PDA

View Full Version : Which principle would you stick to even to the death?



GreenHeart
Sunday, December 22nd, 2002, 09:41 PM
So tell me which principle would you stick to even to the death?

Noddy
Sunday, December 22nd, 2002, 10:31 PM
Decency.

StrÝbog
Sunday, December 22nd, 2002, 10:38 PM
State-enforced racial and cultural purity.

AryanSoldier
Monday, December 23rd, 2002, 11:21 AM
1:Loyalty unto Death

2:Ruthless struggle until Victory

Remember these words my friends,

"Sieg Um Jeden Preis!"
(Victory at ANY cost)

Wehrmacht propaganda poster circa 1939-42

HEIL HITLER!!!

Mikhail
Monday, December 23rd, 2002, 05:54 PM
working class rights

Ederico
Monday, December 23rd, 2002, 06:24 PM
Survival of the Aryan Race and its total sovereignity from non-Aryan interference from within our own Societies, that requires Racial Segregation which necessitates deportation of non-Aryans from Europe and other measures. The right of every Aryan Citizen to have a decent livelihood in his own Lands. I am still working on other matters, or I forgot them.

Hellstar
Tuesday, December 24th, 2002, 07:49 AM
A truth that I feel I can live with for the rest of my life and extend/pass further through my descendents. a gathering/connection between past/present and future, my heart which only knows truth from nature & human deceit shall guide me, my steps shall eco into eternal halls within the future domains when I from the past come to carry on.

Azdaja
Tuesday, December 24th, 2002, 07:52 AM
For me it is important that a political system be an extension of a greater, natural, spiritual world-view. The betterment of its citizens - both on an individual and collective level - should be one of the main duties of any healthy goverment.

Johnson
Tuesday, December 24th, 2002, 12:59 PM
Political stability, ensured length of reign.

AryanSoldier
Monday, February 3rd, 2003, 04:59 AM
Where do you fall?

I am a National Socialist

HEIL HITLER!!!

Saladin
Monday, February 3rd, 2003, 09:19 PM
I am an ambiguous capitalist libertarian. :butt

Conquistador
Monday, February 3rd, 2003, 11:48 PM
National Sindicalist

EDIT: Back again to National Socialism :)

GreenHeart
Tuesday, February 4th, 2003, 01:52 AM
National Socialist (Nordicist)

I am an Aryan, and proud of my heritage which was handed down through the ages to me from my noble ancestors.

Jack
Friday, May 2nd, 2003, 06:59 PM
White Power Existentialist.

Ederico
Friday, May 2nd, 2003, 07:42 PM
Pan-European Racialist & Socialist (Some form of Socialism most probably, I am still defining myself).

Tryggvi
Saturday, May 3rd, 2003, 03:02 AM
Rationalist, Libertarian, Atheist.

Tryggvi
Saturday, May 3rd, 2003, 03:36 AM
Originally posted by NordicPower
National Socialist (Nordicist)NordicPower! Where have you been? I wondered already where you are...

- Tryggvi

Ederico
Saturday, May 3rd, 2003, 11:30 AM
Originally posted by Thorburn
NordicPower! Where have you been? I wondered already where you are...

- Tryggvi I suppose she is not here. We had problems with her and I have heard she went to another board.

Oberst Jager
Saturday, May 3rd, 2003, 03:46 PM
National Socialist

NatRev
Saturday, May 3rd, 2003, 06:10 PM
It all depends on what you define as National and what you define as Socialist.

I tend to see beyond the restrictions of nationalism yet within the confines of similar racialy related nations. I am not an internationalist yet I seek cooperation and mutual understanding from kindred folk of other nations. I tend to think of myself more as a Volkish Communitarian. This is not totally disimilar to National Socialism, in fact it is by and large more or less National Socialism.

Economically I know that I am left wing, yet culturally I feel that I am right wing. However, at times I feel that left and right are merely convenient dinner place mats used by the media to describe specific people or groups.

In fact, some of the policies of the NSDAP's 25 point programme are commonly used by most mainstream political parties, both of the 'left' and by the 'right'.

I am 'socialist' as I belive in the structure of society, the collective comradeship of group cooperation and team work. I do however feel that, specifically in the UK, the term Socialism has become confused and is now not concentrating its time on the people it was originally intended for, the British workers.

By workers I mean anyone that contributes towards society, whether they're a shoe salesman, a doctor, a secretary, a road sweeper etc. as ,ong as they do theiur bit, that's Ok with me.

Mainstream socialism now has turned its back on these folks and is instead optiong out to help whatever 'minority' group is the flavour of the month, it used to be gay rights but now the so-called 'Socialists' are catering for the asylum seekers and saying how most people in Britain are happty to have them here.

Ha! Virtiually everyone I know hates them, or at least thinks we shouldn't have them here. Why are the mainstream Socialists not listening to them? Ah, I forgot, they're only 'British workers', they don't matter in the grand scheme of things, it's foreigners and gays that get all the benefits!

A good website that I have found to be useful is :

http://www.politicalcompass.org/

try it, you'll find the information quite interesting.

Sigrun Christianson
Saturday, May 3rd, 2003, 07:23 PM
According to that test, I'm a Libertarian to the right. Interesting. :)

cosmocreator
Saturday, May 3rd, 2003, 09:09 PM
I'm a racial separatist first. Each sub-type should adopt whatever political system they think is best for themselves. And I don't think they'd be all the same because each sub-type is different physically/mentally.

NatRev
Saturday, May 3rd, 2003, 10:23 PM
true

I view politics as a secondary subject

race ultimately must be our primary incentive

all other differences must be put aside till we can trully be independant and free from ZOG rule

Prince Eugen
Thursday, May 8th, 2003, 08:59 PM
National Socialist of course.I hate democracy and elections but in many countries N.S. is out of law so we need some orgs and parties with patriotic or nationalist profile if we want to survive political . I mean honourable parties like N.P.D. in Germany not some conservative bastards who need us only for the ''dirty" job .

Bigred
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 02:57 PM
National Socialist

Heil Hitler

the best of us all.

NatRev
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 05:55 PM
I think there will be an upsurge in moderate nationalist groups especially over the concerns about so-called asylum seekers, it's the same all over Europe but I think we in the UK are getting too many of them, (how little is too many?).

The BNP are winning seats but they still have a 'racist' slant to them, which is OK in my book, but most voters would be turned off by that, if they were to moderate their views and concentrate on the major issues of asylum seekers, white workers rights and nationalist self determination, I'm sure they'd get more votes.

Just a theory mind.

Demigorgona
Friday, May 9th, 2003, 07:34 PM
I'm a racial socialist.

Evolved
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 11:48 AM
:eek:

Apparently I'm a far left wing authoritarian!

My Political Compass (http://www.digitalronin.f2s.com/politicalcompass/questionnaire.pl?page=printable_graph&X=-5.88&Y=1.90)

NatRev
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 07:08 PM
Me too, but read the stuff about RIGHT WING EXTREMISM, that's quite an eye opener, the BNP (British Nationalist Party) are, according to the site, more Left wing that the mainstream socialist Labour party, which in fact is very close to the Conservative party.

Besides, concepts of left & right relate only to economic ideals, I think we're quite varied in our individual positions, which is OK as we're all intelligent personalities here anyway.

Azdaja
Saturday, May 10th, 2003, 07:12 PM
Hey, I'm also a left-wing authoritarian! I guess that makes sense, though. If I were living in a racialist country, I would certainly lean to the left in almost all economic matters.

Moody
Wednesday, March 17th, 2004, 06:50 PM
I am a White Nationalist; interesting to see how some people characterised themselves;

e.g., Jack; "White Power Existentialist".

What happened to that phase!
It no doubt fell prey to racial angst!

Siegfried
Wednesday, March 17th, 2004, 07:08 PM
Folkish nationalist, striving for pan-European unity and solidarity. Proponent of decentralisation of most of the State (in the materialist, administrative/judicial sense of the word), environmentalism, and a moderate form of Capitalism in a folkish context.

kinvolk
Wednesday, March 17th, 2004, 08:57 PM
White American libertarian Constitutionalist. Darn proud of my aryan/Germanic heritage. I WILL fight jewish marxism!!

Jack
Wednesday, March 17th, 2004, 11:42 PM
I am a White Nationalist; interesting to see how some people characterised themselves;

e.g., Jack; "White Power Existentialist".

What happened to that phase!
It no doubt fell prey to racial angst!
LOL Could you elaborate on that a bit?

Moody
Thursday, March 18th, 2004, 05:54 PM
LOL Could you elaborate on that a bit?

As I said, its revealing to look back at how various people present their positions; some remain true, others chop and change - some drop out altogether.

Those who remain true are creating a body of work which is constructive and worthwhile.

Some just want to play around and fritter away what little they have.
Others slip in and out hoping to dodge the inevitable brickbats which are destined to come our way, whatever positions we take.

That 'looking back' gives one a few surprises - 'ah, so that's what he/she once argued bitterly in favour of!'

And so, the one who argued fiercely about the inappropriateness of 'White' was once happy to call himself so!
The one who attacked others for "Existentialist rubbish" actually called himself an ... "Existentialist".
Not only that, a "White Power Existentialist"!

Now that is a funny moniker - hilarious; I can just imagine Jean Paul Sartre in his Aryan Nations uniform!

Jack
Friday, March 19th, 2004, 01:32 PM
As I said, its revealing to look back at how various people present their positions; some remain true, others chop and change - some drop out altogether.

Those who remain true are creating a body of work which is constructive and worthwhile.

Some just want to play around and fritter away what little they have.
Others slip in and out hoping to dodge the inevitable brickbats which are destined to come our way, whatever positions we take.

Some learn from a million paths, others learn what they started with and stay with it. Worthwhile in whose eyes, according to what standards?


That 'looking back' gives one a few surprises - 'ah, so that's what he/she once argued bitterly in favour of!'

I 'argued bitterly in favour' of white power existentialism? Where, exactly?


And so, the one who argued fiercely about the inappropriateness of 'White' was once happy to call himself so!

And since then I've been a nihilist. Some people progress, Moody, towards better accuracy. I knew exactly what I meant by white.


The one who attacked others for "Existentialist rubbish" actually called himself an ... "Existentialist".
Not only that, a "White Power Existentialist"!

How positively shocking (:o Times change Moody, I'm not afraid of criticizing what I was.


Now that is a funny moniker - hilarious; I can just imagine Jean Paul Sartre in his Aryan Nations uniform!

I never did like Sartre. Camus was better.

Ederico
Friday, March 19th, 2004, 02:22 PM
Folkish nationalist, striving for pan-European unity and solidarity. Proponent of decentralisation of most of the State (in the materialist, administrative/judicial sense of the word), environmentalism, and a moderate form of Capitalism in a folkish context.

That sounds quite like me.

Moody
Friday, March 19th, 2004, 06:41 PM
There's a bit of everyone in there!
Everyone and no-one.

To Jack; 'Worth', means that which is both 'valued' [cf. 'Wert'], and has value in itself.
When we give worth to something, we 'worship' it [literally 'worthship'].

A body which is cohesive and coherent is worthwhile, by definition.
A statue of a god, whole and intact, can be worshipped and has high value. A statue which is fragmented and shattered into a "million" pieces is worthless.

'Nihilism' is likewise worthless by definition as it denies value, or rather it places value in 'nothing' [and is thus contradictory].
One does not 'progress' to Nihilism, one declines into it as into a slough of despond.

Neither can I imagine Albert Camus in his White Power guise!

Worthless.

Jack
Saturday, March 20th, 2004, 08:19 AM
There's a bit of everyone in there!
Everyone and no-one.

To Jack; 'Worth', means that which is both 'valued' [cf. 'Wert'], and has value in itself.
When we give worth to something, we 'worship' it [literally 'worthship'].

A body which is cohesive and coherent is worthwhile, by definition.
A statue of a god, whole and intact, can be worshipped and has high value. A statue which is fragmented and shattered into a "million" pieces is worthless.

'Nihilism' is likewise worthless by definition as it denies value, or rather it places value in 'nothing' [and is thus contradictory].
One does not 'progress' to Nihilism, one declines into it as into a slough of despond.

I know more than I did.


Neither can I imagine Albert Camus in his White Power guise!

Last I checked existentialism was about making decisions, taking responsibility for them and acting, well aware that there is no meaning of life seperable from what we give it.


Worthless.

:P

Taras Bulba
Saturday, March 20th, 2004, 06:32 PM
Here I list all the schools of thought that influence me:


http://www.thephora.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6299

Slavophilism/Russophilism
Integralism
Fascism
NS
Revolutionary Conservatism
Traditionalism
Ukrainian Integral Nationalism(minus its Russophobia)
Russian Solidarism
Ethno-Symbolism
Primodialism
Eurasianism
Romanticism
European New Right("Nouvelle Droite")
Orthodox Christianity
Traditional Roman Catholicism
Anti-capitalism
Corporatvism
Distributism
Social Conservatism
Communitarianism
National Anarchism

Moody
Monday, May 3rd, 2004, 09:16 PM
That is influence - but what about ALIGNMENT?
Different thing.