PDA

View Full Version : Kai Murros - The Revolution



Lumivaara
Saturday, October 2nd, 2004, 10:09 AM
A former conservative turned into a NB.
http://www.kolumbus.fi/aquilon/intindex.htm

- Revolution in a modern society is based on creating a counter society in the base areas which are under the Party's control.
....
-History consists in struggle between the masses and the elite and between different cliques within the elite. As the people become the new elite, an elite that governs through organic democracy, this struggle will come to an end. This will be the prelude to the history of humankind.
...
- The most devious revolutionaries are actually those who join the capitalist camp and act just like any other capitalist but with an exeptionally ferocious and blatant zeal, thus strengthening the self-destructive tendencies of the system. These are those who have most profoundly understood the dynamics of the revolutionary process but will run the risk of being shot when the Party finally takes over.

Oskorei
Saturday, October 2nd, 2004, 01:03 PM
Great quotes, my favourites are the following.

You have to see our revolution in a biological context. We are basically a pack of wolves defending its territory and cubs, a pack of wolves fighting for its survival, defending its right to exist.

Accept the fury, let the hatred guide you, find the beast in you. Break your shackles and burn the bridges behind you. Nothing good will ever come out of you before you know who you truly are.

The ultra radical left deviationists have openly declared that they will always and unconditionally take side with foreign hordes that are spreading into our streets and towns. This means that the ultra radical left deviation has in effect declared war on the European Nation and aims at hurting our people whenever it is possible.

If we take a closer look, it becomes very clear that the ultra radical left deviation is motivated by perverted hatred and malice towards their own people... at the same time they talk about revolution --- revolution, but by and for whom? How can you start a revolution if you hate and despise your own people and want to hurt them?

Our enemies do not know what kind of powers they are dealing with and that is why they are about to unleash beasts whose existence the world so dearly would like to forget.

Gangs of uprooted criminals invading our streets, looting our stores, robbing our people abusing our welfare system and liberals wailing and blaming racism for everything -- things just couldn't be better.

Well, I could go on and on, herr Murros sure has a way with words. Great page, Lumivaara

ogenoct
Monday, October 4th, 2004, 12:05 PM
This site is awesome! Thanks for the link. My favorite quote:

"In the hours of this magical night we will celebrate the wonder of unity, this Being Together. There are no rich or poor, old or young, wise or fool among us, for we are ONE. Everyone is important, everyone is needed and no-one is ever alone.... ....The race has gathered here under the stars to celebrate its eternal life.

"Do not confuse us with political parties for there is nothing political about us -- we are a spiritual movement, we are a religion."

Deling
Monday, October 4th, 2004, 01:19 PM
Kai Murros is a poet and satiric. His Revolution is a satire of Mao's Little Red, written from a European point of view with a modern touch (according to himself). Look at the great cartoons on the site, displaying Europe's national rebirth. Wonderful! It's poetry to inspire!
I was to translate his book into Swedish, but unfortunately it didn't come to realisation. No one was interested in publishing it either. It sold rather good in Finland though, being a 77-pages prosa, that is.

ogenoct
Monday, October 4th, 2004, 01:23 PM
Kai Murros is a poet and satiric.
It looks to me like he is rather serious. What is the name of his party? What kind of actions does it undertake? Can you tell me something about Murros' organization? I am utterly fascinated by his writing.

Constantin

Deling
Monday, October 4th, 2004, 02:22 PM
Kai Murros has no political organisation. He's a editor working for a large Finnish publishing firm, translating and editing large volumes of books. He is serious, but it's also satire. What he wants to do, according to himself, is promote and popularize the ideas of National-revolution. He's also sympathetic to NB. Unfortunately, I've lost contact with him... :(

(BTW, do you know were one could get a copy of Agursky's Third Rome: NB in USSR?)

ogenoct
Monday, October 4th, 2004, 08:39 PM
What he wants to do, according to himself, is promote and popularize the ideas of National-revolution. He's also sympathetic to NB. Unfortunately, I've lost contact with him... :(

(BTW, do you know were one could get a copy of Agursky's Third Rome: NB in USSR?)
I bought two used copies of Agurksy's book at amazon. You should check if they still have some to offer. I like Murros. His quotes are stunning in their evocative simplicity and beautiful in their uncomprising expression of truth. I also admire his staunch left-leaning and anti-capitalist approach to pan-European racialism. What else has he written? Does he collaborate with any political organizations? How popular is he in Finland?

Constantin

ogenoct
Monday, October 4th, 2004, 09:11 PM
http://www2.helsinginsanomat.fi/english/archive/news.asp?id=20010410IE3

Down with bourgeois selfishness!
http://www2.helsinginsanomat.fi/kuvat/yleiset/ffffff.gif

By Irma Stenbäck


http://www2.helsinginsanomat.fi/kuvat/uutiset/2001/04/04/20010404ku32p.jpg

"The elite is blind. The state can't be toppled by revolutionary masses of workers, but by capitalists blinded by greed. Information technology is the rope from which the capitalist will hang. The revolution will be fought on the terms of the middle classes. Liberals should be beaten every day!" These quotes are taken from Kai Murros' book The Revolution and its Execution in Modern Society. The publisher was thrilled to finally get his hands on a Finnish political satire. This is Murros' first book. The author, who is not using a pseudonym, is a thirty-something historian from the petty bourgeois district of Käpylä in Northern Helsinki. He has spent a year in China on a scholarship. Murros is now a self-designated "Marxist", and when he was a student he was the chairman of the rather more conservative Töölö National Society. He says that he is intrigued by people who join political parties. Is he being serious? He says that he wrote the book in earnest, with a post-modern twinkle in his eye. He sought to analyse society, to find aesthetics in words and thoughts. The idea for a modern day revolutionary guide came from his notebook, where he had jotted down ideas for his thesis, which was on the Chinese People's Liberation Army's military strategy in the cross-currents of Maoist ideology.

After several heated bar-room debates he decided to put his points of view down on paper. He was fed up with the current system and the eternal whining. He says that he could see where the global economy and consumer hysteria was leading. The readers can interpret his book any which way they please. The book does not have a bibliography, but a political historian will recognise the rough and ready quotations. Murros' favourite classics are Mao, Lenin, and Stalin, but he has also used Niccolo Machiavelli and Karl von Clausewitz. Of the Finnish historians, Murros particularly admires Heikki Ylikangas. The book can be read as a political paradox, a collection of aphorisms, a pamphlet, or political poetry. Murros has deliberately used the socialist prose of the seventies' declamatory propagandists, now caught in the chokehold of their capital. The red-covered book might be too much to take for a dour pragmatist, as the red-green revolution is victorious through the use of violence. Murros himself is opposed to violence, and prefers gardening. He says that sometimes one has to be extremely radical in order to defend the traditional. He feels that the Nordic countries have the world's most successful society.


Helsingin Sanomat / First published in print 4.4.2001

Deling
Monday, October 4th, 2004, 11:46 PM
"I bought two used copies of Agurksy's book at amazon. You should check if they still have some to offer. I like Murros. His quotes are stunning in their evocative simplicity and beautiful in their uncomprising expression of truth. I also admire his staunch left-leaning and anti-capitalist approach to pan-European racialism. What else has he written? Does he collaborate with any political organizations? How popular is he in Finland?"

I checked, it looked like they were sold out.
Murros have written some articles for Terra Firma, I know, under the pseudonym Aquilon or something like that. Check these two out, they're rather good. In those he makes a satire out of the Turner Diaries, or something.

I don't know if he's political involved. He wrote to me once that some nationalist groups tried to contact him, but he wasn't very interested. Finland isn't known for great authors nowadays, but I don't think he's so well-known in Finland.

He look and seem a bit like a Finnish Limonov... =)
It's also interesting that Finland produces so many 'Green-Brown' authors, such as Pentii Linkola and Kai Murros. It must be the Fennoman folk soul. Finns have always been associated with the soil and forests.

Lumivaara
Tuesday, October 5th, 2004, 09:11 AM
I don't know if he's political involved. He wrote to me once that some nationalist groups tried to contact him, but he wasn't very interested. Finland isn't known for great authors nowadays, but I don't think he's so well-known in Finland.
Typical mass people dont now nothing about Murros, his mostly known in small groups. But the public came to know him when his book Revolution and how to do it in a modern society came out some year ago. Belive me or not but the known liberals were furious.



He look and seem a bit like a Finnish Limonov... =)
It's also interesting that Finland produces so many 'Green-Brown' authors, such as Pentii Linkola and Kai Murros. It must be the Fennoman folk soul. Finns have always been associated with the soil and forests.
A new book from Linkola just came out https://kauppa.aatma.fi/kuvaus.php?id=9354&erottaja=1

ogenoct
Tuesday, October 5th, 2004, 12:14 PM
Murros have written some articles for Terra Firma, I know, under the pseudonym Aquilon or something like that. Check these two out, they're rather good. In those he makes a satire out of the Turner Diaries, or something.

I don't know if he's political involved. He wrote to me once that some nationalist groups tried to contact him, but he wasn't very interested. Finland isn't known for great authors nowadays, but I don't think he's so well-known in Finland.

He look and seem a bit like a Finnish Limonov... =)
It's also interesting that Finland produces so many 'Green-Brown' authors, such as Pentii Linkola and Kai Murros. It must be the Fennoman folk soul. Finns have always been associated with the soil and forests.
The material that is on Terra Firma is the same that is on Murros' own site. It is simply a compilation of his quotes. What satire of THE TURNER DIARIES are you referring to? I cannot see a comparison with Limonov. Murros seems more racially conscious than the leader of the Russian NBP. Who is Pentii Linkola?

Constantin

ogenoct
Tuesday, October 5th, 2004, 12:18 PM
I found this:

http://www.kolumbus.fi/jik/sarastus/frntpage.htm

C.

ogenoct
Tuesday, October 5th, 2004, 01:15 PM
http://www.angelfire.com/zine/thefallofbecause/articles/humanflood.html


Humanflood





By Pentti Linkola

[Translated by Harri Heinonen and Michael Moynihan]

Introduction by Michael Moynihan.




Is Pentti Linkola posing the most dangerous thoughts mankind has ever considered? Or is he this planet's only remaining voice of sanity? Living an ascetic existence as a fisherman in a remote rural region of his frigid homeland, the Finnish philosopher has pondered mankind's position vis-á-vis the earth it inhabits and dares to utter the unspeakable. In order for the planet to continue living, man - or homo destructivus, as Linkola names him - must be violently thinned to a mere fraction of his current global population. Linkola's metaphor for the predicament is as follows:
What to do, when a ship carrying a hundred passengers suddenly capsizes and only one lifeboat, with room for only ten people, has been launched? When the lifeboat is full, those who hate life will try to load it with more people and sink the lot. Those who love and respect life will take the ship's axe and sever the extra hands that cling to the sides of the boat.

As time creaks onward, Linkola's predictions and indictments grow more dire. He has come to realise that extreme situations demand extreme solutions:
"We still have a chance to be cruel. But if we are not cruel today, all is lost." The sworn enemy of Christians and Humanists both, Linkola knows that the fate of the earth will never be rescued by those who exalt "tenderness, love and dandelion garlands." Neither the developed nor under-developed populations of the planet deserve to survive at the expense of the biosphere as a whole. Linkola has urged that millions will starve to death or be promptly slaughtered in genocidal civil wars. Mandatory abortions should be carried out for any female who has more than two offspring. The only countries capable of initiating such draconian measures are those of the West, yet ironically they are the ones most hamstrung by debilitating notions of liberal humanism. As Linkola explains, "The United States symbolises the worst ideologies in the world: growth and freedom." The realistic solution will be found in the implementation of an eco-fascist regime where brutal battalions of "green police," having freed their consciences from the "syrup ethics," are capable of doing whatever is necessary.
In Finland, Linkola's books are best-sellers. The rest of the world clearly cannot stomach his brand of medicine, as was evidenced when the Wall Street Journal ran an article on Linkola in 1995. A stack of indignant hate-mail ensued from ostensibly turn-the-other-cheek Christians, loving mothers, and assorted do-gooders. One reader squawked, 'Sincere advocates of depopulation should set an example for all of us and begin the depopulating with themselves." Linkola's reply is far more logical: "If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die."
What follows is the major text of Linkola's to be translated into English. It is a chapter from his 1989 book johdatus 1990-luvun ajatteluun
[Introduction to the Thought of the 1990s].

*****




What is man? "Oh, what art thou man?" the poets of the good old days used to wonder. Man may be defined in an arbitrary number of ways, but to convey his most fundamental characteristic, he could be described with two words: too much. I'm too much, you're too much. There's five billion of us - an absurd, astonishing number, and still increasing… The earth's biosphere could possibly support a population of five million large mammals of this size, given their food requirements and the offal they produce, in order that they might exist in their own ecological niche, living as one species among many, without discriminating against the richness of other forms of life.



What meaning is there in these masses, what use do they have? What essential new contribution is brought forth to the world by hundreds of human societies similar to one other, or by the hundreds of identical communities existing within these societies? What sense is there in the fact that every small Finnish town has the same choice of workshops and stores, a similar men's choir and a similar municipal theatre, all clogging up the earth's surface with their foundations and asphalt slabs? Would it be any loss to the biosphere - or to humanity itself - if the area of Äänekoski no longer existed, and instead in its place was an unregulated and diverse mosaic of natural landscape, containing thousands of species and tilting slopes of gnarled, primitive trees mirrored in the shimmering surface of Kuhmojärvi lake? Or would it really be a loss if a small bundle of towns disappeared from the map - Ylivieska, Kuusamo, lahti, Duisburg, Jefremov, Gloucester - and wilderness replaced them? How about Belgium?



What use do we have with Ylivieska? The question is not ingenious, but it's relevant. And the only answer isn't that, perhaps, there is no use for these places - but rather that the people in Ylivieska town have a reason: they live there. I'm not just talking about the suffocation of life due to the population explosion, or that life and the earth's respiratory rhythm cry out for the productive, metabolic green oases they sorely need everywhere, between the areas razed by man. I also mean that humanity, by squirting and birthing all these teeming, filth-producing multitudes from out of itself, in the process also suffocates and defames its own culture - one in which individuals and communities have to spasmodically search for the "meaning of life" and create an identity for themselves through petty childish arguing.



I spent a summer once touring Poland by bicycle. It is a lovely country, one where small Catholic children, cute as buttons, almost entirely dressed in silk, turn up around every corner. I read from a travel brochure that in Poland the percentage of people who perished in the Second World War is larger than in any other country - about six million, if my memory doesn't fail me. From another part of the brochure I calculated that since the end of the war, population growth has compensated for the loss threefold in forty years… On my next trip after that, I went through the most bombed-out city in the world, Dresden. It was terrifying in its ugliness and filth, overstuffed to the point of suffocation - a smoke-filled, polluting nest where the first spontaneous impression was that another vaccination from the sky wouldn't do any harm. Who misses all those who died in the Second World War? Who misses the twenty million executed by Stalin? Who misses Hitler's six million Jews? Israel creaks with overcrowdedness; in Asia minor, overpopulation creates struggles for mere square meters of dirt. The cities throughout the world were rebuilt and filled to the brim with people long ago, their churches and monuments restored so that acid rain would have something to eat through. Who misses the unused procreation potential of those killed in the Second World War? Is the world lacking another hundred million people at the moment? Is there a shortage of books, songs, movies, porcelain dogs, vases? Are one billion embodiments of motherly love and one billion sweet silver-haired grandmothers not enough?



All species have an oversized capacity for reproduction, otherwise they would become extinct in times of crisis due to variations of circumstances. In the end it's always hunger that enforces a limit on the size of a population. A great many species have self-regulating birth control mechanisms which prevent them from constantly falling into crisis situations and suffering from hunger. In the case of man, however, such mechanisms - when found at all - are only weak and ineffective: for example, the small-scale infanticide practiced in primitive cultures. Throughout its evolutionary development, humankind has defied and outdistanced the hunger line. Man has been a conspicuously extravagant breeder, and decidedly animal-like. Mankind produces especially large litters both in cramped, distressed conditions, as well as among very prosperous segments of the population. Humans reproduce abundantly in the times of peace and particularly abundantly in the aftermath of a war, owing to a peculiar decree of nature.



It may be said that man's defensive methods are powerless against hunger controlling his population growth, but his offensive methods for pushing the hunger line out of the way of the swelling population are enormously eminent. Man is extremely expansive - fundamentally so, as a species.
In the history of mankind we witness Nature's desperate struggle against an error of her own evolution. An old and previously efficacious method of curtailment, hunger, began to increasingly lose its effectiveness as man's engineering abilities progressed. Man had wrenched himself loose from his niche and started to grab more and more resources, displacing other forms of life. Then Nature took stock of the situation, found out that she had lost the first round, and changed strategy. She brandished a weapon she hadn't been able to employ when the enemy had been scattered in numbers, but one which was all the more effective now against the densely proliferating enemy troops. With the aid of microbes - or "infectious diseases" as man calls them, in the parlance of his war propaganda - Nature fought stubbornly for two thousand years against mankind and achieved many brilliant victories. But these triumphs remained localised, and more and more ineluctably took on the flavour of rear-guard actions. Nature wasn't capable of destroying the echelon of humanity in which scientists and researchers toiled away, and in the meantime they managed to disarm Nature of her arsenal.
At this point, Nature - no longer possessed of the weapons for attaining victory, yet utterly embittered and still retaining her sense of self-esteem - decided to concede a Pyrrhic victory to man, but only in the most absolute sense of the term. During the entire war, Nature had maintained her peculiar connection to the enemy: they had both shared the same supply sources, they drank from the same springs and ate from the same fields. Regardless of the course of the war, a permanent position of constraint prevailed at this point; for just as much as the enemy had not succeeded in conquering the supply targets for himself, Nature likewise did not possess the capability to take these same targets out of the clutches of humanity. The only option left was the scorched earth policy, which Nature had already tested on a small scale during the microbe-phase of the war, and which she decided to carry through to the bitter end. Nature did not submit to defeat - she called it a draw, but at the price of self-immolation. Man wasn't, after all, an external, autonomous enemy, but rather her very own tumour. And the fate of a tumour ordains that it must always die along with its host.

In the case of man - who sits atop the food chain, yet nevertheless ominously lacks the ability to sufficiently restrain his own population growth - it might appear that salvation would lie in the propensity for killing his fellow man. The characteristically human institution of war, with its wholesale massacre of fellow humanoids, would seem to contain a basis for desirable population control - that is, if it hadn't been portentously thwarted, since there is no human culture where young females take part in war. Thus, even a large decrease in population as a result of war affects only males, and lasts only a very short time in a given generation. The very next generation is up to strength, and by the natural law of the "baby boom" even becomes oversized, as the females are fertilised through the resilience of just a very small number of males. In reality, the evolution of war, while erratic, has actually been even more negative: in the early stages of its development there were more wars of a type that swept away a moderate amount of civilians as well. But by a twist of man's tragicomic fate, at the very point when the institution of war appeared capable of taking out truly significant shares of fertile females - as was intimated by the bombings of civilians in the Second World War - military technology advanced in such a way that large-scale wars, those with the ability to make substantial demographic impact, became impossible.

Oskorei
Saturday, December 3rd, 2005, 11:06 AM
It looks as if herr Murros also added some art to his page now:
http://www.kolumbus.fi/aquilon/art.htm

Cyberpunk and Mad Max-inspired it seems.

Wjatscheslaw
Sunday, December 4th, 2005, 03:31 AM
Mad Max-inspired it seems.
What's this?

Siegfried
Sunday, December 4th, 2005, 08:21 AM
What's this?

Mad Max was a series of movies in a post-apocalyptic setting: part one (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0079501/), two (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082694/), and three (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089530/).

Lusitano
Sunday, August 6th, 2006, 10:28 AM
Our task is to turn myths into concrete reality. Myths will guide us, myths are the very stuff the national philosophy is made of. We need a myth, a powerful story, the greatest story ever told through which we will shape the mind of the masses.

The people have an intuitive understanding for the importance of myths. The people sense their powerful immaterial forces and how they bind individuals together as a nation. No wonder intellectuals who despise the people also look down upon myths.

(http://forums.skadi.net/)The ordinary man of the street is guided through his life above all else by the myths embedded in the collective consciousness. Take away the myths and he has nothing, he is lost without a direction. A sterile, theoretical and speculative philosophy cooked up by shady intellectuals has nothing to offer to the people.

(http://forums.skadi.net/)Accept the fury, let the hatred guide you, find the beast in you. Break your shackles and burn the bridges behind you. Nothing good will ever come out of you before you know who you truly are.

(http://forums.skadi.net/)If the troubles of modern Europe were only economical and political in nature, we would surely lose. But there is an element that our enemies fail to grasp in full -- the rage of the masses fighting for their right to excist as a nation. To understand the severity of this phenomenon it would require our elite to finally open its eyes to the harsh realities of life and in process give up the naive illusions it harbors...
... Luckily for us the elite is unable to do it.

This war will be the decisive push of the Europeans to reclaim their place in the world. We are fed up with being the scape goats of the world, we are tired of being blamed for our achievements and we are sick and tired of yielding to every possible demand by non-europeans simply because we are supposed to carry the collective white man's guilt AD INFINITUM.



For over a thousand generations our people have lived of this land, over a thousand generations of people have grown out of this land, physically come into being by the riches of this hallowed ground. For over a thousand generations this sacred soil has nurtured and provided our people. We are one with this soil for every ounce of our flesh and blood comes from this soil, there is nothing in us that is alien or hostile to it...
... and when our life comes to an end, we will return to this land like a traveller who returns home...
... and all this we should give away at the drop of a hat since we are being told so by our morally corrupt elite...

Our enemies do not know what kind of powers they are dealing with and that is why they are about to unleash beasts whose existence the world so dearly would like to forget.

You have to see our revolution in a biological context. We are basically a pack of wolves defending its territory and cubs… a pack of wolves fighting for its survival, defending its right to exist.

symmakhos
Saturday, September 9th, 2006, 12:10 AM
Only tonight have I discovered this genious Finn, so I bump this old thread. Hear the truth.

http://www.kolumbus.fi/aquilon/intindex.htm

- Cosmopolitan liberalism is an integral part of the strategy of the capitalist class in its bid to globalize its power. Cosmopolitan liberalism serves only the needs of the capitalist class.

- Cosmopolitan liberalism is a new ideological smoke screen for class oppression.

- The middle class thinks that its needs coincide with the needs of the capitalist class. Therefore the middle class lets the capitalist class rule the state -- but in doing so bitterly loses.

- Liberalism is a cancer gnawing at the very foundation of the nation. Liberalism is the most most dangerous ideological enemy of the Party and its total eradication from the face of the earth is the most important task for the Party.

- Special ideological diligence and consciousness will be required from the Party in order to distinguish and fight two different and therefore especially dangerous forms of liberalism - right wing liberalism and left wing liberalism.

- All the problems in modern society stem from two, originally opposite forces, right liberalism and left liberalism.

- Right liberalism and left liberalism are the thesis and antithesis, their synthesis is deadly.

- Liberals must be struck every day.

http://www.kolumbus.fi/aquilon/murros2.gif- Right liberalism is the ideology par excellence of the bourgeoisie. It glorifies the omnipotence of capitalism and how necessary and wise it is to surrender ourselves to the iron laws of economics, portrayed as fundamental as the forces of nature. As the bourgeoisie has been able to pin down the working class by exploiting the oportunities provided by globalization, right liberalism Ð the ideology of capitalism - has been busy contributing to the distruction of the material basis of life for the working class.

- While left liberalism has been pulling down what it has considered traditional, authoritarian and reactionary, left liberalism has also freed the individuals from their responsibilities and duties towards their community. Left liberalism is only concerned about rights, never duties. It believes that the reasons for dysfunctional behaviour come from the outside, thus one cannot be expected to have any kind of self discipline.

- As right liberalism - the ideology of the bourgeoisie - had first destroyed the material basis for a decent living for the working class, it is no wonder that left liberalism was able to break the moral fibre of the national community.

- The middle class tends to accept all the actions of the capitalist class aiming to strengthen its own position, thinking that this will benefit the middle class as well.

- The capitalist class can always rely on the middle classes support when it tries to bring down national borders in order to let the tide of cheap labour and foreign sweatshop products come in and to deregularize all controls on the movements of capital and production.

- The middle class keeps dreaming of shoeshine boys working at its feet even though in fact the middle class has resigned itself to its role of providing bootlicking service for the capitalist class.

Anglo-Canadian
Saturday, September 9th, 2006, 01:33 AM
Benny Hill warned all that would listen and heed about the ever-pressing dangers of the revolution of the collectives. How many have suffered the fate of being dragged through the streets by the Bolsheviks already?:D

ogenoct
Friday, September 25th, 2009, 08:44 AM
AQUILON AND THE NEW EUROPEAN NATIONALISM

by Kai Murros


1. Ever since I can remember I have been a passionate nationalist; unfortunately in my younger days I was simply a petty Finnish chauvinist without any greater aspirations or understanding. I was re-living the past, I was stuck in the memory of the 20’s, 30’s and 40’s, the time when the militaristic and often quite reactionary Finnish nationalism reached its high point.

A great deal of my militant chauvisnism can be seen as a reaction against the so called “Finnlandisierung” which meant that especially in the 70’s and early 80’s nationalism in Finland was a taboo. Finnish media and cultural life was controlled by leftists who imposed a guilt-complex on the Finnish people; the elite taught Finns to hate themselves because of what happened in WWII. So in retrospect I understand that I had to be what I was back then but I also had to evolve as well.

Eventually I grew out of reactionary chauvinism. One of the decisive moments in my life was in 1981 when the news about the Brixton race riots reached Finland. I suddenly realized that my kinfolk were under attack, that a hideous primitive enemy was threatening people who are of the same race and the same blood as Finns. Soon after this I became aware of the worsening ethnic situation in Germany, that the number of the Turks was constantly growing - and nothing was done about it.

These events got me to realize that if I get stuck in the narrow world of petty Finnish chauvinism I keep myself apart from my European family. It is clear that if I value the poetry of Shakespeare, the music of Bach, Händel Mozart, the art of Rodin etc. I have to be a pan-European Nationalist. Provincial nationalism is a dead end; it is emotional isolationism. It creates artificial division which is why it is a crime against the unity of our race.

Despite my pan-European awakening I still had much to learn. My greatest weakness was that in economic questions I was very much a neo-liberal. In the 80’s I was an eager supporter of Margaret Thatcher. I saw the world primarily as the world of economics and I believed that the laws of economics - as they were explained to us - were just as objective as the laws of nature.

However the massive economic depression in Finland between 1991 and 1995 forced me to change my views on economics. I came to realize that Economics is not a physical science, the laws of Economics are man-made laws. They are not objective, immanent or something you cannot revise. I had matured enough to understand that the activities of the human race cannot be explained by one theory or paradigm alone - least of all by Economics.

Since the mid 90’s it had become absolutely clear to me that a true nationalist must always be a socialist of some sort. One cannot be a nationalist and a liberal. Nationalism is a collective ideology and liberalism an individualistic ideology - they cannot be combined.

The fall of the Soviet Union also gave me an opportunity to explore socialism with fresh eyes - Soviet communism was no longer a threat to our country and the dogmatic Finnish communist movement had disintegrated. Finally it was possible to be a socialist without appearing like a traitor and finally it was also possible to explore socialism from a fresh point of view without having fanatic know-it-all communists around you threatening you and telling you what the correct party line is.

Since the mid 90’s my aim has been to create a synthesis between metaphysical nationalism and socialism based on materialistic philosophy - in other words I wanted to explain the pan-European national revolution by using historical materialism.

My socialist theory is very much influenced by Maoism because for the Chinese, Maoism is in fact a nationalistic ideology. In his writings Mao always mentioned patriotism in a positive light and considered socialist revolution and national revolution to be fundamentally the same thing. According to Mao without socialist revolution there can be no national liberation. Maoism is not plagued by “leftism”, the perversion of socialist theory which preaches the self-hatred and guilt complex of the European people. There are no leftist “intellectuals” in China telling the Chinese people that the world would be a better place without them.

2. As I was writing Aquilon my aim was to create a virtual nationalist leader who would be the projection our hopes and dreams, someone we are subconsciously waiting for - a nationalist Messiah, a Muhammed for the Europeans who gives us a new creed of national liberation, unites the quarrelsome European tribes and finally leads them into endless outward
expansion.

Aquilon is the embodiment of our rage, hatred and disappointment, Aquilon is the embodiment of our subsconscious, our inner beast. Aquilon is FUROR EUROPAEICUS yet at the same time Aquilon has a very cold, cynical and calculating side. Aquilon can be totally unscrupulous and will stop at nothing to get his way - you could argue that Aquilon is amoral but in my opinion Aquilon simply belives in his cause and for Aquilon the end always justifies the means.

I didn’t want Aquilon to be an idealized and clean character. It is very important to note that there is constantly a conflict within Aquilon - he is at the same time both cynical and idealistic, high-minded and brutal, honest and deceptive. Psychologically this makes him much more interesting than if he was simply “good”. Secondly this reminds us of the nature of our coming revolution: Our cause is noble and our demands are just but the revolutionary process itself will be bloody and dirty business. We just had better get used to the idea that WE WILL HAVE TO use every dirty trick we can and that eventually we will leave a trail of blood behind us.

Aquilon is the metaphysical/psychological side of my nationalist creed while the book “Revolution and how to do it in a Modern Society” is the more materialistic/rational side of the same thing. But still you can find hints of materialistic philosophy in Aquilon’s speeches as well. Even the greatest passion needs a materialistic and rational base.

3. Since Finland is situated in the northernmost corner of our continent, it means that politically we are very much on the periphery. In history Finns have never been spearheads in any political change, Finns only have followed with the great changes that have originated in the centre of Europe and have adapted to them - often with great skill, though.

Even today we can see that as nationalism is rising all over Europe the nationalist movement in Finland is very weak and undoubtedly will remain so also in the foreseeable future. Mostly this is due to the fact that immigration to Finland has been remarkably low and most immigrants in Finland are still white Europeans - most often Estonians and Russians.

Firstly I would say that the Finnish nationalist movement has very little to offer the great nationalist movements in the centre of our continent. However due to the fact that our nation is very small Finnish nationalists should always emphasize the PAN-European aspects in their work because the resurrection of reactionary petty chauvinism is a constant threat to European nationalism.

Finnish nationalists could also show some example in putting the past behind, forgetting the conflicts of the past, looking forward and finding allies in former enemies. Russo-Finnish relationships in general are commendable nowadays but still I would like to see Finnish and Russian nationalists together as brothers-in-arms fighting a common enemy.

4. I am very excited about the NPD (National Democratic Party of Germany) and its future prospects. I have been following the NPD’s web site for some time now and I believe that the NPD can make the much needed change in Germany. Actually a couple of years ago I tried to contact the NPD several times. I sent my writings and copies of my book to different addresses in Germany and I also sent e-mails but unfortunately I couldn’t contact anyone.

The NPD is both traditional and modern - it very successfully combines traditional German nationalism with a modern pan-European nationalism. The NPD looks forward and is ready to deal with the challenges the European civilization will face in the future. The NPD is at the same time both German and Pan-European and there lies its strength, because a modern nationalist must understand that we are in this mess together and only together we shall survive. The age of mini-nationalism is definitely over.

What I am particularly happy about is that despite its successes and constant growth the NPD hasn’t lost its radical character. The NPD will not suffer from the sclerosis of the fat impotent main stream parties. The NPD is radical both in nationalist/ethnic issues as well as in social and economic issues which is the winning combination, because we have to prove to the people that it’s only the nationalist movement which takes their everyday needs and worries seriously and is both willing and able to deal with them. The mainstream parties are only interested in serving the interests of global capitalism and the needs of the immigrant masses so there is a great demand for a party like the NPD.

5. Most of all I am interested in the art of propaganda. I find it so much more exciting and inspiring than debating over ideology and political theory. In my opinion political propaganda comes first and ideological contemplation only second. Masses respond to propaganda and not to stuffy dusty books written by boring intellectuals. Good political art captures and condenses a thousand tedious theoretical books into one poster, one picture, one sentence, one phrase, one cry. Political art transforms intellectual speculation into a physical object, a weapon in a struggle about life and death.

For me, the European Revolution is an aesthetic project. Political art tells us what we want: How we want our life to look like one day, how we want the world to look like one day. Revolutionary struggle is simply a process which will transform this vision into a reality. Ideology and theory only facilitate our struggle: they explain to us HOW and WHY we will create the world of our dreams. We don’t read great works of philosophy to find out if our race has a right to exist: we make the dusty philosophy serve our cause. Philosophy is our slave, the slave of national survival. Books are dead, we are alive, ideas don’t mean anything without people and we are the people.

Art is the stuff the future is made of, art moves people in mysterious ways, art is the soul of our race. Art gives the first wakeup call that things are about to change. This is why if we wish to seize the future we must seize art and the aesthetics. More than anything else I would like to be involved in making political art/propaganda. Just like the masses respond to visions rather than to theories. For me passion always comes first - I follow my instincts and emotions and if I have time I may spend a few moments intellectualizing it.

6. Well, first of all I would say that half the job will be done for us by our enemies. As long as the liberal elite is running the show things will only go from bad to worse. The liberals are totally unable to change their basic paradigm and therefore they will keep wrecking our civilization and coincidentally also undermining their own position. Year after year there will be more and more desperate, poor masses trying to get into Europe to get their share of the pie and liberals will still be dreaming that integration is possible if only we are willing to be submissive and apologetic - if only we are willing to die out.

But the explosion of FUROR EUROPAEICUS is just around the corner because despite what the liberal elite wants to believe no nation, tribe or community has ever accepted to die without a fight. The fact that we are kind and polite and that we get angry only very slowly doesn’t mean that we are suicidal. So far we have been turning our cheek over and over but it doesn’t mean that things are going to remain this way forever.

So we have to be there when it finally happens - the Great Paradigm Shift - the one the liberals didn’t see coming. I believe that starting in the next decade we will experience something that will very much resemble the 60’s but politically and culturally it will be its complete antithesis. Suddenly there will strong creative vibes in the air, new music, new fashion, new poetry will energize the young native Europeans. Sterile dullness will be broken and suddenly people will once again be full of hope, enthusiasm and determination.

The European Revolutionary movement will be a cultural movement - otherwise it cannot survive - it will be an aesthetic movement so that it can leave its mark on the world. The first wave of the European Revolutionary movement will be the artists, poets, designers, musicians, actors, script writers - they are the first to explain to us what the coming age is all about. The next wave will then be the wave of the masses, organized political activity and armed struggle.

In order to win we need people who work in the fashion industry or in the entertainment business, we need people who understand advertising and marketing - people who can broadcast our message to the masses by using modern means, a language that people can understand.

Our cause is noble but our means must be practical and effective. We have to transform progressive pan-European nationalism into a brand and sell it to the masses, we must customize it to suit the needs of different segments of potential supporters. Propagating nationalism is basically no different than selling Coca Cola - propaganda is about selling ideas. When good marketing and the needs of the masses coincide, the result may well be a massive breakthrough.

The New European Nationalism will be sexy, sassy, outrageous and glamorous. It will be the most alluring form of rebellion and our young people will love it. The New European Nationalism will be violent, brutal, fanatic and macabre and our young people will love it even more! When fat, impotent liberalism has reached its final stage of paralysis and soiled its own bed the only way to challenge this moral corruption is through discipline and organization. In this world of filth it will be an intoxicating power trip for young people to experience the Esprit de Corps of the nationalist storm troops.

The worst mistake we could make is to endlessly re-live the past, use outdated aesthetics and images and try to revive nostalgia as an answer to modern problems. The European civilization and the entire planet is about to face unprecedented challenges and dangers in the coming decades and if the nationalist movement in this situation gives the impression of being an anachronism we will lose all our chances for success.

Of course even the best marketing cannot create revolution out of nothing, I simply mean that clever and intellectually agile marketing captures and expresses the “Zeitgeist” before the politicians and sociologists realize what is going on. The next global megatrend will be in our favour but still we must be open-minded enough to learn how to surf on this wave.

7. My texts are available online on my website:
http://www.kolumbus.fi/aquilon/intindex.htm

ogenoct
Friday, February 5th, 2010, 09:14 AM
http://mauryk2.wordpress.com/2010/02/05/the-tactical-moxie-of-kai-murros/


the tactical moxie of kai murros

By mauryk2


The blurb on the Kai Murros Fan Club on Facebook says it best: Kai Murros is one of the most important pan-European visionaries alive to today. He is also one of the most respected thinkers of the New Right in Europe. His ideas are some of the most radical & original in the movement. He lives in Helsinki.

Now Nationalist ideas are marginalized in Finland much as they are in the USA. And subject to the same media blackout. Yet Kai Murros pierced the smoke & mirrors and got a hearing. How?

Events forced him into a change of thinking. Finland in the early 1990s was enduring one of the worst depressions in its history–comparable to what the USA is experiencing now. He found the so-called laws of economics were not immutable laws of nature but in his words: “The laws of economics were simply political propaganda, a smokescreen the liberal elite was using to protect its interests.”

(Keep in mind that what is termed liberalism or neo-liberalism in Europe and most of the world is called conservatism or neo-conservatism in the USA.)

Europe faces what we in the USA face: Globalism, liberalism, compulsory consumerism, immigration, ethno-masochism. And like the USA in a totally conformist society. To publicize his views and get a hearing to get out of the Far Right political ghetto, he wrote a book. Not any book, but a tome entitled REVOLUTION–AND HOW TO DO IT IN A MODERN SOCIETY. It was written in the form of a manual for the members of a revolutionary party. Murros explained his tactic this way:

“I wanted to get as much publicity as possible with my book. Of course I could have written piles & piles of letters to newspapers complaining and accusing stupid politicians and greedy capitalists, but nobody would have noticed me, Therefore I had to make myself noticed, I had to kill people at least verbally and when I had my moment of fame I publicly named Finnish politicians & capitalists and said that they would be arrested & thrown into prison camps after the revolution.”

Murros then elaborated as to his purpose:

“It was clear to me that I would never be accepted in the media as a Nationalist per se. Finland like the entire Western world is ruled by the infamous & destructive generation of the year 1968. These left liberals would crucify anyone who showed any compassion or love for native Europeans but as a leftist I was allowed to talk and spread my Nationalist subtext.

“My task was to use Marxist theory to prove that the revolution is imminent BUT IT WILL BE A NATIONAL REVOLUTION. I wanted to use the intellectual arsenal of the Left against the Left itself. I think I did a pretty good job, because in my opinion we can actually be very orthodox Marxists and use the methodology of historical materialism strictly and still come to the conclusion that the Revolution will be NATIONAL.”

The generation of 1968 in Europe is comparable to the New Politics Liberals in the USA who took over the Democratic Party in the 1970s and dispossessed the white working-class who had been the base of the New Deal.

The tactical moxie of Kai Murros is beyond a brain dead American Far Right, currently reduced to tail ending the Tea Party Movement whose guide post is a return to rose-tinted view of the “Good ol’ Days.” That trajectory leads to the Republican Party and the American political game of musical chairs.

Like Kai Murros, I propose to go beyond that.

To be continued . . .

ogenoct
Monday, March 8th, 2010, 07:00 PM
Dear Constantin,

I managed to find this translation of the article about me. This was in the English section of Helsingin Sanomat so the translation is much better than what I could have done. This article is actually quite funny, I like it -- what do you think?

Yours
Kai

***

"The elite is blind. The state can't be toppled by revolutionary masses of workers, but by capitalists blinded by greed. Information technology is the rope from which the capitalist will hang. The revolution will be fought on the terms of the middle classes. Liberals should be beaten every day!"
These quotes are taken from Kai Murros' book The Revolution and its Execution in Modern Society.

The publisher was thrilled to finally get his hands on a Finnish political satire. This is Murros' first book. The author, who is not using a pseudonym, is a thirty-something historian from the petty bourgeois district of Käpylä in Northern Helsinki. He has spent a year in China on a scholarship.

Murros is now a self-designated "Marxist", and when he was a student he was the chairman of the rather more conservative Töölö National Society. He says that he is intrigued by people who join political parties.

Is he being serious?

He says that he wrote the book in earnest, with a post-modern twinkle in his eye. He sought to analyse society, to find aesthetics in words and thoughts.

The idea for a modern day revolutionary guide came from his notebook, where he had jotted down ideas for his thesis, which was on the Chinese People's Liberation Army's military strategy in the cross-currents of Maoist ideology.

After several heated bar-room debates he decided to put his points of view down on paper. He was fed up with the current system and the eternal whining. He says that he could see where the global economy and consumer hysteria was leading. The readers can interpret his book any which way they please.

The book does not have a bibliography, but a political historian will recognise the rough and ready quotations. Murros' favourite classics are Mao, Lenin, and Stalin, but he has also used Niccolo Machiavelli and Karl von Clausewitz. Of the Finnish historians, Murros particularly admires Heikki Ylikangas.

The book can be read as a political paradox, a collection of aphorisms, a pamphlet, or political poetry. Murros has deliberately used the socialist prose of the seventies' declamatory propagandists, now caught in the chokehold of their capital.

The red-covered book might be too much to take for a dour pragmatist, as the red-green revolution is victorious through the use of violence. Murros himself is opposed to violence, and prefers gardening.

He says that sometimes one has to be extremely radical in order to defend the traditional. He feels that the Nordic countries have the world's most successful society.

Helsingin Sanomat / First published in print 4.4.2001

TeutonicMensch
Tuesday, March 9th, 2010, 02:16 AM
I must say, with what I've read so far, I am very impressed.

At times I am very disheartened that it seems atleast in my part of the World, people continue to fall dupe to the divisive plan of left/right politic.

People over here seem to focus more on words and ideas than the biologic reality that it is a struggle for blood and kinship which we wage.

I ascribe to the view that it is the struggle which defines us, not political labels or sentiments.

Hailsa
-James K. Irmert

Wanderer
Tuesday, March 9th, 2010, 02:46 AM
I like this thread...I am inclined to believe that ww1 and ww2 were both designed to poison Europe genetically...first, by exposing Central Europeans to non-white soldiers, i.e. blacks, Asians, Hispanic and Native-Americans, etc. (whether wearing the British, French, or American uniform), and later, to Soviet mongrels of various Asiatic origin, as well as another wave of non-white American riff-raff, who of course wasted no time in pursuing the womenfolk. As an American of German heritage, let me just state plainly and bluntly that I am quite different from my American 'fellow citizens.' I happen to have respect for my heritage, which guides my conscience. Let's just say that non-white Americans, and now plenty of wiggers and their ilk who mimic non-white ways, are all too happy to get down with any female who happens to open their legs for them.

Anyways, the revolution against this anti-human, left-wing agenda that threatens to put every single human being in its chains will only happen when people become more race-conscious, as I think this thread seems to say. The Jews and their helpers, who unfortunately happen to be white Anglo-Saxons, it seems, control this world, and they want all people reduced to slobbering idiots who they can manipulate. That is what many Americans are , unfortunately, and I hate to say it, but too many white Americans are completely ignorant about how in the dark they are. White Americans, good luck with this, will have to relocate to zero (hard to do for most). What white people will give up their churches, who preach the idiocy of brotherly love, and find the truth that is their own genetic code. Unfortunately,too many Americans, and possibly many western Europeans, i.e. French, British, etc., are quite happy to follow the prevailing trend, which is to celebrate non-whites and non-white culture, courtesy of the Zionist mind-control machine. Revolution will only happen when a SIGNIFICANT majority of whites become convinced that their salavation will be to throw of the shackles and christianity and all other outside influences that have sapped their heritage, making them complacent ans weak. Nullpinkt must happen again, but this time for all Germanics, everywhere. And yes, I'd gladly include anyone from the Scots, to the Swiss, to Canadians, in my definition of Germanic.

ogenoct
Wednesday, September 1st, 2010, 05:13 PM
Please listen to the interview that Tomislav Sunic conducted with Kai Murros:

http://reasonradionetwork.com/?p=8853

ogenoct
Monday, November 15th, 2010, 09:05 PM
Please read my essay NEW EUROPEAN FASHION in the latest edition of Kai Murros' online magazine LE JOURNAL:

http://www.kolumbus.fi/aquilon/journal/09e.html

ogenoct
Monday, November 29th, 2010, 06:36 AM
Good introduction:

http://www.thebritishresistance.co.uk/writers/finlandia/373-kai-murros

ogenoct
Sunday, May 15th, 2011, 11:02 AM
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/kai_murros_on_the_european_revolution/


Style/Attitude/Revolution - A Letter to a Friend

by Kai Murros


The fundamental question us, white nationalists, are facing today is how to take over our societies psychologically, how to rise from the political and intellectual periphery in to the centre, refine our sub-culture to make it main stream and force the public in our societies to accept our vision of the future as the only possible alternative. To do that, we must first perfect the concept of the Pan-European nationalism and in doing so we must pay great attention to how the Pan-European movement looks like and feels like. Therefore we must be conceptual artists, fashion designers and copywriters rather than boring intellectuals and helpless theorists. If our concept is good it will dwarf other political styles and begin to dominate people’s thinking.

Seizing the hegemony in the society requires that nationalists are determined to become the new elite and understand that fundamentally they must wage politics of power and will. Today nationalists have nothing but if they at least have the right attitude then they have a chance, because what makes elite an elite is precisely the attitude. The conviction of being right and above others gives the members of the elite self-confidence and determination, which is then reflected in their appearance and behaviour. Outsiders recognize very easily those who seem to be on top of things, assertive, cool and even good looking. The masses inherently despise desperate people and rather follow those who are arrogant and bold.

Nationalists must tirelessly talk about power and how to get power. Nationalists must make it absolutely clear that the movement is all about power, absolute power, power for the sake of power, a cynical conspiracy to get power. Nationalists must make everybody understand that one day they will have absolute power. This is important because all this talk about power makes nationalists look powerful and dangerous even when they don’t yet have power. Women, for example, love determined men who give the impression that they have great plans for the future. Power is sexy, nationalists have to make it their fetish.

Nationalists must always emphasize that they know more than the outsiders—after all they understand the process of how and why western civilization will collapse and thus prepare conditions for the nationalist takeover. People are often very curious about groups/societies/cults/sects etc. that seem to have information that is not openly shared. Once there is a body of knowledge—New Right philosophy, nationalist theories on revolution or urban warfare techniques and combat exercises that can be acquired by joining this elitist, closed organization people get an irresistible urge to join - the more difficult it is to get in the more attractive it becomes. And once you are in the group, you can really feel that you are better than the outsiders.

Since nationalists do not yet have the money or means to effectively broadcast their message, the best platform for nationalist propaganda are the nationalists themselves and therefore their appearance is of utmost importance. Nationalists should create a style that reflects power, strength, arrogance, danger and intelligence. The style should be easily recognizable so when nationalist youths are out in the town people notice them immediately—every single nationalist should be a walking propaganda poster for the movement. When nationalists are gathering it should immediately give a sense of downright occupation. There are several psychological studies on how a uniform affects the people who wear it and those who are outside the group—the affects are very dramatic! Once nationalists are oozing with sex, death and danger more and more people want to join them. Fighting for your people is sexy—this is extremely atavistic—looking good while fighting for your people is even sexier.

Now how should a young cadre of the national revolution look like? Unfortunately I am not a fashion designer - although I really would like to be - anyway, I’ve been toying with some ideas. First of all I like very much the Mod -style and attitude, the colours of the today’s Mod-nationalist should definitely be black and dark grey. An addition to the smart suit would be Dr. Martens boots laced up to knee high—like mormons gone bad. Imagine a young stylish nationalist wearing a black suit, white shirt, black tie, Dr. Martens boots and a shoulder bag. In the shoulder bag the nationalist could carry books from Juenger, Evola, Nietsche, Thiriart, Niekitsch etc. and maybe a brass knuckles or something. The message would be that I can have an intelligent discussion with you or I can kick your teeth in—a nice combination of intelligence and violence.

The nationalist street combat uniform should definitely be the black biker all-leather outfit, with a white shirt and black tie. Against head injuries the nationalist shock troops should wear the black crash helmet. A crash helmet provides the best possible protection against any projectiles and blows as long as firearms are not used. The crash helmet also covers the shock trooper’s face revealing only his eyes—this way the fighter can hide his identity and in a combat situation you are always more threatening to your enemies if they can’t see your face and read your facial expressions so you don’t give away any signs of individual weaknesses.

Nationalist shock troops should be armed with aluminium baseball bats. By wielding the bat with both hands you can deliver terrible blows to your enemy, but more importantly the shining silver bat looks nice against black leather mass—the aesthetic aspect is always just as important as the practical one. Black and silver were the colours of the SS and in this way they could be our colours too—in a very modern way. I’ve also been toying with the idea that the shock troops could also use American football pads as protective armour. Wearing black leather and football armour the shock troopers would be like some cool apocalyptic Mad Max road warriors—a fitting reference to the ongoing collapse of our civilization. In case football armour is a bit uncomfortable to wear in a fight, there are also other body armours that are lighter and easier to use ... but still look great, check this out:

http://www.ioffer.com/146998239

Nationalist shock troops should then learn to carry their weapons and move about in a uniform manner. The shock troops should learn to march in the same rhythm—the sound of the steps alone is a psychological factor. The shock troop formation looks great when it learns to move, turn, fold and unfold like a real military formation or like a mechanism made of leather and steel. The ability to move about like a real military formation requires a lot of drill but if done properly our fighters definitely give the impression of discipline and power—power has to be their fashion.

We must aesthetisize violence and spice it up with a hefty doze of sex—if we can do that our movement will become irresistible to young white males looking for action and purpose in life. The movie Clockwork Orange is a good example of how even cruel and senseless violence can be made appealing—we’ll just have to do it in real life and give it an ideological frame. Biologically sex and violence always go together—in nature males fight for their right to procreate and then defend their offspring and territory—this is in a nutshell exactly what the white nationalists are facing today. White national revolution is a biological phenomenon and that’s why it’s unstoppable!

Drill is very important because it gives nationalist units command structure and cohesion and their enemies get the idea that nationalists really mean business. A well drilled shock troop unit is the best publicity the movement could ever have, because the masses follow the strong and the self-confident. A riot or a street fight should be regarded as a spectacle, an opportunity for the shock troops to be seen and be admired by the timid public—nationalist demonstrations should never be just an angry mob of men with short hair. When the movement shows signs of strength and discipline, young males will flock under its banners—this pack mentality is in their genes, it just has to be activated. If the movement can make the young fighters to submit themselves to the tedious drill, it will turn them into real soldiers of urban warfare.

I’ve also been thinking that paint ball war gaming could also be an excellent opportunity to wear smart gear and look intimidating. Instead of guerilla fighting in the forests nationalists should especially simulate urban warfare, which is something they are most likely to face in the future as societies begin to fall apart. And, like I said, extra attention must be given to what the combatants wear—they should look as stylish and militant as possible—the best thing would be if we could create a cool nationalist citycamo look for them.

One option here is that we go for a fusion of different elements such as (city)camo, army surplus, leather, studs, dyed jeans, hoodies and other combat/martial arts paraphernalia. With a little imagination everyone could create their own personal look—just like punks, they all look so different—their creativity seems to be absolutely endless in that department—but still in a uniform sort of way. This would give an impression of a ragtag army instead of the faceless mass of black leather, but I think it would fit the concept of post-collapse urban warfare well. Combatants having their own customized style and gear would be like characters in computer and video games—this time they would be creating their own real-life fighter characters. The most effective way to activate young people is by giving room for their individual creativity and imagination.

The idea of paintball war gaming is, of course, that nationalists publicly start preparing for war. The worst mistake would be to do this secretly somewhere in the forests. Combat training for the coming civil war must be brought outrageously in the open—obviously, where there are vacant buildings and rundown factories, but hopefully near where people live so that as many as possible can see what nationalists are doing. Once people realize what is going on they begin to believe that the country really is heading toward a violent confrontation and those who prepare for it openly and systematically are seen strong and powerful. Considering the state our societies are today, it doesn’t take much to shake people’s confidence in the system, this way we will scare the general public to accept our vision of the future.

Nationalists should start to act like a real insurgent army and start forming real units, where fighters have ranks and specialized tasks for different situations—it doesn’t matter how small this unit is as long as long as everything is done properly: Uniforms, training and structure. What ever nationalists do as a group they must always have a structure—this way outsiders take them seriously and they take themselves even more seriously—and obviously, nationalist fighters must look good!! Paintball war gaming is not just a bunch of lads running around and shooting each other but a PR campaign, a publicity stunt, a way advertize our concept to the general public and to other nationalists. Creating paramilitary combat units is in itself an open challenge to the system and it will not go unnoticed. By giving an impression of structure, discipline and determination nationalists will spread a sense of unease among the liberals as they start to wonder if there is something going on that they have no control upon. Nationalists do not have fire arms, but their attitude and attire alone make them look dangerous and appealing enough.

I guess I have a very one track mind when it comes to style and it seems that all I can think of is just recycling already existing elements—this way they are more easily available, though, but I do believe that uniforms like these would give their wearers a lot of needed visibility and credibility in the streets. I am convinced that somehow we should launch a brand new line of nationalist street fashion—in the post-modern world the coming revolution will be, above all else, a revolution of fashion and style as representation is just as important as the content itself—if nationalist fighters look good they feel good and the audience will love them. The Fascists knew this well—fascism is not an ideology but a style and a state of mind—and that’s why Fascism will always make a comeback. If the soil is fertile, the change can come very suddenly and the ground zero for the explosion of new creative cultural energy can be a small group of people or a geographical space—just imagine how Malcolm McLaren and Vivienne Westwood launched punk style from their SEX boutique.—The stage is set, now we must enter it.

Roderic
Friday, September 2nd, 2011, 04:07 AM
Kai Murros have a very powerful message about the psychology of the National Revolution.

8JAocgOUvnQ

SV6pjHmXSS4

97mbNzg2YUQ

ogenoct
Thursday, February 16th, 2012, 10:34 AM
http://www.kolumbus.fi/aquilon/moscowspeech2010.htm


Moscow Speech 2010

Dark clouds are hanging over Europe. The European people have been utterly betrayed by their elite. The magnitude of this conspiracy is unprecedented in human history, our ruling elite has turned out to be a mere corrupt lackey of global capitalism. These high priced paracites have stolen the Europeans their livelyhood, their land, their future and their self-esteem. These prostitutes of the corporate world have also exposed Europe to an endles rampage of brutal beggars and forcefully denied Europeans any means of defending themselves.

We have become powerless, we have lost control over our lives, we are denied our place in this world and our spirit is waning. What once was ours has been taken away and given to greedy aliens, what we once held sacred is ridiculed and mocked by arrogant intruders, what once was familiar to us has now been degenerated into something strange and threatening.

For decades Europeans have been taught to hate and despise themselves, generations of Europeans have been brought up believing that the world would be a better place without them, they have been brought up to feel the crushing weight of the white man's endless guilt. Europeans are constantly reminded that only through self-destruction can they pay for the sins of their civilization.

The death of Europe is the fashion of the day, our demise a sign of progress, the disintegration of the traditional Europe a way forward, the predatory invasions against Europe only the latest trend, self-hatred, a sure sign of intellectual thinking.

We are called to celebrate the physical, intellectual, cultural and spiritual collapse of our civilization. We have already been brainwashed to believe that the collapse is inevitable and that it is a law of nature that we should die out and the barbarian hordes at our gates should win.

Under the disguise of liberalism, humanism and democracy Europeans have been persuaded to commite an ethnic suicide -- a race that has achieved so much and has survived so much has been tricked to welcome its own down fall and to take active measures in order to become a stranger on its own soil.

We are witnessing the most vicious and cruel conspiracy in history -- the conspiracy to replace the European people, a systematic campaign to wipe out the Europeans from the existence first by socially degenerating the people and then through mental and physical retardation to paralazyze the ability of the people to resist, to poison the very biological stock where all the great deeds of the past once grew. So that in the end a herd of geldings would be easier to usher to their death rather than the once prowd race of warriors, craftsmen and explorers.

But as our situation deteriorates the harsh realities of life will force the European people to open their eyes. Undoubtedly the media will try to deny the truth until the end and the academic elite will keep on spreading lies as it has always done, but once we hit rock bottom and face doom the truth will come out.

They may preach leftism, liberalism, feminism, love and peace, reason and tolerance but as our desperation and anger grows the old instincts start working again -- we are biological beings after all and we have the will to survive, the need to protect our offspring and the urge to defend our territory still intact -- they cannot erase them from our genetic make up. You can fight nature only so far but once you have crossed the line, nature strikes back.This is a struggle between sterile theories and the primitive forces within us, between high flying politically correct ideals and our atavistic passions and in the end life will prevail over theory and abstractions.

The war for the liberation of Europe means that in the future global politics will be dictated by our biological needs and instincts - the collective beast of the Europeans will take over and replace the soft, polite, liberal and civilized Super Ego. It is clear that when the beast takes over reason, tolerance and moderation step aside -- the European revolution will be the revolution of the subconscious. The modern world has turned into a deadly trap to us and in order to break free we will turn to the dark side of our personality for strength.

Many of you may ask -- will it be too late, maybe the aliens are already too strong when Europeans finally awake. How can we beat them if we are already in the minority?!?

--- We will win the intruders because our resolve is stronger, we are defending our own soil and our roots go deeper --We will win because our existence is at stake, our strategic advantage in this struggle is that we have no place to go. Once we realize that we are cornered like rats, we will unleash a frenzied attack.

The war for the liberation of Europe will be the climax of our history, because of this war, everything that has happened to us so far makes sense, our history is a gradual development so that in the end we would declare this war. This war is the logical conclusion of our past and a direct consequence of what has been done to us -- the powers that be can only blame themselves. This war is also the beginning of our future, something we will create together as one powerful nation -- after we have dealt with our enemies there are no limits to what we can achive and how far we can reach.

We must, in the end, admit that we actually need this crisis. This crisis will bring out the best in us -- it will harden us, make us stronger and wiser. Without this crisis there would not be unity among Europeans - only the sense of imminent death will bring Europeans together, only the looming peril will force the Europeans to find each other as brothers and sisters and only the burning hatred toward a common enemy will help Europeans to erase all national barriers dividing and weakening our race.

The war for the liberation of Europe will finally weld us Europeans together. It had to be this way -- economy, technology and some artificial political ideals were never enough to create a nation -- the liberal fantasy was doomed right from the start. In stead, we need this intense pressure from the outside, we need this struggle over life and death, we need this explosion of shared emotions ---- fear, hatred, rage... ... love, loyalty, courage. In the end blood is united with blood and we will wittness the birth of a nation.

This common struggle -- the tears of loss and the tears of joy -- the memories of those, who return home and the memory of those who die in battle will create the myths that bind us Europeans together until the end of days. This war will erase our troubled past and gives us the future. -- We absolutely and categorically need this war. We need one more war -- a war of all wars -- one magnificent, glorious, noble, mesmerizing, enticing, breath taking war. We must never be ashamed to admit that the resurrection of Europe requires the greatest war this planet has ever seen.

As long as the Europeans were on top of the food chain, runing their colonial empires accross the globe we didn't have to worry about the survival of our race and civilization. Europeans were only concerned about fighting other Europeans and becoming more powerful at the expense of their racial kinfolk.

But now we have lost the colonial empires and we are about to lose everything else as well. Under the pressure we will, however, adapt, learn and evolve and as a result we will become more cunning, cruel and ferocious. This crisis teaches us to win, this crisis forces us to win.

Today the media claims that Europeans are sterile, aging and tired

that Europeans are peace loving

that Europeans are shy, weak and always willing to step aside

that Europeans are too tired to build anything anymore, too lazy produce anything anymore

that Europeans have lost their lust for life. --- We will show them!

Let the whole world know that Europeans refuse to die, let it be clear to everyone on this planet that Europeans will not apologize and will not retreat anymore.

We will go further than ever before. We conquer the future for us and we will not share it with anyone. -- What Europe needs, she takes!

For us Europeans defeat is not an option -- we have created the greatest civilization on earth, we have always crushed our enemies, we have explored this planet, reached the moon, split the atom and accumulated scientific knowledge far more than all the other races together. Even today, at the moment of our weakness, we are still admired and envied by the entire world.

Our enemies, the vile alien masses herding in our streets, attacking, extorting, robbing our people, abusing our hospitality, laying claim on our soil have not yet even grasped what absolute and total violence in massive scale means. They seem to think that they can intimidate us into submission by using terrorism and petty gang violence, but they forget that once us Europeans turn violent we wipe out races, we destroy entire civilizations, we desolate continents and we start world wars.

Europeans are masters of violence. The nature has endowed us with courage, patience, resilience and a systematic mind. We will use these gifts to the fullest in the coming years. We will declare a total and radical war of destruction on those who wish us harm and we will not stop untill we have destroyed them completely.

Those who hope that Europe would fall will soon be greately dissappointed and those who conspire to harm Europe and Europeans will soon fear for their lives -- there is no place on this earth where they can hide from us -- we will hunt them down and we will make them pay.

The liberals keep warning people about us and our plans, the liberals are like old babbling women who tell horror stories of what will happen if nationalists take over one day. And of course the liberals are right -- once we are unleashed we will open the gates of hell and summon the FUROR EUROPEICUS. There is nothing more frightnening in this world than the bloodlust of nation that has suffered injustice.

We accept the fact that there is struggle in nature and that all biological as well as cultural evolution is based on this constant struggle. We maintain that the highest form of social and cultural struggle is the struggle between entire civilizations. The age of competing nations is over as nations are now regrouping and gathering under the banners of civilizations. Civilizations are superorganisms, they compete over living space and resources and only the strongest will prevail.

We maintain that the European civilization is superior to all other civilizations and that all her needs must be met first. In order to protect her interests globally we will call a global mobilization of the European people. For us there is only one law, the highest law -- our survival -- and what ever course of action we may choose in the future, its sole purpose is the implementation of this law.

The coming war is not going to be a moral problem, the coming war will be a mere technical problem and once we have solved the technical problem we will be able to wage a war of absolute destruction in all corners of the earth as we see fit. We can take the iniative where ever, when ever and against whom ever we want and stay on the offensive until the enemy is exterminated. For us war is the logical culmination of evolution. For us politics is secondary to war, for us politics is just a prelude to war. All the great questions of our time can and will be solved through war.

The world is facing cataclysmic changes as the tectonic plates of races and civilizations are colliding -- overpopulation is making the world too small for us all. The endless minor conflicts that have burned accross the planet for decades will grow in to gigantic genocidal wars over living space and life sustaining resources -- water, food, breathable air and energy. Societies will fall, chaos will reign and civilization will collapse leaving most parts of the planet into savagery.

Europe will face these challenges of the future by systematically waging wars with radical enviromental, ecological and ethnic goals. We will check the avalanche of hostile over growing populations, we will decimate the predatory migrations against Europe --- all threats against Europe will be eradicated --- we will strike overpopulation right at its source!

What starts in the streets of Europe with fists, knives and broken bottles will end in gigantic clashes in far away battlefields - our front line strecthes from the Strait of Gibraltar to Vladivostok and from Rio Grande to the shores of Australia.--- In these wars of tomorrow there will be no Finns or Russians, Swedes or Spaniards, Italians or Irish anymore because such consepts have simply seized to excist. The warriors of the future are simply Europeans united in common struggle, sharing the baptism of fire and the communion of power.

In the crucible of these cataclysmic wars an entirely new race is born. Through pain and struggle the new European man will reclaim his throne, sacrificing himself at the altar of his race the new European man will be bestowed upon unforseen powers. We will wage the coming wars with religious devotion, Europe's future armies will be the new Holy Order in a modern battle field, for them the destruction of Europes enemies is a sacred ritual. Our fanatism and uncompromising radicalism will be a rude awakening for those, who thought we would happily accept defeat.

In order to secure Europe's place in the world and to restore her power and prestige we must resort to total mobilization of Europe's productive forces. --- Europe must stand on its own again, Europe must be self-sufficient -- all ties of dependency to foreign production must be cut. Europe must be able to produce everything her people, economy and armed forces need.

Our grand strategy must be made absolutely clear to absolutely everybody, right from the start:

1) We will re-industrialize Europe.

2) We will re-militarize Europe.

3) And, we will re-vitalize Europe.

This gigantic undertaking will restore the pride and self-esteem of the European working class and a future for those millions of Europeans whose lives have been shattered by the blind forces of global capitalism. This unprecedented collective effort in European history will guarantee that no European will ever again be without a proper job with a proper wage, that no European will ever again go hungry and that there will always be a decent home for each and every European.

-- Once again everyone is important as all hands are needed in the reconstruction of Europe. -- We will snatch Europe from the jaws of death and make her the queen of continents again!

All this and much more we will do so that Europe would live forever. -- In the years to come our movement will evoke ancient forces, restore long lost traditions, find what once was lost and mend what once was broken. Stories will be told and songs will be sung telling the deeds of the heroes, who fought today for the survival of Europe.

And finally when all is done and the heroes have receded in to the twilight of gods, we can safely say that the pre-history of our race is over and the future just about to begin.