PDA

View Full Version : Kashmiri Brahmin woman



ROMA
Monday, May 5th, 2003, 03:36 AM
http://images.indian-magic.com/aditi/aditi08.jpg

more:
http://images.indian-magic.com/aditi/aditi10.jpg

classify please
her eyes are natural and clearly green

Stríbog
Monday, May 5th, 2003, 04:40 AM
Her face and eyes are definitely neo-Danubian. She is certainly Aryan in every possible definition of the word, if she is a Brahmin. Very attractive :gift

ROMA
Monday, May 5th, 2003, 07:41 AM
I know! :D
she's a pure Kashmiri Pundit woman,her parents fled to Delhi because of the barbaric Aryan killing muslims in the Kashmir region.

Ederico
Monday, May 5th, 2003, 01:18 PM
I do not know about Racial Classifications but she looks Europid to me and highly attractive. Perhaps volksdeutsche could come around and tell us what she is.

Azdaja
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 11:15 AM
<< she looks Europid to me and highly attractive >>

Hey man, that's a good enough classification for me, lol

Evolved
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 11:24 AM
She's not Nordic: black hair, brownish skin, low forehead (look at her hairline), small chin, broad cheekbones..

http://www.indian-magic.com/cgi-bin/gal.cgi?ce=aditi
http://www.indian-magic.com/cgi-bin/spgal.cgi?gal=swimwear&ce=aditi

At first glance she looks atypical for India, but honestly, you can tell she has a lot of nasty sh*t swimming around in her DNA. And a true Aryan woman would not be so insecure in her beauty as to wear padded pushup bras with her swimwear and blue contacts. x_p

On close inspection, she has brown eyes:

http://images.indian-magic.com/aditi/aditi41.jpg

Again, pure does not come to mind when looking at her. I have yet to see an person who is 100% Indian who looks like a 100%European.

goidelicwarrior
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 12:18 PM
Originally posted by ladygoeth33
She's not Nordic: black hair, brownish skin, low forehead (look at her hairline), small chin, broad cheekbones..

http://www.indian-magic.com/cgi-bin/gal.cgi?ce=aditi
http://www.indian-magic.com/cgi-bin/spgal.cgi?gal=swimwear&ce=aditi

At first glance she looks atypical for India, but honestly, you can tell she has a lot of nasty sh*t swimming around in her DNA. And a true Aryan woman would not be so insecure in her beauty as to wear padded pushup bras with her swimwear and blue contacts. x_p

On close inspection, she has brown eyes:

http://images.indian-magic.com/aditi/aditi41.jpg

Again, pure does not come to mind when looking at her. I have yet to see an person who is 100% Indian who looks like a 100%European. so you would not see her as white if you saw her on the streetin the US ?? btw why do you have mongols or huns in your awatar.. they together with the moors where the greatest threats and contaminators Europe ever faced....

Beef_Noodle
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 01:11 PM
Originally posted by triskel
so you would not see her as white if you saw her on the streetin the US ?? btw why do you have mongols or huns in your awatar.. they together with the moors where the greatest threats and contaminators Europe ever faced....

Maybe Ladygoeth is jealous....anyway I saw a picture of this Aditi model once where she had white skin, blue eyes and red hair..she looked 'whiter' than most Englishwomen. The right lighting and photographers can achieve any effect possible.

goidelicwarrior
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 01:13 PM
Originally posted by Beef_Noodle
Maybe Ladygoeth is jealous....anyway I saw a picture of this Aditi model once where she had white skin, blue eyes and red hair..she looked 'whiter' than most Englishwomen. The right lighting and photographers can achieve any effect possible. have to agree this time....

Glenlivet
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 03:17 PM
Who said she is Nordid? Do you think they implied it? Maybe so, to discredit the Nordid race.

Thanks for showing us again how it's very hard to classify models (especially in India and Pakistan who frequently use hydroquinone to lighten their skins or very light powder makeup to take away the sallow complexion and look more "European, and they dye their hair and use light contact lenses help which can confuse us). Well, most North Indians I met wanted to be "white" and they looked up to Europeans (especially those colonialists who ran their country), as they have an inferiority complex! There goes the fake proudness. What a shame. I remember an Indian woman in London who told me that her daughter look exactly like an English girl, yes, exactly like an English girl. I said fine, then I saw her and she was something like the Kashmiri girl below. Totally fake, and I wondered how she can move the facial muscles with all the things on her face.

She is Europoid (but still mixed and in some pictures I see the traces of the Indo-Melanid race, and the Europid part being even Armenoid?), future wise, of course. Do you think that she has also some Mongoloid traits? That is why they need to fix the pigmentation part. Not anyone can change the looks to look Europid, so some of them can get away with it.

But I think I know her type. The racial type known as "Armenoid" (a variation of it?) or Pamir-Ferghana type originated in the northern Caucasus and ended up mostly in the Pamir and Hindu Kush mountain ranges some 5000 years ago, where they brought their Burushaski languages with them. So the broader face, broad cheekbones, round head, fine-built and the fleshy nasal tip indicate that.

We should not use Aryan (we can speak about Indo-Aryan languages and customs) to show a physical type, as we know too little. But no author mention that type being present among the early Aryan tribes.

Kashmir got more blondism than North India.

Other pictures of that girl:
http://images.indian-magic.com/aditi/aditi39.jpg
http://images.indian-magic.com/aditi/aditi36.jpg
(blue eyes here, a chameleont?)
http://images.indian-magic.com/aditi/aditi29.jpg
(gross)
http://images.indian-magic.com/aditi/aditi23.jpg

http://images.indian-magic.com/aditi/aditi53.jpg
(more natural)

Maybe the Mediterranists like half-naked swarthy women. That girl would not pass in southern Iraq, not to speak about any European country.






Originally posted by ladygoeth33
She's not Nordic: black hair, brownish skin, low forehead (look at her hairline), small chin, broad cheekbones..

http://www.indian-magic.com/cgi-bin/gal.cgi?ce=aditi
http://www.indian-magic.com/cgi-bin/spgal.cgi?gal=swimwear&ce=aditi

At first glance she looks atypical for India, but honestly, you can tell she has a lot of nasty sh*t swimming around in her DNA. And a true Aryan woman would not be so insecure in her beauty as to wear padded pushup bras with her swimwear and blue contacts. x_p

On close inspection, she has brown eyes:

http://images.indian-magic.com/aditi/aditi41.jpg

Again, pure does not come to mind when looking at her. I have yet to see an person who is 100% Indian who looks like a 100%European.

Hans
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 03:46 PM
Holy shinkies, she is HOT!

:Ola

Probably some arabian blood in there but I'm already under her spell...can't...help...it. Can...not...resist...

I dunno, those eyes look real to me and with them being enhanced by her dark hair...they REALLY stand out.

If you don't consider her white, I don't think I have the will power to hang with yall...

Hans
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 03:49 PM
OK, maybe her eyes are brown.

I guess my kiddo will have brown eyes then... :AWW

Azdaja
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 04:08 PM
She can charm my snake anytime, lol.
If that makes me a race-mixer, I don't even care. She really is hot.

Glenlivet
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 04:35 PM
Maybe in the first picture. I'm disappointed, but we all have our tastes. So you go by attractiveness, and not the racial type?




Originally posted by Azdaja
She can charm my snake anytime, lol.
If that makes me a race-mixer, I don't even care. She really is hot.

Rahul
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 04:38 PM
The woman in the picture has green eyes. Many Chitpavan brahmans in the Maharashtra region have green/gray eye colour. These are migrants from the North Western Frontier Province and Kashmir, which they left to settle outside a moslem-ruled and persecuted region.

On the contrary, we have some Moslems, who look apparently different from average madesi Indian because they are mongrels derived of the Turkic-Semitic-Mongolian moslem invaders.

Most of the Punjab wasn't even populated when Aryas arrived from the north. Neither was Tibet inhabited by the mongolian race. The claim of civilisation in the Harappa-Mohen-jodaro expanse are beginning to turn into crass hokum, which was accepted since the days of Wheeler. The Brahui of Bloch tribe actually happen to be recent migrants to the western frontier with Iran. Dravidians themselves are no race, its a myth which the collected populations of the south and east are referred to as.

Dravidian is derived of the word 'Dravinam', or wealth. They were wealthier than any other ethnic group but they were migrants from Polynesia, Afrika, Arabia etc.

As for the dark skin colour of the North Indians, Punjabis, Dogris etc., it is absurd to insist on race-mixing for the climate is actually hotter than most parts of Afrika. In the summers, the maximum temperature remains over 40 degrees centigrade for period within April-September. The only reason why life is sustained here is the perennial supply of waters from the Great Himalayas, through many a rivers, revered many times removed, in our traditions.

Azdaja
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 04:45 PM
<< Maybe in the first picture. I'm disappointed, but we all have our tastes. So you go by attractiveness, and not the racial type? >>

Well first, let's take a look at reality. There is no way a guy who looks like me is ever going to have a chance to have sex with a girl who looks like her, unless I was paying her for her services, lol.
Second, she's a model. I know most people from her region are nowhere near as attractive. So it's not like I'm going to fly down there in search of a sex partner.
Third, I'd never have children with anyone I suspected of being tainted, regardless of 'hotness'.
But fourth: I'm not going to lie. I'd rather have sex with a hot Alpine (if there is such a thing, lol) than with a homely-looking Noric.
Fortunantly for me though, I find most Noric women to be hot.

So yeah, when it comes to sex I'm superficial. As far as falling in love...that's a different story. You can't "choose" who to fall in love with.

ROMA
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 04:50 PM
Obviously ladygoeth is jealous..lol
and.. uhm mogols, huns and magyars are originally NON- whites
she's gorgeous,med...green,blue or brown eyed I don't care,she is great and has a fine structure even without push-up bras she still looks fit..don't you think

2nd Volksdeutsche Kashmir is a part of North India so why compare these 2
She is whiter then a southern Iraqi <i know so many Iraqi's at my university most are Kurds.lol what are you thinking.
And trust me she could pass as a south Italian ANYDAY,I dont understand where u got you knowledge from,Have u ever actually BEEN to italy??I dont thinks so so before you judge like that u should know your sources better.
I can sense a bit jealousy,also from you,I know Indians they are the only non-european people I hang with(curries are great)And trust me,they really look down on british and other nord europeans actually,yes because of the british ofcourse,but also because they do consider themselve Aryan,noble,Hindu and they hate the fact Nordics think they are Aryan..I never feel hostility by them towards Italians,I don't know,A lot of Italians also seem to like visiting India,they like the dark haired,milky skin type there as in their movies.Also Sonia Gandhi the widow of ex-president Rajiv Gandhi is Italian and a highly respected lady in the High Indian society



And about the eyes?well I have seen Punjabis with blue, green, grey eyes even In delhi I saw street children with light coloured eyes,some with very dark skin,so assuming they wear contacts is kind of a joke.

I do think Hindus are beautiful people and I respect their culture and so do alot of (med) racialists,ever heard of Savitri Devi?
She even married a white Brahmin.

The model a high caste Hindu woman and already married with 3 kids..her man's name is Lakdawala.Noting she is high caste she would never mix with another race or someone from another country,this is the way the real Aryans still survive in India,sorry Hans.

Ederico
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 05:11 PM
@ROMA

After seeing a couple of her other pictures, I seriously doubt that she would pass of as any European including Southern Europeans unless a Southern European with non-Europid admixture. I must correct myself regarding my statement that she is Europid, I guess I was a bit disillusioned by her beauty and by my ignorance in anthropology. As volksdeutsche stated in a private conversation she is Europoid of a local type (for Northern India). She looks different even to a Southern European of Europid stock, she has an apparent Indian look yet beautiful.

I would like to ask you a question, what is your purpose on this board?

Frankly as a Pan-European your apparent hostility towards Nordics is annoying. I have had to dealt with opposite scenarios and they seriously annoyed me, yet I thought Southern European Racialists where exempt from such hostilities towards other Europeans, apparently I was wrong.

ROMA
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 05:20 PM
I'm not being hostile at all,but people that state all great civilizations that have ever excisted and claim that they were nordic irritate me..because this is a fable.That's all.

Glenlivet
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 06:33 PM
I agree, but who stated that here. There's no need for those preemptive comments.




Originally posted by ROMA
I'm not being hostile at all,but people that state all great civilizations that have ever excisted and claim that they were nordic irritate me..because this is a fable.That's all.

Ederico
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 07:54 PM
Ok ROMA I hope this is cleared. I don't like such statements at all. Sometimes I compare some Nordicist claims to those of the Afro-Centrists to tell the truth although the Nordicists are much more credible.

Glenlivet
Tuesday, May 6th, 2003, 08:06 PM
I compared them because it's obvious that some people at this board seek European-looking people in more exotic places.

I mentioned southern Iraq because there are Veddoid remnants there.

Kurds have lot of blondism and they live in Northern Iraq, and I have also seen many.

Sure, a South Italian who got some Saharid (in the Caspid group, if you see Indid and some Armenoid or Pamir-Ferghana in her, and Indid is similar to the Saharid part, but darker, then why not, although I wouldn't say that is her predomiant futures). I know that South Italy got Saharid, Pontid, Arabid and Armenoid types. So the mixtures could give similar looks, yet there are always subtle differences. You can have her. She is still not typical for Southern Italy, but she is for the region that she comes from.

I have yet to see an Indian who really look down on the British, especially when we talk about racial matters. Maybe in words, but not in practise. The British "divide & conquer" strategy worked well in India.

Sure, Aryanism is more connected with the Iranic people and some parts of Northern India.

There's still a dispute of who control Kashmir, Pakistan or India. You don't need to tell me who should have it. That is not an issue for this forum.

Good for you that Italians and Indians have good political relations. Why should we care about that? Fine, you claim that they like Italians and not North Europeans, and they look up to blondism too, which is more common in the north. I know some North Indians in person as well.

Why should you even mention that you have not felt any hostility from them againts Italians?

Dark hair and a milky skin type is more common in Turkey, Kurdish-inhabited (e.g. eastern Turkey, northern Iraq, western Iran and parts of southern Caucasus) lands, northern and central Iran and among the Nuristanis of Afghanistan than in India, enough said. Forget the Aryan customs, don't mix religion, culture and race. You will find more types who could fit in Europe (even north of the Alps) when you reach North Iran and Southern Caucasus and you can even find Nordid types when you reach NW Caucasus.

Nuristani boy:
http://www.musarium.com/portraits/art2/images/Photo0007.jpg

Imran Khan, a Pathan cricketer from Lahore, Pakistan:
http://pakcricket.virtualave.net/players/imran7.gif

Btw, Punjabi Sikhs don't follow the caste system like Hindus do.
But there's sad part for India, that though the Sikh Gurus abolished caste, there are still numbers of Sikhs who cling to caste. No one lives in a vacuum.

I guess for some, the teachings of the Sikhs Gurus are not quite as strong as this twisted caste identity, given to them by the twisted Hindu (Brahminical) concept of caste. Do you think it served the Indians well againts the British? Think twice.

You're not "higher" because you put someone down. It's the deeds that counts.







Originally posted by ROMA
Obviously ladygoeth is jealous..lol
and.. uhm mogols, huns and magyars are originally NON- whites
she's gorgeous,med...green,blue or brown eyed I don't care,she is great and has a fine structure even without push-up bras she still looks fit..don't you think

2nd Volksdeutsche Kashmir is a part of North India so why compare these 2
She is whiter then a southern Iraqi <i know so many Iraqi's at my university most are Kurds.lol what are you thinking.
And trust me she could pass as a south Italian ANYDAY,I dont understand where u got you knowledge from,Have u ever actually BEEN to italy??I dont thinks so so before you judge like that u should know your sources better.
I can sense a bit jealousy,also from you,I know Indians they are the only non-european people I hang with(curries are great)And trust me,they really look down on british and other nord europeans actually,yes because of the british ofcourse,but also because they do consider themselve Aryan,noble,Hindu and they hate the fact Nordics think they are Aryan..I never feel hostility by them towards Italians,I don't know,A lot of Italians also seem to like visiting India,they like the dark haired,milky skin type there as in their movies.Also Sonia Gandhi the widow of ex-president Rajiv Gandhi is Italian and a highly respected lady in the High Indian society



And about the eyes?well I have seen Punjabis with blue, green, grey eyes even In delhi I saw street children with light coloured eyes,some with very dark skin,so assuming they wear contacts is kind of a joke.

I do think Hindus are beautiful people and I respect their culture and so do alot of (med) racialists,ever heard of Savitri Devi?
She even married a white Brahmin.

The model a high caste Hindu woman and already married with 3 kids..her man's name is Lakdawala.Noting she is high caste she would never mix with another race or someone from another country,this is the way the real Aryans still survive in India,sorry Hans.

ROMA
Wednesday, May 7th, 2003, 02:26 AM
Anyway I'm Italian and I have seen enough Indians in India itselve so let me judge if they could pass as an Italian or not,ofcourse they're not Italians but it's just an example,some look western med.And the woman in the pic could pass like one trust me 100%.

Ofcourse Indians look down on British but they won't tell you in your face.Why?Because they are very hospitable and well mannered people.The reason also they know their part of their ancestors were the REAL tribe to call themselve Arya and not the Germanics for which Hitler borrowed the name Aryan for.Aryans were meds.

Kashmir is divided in 2 parts(didn't u know?) west kashmir,the smallest part controlled by Pakistan.east kashmir,the biggest,is part of India so when we speak on kashmir in the news etc we are talking about North India
.
Blondism is in India but very rarely.Blonde and blue eyes isn't the beauty ideal in India though.Dark hair and dark eyes and light skin is the ideal,lately,coloured eyes are coming up but it hasn't been always like that especially in Bollywood folms,which i like,because these films are racialist if you look at them carefully and intensively.

I know in which areas milky skin can be found,but u can find it in India for sure.Also Hindu Pathans can be found in India dure they fleeding during the coming of the muslims.Pathans used to be Hindus and Buddhists,they are described in the Indian holy books as Pakhta=Pakhtoon=Pashtun=Pathan Pathans are very similar in appearance to Kashmiris.

Sikhism does not teach people to associate with caste..but trust me..Sikhs do associate with their heritage = caste.The proudest Sikhs are the Jatts (probably Scythian heritage)Khatri's,Rajputs.



U seem to know alot about India aswell and that's cool.But have you ever visited it? like I did and still am,you would understand it much better.I have visited villages in Kashmir and the place is beautiful and so are the people,very good looking.A visit to India will change your view the on world and life.

Evolved
Wednesday, May 7th, 2003, 05:07 AM
Originally posted by triskel
so you would not see her as white if you saw her on the streetin the US ??

No, and there are a lot of other people in the US who I would not mistake for white, like Vin Diesel who is commonly mistaken for a white person. Even my sister, who admits to having a crush on him did not know he was 1/2 black.

I don't care too much about India and feel zero kinship with those colored people or their so-called Aryan culture. I watched all 3+ hours of "Gandhi," too. If Mediterraneanists want to embrace Indians as their kin, it's fine with me as long as they aren't bringing their dothead lovers into Europe and North America. x_p

The avatar is of a Magyar, btw. Less than 1/4 of Huns were mongoloid. Huns were Türk, Türk people don't fit into the Pan-Aryan universe?

http://duygu.dikmenoglu.tripod.com/

I'm jealous because some Nordic-baiting Roman has a thing for cow-worshipping mongrels? Not at all! By the way he takes insults against Indians so personally, you'd think he was sleeping with one! :erm

Have fun drooling over this darkie, I'm going back to my yurt for some sleepy.. x_zzz

ROMA
Wednesday, May 7th, 2003, 05:53 AM
You are being offensive again,Didn't u know one of the moderators RAHUL is Indian?
And uhm..so many members from here claimed they loved her looks and wouln't care to have her..so it must be jealousy obvious.

by the way
Turks are Non-White so are Magyars.
U still don't get it. Aryans are Vedic and Zoroastrian people.Turks are NEVER Aryan.
Turks besided Huns,Mongols,and Arabs were also a big threat to whites didn't u know?lol Turks.
your tryin to show me Turk celebrities?lol.I have been to Turkey.
They worshipped me because I told them I was Italian.Some of em girls are good looking,well yeah,some have med blood(the western ones) besides non white Turk blood.
bunch of wannabe Italians.lol.
Turks are non-whites non-Aryan and muslim lol.the website is full of muslims,I dont look at that.

Evolved
Wednesday, May 7th, 2003, 10:10 AM
Originally posted by ROMA

You are being offensive again,Didn't u know one of the moderators RAHUL is Indian?

Good for him. :) And if you want to kiss Indian ass, that's fine by me.


And uhm..so many members from here claimed they loved her looks and wouln't care to have her..so it must be jealousy obvious.

And uhm..I honestly don't give a shit what exotic photography model you or any other man on this message board want to slip the salami to.



by the way
Turks are Non-White so are Magyars.


If I can find some with brown skin and green eyes maybe that would change your mind? x_p Stick to your Hindu exotic models, don't lecture me on what the Magyars were like. Are you reading this from "March of the Titans" or some other oversimplified crap book?



U still don't get it. Aryans are Vedic and Zoroastrian people.Turks are NEVER Aryan.


Since this forum is no longer called Aryan Dawn, how about I make a statement? I don't give a shit about who is culturally Indo-European. And the so-called "Aryan" culture of shit-skinned white-wannabe dothead Dravidians does not interest me in the least, anymore than how Negroids practice Germanic pagan traditions during Easter. I'm not into this pan-Aryan BS you're spewing where Neolithic Meds become the original Aryans. The homeland of the earliest Indo-Europeans was an inland area between Northern Europe and Southern Russia. The Kurgans. They weren't these Australoid-Mongoloid-Negroid mixed mongrels in Bollywood films who color their hair, fake their eye color and lighten their skin with chemicals. The fact that you go around worshipping this fake wanna-be Nordid from South Asia and insult actual Nordids and European ethnic groups is just a little psychotic.



Turks besided Huns,Mongols,and Arabs were also a big threat to whites didn't u know?lol Turks.


Huns were more racially diverse than you probably know.



your tryin to show me Turk celebrities?lol.I have been to Turkey.
They worshipped me because I told them I was Italian.Some of em girls are good looking,well yeah,some have med blood(the western ones) besides non white Turk blood.
bunch of wannabe Italians.lol.
Turks are non-whites non-Aryan and muslim lol.the website is full of muslims,I dont look at that.


Turks are the most secular Muslims I've ever known. I have no problem with them or any other Muslim for their religion. Christianity, Islam, Judaism- it's all cut from the same cloth. I guarantee you those nearly half-naked Turkish women would not be considered by most to be Muslims. They are obviously not very devout. Are you saying if a white person (even one of your "Aryan" Indians) was practicing Islam, you'd consider them non-Aryan based on their religion? That does not apply equally to another Semitic religion popular in Europe for centuries? :rolleyes:

Glenlivet
Wednesday, May 7th, 2003, 03:15 PM
That woman is very mixed and anyone can see it from the other pictures I provided. Her dominant futures are from the Pamir-Ferghana race, and she is probably brachycephalic, thus not Mediterranid (although some would say that type, together with Armenid is a brachycephalised Afghanid, possible, but Alpinids were found in Minor Asia at one time, and the Armenian homeland was more in Eastern Turkey than where it's now). Her skin pigmentation is even darker than what is usual for the Insular Mediterranids. I showed her natural look and people keep talking about the fake one.

Of course this or that doesn't do it when Indians told me straight to my face that they want to be lighter (and one said that he would like to have the same ruddy skin colour that I have, and that was really sad, nothing fun at all). They refer to the British as "white", and they are not see as European-looking or "white in Britain (or elsewhere for that matter), and there's a reason for that. Do you know what kind of jobs Pakistanis and Indians have in Dubai? Have you also heard about the racial riots between the English and the South and East Asians in Northern England last year? Maybe you can fool others, but not me when it comes to those complex issues.

I know that the language of the Germanic people, and something of our culture, springs from a much greater stem. The Germanic language, like Celtic, Latin, Greek, Iranian, and Sanskrit (among others), is part of the Indo-European (I-E) language group, all going back to a common root called Proto-Indo-European. But are we all the same morphological sub-race? Of course not, are we mostly Europid? Yes, we are.

The peoples of Europe, eastern or western, are and have always been a heterogenous mixture of physical types.

What distinguished the steppes peoples from their western neighbors was their language and culture. Like their western neighbors, the steppe folk derived a large part of their living from hunting, fishing, and farming of grains (wheat and barley) and legumes (beans, peas, and lentils). However, the basis of steppe culture was cattle raising. Cattle were absolutely the heart and soul of their culture.

The genetic data favours an origin on the Russian steppes.

Aryan customs (whatever that is) doesn't matter to me, and not most other people who live in Europe. There are plenty of myths, but Aryan is not equal to Indo-European, and the Indo-European centre is put in the Black Sea-Caspian (and the proto-language in Transcaucasus) belt by Gamkrelidze and Ivanov, although Lundman put it as west as Mähren (and Galicia) and the spreading being from there.

Collin Renfrew believes that the Indo-Europeans are first identifiable in Anatolia where they practised agriculture around 7000 BC, and it was from here that one of their groups moved westward to Europe, crossing the Bosporus and another group, moving eastward, via the region south of the Caucasus mountains and the Caspian Sea, into Northern Iran.

But they should then have common vocabulary for agricultural items, which is not the case. Furthermore, the Hittite (Lundman mentioned the Falid type being found among them) language was for the elites, and the basal language was non-Indo-European.

The homeland ladygoeth mentioned is a theory from Maria Gimbutas, the "Kurgan" homeland. According to her, the reconstructed linguistic evidence suggests that the Indo-Europeans were horse-riding warriors who used thrusting weapons and could easily overrun other areas, and did do so in so far as central Europe is concerned, around the fourth-fifth millennia BC. But there's an great incongruity between the terms found in the reconstructed Indo-European language and the cultural level met with in the Kurgans, and Kathrin Krell is the one that attack her theory with that. Marija Gimbutas had an illustrious career as a major 20th-century archaeologist and a primary founder of modern Indo-European studies. Her model for Indo-European origins is still the leading theory in the field. Its basic outlines are still upheld -- minus the Goddess interpretations -- by her former student J.P. Mallory, now one of the top authorities in the field. She has the ability to read 16 European languages, and only that must be admired. She is Lithuanian, and the Baltic languages are said to be one of the closest to proto-Indo-European, so maybe that helps.

You can also read 1997. The homelands of the Indo-Europeans. Archaeology and Language I, eds. R. Blench and M. Spriggs, London and New York, Routledge, 93-121., by James Mallory, Professor in Prehistoric Archaeology

Frederik Kortlandt, Professor of Balto-Slavic languages and of descriptive and comparative linguistics in Leiden, The Netherlands wrote "THE SPREAD OF THE INDO-EUROPEANS":

http://www.kortlandt.nl/publications/art111e.pdf

Maybe some Hindus want to place it in NW India. But that will be their job to convince us. The Indo-Europeans (Lundman thought the eastern Aryan people were East-Nordid, thus Aistin and Pontid) physical type which was in Southern Russia is nowhere to be found in India, of course.

Another thing, the Mediterranids in western Europe, of Insular or more Cro-Magnoid and stocky Berid type was found before the Indo-Europeans arrrived from east. You can connect the Pontids and Afghanids with the Indo-Europeans, but never the Insular Mediterranids, and Nordenstreng and Lundman support that. But it's also obvious going by the geography.

I know that Kashmir is divided in two parts, and I see the same news and I know about the UN resoluations like anyone else. I meant that there's still an ongoing fight.

Kashmir got many different ethnical groups and some are Central Asiatics, and blondism is from there as well. Some of the most Mongoloid populations on earth are ash-blond, so what.

I don't have time or money to visit India. I might visit it after I have seen all of Europe and Caucasus and the Middle East, USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. My cousin will visit India next month, and I shall see what she thinks. You will just see a small sample when you visit such a huge land like India, and it's very different as a tourist from the west than to live in a place as a native or even a foreigner.





Originally posted by ROMA
Anyway I'm Italian and I have seen enough Indians in India itselve so let me judge if they could pass as an Italian or not,ofcourse they're not Italians but it's just an example,some look western med.And the woman in the pic could pass like one trust me 100%.

Ofcourse Indians look down on British but they won't tell you in your face.Why?Because they are very hospitable and well mannered people.The reason also they know their part of their ancestors were the REAL tribe to call themselve Arya and not the Germanics for which Hitler borrowed the name Aryan for.Aryans were meds.

Kashmir is divided in 2 parts(didn't u know?) west kashmir,the smallest part controlled by Pakistan.east kashmir,the biggest,is part of India so when we speak on kashmir in the news etc we are talking about North India
.
Blondism is in India but very rarely.Blonde and blue eyes isn't the beauty ideal in India though.Dark hair and dark eyes and light skin is the ideal,lately,coloured eyes are coming up but it hasn't been always like that especially in Bollywood folms,which i like,because these films are racialist if you look at them carefully and intensively.

I know in which areas milky skin can be found,but u can find it in India for sure.Also Hindu Pathans can be found in India dure they fleeding during the coming of the muslims.Pathans used to be Hindus and Buddhists,they are described in the Indian holy books as Pakhta=Pakhtoon=Pashtun=Pathan Pathans are very similar in appearance to Kashmiris.

Sikhism does not teach people to associate with caste..but trust me..Sikhs do associate with their heritage = caste.The proudest Sikhs are the Jatts (probably Scythian heritage)Khatri's,Rajputs.



U seem to know alot about India aswell and that's cool.But have you ever visited it? like I did and still am,you would understand it much better.I have visited villages in Kashmir and the place is beautiful and so are the people,very good looking.A visit to India will change your view the on world and life.

Glenlivet
Wednesday, May 7th, 2003, 04:30 PM
Religion and race is not connected in the way that you would like to. Compare yourself with most Bosnians and you shall understand. Some Germans in WW2 thought that many of them and the Geghs of Albania are Goths, thus Germanic.

That is Himmler's racial doctrines, and I don't know if that is true or not. Part of it could be propaganda.

I will attach a picture of a young Bosnian Serb boy near the Bosnian Serb town of Uglejvik, Bosnia-Herzegovina. May, 1996.

The Turko-Kumans were of the low-skulled Central Asiatic Kumid type. But nowadays Turks are very Europid, and you can find Pontid, Dinarid and Armenid types, and I have even seen Baltid (of Aistin type) and East-Baltid types which Lundman also mentioned. Western and central Turkey is lighter pigmented than most of Southern Europe, perhaps except Northern Italy.

Yes, Iran come from Aryan. THE ZEND-AVESTA, the first Vendid part:
http://www.sacred-texts.com/zor/sbe04/sbe04.htm

The second part contains Sirozahs, Yashts and Nyays.

The third part contains Gathas, Yasha, Visparad, Afrinagan Gahs and miscellaneous.

The Aryans of old Iran:
http://www.farvardyn.com/zoroaster.htm

Zoroastrianism is an ancient Aryan religion. Zoroastrianism began in Iran in the first millenium B.C. and still exists in the present day in small communities in Iran (e.g. Yazd) and in diaspora in India (among Parsis in Northern India), North America, and elsewhere.

It's the sacred writings of Zoroaster (Zartusht) that formed the basis of the religion that prevailed in Iran from the 6th century BC to the 7th century AD. Avesta means the lore, or sacred writings, and Zend, the commentary.

Most of the Iranian myths are metaphysical symbolism. Out of Asha (the universal law) arises Ahura Mazda (or pronounced Ohoromazd, meaning the wisdom of goodness, or the wise Lord or God). All monotheistic religions have been influenced by Zoroastrianism.

We can put different meanings into a word, and that is what happend with Aryan. It's only unfortunate that it's has been misused so many times. The Indic and Iranian branches are collectively called Indo-Aryan languages, and it's of linguistic value.

That the Aryan race theory is not dead is because of the general insistence by European scholars that the word Varna means colour and the acceptance of that view by a majority of the Brahmin scholars.

Fortunately, the word Varna does occur in the Zend Avesta. It takes the form of Varana or Varena. It is used specifically in the sense of “faith, religious doctrine, choice of creed or belief.” It is derived from the root Var which means to put faith in, to believe in. One comes across the word Varana or Varena in the Gathas about six times used in the sense of faith, doctrine, creed or belief. This evidence from the Zend Avesta as to the meaning of the word Varna leaves no doubt that it originally meant a class holding to a particular faith and it had nothing to do with colour or complexion.

Furthermore, there is no evidence to show that the distinction between Aryans, Dasas and Dasyus was a racial distinction.

The Vedas do not support the contention that the Aryans were different in colour from the Dasas and Dasyus.





Originally posted by ROMA
You are being offensive again,Didn't u know one of the moderators RAHUL is Indian?
And uhm..so many members from here claimed they loved her looks and wouln't care to have her..so it must be jealousy obvious.

by the way
Turks are Non-White so are Magyars.
U still don't get it. Aryans are Vedic and Zoroastrian people.Turks are NEVER Aryan.
Turks besided Huns,Mongols,and Arabs were also a big threat to whites didn't u know?lol Turks.
your tryin to show me Turk celebrities?lol.I have been to Turkey.
They worshipped me because I told them I was Italian.Some of em girls are good looking,well yeah,some have med blood(the western ones) besides non white Turk blood.
bunch of wannabe Italians.lol.
Turks are non-whites non-Aryan and muslim lol.the website is full of muslims,I dont look at that.

ROMA
Wednesday, May 7th, 2003, 05:53 PM
var = faith na = no so (sanskrit)..so varna is faithless=faithless = the dark.
also the indian branch of the aryan people were in constant fight with the iranian ones,well some tribes,so the indian aryans adopted some iranian gods as demons and vice versa.
but also alot of gods are being used in the zend avesta and the Hindu holy books.

Certain turkish (anatolian)tribes were obviously indo-european speaking ones (still NOT aryan) tribes like for instance the hithites,hithites worshipped vedic style gods (vedic is Hindu) and their language is said to be very similar to sanskrit,a seal completelt written in sanskrit has been found in south east turkey.


http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/DL25Ag02.html

The earliest written mention of Mithra, the guarantor of contract, was found on tablets not far from Ankara amid the ruins of Bogazkoy, the capital of the Indo-European Hittites. The Mithra gods (also Indra, Varuna and Natasya) were invoked as the god of oath in the peace treaty between the Hittites and the Indo-Aryan Mitannis, who ruled for three centuries in southeast Turkey and Syria (1,500 BC to 1,200 BC). The Bogazkoy archives also produced a horse-training manual.Mitra,Varuna,Indra are STILL being worshipped by Hindus.
Also Ahura Mazda = (Aura) Mitra
:rolleyes:
Note: a lot of these ancient people are muslims by now..and muslims are worthless in my opinion and certainly NOT Aryan,even white skinned,green eyed muslims in North India are not Aryans,the whole meaning of the word disappeared.

If you want to know more about the distinction of dasas and Aryas u should ask RAHUL he can give u some sources and explain it to you.

I have visited Dubai,and stayed in the burj-al-arab hotel during a stop when I went to India,the Indians and Pakistanis have alot of good jobs there,most are in the clothing/textile and gold business there are alot of Indian jewelleries,ofcoousre some have 'lower' jobs like cleaners etc.
I heard of the racial riots in Oldham and Brandford yes but what are you trying to say..this means thats the south asians in England obviously do NOT respect English at all isn't it lol
Trust me even in Bollywood films they make a fool out of British,u really don't have to teach me.I'm an expert and I do understand Hindi.And you know the Indians migrating to the west are obviouly not the wealthy high caste ones.

Sanskrit is rather related to old Greek and Roman then it is to old German.So because of these linguistical similarities between Sanskrit and old Greek and Roman languages there also a racial.

Like I told you the hithites were Indo-European worshipped common gods like the Aryans so the Aryans must have been indo-european there is no doub't.

But present day Turks are very mixed with Semites and Mongols so they are no considered a non-white Muslim people and that's what I also call them.

Ladygoeth obviously love Turks but let me tell you,all the non-muslim (south) eastern Europeans absolutely HATE Turks!
Well thats not that strange is it?the way these barbar Muslims invaded their lands and killed many.
Im glad these bastards never made it to Italy,pure scum is what they are.U might b happy with your non-white Magyars,Huns,Mogols and Turks but almost ALL the WN's and other racialists don't give a SHIT about them and you know that.How can u be a WN Racialist while respecting Turks...lol..funny shit
Also yeah I'm a big admired of Aryan religion and Culture as U can see,the culture is Pure,the religion is noble and flawless allthough I don't agree with holy cows but this is interpreted wrong by many,It's more a symbolic respect Hindus have for milk giving cows (milk=water=life)Hindus respect life.

Many WN Racialists are sharing the same ideology and fascination for the Aryan Hindu culture,even Hitler was impressed by this ancient never deveated and superior tibe called the Aryas,he even borrowed the name to use it for his own people!

Because I respect Aryan culture I'm kissing Indian ass?So you wan't to tell me Hitler kissed Indian ass?Did Savitri Devi(maximiani portas) the ultra-fascist woman kissed Indian ass?(lol.what are you talking about,they certainly not kissed turkish and mongol/magyar's non aryan ass.)
NO!! They respected the superior ancient tribe of the fierce Aryans,the nobles,creators of big civilizations in South Asia when in these times most (yes north) Europeans still lived in caves etc.
Do u think North Indian Brahmins even want to be of your kin (whatever) NO.They know their ancestors were the Aryans and not the Europeans the only people they want to be related to are the Aryan persians,well they are related.
Here : Iranian Aryans don't give a damn about Europe and western civilization

http://www.sumka.org/

U give me bare jokes: Magyars,Mongols,Turks lol alltogether the biggest threat to the Europeans,I can never ever respect these who killed many white Europeans and mongilized and converted parts of Europe.So I will never ever kiss THEIR ass,like you do, that's for sure,in that case I will rather kiss Indian ass as they haven't been a treat for white Europe in the past and never harmed Europe like these bastard Turks did.Turks also imported slavic white women and children to mic with their population,some white children were trained to be elite soldiers in the army hence some blonde looks lol its all a lie.
Maybe you don't get it because you don't live in Europe.Turks are hated very much here in Holland where I'm at.They only cause trouble,they're hated in Germany where there are large Turkish communities and let's not start on eastern-Europe lol.All the heroin sold and smoked and injected in europe is brought here by Turks (who have heroin opium planters in Afghanistan and Pak) they are the heroin wholesalers here lol,killing thousands of whites a year and u like Turks?


TURKS CAN FUCK OFF OUT OF EUROPE FOREVER


http://www.hindu-mythology.com/photone/swastik.jpg

Nordhammer
Wednesday, May 7th, 2003, 06:07 PM
Originally posted by ROMA
Anyway I'm Italian and I have seen enough Indians in India itselve so let me judge if they could pass as an Italian or not,ofcourse they're not Italians but it's just an example,some look western med.And the woman in the pic could pass like one trust me 100%.

People should "trust you" regardless of their eyes, genetic studies and common sense? lol I have a great idea, take your Italian self out of the Nordland and move to India so you can be with your people.


Originally posted by ROMA

Of course Indians look down on British but they won't tell you in your face.Why?Because they are very hospitable and well mannered people.The reason also they know their part of their ancestors were the REAL tribe to call themselve Arya and not the Germanics for which Hitler borrowed the name Aryan for.Aryans were meds.

Why should they look down on the British? All India does is copy the culture, technology and fashions of Nords and want to immigrate to our lands. They should revere the British and Nords alike. They should all be repatriated back to India.


Originally posted by ROMA

Blondism is in India but very rarely.Blonde and blue eyes isn't the beauty ideal in India though.Dark hair and dark eyes and light skin is the ideal,lately,coloured eyes are coming up but it hasn't been always like that especially in Bollywood folms,which i like,because these films are racialist if you look at them carefully and intensively.

Meaningless. Blondism also exists in Mongoloids, Negroids and Australoids. So what?

Nordhammer
Wednesday, May 7th, 2003, 06:12 PM
Originally posted by ROMA
You are being offensive again,Didn't u know one of the moderators RAHUL is Indian?
And uhm..so many members from here claimed they loved her looks and wouln't care to have her..so it must be jealousy obvious.

by the way
Turks are Non-White so are Magyars.
U still don't get it. Aryans are Vedic and Zoroastrian people.Turks are NEVER Aryan.
Turks besided Huns,Mongols,and Arabs were also a big threat to whites didn't u know?lol Turks.
your tryin to show me Turk celebrities?lol.I have been to Turkey.
They worshipped me because I told them I was Italian.Some of em girls are good looking,well yeah,some have med blood(the western ones) besides non white Turk blood.
bunch of wannabe Italians.lol.
Turks are non-whites non-Aryan and muslim lol.the website is full of muslims,I dont look at that.

You don't have Turks and Magyars as moderators here? I'm surprised.

What bottomfeeders want is of no importance to me. There are plenty of prowhite males who desire Asian women, and think of them as white.

ROMA
Wednesday, May 7th, 2003, 07:10 PM
India copying nord culture?lolll
what a joke

pro white(usually nordic)men that regard asian/oriental women as white?lol
who cares.


ur post is of absolute no relevance to my thread

Glenlivet
Wednesday, May 7th, 2003, 11:16 PM
Don't try the same methods you did in another forum, the Latin board on the "The Aryan Hindus". Don't waste your time, we DON'T care about Aryan this or that, especially when you connect it with racial types. It can be interesting to read about old customs, or read the old scriptures to understand some population migrations. But it won't change our daily life in EUROPE.

We are not blind, we can tell who is our kin by the morphology and pigmentation. I wonder if the "Nordish" concept (despite its partly political value, and that it's not a strictly homogenous group who differ in nasal shapes, head shape and cephalic index, vault being low or high) can be useful when it comes to these issues.






Originally posted by ROMA
India copying nord culture?lolll
what a joke

pro white(usually nordic)men that regard asian/oriental women as white?lol
who cares.


ur post is of absolute no relevance to my thread

Nordhammer
Thursday, May 8th, 2003, 12:07 AM
Originally posted by volksdeutsche
Don't try the same methods you did in another forum, the Latin board on the "The Aryan Hindus". Don't waste your time, we DON'T care about Aryan this or that, especially when you connect it with racial types. It can be interesting to read about old customs, or read the old scriptures to understand some population migrations. But it won't change our daily life in EUROPE.

We are not blind, we can tell who is our kin by the morphology and pigmentation. I wonder if the "Nordish" concept (despite its partly political value, and that it's not a strictly homogenous group who differ in nasal shapes, head shape and cephalic index, vault being low or high) can be useful when it comes to these issues.

I don't know why you cast doubt on Nordish everytime you use the name and follow it with a long explanation. If it's too mindboggling for people, consider this - racial types not indigenous to the nation's foundation should not be there.

To ROMA: All of the white males I've known who mated with Asians and called them white were not Nordic. One is the Egyptian VP of NAAWP with a fully Asian wife and hybrids kids.

Evolved
Thursday, May 8th, 2003, 08:27 AM
When did I worship a Türk? I posted a link to a site about a pretty, Europid Türk woman. This shows your bias is cultural and not racial, as the Türk woman is much more acceptable for Europe than this Brahmin.

I was good friends with a Türk in my school days, that's all. There are people of Türk culture (in Türkiye and beyond) who are racially white, what do you think of them? It's a diverse culture group. There are racial types in Türkiye which would fit into Europe and others who would not, don't you think? Who cares about which ethno-linguistic branch they are from, why should that matter. Share your feelings about the Ural-Altaic Eesti, Suomi, and Magyar people of Europe. :)

I'm proud of my non-Aryan Ural-Altaic ancestry. You can say whatever you want about that. :)

The real Aryan Scythians enjoyed marijuana. :chill This is fascinating:
http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/cannabis_history_hashish.shtml

It seems to me you've come to this board to prop up Indians and insult Europeans, saying how ugly real Nordids are. Considering that you're 100% Roman and not Indian yourself, this is unusual behavior.

India is an inferior country because it is filled with inferior people, who they are succesfully exporting to the United States and Europe. This to me is a big problem. I think I posted this before, but some of my Indian neighbors displayed some criminally perverse behavior, a 20-year-old Hindu raped and impregnated his 12-year-old sister. Have you looked at carvings depicting the Kama Sutra, where they illustrate homosexual sex acts and beastiality?

I worked with a Indian woman who was obviously of a lower caste (which most of the Indian immigrants to US are) and she told me she admired my fair hair and skin. A blond woman I know who visited Türkiye said she and other blond women experienced a lot of attention from would-be Türk gigolos, since her Nordic look is exotic to them. The idea that in Türkiye they worship the Mediterranean look is ridiculous, since the good majority of them are dark haired/dark eyed anyway. Are they stretching out their skulls to feign dolichocephaly? So many bleached blond women on their TV shows, I never saw any with dyed black hair, what would be the point.

Beef_Noodle
Thursday, May 8th, 2003, 02:27 PM
What a strange thread. I've never met a Hindu who claimed he wanted to be Italian, British or Nordic (??) nor have I met any that expressed a love for European culure, in fact I mentioned to a Hindu once that he could pass as a native European and he gave me a cold stare. And I have never ever met a Hindu who dyed his/her hair, that is what the Chinese people do (and I don't think its because they want to be European either, they are smart enough to know that changing their hair color won't change their race).

ROMA
Thursday, May 8th, 2003, 02:29 PM
again your making a fool out of yourself

which Indian woman is going to admire YOU?lol when the most beautiful women come from India,hence the dozens of miss universe, miss world ,miss asia winners in the pas decade.
This Brahmin women is a mrs world 2001,ull probably don't believe it so here's the link
http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/mar09/ent3.asp

I still don't get it,an Indian that admires YOU?Lolol soz but you aint exactly the beauty ideal for Indians trust me.Fair hair?lol isn't what they're into and your features..nah sorry
who cares if your friend was a turk(lol) or Türk like u want it to spell, Türkiye lol.
I have been to Turkey and it's a nice country but it don't mean nothing,I have been to Istanbul,Kusadasi and Alanya/Antalya..Turk playboys?lol I've seen em,bunch of wannabe Italians they love to imitate the Italian look and make cheap imitations of Italian designer clothes then show off with them.Turks loll.Have I ever stated they worship the med look in Turkey?Where the hell u got that from.lolol.And just think for a moment..any nordic/blond women visiting a med/non-blonde/non-white country will have much attention of the local 'players' isn't that a bit logical?......
ohh yeah btw EVEN TURKISH PEOPLE LOVE BOLLYWOOD FILMS
(LETS NOT TALK ABOUT THE ARABS) and they praise the beauty of Indian woman so lets not even go there.

(by the way whats with the spelling of Türkiye it's Turkey,we're talking English here,ud make me think your a turk yourself and proud of your culture)

Ok now let's face reality..
There are many Turks,Arabs and Indians here in Holland and almost all of them have had a sexual relationship with a white usually blond woman before marrying a woman from their own country.Blonde women are very easy to get for a man with exotic looks here..It's not like the men come up to them,no white women do.Even in Indian clubs in Bombay for example,ofcourse white women get in contact with local playboys,but that's sexual,which is diffrent then being a beauty,white women tend to dress far more sexy then (middle)eastern ones ofcourse!duh

Everyone knows the Scythians and Assasins (Hassisins->Hasheesh) consumed their cannabis...

I defend Indians because I visit they country almost every year,It's like a buzz that I have.I love their Aryan culture religion and mystic.I also love their food,It's the best(after Italian)
Some of my best friends are high caste Indians that study here in Holland at my uni and they are very intelligent people of whom you wouldnt win a debate with easily,trust me.I think Hindu people have contributed alot to todays society,such as mathematics ('stolen" by arabs) and the decimal system which is very useful isn't it.Heres some more invention by the Hindus,learn to respect them as almost every scientist does,we're talking about intelligent people here...

"a. India invented the Number System. Zero was invented by
Aryabhatta. India also invented decimal point.
b. The World's first university was established in Takshila in 700BC.
More than 10,500 students from all over the world studied more than
60 subjects. The University of Nalanda built in the 4th century BC
was one of the greatest achievements of ancient India in the field of
education.
c. India never invaded any country in her last 10000 years of history.
d. Sanskrit is the mother of all the European languages.
Sanskrit is the most suitable language for computer software -
a report in Forbes magazine, July,1987.
e. Ayurveda is the earliest school of medicine known to humans.
Charaka, the father of medicine consolidated Ayurveda 2500 years ago.
Today Ayurveda is fast regaining its rightful place in our civilization.
f. Although modern images of India often show poverty and lack of development,
India was the richest country on earth until the time of British invasion in
the early 17th Century.
g. The art of Navigation was born in the river Sindh 6000 years ago. The very word
Navigation is derived from the Sanskrit word NAVGATIH.
The word navy is also derived from Sanskrit 'Nou'.
h. Bhaskaracharya calculated the time taken by the earth to orbit the sun
hundreds of years before the astronomer Smart. Time taken by earth to orbit
the sun: (5th century) 365.258756484 days.
i. Budhayana first calculated the value of "pi", and he explained the
concept of what is known as the Pythagorean Theorem. He discovered this in the
6th century long before the European mathematicians.
j. Algebra, trigonometry and calculus came from India. Quadratic equations were
by Sridharacharya in the 11th century. The largest numbers the Greeks and the
Romans used were 10^6 whereas Hindus used numbers as big as 10^53
(10 to the power of 53) with specific names as early as 5000 BC during the
Vedic period. Even today, the largest used number is Tera 10^12
(10 to the power of 12).
k. According to the Gemological Institute of America, up until 1896,
India was the only source for diamonds to the world.
l. USA based IEEE has proved what has been a century old suspicions in the
world scientific community that the pioneer of wireless communication was
Prof. Jagdeesh Bose and not Marconi.
m. The earliest reservoir and dam for irrigation was built in Saurashtra.
n. According to Saka King Rudradaman I of 150 BC a beautiful lake called
'Sudarshana' was constructed on the hills of Raivataka during Chandragupta
Maurya's time.
o. Chess (Shataranja or AshtaPada) was invented in India.
p. Sushruta is the father of surgery. 2600 years ago he and health scientists of
his time conducted complicated surgeries like cesareans, cataract, artificial limbs,
fractures, urinary stones and even plastic surgery and brain surgery. Usage of
anesthesia was well known in ancient India. Over 125 surgical equipment was used.
Deep knowledge of anatomy, physiology, etiology, mbryology, digestion, metabolism,
genetics and immunity is also found in many texts.
q. When many cultures were only nomadic forest dwellers over 5000 years ago, Indians
established Harappan culture in Sindhu valley (Indus Valley Civilization)
r. The place value system, the decimal system was developed in India in 100BC.
s. India is the only country other than Japan, to have built a super computer
indigenously and US.
t. India is among the few countries in the world to have its own space
program and satellites.
u. Pentium chip was invented by an Indian.
v. India is the largest English speaking nation in the world.
w. India has the second largest pool of Scientists and Engineers in the World.
x. India is the largest Democracy in the World.
y. India is one of the few countries in the World, which gained independence without violence.
z. India has largest number of Pager and Cell phone subscribers.
Some More Interesting Facts about India and Indians
Albert Einstein said: "We owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to count,
without which no worthwhile scientific discovery could have been made."(even a jew had to admit it)
Mark Twain said: "India is, the cradle of the human
race, the birthplace of human speech, the mother of
history, the grandmother of legend, and the great grand
mother of tradition. Our most valuable and most
structure materials in the history of man are treasured
up in India only."
French scholar Romain Rolland said: "If there is one place on the face of earth
where all the dreams of living men have found a home from the very earliest days
when man began the dream of existence, it is India."

There are 3.22 Million Indians in America.
38% of Doctors in America are Indians.
12% of Scientists in America are Indians.
36% of NASA employees are Indians.
34% of MICROSOFT employees are Indians.
28% of IBM employees are Indians.
17% of INTEL employees are Indians.
13% of XEROX employees are Indians.

inferior IQ?I don't think so
They are the wealthiest ethnic group in the States (jews not included)

http://webtechstore.hypermart.net/nirmal/journal/rgohil01.html

Evene the Kama Sutra is practised by millions of couples in the world<it;s the best 'novel'written of sexual life ever,by certain techniques males and females can have orgasms that last like minutes and even longer.:rolleyes:
Beastiality and homosexuality?nah and if so these occur in everywhere in the world,Didn't u know the Turks have a thing for little boys?Turkey is the only eastern country where prostitution is offically legal,and yes I have seen them Russian 'Natashas" in every streetcorner in Istanbul at night.

What the hell have magyars and turks and huns done in the past for todays modern society?Nothing!look at this list.Look at the list of the inventions of the Romans and the Greeks!The words greatest ancient non-barbarian civilizations.

Indians love their own country and are proud and happy with what they are,but Turks lol they all want to move into (western) Europe when they can have their coffee in their coffeehouses,sittin all day,living on wellfare,at least Indians are hard working people,U dont know the story of Turks here in Europa at all!!They even want to become a member of the European Nation Lol!thats the only reason they supported the allies during the Iraq campaign.duh!Your in the States so you don't understand:

TURKS DON'T BELONG IN EUROPE

http://aishwariya.htmlplanet.com/cgi-bin/i/ash72.jpg
http://www.indiafm.com/posters/movies/03/dkr/still3.jpg
:rolleyes:
You see this woman?This is Aishwarya Rai miss world 1994,and most people on the miss world sites claim the most gorgeous miss world ever,here eyes are natural green/blue.Ofcourse you will find pictures of her with some darker tanned skin,well ofcourse India is hot!I have seen her films and Im a great fan of hers and NO turk woman can compete with here even pale like the death.She has fans alos in Turkey..Turks love the bollywood films but they used to be into it alot more 20 years ago,they even were popular in Russia.

Now here,this woman,u see,is what makes Indian people proud,even though most of 'em are poor,its belezze, and I sure wouldn't stop them.

Nordhammer
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 03:00 AM
Originally posted by ROMA
again your making a fool out of yourself

which Indian woman is going to admire YOU?lol when the most beautiful women come from India,hence the dozens of miss universe, miss world ,miss asia winners in the pas decade.
This Brahmin women is a mrs world 2001,ull probably don't believe it so here's the link
http://www.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/mar09/ent3.asp

I still don't get it,an Indian that admires YOU?Lolol soz but you aint exactly the beauty ideal for Indians trust me.Fair hair?lol isn't what they're into and your features..nah sorry
who cares if your friend was a turk(lol) or Türk like u want it to spell, Türkiye lol.

Are you sure you're Italian or are you one of these you refer to as passing for Italian? Roma is also a name for gypsies. Are you some nasty gypsy that doesn't bathe and steals from old white ladies?


Originally posted by ROMA

I have been to Turkey and it's a nice country but it don't mean nothing,I have been to Istanbul,Kusadasi and Alanya/Antalya..Turk playboys?lol I've seen em,bunch of wannabe Italians they love to imitate the Italian look and make cheap imitations of Italian designer clothes then show off with them.Turks loll.Have I ever stated they worship the med look in Turkey?Where the hell u got that from.lolol.And just think for a moment..any nordic/blond women visiting a med/non-blonde/non-white country will have much attention of the local 'players' isn't that a bit logical?......
ohh yeah btw EVEN TURKISH PEOPLE LOVE BOLLYWOOD FILMS
(LETS NOT TALK ABOUT THE ARABS) and they praise the beauty of Indian woman so lets not even go there.

Oh yeah, it's so nice, their idea of a toilet is a hole in the ground. You should have stayed, that lifestyle probably suits you.

Bollywood is a corny, tacky rip off of American films and music. Just like these Asians who mimic our culture.



Originally posted by ROMA
I defend Indians because I visit they country almost every year,It's like a buzz that I have.I love their Aryan culture religion and mystic.I also love their food,It's the best(after Italian)
Some of my best friends are high caste Indians that study here in Holland at my uni and they are very intelligent people of whom you wouldnt win a debate with easily,trust me.I think Hindu people have contributed alot to todays society,such as mathematics ('stolen" by arabs) and the decimal system which is very useful isn't it.Heres some more invention by the Hindus,learn to respect them as almost every scientist does,we're talking about intelligent people here...

India's national IQ is only 81. American Negroes have an average IQ of 85! India is just another 3rd world cesspool, whose only salvation is a small intellectual elite that barely survived the mongrelization. The truth is evident as to who is superior, as you and your dark brethren all immigrate to Nordish lands. You praise your people yet can't stand to live in your native lands. Your actions betray your words.

India is so great blah blah blah, and that's why you don't live there and so many Indians immigrate to Nordish nations at any chance they get. Indians go to Nordish countries to get educated, Nords don't go to India. The center of the human race is Nords, not Indians.



Originally posted by ROMA

There are 3.22 Million Indians in America.
38% of Doctors in America are Indians.
12% of Scientists in America are Indians.
36% of NASA employees are Indians.
34% of MICROSOFT employees are Indians.
28% of IBM employees are Indians.
17% of INTEL employees are Indians.
13% of XEROX employees are Indians.


Sounds like a bunch of nonsense. 38% of the doctors. lol I'm not familiar with all the Indian names, but I don't even see ONE on this list - http://info.med.yale.edu/yfp/best/bestny2002.html

I'd like to see the sources for this finding.

Where I live I've only seen 2 Indian doctors out of hundreds, mostly Nords, with many Jews. The number of Indian doctors here is on par with these halfwit African imports who can barely speak English much less practice medicine successfully. Although, I must say the Indian doctors are high quality here. One is a plastic surgeon who is quite good, and even though he's fully Indian he has no Indian accent but has a very strong Southern accent, it's funny.



Originally posted by ROMA

inferior IQ?I don't think so
They are the wealthiest ethnic group in the States (jews not included)

Judging Indians as a people, and not just a small elite, they are inferior in IQ. Their national IQ is a mere 81.
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/wealth_of_nations.htm


Originally posted by ROMA

http://aishwariya.htmlplanet.com/cgi-bin/i/ash72.jpg
http://www.indiafm.com/posters/movies/03/dkr/still3.jpg
:rolleyes:
You see this woman?This is Aishwarya Rai miss world 1994,and most people on the miss world sites claim the most gorgeous miss world ever,here eyes are natural green/blue.Ofcourse you will find pictures of her with some darker tanned skin,well ofcourse India is hot!I have seen her films and Im a great fan of hers and NO turk woman can compete with here even pale like the death.She has fans alos in Turkey..Turks love the bollywood films but they used to be into it alot more 20 years ago,they even were popular in Russia.


You can't get off of her can you. Negresses have been Miss America and Miss World also. So what. You want to start hyping up the blacks now? http://www.aaregistry.com/african_american_history/1293/Miss_World_crowns_first_Black_African

These competitions are heavily political and meaningless.

Nordhammer
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 03:06 AM
I believe they let Indian women win because they represent the mongrel ideal the Jews and their goy collaborators have for the world.

http://www.the-week.com/20dec17/events4.htm

She looks very similar to the triracial mongrels that come out of South America.

Nordhammer
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 03:10 AM
This is the kind of immigration America had when it was sane and ruled by its founding people. http://www.swedishamericanhist.org/arnoldbarton.html

Italia_Ariana
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 03:59 AM
I'm going to post this because it seems that there has been a few anti-italian posts because of Roma's fascination with India.

ROMA, are you crazy???

Why are you giving the impression that Indians and Italians are the same people?

I have nothing in common with those people, neither do all the other 56 million Italians.

Our nation is not a racemixing one! Our jewish ass-licking government reports that we have one of the best integration of immigrant programs in Europe, however that is only on the surfice.

I WILL NEVER BEFRIEND A COUSIN OF THE GYPSY!

Everyone, please don't believe all Italians are like that! We are a good white nation and many of us are working hard, every day and night to keep it that way.

Thank you

Buongiorno! :goodmorni

Nordhammer
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 04:09 AM
Originally posted by Italia_Ariana
I'm going to post this because it seems that there has been a few anti-italian posts because of Roma's fascination with India.

ROMA, are you crazy???

Why are you giving the impression that Indians and Italians are the same people?

I have nothing in common with those people, neither do all the other 56 million Italians.

Our nation is not a racemixing one! Our jewish ass-licking government reports that we have one of the best integration of immigrant programs in Europe, however that is only on the surfice.

I WILL NEVER BEFRIEND A COUSIN OF THE GYPSY!

Everyone, please don't believe all Italians are like that! We are a good white nation and many of us are working hard, every day and night to keep it that way.

Thank you

Buongiorno! :goodmorni

Don't mess with an Italian woman. :)

Italia_Ariana
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 04:20 AM
Già! Italian women are the best, I'm proud to be inamoured with one of them. Soon, we will have lllooootttss of white children.

Roma, leave those Indian whores and find yourself a nice Roman girl, eh?

Mussolini was influenced by all the women he was with:
1. The socialist one
2. The jewish, but pro fascist
3. After 1938 he found a nice mistress who was antisemetic too!

Good for Il Duce!

Alessandra Mussolini (Il Duce's grandaughter) is one of the most respected politicians in Italy. Thank God for the Mussolini family.

I got to get some sleep! CCIIAAOO!!!!:)

Sigrun Christianson
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 04:32 AM
I don't consider her white and I'm not jealous. :)

Evolved
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 05:27 AM
I think ROMA is racemixing with an Indian female and feels the need to justify it constantly. I'm just so sure she's a perfectly white Brahmin and 1000% more beautiful than a Scandinavian supermodel. x_p

I know I can't be compared with an Indian woman, but that in my mind is a very good thing. It's like comparing a blonde or redhead angel in a Botticelli painting to an orangutan. :D

Aishwarya Rai: Ooooh! An Indian with green eyes! In Europeans this is not an accomplishment. I'm not jealous of saucer lips and yellow skin. :rolleyes:

The last thing I'm going to say about Indians or India:

Indians suck, they have an overpopulated third world country and their films (yes, I've watched Bollywood crap) are annoying as hell. Their music and singing I can't stand to listen to it, a lot of high-pitched squealing "AIIIiiiieeeaiiiEEEEiiieeeaaaii!"and sitars. Aryans were not Indian, so worshipping Indians for the Aryan culture brought to them by invaders from Russia is illogical. If I adored the "Spanish culture" of the Mexicans or Filipinos, would that not sound just a bit retarded? Indians can pucker up their big brown lips and kiss my pretty pink ass. x_p

Evolved
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 05:59 AM
Originally posted by ROMA


again your making a fool out of yourself


No, you are, and constantly.



which Indian woman is going to admire YOU?


I imagine the vast majority would be jealous of me because I'm white and they are brown. But I don't really know, they smell like week old curry so I try to avoid being in their presence.



lol when the most beautiful women come from India,hence the dozens of miss universe, miss world ,miss asia winners in the pas decade.


I'm not a beauty pageant contestant or some attention starved model/actress/prostitute who'll do anything to be famous. I guarantee you I have more dignity and self-respect than any of these shit-skinned shiva lovers you keep posting.



This Brahmin women is a mrs world 2001,ull probably don't believe it so here's the link


No, I don't believe it, a mongrel being proped up as the most beautiful woman on earth?! Vin Diesel, Halle Berry, Denzel Washington and Keanu Reeves are also often listed as 4 of the world's sexiest people.




I still don't get it,an Indian that admires YOU?Lolol soz but you aint exactly the beauty ideal for Indians trust me.Fair hair?lol isn't what they're into and your features..nah sorry


I still don't get what your purpose is at this forum. This isn't the self-hating white forum for those who cry themselves to sleep each night because they weren't born as a brown Hindu.

Post your picture, let's see the Roman ideal. :)



who cares if your friend was a turk(lol) or Türk like u want it to spell, Türkiye lol.


Who cares if you want to stick your manicotti up some dothead's sari?



(by the way whats with the spelling of Türkiye it's Turkey,we're talking English here,ud make me think your a turk yourself and proud of your culture)


I feel closer to the Türk people than I do to Indians.



TURKS DON'T BELONG IN EUROPE


Neither do "high caste Brahmins," you ass.

ROMA
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 08:37 PM
lol
jealousy is for the weak

and uhm..lol she is a mrs world and uhm..lol
sorry ..but...I hope this is not trolling..but..You are NOT attractive you get me

and do Indian Brahmins want to be European as most are rich in India and Turks lol(ur related yeah i knew that) turks want to become a member of the EU lol related to turks..I rather be related to Aryans.Turks my ass.Lol ur engaged to A hungar?you sur hes not a muslim?and if he isnt and ur moving to hungary u will see what they say if u feel related to Turks.LOL! apparantly u dont know europe.muhahahah the hate against the turks is the biggest in east europe where u like to settle,how ironic.

Nah no Indian woman will be jelous of you,ever.the dont like pink they like milky skin which you have not.
the model is was the most beautiful married woman on earth among dozens of blondes scandinavians germans whatever..she beat them all..maybe its the aura.

Im introduced by this forum by Hindu called RAHUL,who is an aryan moderator here,a wise and intelligent man.hes allowed to moderate here do u ever think a Turk would be allowed to do that LOLLL

Maybe you are living in some sort of fantasy world or something,turkish lol.
U don't even know the problems of Turks in europe,when did I ever state Brahmins belong in Europe LOL cant u read?you just keep on making a fool out of yourself,and it's getting worse

My purpose?whats yours A white Racialist that respects and feels related to Turks(lol)Huns AND magyars together the biggest threat to white Europe.
compare that to me: An Italian racialist,mediterannist,and vedic Aryanist,I study vedic Aryan culture,which is probably too difficult for you, which is still present in India,at least Indians were never a treath to the white europeans.
Have you ever heard of 14 words,maybe you should read em again!

ROMA
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 08:43 PM
Lol@Italia Ariana you so funny
ofcourse I love Roman women,They are the best!!
Dark haired Roman women xxx
si and don't call Indian women whores they are respected,did you know alot Italians(also racialists )visit India alot?per favore don't judge them ok.
their civilization was great when Roma was great,they are not barbari.

ROMA
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 08:47 PM
Nordhammer : The center of the human race is Nords, not Indians.
lolol
you really think that?and how high might your IQ be if im allowed to ask..
lol

Nordhammer
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 10:47 PM
Originally posted by ROMA
Nordhammer : The center of the human race is Nords, not Indians.
lolol
you really think that?and how high might your IQ be if im allowed to ask..
lol

"In 1952, on the fifth anniversary of independence, the Indian government commissioned a survey to find out if the average Indian villager had heard yet that the British had gone. The study was quietly cancelled when early results showed that the average villager had never heard that the British had ever arrived!" :D

I'm smarter than the average bear. :)

ROMA
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 11:52 PM
lol
is that supossed to be funny?
do you know how many people there are in India and how big the country is?I don't think so
lol smarter then the average bear,well so are niggers(I hope)

ROMA
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 12:55 AM
I don't think so
Indian women are known to be one of the finest in the world
Aiswarya Rai ,Miss World 1994,from India has been chosen to be the most gorgeous miss world ever.

the negro women,well yes THAT is another story of positive discrimination.

Italia_Ariana
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 03:54 AM
Originally posted by ROMA
Lol@Italia Ariana you so funny
ofcourse I love Roman women,They are the best!!
Dark haired Roman women xxx
si and don't call Indian women whores they are respected,did you know alot Italians(also racialists )visit India alot?per favore don't judge them ok.
their civilization was great when Roma was great,they are not barbari.

Italians go to India because we are a people of exploration and travel.

Their civilization was great when they had a defined white class! They're a mess now, Roma.

I know a few Indians at the University I go to, and they are treated like every single foreigner here.

We have no pseudopanmediterraneanist special treatment with them!

The ancient civilization which we Italians feel close to are the Greeks. I would gladly fight alongside my Greek brothers and sisters to expel the nonwhites from their land.

LadyGoeth,

Please don't slander the modern Romans. There are alot of Roman WNs and are trying to cure Italy's most multicultural city. Thanks.

ROMA
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 05:00 AM
no thats not true italia ariana ..Indian people are not treated like the north african magreb scum we got,i hate these bums that dont do shit just sit on their ass...

Evolved
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 07:18 AM
I've never seen an Indian with milky (as in white, not chocolate milk) skin. :)

I've made it clear that your opinion of my looks means absolutely nothing to me. Myself being the antithesis of a darky, I don't wonder why you think I'm so ugly. You also insulted another woman here, comparing her to a cro-magnon. Nothing Aryan about your behavior in this regard. x_nono

It is true, the average Hungarian has no love for Türkiye or it's people, due to the occupation by the Ottomans. Huns were indeed Türk. Many people feel Attila is the father of Hungary. The Magyar Chief Árpad considered himself a direct descendant of Attila and the land once ruled by the Hun king was his birthright. Through all Hungarian history, Attila has been regarded highly as a patriotic figure and inspiration. :)

There is at least one Türk on this message board I'm sure. Otherwise I could invite some Türks here, if Indians are welcome I don't see why Türks would not be. :)

omnu
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 01:14 PM
Yet another reason why I hate all non aryan people......

Iranians are even more whiter than Turks,you pathethic mongol lover.

Ederico
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 03:12 PM
Originally posted by ladygoeth33
There is at least one Türk on this message board I'm sure. Otherwise I could invite some Türks here, if Indians are welcome I don't see why Türks would not be. :)

I would rather not see the board flooded with Turks. Obviously if they are intelligent and supportive of our cause, that could be different. Some Turks are Europid too, but when Culture and Religion get included in Racialism they get excluded.

Katinkatze
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 04:31 PM
I think what ROMA is saying is a whole load of crap... I mean c'mon... i must admit this brahmin whore IS goodlooking but have you ever been to india??? for goodness sake, if you go there all you see there are dark women and men alike and they all look pure mudd.... sickening... I myself like india, my grans have visited it many times, I myself shall go some time but there is no way an indian can look even averagely good looking... no way! And personally I think LadyGoeth33 had some good points there, totally agree with her... I really dont think she's being jealouse...but shes being what she is a good racialist... not like some of you guys in here who seem to be all "ohh I'm a big boy now i go around being all proud I'm a racist and stuff" and then you get a watery mouth for a mudd! sick! in these cases some of you make me embarrased that you call yourself what you say you are... i.e good racists/ racialists... whichever....

And so what if alot of miss wolrlds were won by indians or whatever! Only god knows how much effing there is at the side! and did you ever think a moment that more than half the judges usually are either black or asian??? so there goes the point down the drain... just coz these contests are won by them it REALLY doesnt mean their race is the finest etc etc... far from it...

ROMA
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 04:53 PM
:rolleyes:
wow you make sense
you must be the most intelligent person of Malta
lolol
when did Miss Malta ever win anything compared to the at least 8 miss universes,miss worlds,miss asia pacifics,mrs worlds miss tourism the last 10 years,Miss Italia not doing bad.I mean what is Malta,some people don't even know Malta lol.

ROMA
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 04:55 PM
Lol@Turks on this board
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
where and are they muslim?lol
they bastardized half of the Balkan and they can join this forum?lol
says who!who are you to invite Turks on this board
RAHUL,who is moderator actually lives in India!

Ederico
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 05:00 PM
ROMA I suggest you do not laugh much. We have no policy regarding the presence of Non-Europeans at this board. There is quite a fair amount of freedom in who registers here, yet the identity of this board is of a Racialist one.

Azdaja
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 05:48 PM
Carlton Coon had a theory that there were pockets of Turkey - mainly in the North - where members of the Corded-Ware/Battle-Axe race still exist in relatively speaking large numbers.
After talking with Volks a few days back, I now know Coon is not the only Anthropologist to hold to this view.
The B.A.s, by the way, are of the same racial type as the original Indo-Aryans.

Now what this means is that there are Turks out there who have more of a right to consider themselves RACIALLY "Aryan" than probably any Indian does, because unlike 99.9% of Indians, these small pockets of Turkish BAs are racially uncontaminated.

I'm not a supporter of Turks or anything, but Jesus Christ...it's hypocritical to go Turk bashing while having some obsession with Indians. Especially in light of the above information.

I admit - without second thought - that that Indian model is hot. But it's obvious from a few of the pics that Volks posted that she is not "pure" Europid by any means....unfortunantly, lol.
Let those of us who are attracted to some few non-Europids that we've come across acknowlege it truthfully, but at the same time let's not justify our attractions by trying to paint the non-white objects of our attraction as "pure" or "racially safe" to have sex/relations with.

ROMA
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 09:52 PM
Turks were never the ones to call themselves Aryan whatsoever,pure or not pure.

Azdaja
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 10:20 PM
<< Turks were never the ones to call themselves Aryan >>

So? Did you notice how I wrote the word "RACIALLY" in all-caps? I did it to stress the fact that I was refering to the race of the BAs and not to Aryan culture.
Are we talking about race or culture here? A negro can move to Sweden and adopt their language/culture. Does it make him Europid?
You keep confusing race and culture.

ROMA
Sunday, May 11th, 2003, 01:55 AM
nah Turks were and are not of the Aryan race ever
lol@turks

Evolved
Sunday, May 11th, 2003, 02:51 AM
Who said anything about Iranians, we've been talking about Indians. This is just from my own observations, but I'd estimate 1 out of 1,000 Iranians are "white," as in racially European.
Probably a similar number with Türkiye. Being whiter than Türks, eh? I suppose that is a thing of national pride. :D

http://www.iranianpersonals.com/homepages/Ir/IP/images/pic1.jpg

Indeed, being Iranian is probably so beautiful. For that reason it is so mysterious as to why so many of them leave Iran for Europe and America. Perhaps their goal is to better the quality of life of uncivilized barbarian people with their very presence?

Are you sure about mongols?

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/racial_studies/files/gene.gif

http://www.iranianpersonals.com/homepages/Ir/IP/images/pic2.jpg


Originally posted by omnu
Yet another reason why I hate all non aryan people......
Iranians are even more whiter than Turks,you pathethic mongol lover.

torrent
Sunday, May 11th, 2003, 04:21 AM
Originally posted by ROMA
Lol@Turks on this board
LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
where and are they muslim?lol
they bastardized half of the Balkan and they can join this forum?lol
says who!who are you to invite Turks on this board
RAHUL,who is moderator actually lives in India!

yep they can and even they have done it. secularity is not the right word because it has antireligious properties the word used in turkey is laicist and 99,9% of turks are muslim as in the case of mine. bastardization not only happened in balkans after the bulgarians were divided into five one part went noth italy and got assimilated among romans. mama mia turks are already here.
about prostitution, which i dislike to talk about but you seem to be very intersted in, still they are human beings and government takes care of them not to get ill or be extremely abused even if we or you do not like the situation. otherwise you will find anything anywhere illegally but it would be out of control and far dangerous.
i think you are the last one to moralize sex because in the case of sexual industry turkey can never compete. if the case is sex turkey is very conservative. and if it is pedofilia, homosexuality turkey can never compete in these areas, either. you may criticize turks in many other points but your prefererrals really make me wonder. if you would please, i want to be leaving you with your dark thoughts alone.
i have never been to india but i had seen some indians they were dark but very gracile far more gracile than the woman you want to impose, whose type is nowhere the majority because it cannot be, for such mixtures in such amounts are hard to achieve in stabilization.
i can add that there was a chandrasekhar from india who calculated how big a black hole could be. indians are very intelligent people and they are diverse many religions many types and still wonderfull architecture and wisdom like ayur veda. and i cannot understand why you want to alienate the taj mahal, which was made by the help of architects from Istanbul, to India and which is definitely a part of indian heritage. if you do not want it we would be glad to move it here. nikea consule the elimination of arius, nestorios, orthodoxy catholic restoration, protestanism anabaptists from munster agnostism, jews muslims or SCI. everyone is free to chose their own religion and a man will definitely defend what he believes in this is what a man must do but the way is not attacking or deprasing other religions. practicing or belieivng in what you believe as much as you can is all you can do. so go to a church and confess for you have sinned.
i was not invited i came by myself i had not planned to post but some really good discussions (surely not this one) took place and i could not help posting and i will be posting more. watch me.
i suddenly realized with a flash in my mind(it sometimes happens to me) in fact you do not like indians. you go here and there and rumble around because you feel yourself superior than indians. yes clearly i can see it and you seem to praise them (some of them in fact a small minority) only to make yourself higher. for you feel, how intelligent or white they are, you are still superior in your mind. evil ways.
anyway still best regards
i wish you a happy life but i wish it will be far away from me but we can go on talking so please feel free to post your darkest thoughts.
mostly i would not be posting on such threads about turks at least lately. this one is a rare one in the recent times except the ones about anthropology but i think you were abit out of controll. to be frank very mediterranean behaviour. do not worry we are not much different behaviorally

Azdaja
Sunday, May 11th, 2003, 01:17 PM
<< nah Turks were and are not of the Aryan race ever
lol@turks >>

This is the fourth or fifth time you've responded to someone's arguments/points with a 1 or 2 line nonsensical post.
Next time you disagree with someone in this forum (ie: Racial Studies/Anthropology) you WILL give some valid reasons for doing so, or you will be banned.

ROMA
Sunday, May 11th, 2003, 01:24 PM
No your wrong my friend..I feel equal to white brahmins of India..when I sit on the terras,talking to them,discussing scientficical topics etc etc.
I do not even feel superior towards the lower castes.I feel one in India.


I'm not full of hate like some are here on this board,because people that are full of hate are usually very unhappy people and try to hold on to thoughts,like feeling superior,thinking it wil make them stronger because they have low self esteem.But this feeling of superiority is not long lasting because the hate will get stronger,because of increasing jealousy towards the hated so it is like a vicious circle...jealousy is for the weak

Glenlivet
Sunday, May 11th, 2003, 04:33 PM
Thanks for your thoughts. It touched me. I tend to agree with the last part about the fake praising of a minority (like saying we accept some of you, but not the majority, it's like creating divisions among them) of the Indians. It's not even very racial, more about customs. Why should a North Indian Brahmin have more in common with a South Italian than another Indian?

Kashmir had influence from Central Asia (that is the source of the blondism found there, which is still rare), and you probably know it too. But that woman is just totally fake.

I thought that Shah Jehan decided to build the Taj Mahal as a tribute for Mumtaz Mahal. I thought a Turk designed it, and with a symmetrical Persian plan. Look at the dome.

The Mughals (the Persian word for Mongol) had a lot of power in India during the 17th century. They spread Persian culture to India.

I know that you want to be polite and you made some compliments, although he hurt your feelings. That was honourable.






Originally posted by asparukh
yep they can and even they have done it. secularity is not the right word because it has antireligious properties the word used in turkey is laicist and 99,9% of turks are muslim as in the case of mine. bastardization not only happened in balkans after the bulgarians were divided into five one part went noth italy and got assimilated among romans. mama mia turks are already here.
about prostitution, which i dislike to talk about but you seem to be very intersted in, still they are human beings and government takes care of them not to get ill or be extremely abused even if we or you do not like the situation. otherwise you will find anything anywhere illegally but it would be out of control and far dangerous.
i think you are the last one to moralize sex because in the case of sexual industry turkey can never compete. if the case is sex turkey is very conservative. and if it is pedofilia, homosexuality turkey can never compete in these areas, either. you may criticize turks in many other points but your prefererrals really make me wonder. if you would please, i want to be leaving you with your dark thoughts alone.
i have never been to india but i had seen some indians they were dark but very gracile far more gracile than the woman you want to impose, whose type is nowhere the majority because it cannot be, for such mixtures in such amounts are hard to achieve in stabilization.
i can add that there was a chandrasekhar from india who calculated how big a black hole could be. indians are very intelligent people and they are diverse many religions many types and still wonderfull architecture and wisdom like ayur veda. and i cannot understand why you want to alienate the taj mahal, which was made by the help of architects from Istanbul, to India and which is definitely a part of indian heritage. if you do not want it we would be glad to move it here. nikea consule the elimination of arius, nestorios, orthodoxy catholic restoration, protestanism anabaptists from munster agnostism, jews muslims or SCI. everyone is free to chose their own religion and a man will definitely defend what he believes in this is what a man must do but the way is not attacking or deprasing other religions. practicing or belieivng in what you believe as much as you can is all you can do. so go to a church and confess for you have sinned.
i was not invited i came by myself i had not planned to post but some really good discussions (surely not this one) took place and i could not help posting and i will be posting more. watch me.
i suddenly realized with a flash in my mind(it sometimes happens to me) in fact you do not like indians. you go here and there and rumble around because you feel yourself superior than indians. yes clearly i can see it and you seem to praise them (some of them in fact a small minority) only to make yourself higher. for you feel, how intelligent or white they are, you are still superior in your mind. evil ways.
anyway still best regards
i wish you a happy life but i wish it will be far away from me but we can go on talking so please feel free to post your darkest thoughts.
mostly i would not be posting on such threads about turks at least lately. this one is a rare one in the recent times except the ones about anthropology but i think you were abit out of controll. to be frank very mediterranean behaviour. do not worry we are not much different behaviorally

ROMA
Sunday, May 11th, 2003, 05:05 PM
Yes that's true the Taj was designed by Turks
also all the worker slaves that worked on it had their hands chopped of after the building was finished so that they could never make something like that again..
It's a beautful grave tomb I have seen it several times,very romantic to visit with your loved one.

On the same place were the Taj was built used to be a gigantic Hindu temple which was destroyed by barbaric mughals..

Volksdeutsche u made an interesting statement about the impact of kashmir on Central Asia can you tell me more about it?

Asparukh,I'm sorry I offended you I did not mean to..may I ask you where u from?

Katinkatze
Sunday, May 11th, 2003, 11:14 PM
Originally posted by ROMA
:rolleyes:
wow you make sense
you must be the most intelligent person of Malta
lolol
when did Miss Malta ever win anything compared to the at least 8 miss universes,miss worlds,miss asia pacifics,mrs worlds miss tourism the last 10 years,Miss Italia not doing bad.I mean what is Malta,some people don't even know Malta lol.

Oh Mr.I'm-So-Smart-I-Know-It-All.... if theres one thing about ANYONE that i hate most is a damn smart ass attitude and you aright now are getting such an attitude, and I REALLY dislike it... you dont have to be all sarcastic and stuff if theres something you dont like you just say it instead of being a chauvinist-pig.

and so what if maltese women have never won any beauty beagants, at least theyr not sluts like most of the other contestants are, and still doesnt justify your lusting for non-whites... and howcome your so proud of them??? are you one of them by anychance???

oh and the fact that many poeple havent heard of malta is only through their own ignorance.

Ominous Lord Spoonblade
Monday, May 12th, 2003, 03:18 AM
Originally posted by Thorburn
India also has more than 1,000,000,000 inhabitants, compared to about 350,000 for Malta, I believe. That makes an enormous difference: if India's average IQ would be 100, Malta would need an average IQ of 150 to produce the same amount of geniuses (at a SD of 15). Similarly, if the populations in Malta and India would be equally beautiful, India would have to produce about 3,000 times more Miss Worlds and Miss Universes than Malta to stay pari. ;)

Kind regards,

- Thorburn

aahh....what a beautiful display of logic may I add :)

ROMA
Monday, May 12th, 2003, 10:04 AM
http://www.fashionindia.net/models/female/images_new/neha2_big.jpg

"mixed type" yet sharp featured

http://www.fashionindia.net/models/female/images_new/neha2_big.jpg

Azdaja
Monday, May 12th, 2003, 11:24 AM
Originally posted by ROMA
No your wrong my friend..I feel equal to white brahmins of India..when I sit on the terras,talking to them,discussing scientficical topics etc etc.
I do not even feel superior towards the lower castes.I feel one in India.


I'm not full of hate like some are here on this board,because people that are full of hate are usually very unhappy people and try to hold on to thoughts,like feeling superior,thinking it wil make them stronger because they have low self esteem.But this feeling of superiority is not long lasting because the hate will get stronger,because of increasing jealousy towards the hated so it is like a vicious circle...jealousy is for the weak

I was probably too hard on you. I don't like acting like a 'tough guy' from behind the safety of my computer screen. It's just that all the mods are 'under orders' to be extra-tough on rule-breakers for the time being, mainly to make the board a bit more disciplined. Things were pretty bad here for awhile.
You usually make good posts, and I don't want to ban you. Just take it easy on the smart ass replies for awhile.
Thanks. :)

Sigrun Christianson
Monday, May 12th, 2003, 01:42 PM
ROMA,

You keep stating that India has many beauty contest winners, but so what? What is the significance? Did you see Sweden's entry into the Miss Universe contest? She's a Negro! The rest of the contestants were not great beauties either.

These contests are meaningless and I think most people see them as a joke, I certainly do. I've seen more beautiful, poised and dignified women walking down the street than are in these silly contests.

Now, what would be cool to see is a contest in which each country sends the woman most representative of the country's sub-racial type. I would watch that.

Let's have a Miss Alpine, Miss Brünn, Miss Trĝnder, etc. contest. :P

-Sigrun

ROMA
Monday, May 12th, 2003, 03:21 PM
nah
Indian women are known for their beauty I'm a big fan of beauty pageants so trust me

and uhm about the..
Let's have a Miss Alpine, Miss Brünn, Miss Trĝnder, etc. contest. :P
miss med would win anyway
x_p
I don't know,why segregate em like that
It's about the most beautiful of the world
The Swedish negro woman was apparantly a half blood because she wasn't ugly,just not my taste..
How do you know the women weren't beautiful,were you present at the contest?Pictures don't mean a thing you know.
the slavic,spanish,Italian and Indian women are usually the most beautiful in my opinion.Also the greek girls,,damn and usually very tall..woah!
The south American women are usually very fake(plastic surgery)


Iovvs Optimvs Maximvs :

My Italian sukz,I was raised in the Netherlands I have told many times
and I don't feel like getting personal with you..sorry lol

Evolved
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 05:44 AM
If you asked a room full of White men: "Where in the world can you find the most beautiful women?" I really wonder how many besides yourself would say "India." :)

http://www.fashionindia.net/models/female/neha_dhupia.htm

Colour of Hair: Brown
Colour of Eyes: Dark-Brown

http://www.fashionindia.net/models/female/images_new/neha1_big.jpg

I think using colored contacts must be a common thing with Indian models, because in one picture they'll have black eyes, the next one blue or green. You can tell this is a contact because her pupils are too large, and she is under a very bright light. :eek:

ROMA
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 08:53 AM
any 'normal' man would ofcourse choose it's own country ,and you don't have to be white for that..a Turk would call his country the most beautiful,a chinaman would call chinese women the most beautifu.its a normal reaction ladygoeth,which u don't seem to understand.

I would ofcourse say Italian women are beaautiful (wel in fact they are ;) natural beauties ) but besides I just lke the (Indian) med type,it's matter of taste I would say

(nord european) white men are usually not familiar with Hindi films.but most of inhabitants of the mediterannean (egypt,syria,turkey,north africa) countries and the middle eastern ones know em.and trust me if you start on Indian women with them,they will tel you Indian women are gorgeous.

When Alexander entered India (where he actually got beaten by king Poros) he noticed the remarkable beauty of the Kashmiri and Punjabi women (and so have I,lol)He described the beauty of the women in his diaries.A lot of Greek soldiers settled in certain parts near Kandahar,Afghanistan(in those times part of Hindustan) Creating the Greco Bactrian empire,the Greeks converted to Buddhism and Hinduism.And some near the Himalayas,where red haired people are not uncommon,usually regared as descendants of these Greek soldiers.
Alexander wasn't the only one,alo the Mughal, Turk, Persian and Arab muslim invaders were stunned by their beauty.

The picture of Neha you posted (lol@u) she does wear contacts,her eyes are brown,but u can see without make up she is still a natural beauty.U seem so full of jealousy..:rolleyes:
she was a miss India and she place among the semi finalist in miss Universe 2 years ago.

So what i'm trying to say is most men would choose heir own country if ud ask em where the most beautiful women come from (duh) which is a logical reaction.But most men on this board agreed,the women I have posted here are very fine looking,to your disgust.

Stríbog
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 08:58 AM
Let's have a Miss Alpine, Miss Brünn, Miss Trĝnder, etc. contest. :P

Ok, but I want the phone #'s of the Miss Brünn, Miss Phallian, Miss Trĝnder, Miss Anglo-Saxon, Miss Hallstatt, and Miss Neo-Danubian winners. :gift

ROMA
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 10:39 AM
As long as I get the number of all the mediterannean contestants,all of them.x_p

ROMA
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 10:58 AM
.http://reshamonline.hypermart.net/gif/resham.jpg

A Punjabi woman
the slightly mongoloid features are certainly there in this example

Evolved
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 12:29 PM
Jealous of Indians! HAHAHAHA! Malaria, overpopulation, bathing in sacred sewage? No thanks. :)

I'm also not jealous of Nigerians or Palestinians..

I don't care who you find attractive, it doesn't disgust me. Other than this Indian fetish you also described a Swedish mulatto as "not ugly" so I only assume your standards of beauty are very low or you're mentally deranged.

What I find odd about your taste in women is that you make an effort to insult actual European women, but purposely show us the most Europid-looking women in South Asia. I believe it is another case of Mediterranean inferiority complex (so common, as WN seem to focus mostly on Nordish and related types). You're attracted to (or feign attraction to) the few darker semi-white people you can feel racially superior to, because your feelings are hurt by Nordicists and some part of yourself takes what they say to be true...

Asparukh and Volksdeutsche seem to agree here. :)

If Indians, Sri Lankans, Bangladeshis, Pakistanis, etc are all Meds according to you, are these women also Meds?

http://www.amymichelson.com/Selma_Hayek_4X6.JPG

http://www.absolutely.net/lopez/lop1a.jpg

ROMA
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 12:50 PM
lol ur so frustrated
you are jealous of mediterran beauty it's so obvious
every picture I post u analize like its your life
I never insulted European women,where did that come from
lol are you tripping?

I have never mentioned (dravidian) sri lankan,bengali or south Indian women as being mediterannean.lol what are you talking about.
lol@feeling hurt by nordicists?for what???
Im Roman!!Kelts and Germanics were slaves of Romans!why be jealous.

I have dated tons of nordic blonde women till i couldnt get enough,I live in Holland and Dutch women have a thing for south european men.lol as if you know your in the states loll.Lol @ insulted by nordics.I would never want to be nordic,theyre ofine by me,but I frankly don't care about Nordics.I have had enough of blonde women,Im not attracted to them anymore,they dont "have it",for me at least and I dont like their cooking skills..lol sorry.

Im a pure med. and proud!and if you don't like it? well...that's your problem isn't it.And no I'm not attracted to latinas of south america..its not my style,and i hate their accent. I like med women of the 'solid land' from south europe upto India except the med./semitic mixes in the middle east.
lol you got some serious issues here.


http://www.hotranks.com/images/picpolls/anitaayub.jpg

Punjabi woman

goidelicwarrior
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 02:07 PM
Originally posted by ladygoeth33
Jealous of Indians! HAHAHAHA! Malaria, overpopulation, bathing in sacred sewage? No thanks. :)

I'm also not jealous of Nigerians or Palestinians..

I don't care who you find attractive, it doesn't disgust me. Other than this Indian fetish you also described a Swedish mulatto as "not ugly" so I only assume your standards of beauty are very low or you're mentally deranged.

What I find odd about your taste in women is that you make an effort to insult actual European women, but purposely show us the most Europid-looking women in South Asia. I believe it is another case of Mediterranean inferiority complex (so common, as WN seem to focus mostly on Nordish and related types). You're attracted to (or feign attraction to) the few darker semi-white people you can feel racially superior to, because your feelings are hurt by Nordicists and some part of yourself takes what they say to be true...

Asparukh and Volksdeutsche seem to agree here. :)

If Indians, Sri Lankans, Bangladeshis, Pakistanis, etc are all Meds according to you, are these women also Meds?

http://www.amymichelson.com/Selma_Hayek_4X6.JPG

http://www.absolutely.net/lopez/lop1a.jpg med infieriority??? i think there are trolls onn the boards pretending to be " Meds " as you call them..... you could also claim that this complex is with so called " nords " who dream about the golden greek and Roman civilization wich have left Europe a legacy wich we live by today, law, rhetoric, art, arhitechture.. ???

ROMA
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 02:12 PM
I think your last sentence makes sense..

Nordhammer
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 06:13 PM
Originally posted by triskel
med infieriority??? i think there are trolls onn the boards pretending to be " Meds " as you call them..... you could also claim that this complex is with so called " nords " who dream about the golden greek and Roman civilization wich have left Europe a legacy wich we live by today, law, rhetoric, art, arhitechture.. ???

Yes, they left, they fell, they lost... and the modern world was created by Nordish genius. Nords are in control now. Deal with it. :)

ROMA
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 07:38 PM
what do nords control...lol..explain that to me
I dont think nords control a thing..and I think the jews control the nords
I think the nord race will be extinct in 100 years
due race mixing
nordic women seem to have a thing for darker species
I see it all around me in Holland

Mediteranneans of South Europe will always be there

these are the hard facts
and Rome will rise again

Ederico
Tuesday, May 13th, 2003, 07:50 PM
Originally posted by Nordhammer
Yes, they left, they fell, they lost... and the modern world was created by Nordish genius. Nords are in control now. Deal with it. :)

What do Nordics control exactly, they barely control Scandinavia since it is flooded with all sorts of Non-European Immigrants and any attempt to gain ground is confronted with a barrage of attacks due to the supposed evil of Racism and Nationalism. Nordish genius created the modern world, yeah, oh so true.

Scáthach
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 12:02 AM
miss holland is by far the most attractive!

Ederico
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 12:07 AM
Does Puerto Rico have a significant Europid population, perhaps due to Latin (real ones not those Central American and Hispanic fakes) settlers or something like that?

Nordhammer
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 01:32 AM
Originally posted by Thorburn
The Most Beautiful Miss Universe competition 2002, establishing the most beautiful Miss Universe ever (1952-2001), showed the following outcome:

#4.

http://www.globalbeauties.com/gb/universe/images/u01a.jpg

(Personally, I consider #4 most attractive, based on mere aestheticism.)

Kind regards,

- Thorburn

You consider Ms. Puerto Rico the most attractive? :confused:

Hans
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 01:33 AM
I’m going with Puerto Rico. Cmon, Holland’s hair is such a dye job and so “unnaturally” full/wavy…what have you.

While Puerto Rico may be part Amerindian, I have to give credit where credit is due.

Sigrun Christianson
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 02:12 AM
I think Sweden is the best looking from that group.

-Sig

Italia_Ariana
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 03:00 AM
Originally posted by ROMA

and Rome will rise again


Isn't that the truth! x_p

Nordhammer
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 03:12 AM
Originally posted by Thorburn
CIA World Factbook 2002

Puerto Rico

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/maps/rq-map.gif

Background:
Populated for centuries by aboriginal peoples, the island was claimed by the Spanish Crown in 1493 following Columbus' second voyage to the Americas. In 1898, after 400 years of colonial rule that saw the indigenous population nearly exterminated and African slave labor introduced, Puerto Rico was ceded to the US as a result of the Spanish-American War. Puerto Ricans were granted US citizenship in 1917 and popularly elected governors have served since 1948. In 1952, a constitution was enacted providing for internal self-government. In plebiscites held in 1967, 1993, and 1998 voters chose to retain commonwealth status.

Ethnic groups:
white (mostly Spanish origin) 80.5%, black 8%, Amerindian 0.4%, Asian 0.2%, mixed and other 10.9%

Very European values, and the same Factbook lists 9% whites, 60% mestizos, and 30% Amerindians for Mexico. Thus, the majority are with all probability racially unaltered Europids. Sounds like a good place to retire.

Kind regards,

- Thorburn

Now come on... you know better than that. You know these Medish males love dark meat. :) How South America defines white is a gross bastardization.

For your consideration:

http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/41/308.html

In August, 1999, I received a grant from the National Science Foundation to determine the continental origin of the mtDNA of Puerto Ricans through the analysis of a representative sample. To select the sample, we used a computer program that made a random selection of the total population of Puerto Rico based on the census of 1990. When corrected to take into account population growth in the last 10 years, the original 872 households chosen by the program became 1,073. To further insure the randomness of the sample, we requested hair root samples only from the adult in the household whose birthday most closely followed the date of the interview. We also interviewed the donors requesting information about their mothers, grandmothers, and great-grandmothers, as far back as they could remember, to learn of their origin. To date, 92% of the potential donors have agreed to participate, so that we have been able to collect hair samples from 781 residences.

What do the analyses of these samples suggest?
The results of the analyses of approximately 300 of these samples identify 62% as Amerindian, 30% as African blacks and 8% Caucasian.

Nordhammer
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 03:26 AM
Originally posted by Thorburn
Yes, she has the most gracile figure and face, and conveys the most noble expression of all three (or five) ladies. I like her proportions, too. —

Hmm, you're full of surprises. :)



Originally posted by Thorburn
I'm basing this merely on these two pictures, though. I might revise my judgment, if you find some horrible pictures of her without makeup and digital photo remastering. ;)

I dunno... she looks a lot like J-Lo to me. hehe Dark eyes and yellowish skin? Definitely not my type...



Originally posted by Thorburn
Her hair could be - and probably is - dyed, too, alone to give it more shine. Her natural hair color could be darker or within close range to the one she exhibits. It fits her very well, though. It's difficult to classify models, due to all the cosmetic and sometimes even plastic changes, but Mediterranean dominance in her heritage seems to be the safest bet.

Yes, I would bet her hair is dyed as well. I would say she is dominantly Med but probably not purely.

http://image.muzi.com/icon_c/29968_002_a.jpg

http://www.photorazzi.com/mas_assets/full/6668001.jpg

http://www.saigonnet.vn/vanhoa/tintuc/miss02/21-5/denise01.jpg

http://www.photorazzi.com/mas_assets/full/6668002.jpg

http://my.women.lycosasia.com/miss_uni2001/images/DeniseQ5.jpg

Nordhammer
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 03:29 AM
Originally posted by Scathach
miss holland is by far the most attractive!

Right on, I do too! She has lovely, naturally wavy blonde hair. She looks like an All-American type girl. :)

Nordhammer
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 03:33 AM
Originally posted by Hans
I’m going with Puerto Rico. Cmon, Holland’s hair is such a dye job and so “unnaturally” full/wavy…what have you.

While Puerto Rico may be part Amerindian, I have to give credit where credit is due.

She's a natural dark blonde with highlights, nothing extreme. Her hair is naturally wavy, UP-Nordic type hair, and it's been fluffed out because that was the 80's style.

I don't see anything remarkable about the Rican, really.

Hans
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 04:18 AM
OMG…the first pic of her on the top of this page is awesome! I’m butter just looking at her hair. That is exactly what I’m looking for. If that’s dyed, it’s a damn good job.



Sorry, there really is no hope for me is there? :AWW

goidelicwarrior
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 10:12 AM
Originally posted by Nordhammer
Right on, I do too! She has lovely, naturally wavy blonde hair. She looks like an All-American type girl. :)
acc to Discovery only 19% of North American women have naturally blond hair, does that make NA a Nord nation??

goidelicwarrior
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 10:25 AM
Originally posted by Nordhammer
Yes, they left, they fell, they lost... and the modern world was created by Nordish genius. Nords are in control now. Deal with it. :) where did they leave ? now tell me this... if the " nords " created all this.. why not in Germania??? Thats surely the purest spot, their ancestral home, so if that genious is so strong we should have been able to find marble columns in the these nord lands ? have they a colloseum there? only the fusion of Indoeuros and Etruscans for example formed the Roman empire and you know it.. and the power today is divided betwen the various European nations stretching from north to South... furthermore.. a lot of talking about the mongrelizations of the Roman empire, after more than 2000 years.. but how about the US wich is mongrelized after a mere 250 years of " history " and will not survive very long as it is, because a people without history or common values ( how can a nation of 100 races have common values) will not survive, deal with that !

Azdaja
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 02:32 PM
Originally posted by triskel
but how about the US wich is mongrelized after a mere 250 years of " history " and will not survive very long as it is, because a people without history or common values ( how can a nation of 100 races have common values) will not survive, deal with that !

Dude, you have got to stop confusing the following 2 things:
1) Multi-racial nation = nation in which many different races co-exist.
2) Mongrelization = the physical, genetic, mixing of racial types.

#1 does lead to #2, but they are not synonymous. The fact that the USA is a multi-racial nation does not mean that most white people living here have negroid, arabid, or mongoloid admixture. In fact, the great majority do NOT.
The situation in parts of southern Europe is ENTIRELY different. These areas are where the USA probably WILL be in about 500 years or so (if the country survives that long).
This is not to say that I think most people living in Southern Europe are mongrelized, but it DOES exist, and it exists to a much greater extent than in most other parts of Europe....and certainly to a greater extent than it occurs in the USA (going by percentage of the population, anyway).

The fact is, usually when I see a 'questionable' looking white person...the kind with arabid features, guess what? They are almost always 3rd or 4th generation Americans of Sicilian descent. And when I see dark skinned, pie faced, eurasian-looking 'white' people, they are usually 3rd or 4th generation Americans of Greek descent.
And the fact of the matter is that most Spainards - if they came to America - would be seen as 'minorities' or 'foreigners'. They would NOT blend in with white American society because white American society is, well, whiter than that of the Spanish.

Scáthach
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 03:30 PM
the puerto rican has a lovely smile in fairness to her but miss holland and miss sweden are both very ''classically'' beautiful and natural looking in my opinion.

goidelicwarrior
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 03:34 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja
Dude, you have got to stop confusing the following 2 things:
1) Multi-racial nation = nation in which many different races co-exist.
2) Mongrelization = the physical, genetic, mixing of racial types.

#1 does lead to #2, but they are not synonymous. The fact that the USA is a multi-racial nation does not mean that most white people living here have negroid, arabid, or mongoloid admixture. In fact, the great majority do NOT.
The situation in parts of southern Europe is ENTIRELY different. These areas are where the USA probably WILL be in about 500 years or so (if the country survives that long).
This is not to say that I think most people living in Southern Europe are mongrelized, but it DOES exist, and it exists to a much greater extent than in most other parts of Europe....and certainly to a greater extent than it occurs in the USA (going by percentage of the population, anyway).

The fact is, usually when I see a 'questionable' looking white person...the kind with arabid features, guess what? They are almost always 3rd or 4th generation Americans of Sicilian descent. And when I see dark skinned, pie faced, eurasian-looking 'white' people, they are usually 3rd or 4th generation Americans of Greek descent.
And the fact of the matter is that most Spainards - if they came to America - would be seen as 'minorities' or 'foreigners'. They would NOT blend in with white American society because white American society is, well, whiter than that of the Spanish. sensitive matter i see.. these Spaniards would be seen as " minorities "?? lol..... btw who can predict 500 ahead? this is how Spain looks after 3000 years, not 250 years, acc to Mr Kemp 2030 the whites will be a minority in the US... bearing in mind that the jews control your destiny it wont take more than a few dacades to create another India...

http://trstrs.netfirms.com/1.htm

Azdaja
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 04:13 PM
Originally posted by triskel
minorities?? ha ha.. dream on

I live in America. And as a person living in America, I can tell you that most Spaniards would stick out like a sore thumb over here. They would in fact be viewed as 'minorities'. When people in America think "white", they think "nordish". The reason is that the great majority of white people in this country are 'nordish'. Most Spaniards are not, so therefore most Spaniards would stick out. It's that simple, like it or not.


Originally posted by triskel
sensitive matter i see.. and how many are part amerindian??

Actually it's not a sensitive matter for personal reasons. I am only a 3rd generation American, so the supposed negro and mongoloid admixture 'many' Americans are supposed to have has no bearing on me.
It pisses me off, though, because what you are saying is false. And what's more, most likely you KNOW it's false, but you need to make yourself (an insecure med) feel better. And how do you do it? By putting others down.
As far as specifically amerindian admixture: Again, it has no bearing on me. The only people that would have that sort of admixture would be people whose families have lived in America since Civil Wars days (at least).
But the fact is - whether you are talking about negroid or mongoloid admixture - the number of 'white' people in this country who have such a thing is very small.
If you are going to gratuitously attack white Americans, then attack their obesity, their stupidity, their lack of culture, their selfishness.
But to attack their racial character - especially considering where you live - is like the pot calling the kettle black. It's ridiculous.


Originally posted by triskel
and you fail to mention all those Italian or Portuguese Americans who dont stick out.. rather you point out those few who do

Actually I mentioned Sicilians and Greeks.

The rest of your post I pretty much do agree with. As far as the 'who's whiter' goes, you are the one that keeps referring to american as 'mongrelized'.

goidelicwarrior
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 04:21 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja
I live in America. And as a person living in America, I can tell you that most Spaniards would stick out like a sore thumb over here. They would in fact be viewed as 'minorities'. When people in America think "white", they think "nordish". The reason is that the great majority of white people in this country are 'nordish'. Most Spaniards are not, so therefore most Spaniards would stick out. It's that simple, like it or not.



Actually it's not a sensitive matter for personal reasons. I am only a 3rd generation American, so the supposed negro and mongoloid admixture 'many' Americans are supposed to have has no bearing on me.
It pisses me off, though, because what you are saying is false. And what's more, most likely you KNOW it's false, but you need to make yourself (an insecure med) feel better. And how do you do it? By putting others down.
As far as specifically amerindian admixture: Again, it has no bearing on me. The only people that would have that sort of admixture would be people whose families have lived in America since Civil Wars days (at least).
But the fact is - whether you are talking about negroid or mongoloid admixture - the number of 'white' people in this country who have such a thing is very small.
If you are going to gratuitously attack white Americans, then attack their obesity, their stupidity, their lack of culture, their selfishness.
But to attack their racial character - especially considering where you live - is like the pot calling the kettle black. It's ridiculous.



Actually I mentioned Sicilians and Greeks.

The rest of your post I pretty much do agree with. As far as the 'who's whiter' goes, you are the one that keeps referring to american as 'mongrelized'. i wont fight with you...?? obviously you havent travelled to Italy or Spain or France or Germany... i sure as hell dident stick out when in the US.. unsecure... lol. my ancestors lived for 2000 years in the same area.. i KNOW where i come from.. so dont try that.. sore thumb.. i think you confuse mexicans with Spaniards.. there are some pics here, do these people stick out? http://trstrs.netfirms.com/1.htm?

Azdaja
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 06:55 PM
Look. Spain is predominantly Med, racially. America is predominately "Nordish" racially. Meds stick out in America. Since most Spainards are Med, most Spainards would stick out over here.

This is kind of veering way off topic now, and I know I'm coming across like I'm anti-Spanish or something. I'm not.
I'll restate my original point once more, and then I'm done with this particular discussion:
Most white Americans are not mongrelized/bastardized with/by negroid, arabid, or mongoloid admixture.

ROMA
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 06:58 PM
I have been in America and I havent seen that many blond people there..most whites there are dark blonde,brown haired.
also in England blondes are minority about 10 percent of the whites there

USA is not predominant nordish at all

Scáthach
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 07:02 PM
nordish is not confined solely to blondes though.
nordish to the best of my knowledge encompasses such sub races as brunn,borreby,keltic,hallstatt(who obviously are going to be blonde)there are others but i cant remember them :goodmorni

Azdaja
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 07:07 PM
Yes, you are right Scathach. Light blonde hair is certainly not a 'nordish' prerequisite.

Scáthach
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 07:12 PM
either way light blonde hair is quite rare anyway is it not?
its probably quite common among hallstatt nords but of all shades of blonde hair,mid to dark blonde is generally prevalent with most people.
natural blondes are quite rare anyway..people with dyed blonde hair on the otherhand x_p

Nordhammer
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 07:56 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja
Look. Spain is predominantly Med, racially. America is predominately "Nordish" racially. Meds stick out in America. Since most Spainards are Med, most Spainards would stick out over here.

This is kind of veering way off topic now, and I know I'm coming across like I'm anti-Spanish or something. I'm not.
I'll restate my original point once more, and then I'm done with this particular discussion:
Most white Americans are not mongrelized/bastardized with/by negroid, arabid, or mongoloid admixture.

I'm glad you speak out about the truth, Azdaja.

The historical facts which most people just cannot stand to believe are - America was founded by Northwestern Europeans and in essence belongs to them, and that continuing immigration was mostly of the Northern European kind(because that's the type of people most Americans wanted, quoted by many politicians and citizens alike even up till the 20th century). The "multiracial nation" is a very new concept and only began to occur since the 1960s, just as it simultaneously began to occur all across the world in white nations. It's a CONSPIRACY, and they are trying to destroy us.

So yes, I agree with you, and any rational person would, that distinct Mediterranean types would stick out. Someone like Antonio Banderras would still be viewed as white but the "exotic" kind. But most people's minds are asleep and they don't pay attention to much anymore, they're just worker drones that do their daily 9-5 and consume, work, sleep.

About the admixture in Americans... we can't know for sure because the "white" category is so polluted now with Jews, Arabs, and hybrids... but according to genetic studies the admixture is *very low* although spreadout in 10-30% of the population according to some studies. But it does concern you even if you're a later immigrant, because one of your ancestors could have mated with one of these mixed white Americans, and thus inherited that lineage, or you could marry one now. But the admixture is very low so it's insignificant phenotypically. Most of the significant mongrelization has happened in the last 2 generations and is evident in people's face, so such things can be avoided.

Azdaja
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 08:16 PM
Originally posted by Nordhammer
But it does concern you even if you're a later immigrant, because one of your ancestors could have mated with one of these mixed white Americans, and thus inherited that lineage, or you could marry one now

Well in my case:
1) My maternal grandfather moved here from Lithuania
2) My maternal grandmother moved here from Poland
3) My paternal grandfather moved here from Quebec
4) My paternal grandmother moved here from Germany

So MAYBE there is some slight 'north american indian' blood in me via my paternal grandfather...but even so, it's not 'American', as in "USA".
If I've got 'admixture' it most likely comes via Poland or Lithuania, but based on the appearence of my grandparents and great-grandparents, this is probably unlikely. Who knows, though?
One day I want to scan pics of them for you guys to classify.

(PS: Nordhammer: Take a look at the thread I posted in the racial classification section, about the models. What is your opinion?)

Glenlivet
Wednesday, May 14th, 2003, 08:19 PM
The Dutch woman, Angela Visser strike me as very Falid, and the Swede, Yvonne Ryding who is still a beautiful lady look Gothic.
Nothing unexpected in terms of the sub-racial type for each country.

The Puerto Rican girl look partly Amerind, like Jennifer Lopez.





Originally posted by Thorburn
The Most Beautiful Miss Universe competition 2002, establishing the most beautiful Miss Universe ever (1952-2001), showed the following outcome:

#1. and Miss Most Beautiful Miss Universe

http://www.globalbeauties.com/gb/universe/images/u89aa.jpg


#3.

http://www.globalbeauties.com/gb/universe/images/u84a.jpg

#4.

http://www.globalbeauties.com/gb/universe/images/u01a.jpg

Kind regards,

- Thorburn

goidelicwarrior
Thursday, May 15th, 2003, 10:59 AM
Originally posted by Azdaja
Look. Spain is predominantly Med, racially. America is predominately "Nordish" racially. Meds stick out in America. Since most Spainards are Med, most Spainards would stick out over here.

This is kind of veering way off topic now, and I know I'm coming across like I'm anti-Spanish or something. I'm not.
I'll restate my original point once more, and then I'm done with this particular discussion:
Most white Americans are not mongrelized/bastardized with/by negroid, arabid, or mongoloid admixture.

OK.. fair enough.. but you never commented the link ?

goidelicwarrior
Thursday, May 15th, 2003, 05:25 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja
Well in my case:
1) My maternal grandfather moved here from Lithuania
2) My maternal grandmother moved here from Poland
3) My paternal grandfather moved here from Quebec
4) My paternal grandmother moved here from Germany

So MAYBE there is some slight 'north american indian' blood in me via my paternal grandfather...but even so, it's not 'American', as in "USA".
If I've got 'admixture' it most likely comes via Poland or Lithuania, but based on the appearence of my grandparents and great-grandparents, this is probably unlikely. Who knows, though?
One day I want to scan pics of them for you guys to classify.

(PS: Nordhammer: Take a look at the thread I posted in the racial classification section, about the models. What is your opinion?) heres a average Spaniard from the area i originate.. you mean these white guys stick out.?? be honest...lol

goidelicwarrior
Thursday, May 15th, 2003, 05:28 PM
Originally posted by triskel
heres a average Spaniard from the area i originate.. you mean these white guys stick out.?? be honest...lol one more... this is how most are.. no ameriindians, negroes, or hispanics.. although they speak Spanish.. lol... its heaven .. :cool

goidelicwarrior
Thursday, May 15th, 2003, 05:31 PM
Originally posted by triskel
one more... this is how most are.. no ameriindians, negroes, or hispanics.. although they speak Spanish.. lol... its heaven .. :cool sorry ...

Ederico
Thursday, May 15th, 2003, 05:32 PM
TRISKEL STOP QUOTING WHOLE POSTS TO MAKE A SHORT REPLY! WHEN YOU ARE REFERRING TO PEOPLE SIMPLY DO A @ AND THE NAME OF THE MEMBER NEXT TO IT AND THAT WILL SUFFICE. THIS IS THE LAST TIME I TELL YOU THIS, NEXT TIME I WON'T EDIT, I'LL SIMPLY DELETE YOUR POSTS. NO NEED TO QUOTE WHOLE POSTS TO DO A GENERAL COMMENT ON THEM!

goidelicwarrior
Friday, May 16th, 2003, 11:14 AM
Originally posted by Iovvs Optimvs Maximvs
sorry...x_blush

Azdaja
Friday, May 16th, 2003, 04:50 PM
Triskel:

Most likely, some of the people in those photos would stand out over here, whereas others would not. It is primarily the med component found amongst the Spanish which would stand out in America, because most white Americans are of a generalized 'nordish' type.
Also keep in mind that the US is a very large country (obviously), and the things I say may very well not apply to all regions/states. In large cities such as NYC, for instance, I doubt most Europid meds would stand out at all. Whereas in my town, they would and do.
If you are really interested in this subject, a very good book to get is "The Dispossessed Majority" by Wilmont Robertson. As a fan of SF and Don Black, you may be interested to know that in "My Awakening", David Duke gives high praise to "The Dispossessed Majority", and recommends that all white Americans read it. One could therefore conclude that Duke agrees with what is written in the book, and chances are so does Don Black. Maybe you could make a post on SF and ask him, and then see how long it takes for a mod to delete it. It could be a fun new game! lol
You can order this book from the National Alliance, and probably from many other racialist groups. It is rather popular.
In brief, Mr. Robertson uses the term "The Dispossessed Majority" to refer the greater part of those white Americans who are of Northwest European descent.
He also discusses "assimiliable white minorities", who can in fact be intergrated into the majority with no ill racial affects, and "unassimiliable white minorities" who cannot be so integrated. The assimiliable white minorities include the Irish (who are technically NW Europeans, but still rather 'clannish'), Balts/Fins, Slavs, Hungarians, and French Canadians.
The unassimilable white minorities include the Southern Italians, Spanish, Cubans, Basques, Portuguese, Albanians, Romanians, Bulgars, Turks and Greeks.
Note also, though, that Mr. Robertson states that there are people within these "unassimiliable" countries which in fact ARE assimiliable. He is speaking about the majority of these countries, not every individual.

goidelicwarrior
Monday, May 19th, 2003, 12:15 PM
5,


Originally posted by Azdaja
Triskel:

Most likely, some of the people in those photos would stand out over here, whereas others would not. It is primarily the med component found amongst the Spanish which would stand out in America, because most white Americans are of a generalized 'nordish' type.
Also keep in mind that the US is a very large country (obviously), and the things I say may very well not apply to all regions/states. In large cities such as NYC, for instance, I doubt most Europid meds would stand out at all. Whereas in my town, they would and do.
If you are really interested in this subject, a very good book to get is "The Dispossessed Majority" by Wilmont Robertson. As a fan of SF and Don Black, you may be interested to know that in "My Awakening", David Duke gives high praise to "The Dispossessed Majority", and recommends that all white Americans read it. One could therefore conclude that Duke agrees with what is written in the book, and chances are so does Don Black. Maybe you could make a post on SF and ask him, and then see how long it takes for a mod to delete it. It could be a fun new game! lol
You can order this book from the National Alliance, and probably from many other racialist groups. It is rather popular.
In brief, Mr. Robertson uses the term "The Dispossessed Majority" to refer the greater part of those white Americans who are of Northwest European descent.
He also discusses "assimiliable white minorities", who can in fact be intergrated into the majority with no ill racial affects, and "unassimiliable white minorities" who cannot be so integrated. The assimiliable white minorities include the Irish (who are technically NW Europeans, but still rather 'clannish'), Balts/Fins, Slavs, Hungarians, and French Canadians.
The unassimilable white minorities include the Southern Italians, Spanish, Cubans, Basques, Portuguese, Albanians, Romanians, Bulgars, Turks and Greeks.
Note also, though, that Mr. Robertson states that there are people within these "unassimiliable" countries which in fact ARE assimiliable. He is speaking about the majority of these countries, not every individual. would you explain the difference betwen Hungarians and Romanians?x_rofl x_rofl and why Basques are accepted into most US racialist organisations like the Klanx_rofl

Azdaja
Monday, May 19th, 2003, 02:01 PM
Originally posted by triskel
would you explain the difference betwen Hungarians and Romanians?x_rofl x_rofl and why Basques are accepted into most US racialist organisations like the Klanx_rofl

They speak different languages, live in different countries, have difference traditions, and there is a signifcant mongoloid component in Hungary....what else do you want to know? I don't understand the motivation behind your question.

There is no such thing as "the Klan". The name "Ku Klux Klan" is in the public domain. That means anyone can use it. If I want, I can call myself the Imperial Wizard of the New England Knights of the KKK, and I've got just as much right to do so as any other 'Grand Wizard' in any other Klan group.
Different Klan groups have different policies. Some probably do allow Basques to join. Others probably do not.

I don't want to be the one to have to do this, as my reasons for doing so may be misinterpreted due to our 'argument'...but I have to give you a warning for quoting my whole post, and only typing a 2 line response. Next time you do this you will be temporarily banned.

goidelicwarrior
Monday, May 19th, 2003, 02:37 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja
They speak different languages, live in different countries, have difference traditions, and there is a signifcant mongoloid component in Hungary....what else do you want to know? I don't understand the motivation behind your question.
temporarily banned. motivations...?? you quote Robertson and then contradict him... acc to Robertson, the alwise.. Hungarians are assimiable, but you just said they are largely mongolic.... i suspect Robertsons knowledge about Europeans is at best poor...

Scáthach
Monday, May 19th, 2003, 05:46 PM
Originally posted by Azdaja

. If I want, I can call myself the Imperial Wizard of the New England Knights of the KKK [/B]


hehehe, maybe you should! :bravo

Azdaja
Monday, May 19th, 2003, 06:12 PM
Originally posted by triskel
motivations...?? you quote Robertson and then contradict him... acc to Robertson, the alwise.. Hungarians are assimiable, but you just said they are largely mongolic.... i suspect Robertsons knowledge about Europeans is at best poor...

Well he is basing who is assimilable and who is not on how close to the nordic (especially) and alpine phenotypes they are.
He designates the bulk of Hungary as "Alpine"...which is certainly debatable. He designates the bulk of Romania as "med" - which is probably true. But in my own personal opinion, it IS stupid to consider Hungarians assimiliable and Romanians not.
Robertsons problem is that he is going off of very superficial things: hair colour/eye colour. I would think many - if not most - east meds would be more assimiliable into a nordic population than would lighter skinned/eyed/haired Alpines.
Keep in mind the purpose of my previous thread was not to put Robertson up on a pedastal. Rather, it was to further my original point that most white americans are nordish.

Nordhammer
Tuesday, May 20th, 2003, 10:09 AM
Originally posted by Azdaja
Well he is basing who is assimilable and who is not on how close to the nordic (especially) and alpine phenotypes they are.
He designates the bulk of Hungary as "Alpine"...which is certainly debatable. He designates the bulk of Romania as "med" - which is probably true. But in my own personal opinion, it IS stupid to consider Hungarians assimiliable and Romanians not.
Robertsons problem is that he is going off of very superficial things: hair colour/eye colour. I would think many - if not most - east meds would be more assimiliable into a nordic population than would lighter skinned/eyed/haired Alpines.
Keep in mind the purpose of my previous thread was not to put Robertson up on a pedastal. Rather, it was to further my original point that most white americans are nordish.

Yes, for some people any brunette brachycephal is an Alpine. :) I believe a large part of Hungary's brachycephaly is UP rather than Mesolithic, but I haven't studied it deeply. Dinaric also plays a significant part.

Prince Eugen
Friday, June 6th, 2003, 09:53 PM
Originally posted by Iovvs Optimvs Maximvs
I would rather not see the board flooded with Turks. Obviously if they are intelligent and supportive of our cause, that could be different. Some Turks are Europid too, but when Culture and Religion get included in Racialism they get excluded.
Turk is aTURK i don't care if he or she has white blood. They look whites , in Minor Asia coast, because they have European ancestry(Greek , Slavic, etc) but they don't fit in EUROPE. I have some German N.S. friends who believe that Turks are worst than Jews or gipsies.

Archangel Michael
Sunday, June 8th, 2003, 11:37 PM
Originally posted by volksdeutsche
Maybe in the first picture. I'm disappointed, but we all have our tastes. So you go by attractiveness, and not the racial type?

Racial preference and sexual attraction do not necessarily always go hand in hand. Personally, I don't find her that attractive, but I can see why others do.

ScotchTape
Saturday, August 9th, 2003, 12:17 AM
http://www.hotranks.com/images/picpolls/anitaayub.jpg

Punjabi woman


ROma, the girl you posted is a pakistani muslim, not indian hindu. SHe is possibly kashmiri. THe mongoloid looking punjabi you posted was also pakistani.

Anyway, i have to agree with Roma. The Aditi girl does have blue eyes and she is lightskinned.
Look at these pictures:
http://images.indian-magic.com/aditi/aditi26.jpg

http://www.piczonline.com/client/scotchtape/Pics/Inaug07.jpg
http://www.starswelove.com/women/adit/adit022b.jpg
http://www1.jagran.com/cinemazaa/wallpaper/dund3.jpg


However, Ashwaria Rai is clearly brownskinned.
http://www.piczonline.com/client/scotchtape/Pics/ashwaryaaet.JPG
http://www.piczonline.com/client/scotchtape/Pics/ash-5.JPG
http://www.piczonline.com/client/scotchtape/Pics/adied.JPG



I hope you all don't mind me posting so many pictures.

a picture from a movie with foundation plastered on LOL:
http://www.piczonline.com/client/scotchtape/Pics/ash09764.jpg

Roma, i seriously doubt that you are italian but anyhow, how do you feel about very darkskinned indians who claim that they look italian?

ANd, since when did india have the most beautiful girls?? I mean, even their celebrities are very average looking in real life. I had the pleasure of meeting Ashwaria Rai in real life and she was nowhere close to being pretty. Sure, some indians are attractive but just because a lot of them win beauty pageants doesn't mean they are really beautiful.
BTW, the dark girl posted as 2nd runner up for Most beautiful miss universe Miss Lara Dutta has scottish and english blood.

ScotchTape
Saturday, August 9th, 2003, 08:02 PM
The model a high caste Hindu woman and already married with 3 kids..her man's name is Lakdawala.Noting she is high caste she would never mix with another race or someone from another country,this is the way the real Aryans still survive in India,sorry Hans.

Hahah. Roma, her husband is Dr. Muzaffar Lakdwala, a muslim.
So much for the highcaste not mixing.