th, 2003, 08:26 PM
Asdaja - that'll make life awkward if you want to say something about Coon's theory or something along those lines! and i wont be able to s-n-i-g-g-e-r at people should i ever feel the need j/k :)

Azdaja
Monday, June 9th, 2003, 08:30 PM
Originally posted by Scathach
Asdaja - that'll make life awkward if you want to say something about Coon's theory or something along those lines!

That's what just happened! I was typing something about C-o-o-n-s theories on the race science board, and this stupid ***** stuff makes it looks like I was swearing at the person I was directing my post at, lol


Originally posted by Scathach
and i wont be able to s-n-i-g-g-e-r at people should i ever feel the need j/k :)

Oh, that's the word! "sblack" LOL!!

Scáthach
Monday, June 9th, 2003, 08:57 PM
i dont know about you but i find it really funny :D infact its almost the type of thing to s****** at ;)

ps : what is a coon? as in carleton's surname! it must be an american word ?

Loki
Monday, June 9th, 2003, 09:09 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja
That's what just happened! I was typing something about C-o-o-n-s theories on the race science board, and this stupid ***** stuff makes it looks like I was swearing at the person I was directing my post at, lol



LOL... that's really hilarious Azdaja! :)

Thorburn
Tuesday, June 10th, 2003, 01:29 AM
Coon seems not to be censored to permit the use of Carleton Coon, the name of the anthropologist. The proper English is Coon's theories which is not censored either. Nor is to snigger or niggard.

Damn has a legitimate use, as in to damn. Same goes for bitch, the female dog.

In the meantime, the German genitive, Coons Theorien, should work, too, and so should Swedish besluta. No problems with Charles Dickens or Dick Reynolds either, I hope.

Cocker spaniel should work, as well as ass, the donkey.

- Thorburn

Evolved
Tuesday, June 10th, 2003, 01:50 AM
I think I found a loophole in the censor system.

Censorship is for ******** and ***********.

x_hehe x_rofl :devil

Ominous Lord Spoonblade
Tuesday, June 10th, 2003, 02:01 AM
Originally posted by ladygoeth33
I think I found a loophole in the censor system.

Censorship is for ******** and ***********.

x_hehe x_rofl :devil

zło :devil mwahahahaaaaaa

time to download some new language fonts x_hehe

Stríbog
Tuesday, June 10th, 2003, 02:07 AM
Censorship is for ******** and ***********.

I was wondering how long it would be before someone thought of that... :rolleyes:

Azdaja
Tuesday, June 10th, 2003, 02:29 PM
Originally posted by Scathach
i dont know about you but i find it really funny :D infact its almost the type of thing to s****** at ;)

ps : what is a coon? as in carleton's surname! it must be an american word ?

"Coon" is a racial slur for Negroes. Maybe the censor figures that one "coon" is not going to cause any problems, but multiple
"c-o-o-n-s" will throw our "online neighborhood" into disarray. ;)

Thorburn
Tuesday, June 10th, 2003, 03:51 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja
"Coon" is a racial slur for Negroes. Maybe the censor figures that one "coon" is not going to cause any problems, but multiple
"c-o-o-n-s" will throw our "online neighborhood" into disarray. ;)
You mean "coons"? ;)

- Thorburn

Azdaja
Tuesday, June 10th, 2003, 04:03 PM
It does not censor it anymore!

Coons, coons, coons!

COONS!

Thorburn
Tuesday, June 10th, 2003, 04:30 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja
It does not censor it anymore!
Originally posted by Thorburn
In the meantime, the German genitive, Coons Theorien, should work, too ...
Nopes. It has a legitimate use, much to the relief of all those who are too sloppy to use the proper English genitive. ;)

- Thorburn

Ominous Lord Spoonblade
Tuesday, June 10th, 2003, 10:21 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja
It does not censor it anymore!

Coons, coons, coons!

COONS!

OMG LMFAO :clap

Scáthach
Tuesday, June 10th, 2003, 10:51 PM
jibba jabba? now those are the types of words that should be censored :D

Azdaja
Wednesday, June 11th, 2003, 11:04 AM
You have to respect Mr. T for his "zero Jibba-Jabba" policy. His stance on "Crazy fools" is also commendable.

whitepowerhosting.com
Wednesday, June 11th, 2003, 12:53 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja
You have to respect Mr. T for his "zero Jibba-Jabba" policy. His stance on "Crazy fools" is also commendable.


ROFLMFAO!!! :Armed

Ominous Lord Spoonblade
Wednesday, June 11th, 2003, 10:38 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja
You have to respect Mr. T for his "zero Jibba-Jabba" policy. His stance on "Crazy fools" is also commendable.

Aryan NS
Tuesday, July 1st, 2003, 10:56 PM
Cencorship is gay. Thats why i hate stormfront.

Conquistador
Wednesday, July 2nd, 2003, 07:03 AM
Originally posted by Aryan NS
Cencorship is gay. Thats why i hate stormfront.

Stormfront has a tendency to get all hot and bothered when one talks about Religion. Talk about pathetic....a board that accepts Mullatos as whites... :rolleyes: One complains, one gets BANNED.

Evolved
Thursday, July 3rd, 2003, 03:38 AM
You can't even use words like "múd" or "savagë" here. Was the censorship software bought from the Simon Wiesenthal Center gift shop? :ehm

cosmocreator
Thursday, July 3rd, 2003, 03:44 AM
SF has high standards of censorship and low standards for racial quality and intelligence level.

They deleted one of my posts last night about an organization here in BC. They also deleted my questioning who deleted it. Some things you are just not allowed to talk about. Secretive organizations have things to hide. Makes you wonder what.

Ederico
Thursday, July 3rd, 2003, 01:23 PM
Originally posted by ladygoeth33
You can't even use words like "múd" or "savagë" here. Was the censorship software bought from the Simon Wiesenthal Center gift shop? :ehm

Yes it was, in fact we are all lackeys of Zionists and Jewish Supremacists alike. This is all one huge conspiracy to destroy any type of Politically Incorrect behaviour (that is behaviour that does not kiss our asses) that might arise anywhere throughout this board.

The above was the serious explanation. LOL.

Below is the not-so-serious explanation. LOL.

We are tired of the type of people that cannot make a post without using a Racial Slur. Everyone should think about it and consider the negative image given to the European Nationalist and Racialist Movement due to some of the Members of this Movement (ok, no real Organisation exists, but you get my point) that make constant use of such slurs. Their behaviour gives all of the Movement a negative stereotyping (stereotypes are bad, so do the Politically Correct establishment say, whatever) which hinders our cause, as it alienates the undecided individuals who are members of our Race.

I perfectly know that it is a bit boring for the users of occasional racial slurs, but we are trying to deter those who make constant use of them, and we all perfectly know, that most such people might be good for a fight in the street as they constantly remind us of (and good luck to them, no one wants them to get hurt). Yet here we are trying to exchange information and knowledge, spread our message, promote our cause, and on the light side create friendships (online at least, due to geographic distances)between like-minded people, racial slurs not only do not serve these purposes, they actually could hinder them.

Fenris
Sunday, July 13th, 2003, 03:09 PM
Originally posted by Aryan NS
Cencorship is gay.

so are windchimes.

(10 points to the person who gets the reference)


I commend the stance on cutting down on habitual slur-users, a post that's little but "hurr ngger lol coon mudhut dweller u suck at the race lolz WP 4 lyfe" does indeed demean the cause, and unfortunately the idiocy of the few reflects on the intelligence and sensibility of the many. It's always the same, and quite absurd in my opinion.

Perhaps instead of blanket-censoring though, it could come down to a general concensus of how much is "too much." I'm sure most wouldn't object to a more "if you, in the eyes of the mods, use too many unnecessary racial slurs or inflammatory language, your posts will be edited" stance, or something to that effect because they are intelligent enough that their arguments and discussions don't rely on the casual bandying-about of denigratory language.

I'm just offering a suggestion here, I'm one of those people that don't need to lower myself to constant "those damn fuzzy wuzzies don't like it up 'em Mr. Mannering" comments.

(another 10 points to the person that gets the reference)

Sigrun Christianson
Sunday, July 13th, 2003, 04:31 PM
Lookie here, you are not strictly prohibited from using the occassional profane expression, so long as it's not superfluous. Some sentiments do call for more emotional language and I'm perfectly Okay with that, but those sentiments are few & far between, imo.

The filter was installed because there are some people who just cannot control themselves. When it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Admin & Mods that people can post using their best judgment, then the filter will be removed.

Not a single one of the Moderators is fond of power-tripping or censoring (I know some of you think otherwise). We need to censor words sometimes, for various reasons, but we don't censor the expression of ideas so long as they are legal and relevant. There is a huge difference.

If a person cannot get his point across without using profanity and racial slurs, then he probably doesn't have anything intelligent to share anyway. ;P

-Sig