PDA

View Full Version : United Nations / UN



jagdmesser
Monday, October 1st, 2018, 07:29 PM
Merkel Fights for Globalism, Warns Trump Against ‘Destroying’ the United Nations


FRANKFURT AM MAIN (AFP) – German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Sunday warned U.S. President Donald Trump against “destroying” the United Nations.

“I believe that destroying something without having developed something new is extremely dangerous,” Merkel said at a regional election campaign event in Bavaria.
The veteran leader — a close ally of Trump’s bugbear Barack Obama while he was president — added that she believed multilateralism was the solution to many of the world’s problems.


Trump failed to see the possibility for win-win solutions, she said, instead seeing only one winner from any international negotiation. In his second appearance before the UN’s annual gathering last week, Trump told the General Assembly that he and his administration “reject the ideology of globalism, and we embrace the doctrine of patriotism”. “Global governance” is a form of “coercion and domination” that “responsible nations must defend against”, he charged.


Merkel’s opposing view to the US leader puts her in the same camp as UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, who warned before Trump took the podium in New York Tuesday that “today, world order is increasingly chaotic”.


Breitbart (https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/09/30/merkel-globalism-warns-trump-against-destroying-united-nations/), 30 Sept 2018.





The world was a lot better before the UN. STOP financing ALL these 'globalist organizations': the UN, NATO and the EU. Then they will collapse and vanish. They are all beggars looking for money / financial handouts.

Long live Trump.

jagdmesser
Tuesday, October 2nd, 2018, 09:59 AM
If you have ever wondered how we got to where we are at today, this video will open your eyes. “Cultural Marxists” said they’d make the “long march through our institutions” and they have. Without exception, the “cultural Marxists” have undermined every institution we have. This is a direct assault on Christian values and their goal is to destroy Western Civilization by destabilizing our society. Take the time to watch this video about Cultural Marxism

“Cultural Marxism: An offshoot of Marxism that gave birth to political correctness, multiculturalism and “anti-racism.” Cultural Marxism maintains that all human behavior is a result of culture (not heredity / race) and thus malleable. While traditional (economic) Marxists focused on class identity in racially homogenous countries (with poor results during WWI), Cultural Marxists facilitated the racial organization of non-whites, while simultaneously asserting that “race does not exist” for white people and that whites must deny all racial loyalties. Cultural Marxists typically support race-based affirmative action, the proposition state (as opposed to a nation rooted in common ancestry), elevating non-Western religions above Western religions, globalization and free trade, speech codes and censorship, multiculturalism, diversity training, anti-Western education curricula, maladaptive sexual norms, the dispossession of white people, and mass Third World immigration into Western countries. Cultural Marxists have promoted idea that white people, instead of birthing white babies, should interracially [sic] marry or adopt non-white children. Samuel P. Huntington maintained that Cultural Marxism is an anti-white ideology….”


Their goals as articulated by Timothy Mathews found here (http://www.henrymakow.com/frankfurt-school-satanic-judaism-in-action.html):


1. The creation of racism offences. [sic]

2. Continual change to create confusion

3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children

4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority

5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.

6. The promotion of excessive drinking

7. Emptying of churches –assault on Christianity

8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime ex. hate crimes laws in which only “minority victims” are protected

9. Dependency on the state or state benefits

10. Control and dumbing down of media

11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family



HERE (http://theunsolicitedopinion.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/agenda21.pdf) is the full text of the 351 page 40 chapter UN Agenda 21 document.


"Cultural Marxists" | UN Agenda 21
(http://theunsolicitedopinion.com/must-watch/)

The Mercian
Tuesday, October 2nd, 2018, 12:20 PM
Cultural Marxists have fully infiltrated most positions of power. When I realised this it was a horrific black pill.

The way I see it is we have a few options; cut ourselves entirely from their systems, or infiltrate them ourselves. Sadly I see neither happening, all I’m seeing is them being ridiculed but still gaining more and more power.

jagdmesser
Friday, October 12th, 2018, 11:25 AM
UN 193 countries: 57 muslim, 56 african, 28 EU (plus US, Australia, Russia, Ukraine etc)

The UN is a muslim and black institution.
Of course they only want their own self interests. The universal problem today is ‘overpopulation.’ Who is overpopulating? The blecks and the muslims.


The UN’s aim is one world government and the one world government will be the UN.

This Human Rights "Freedom of movement" is a globalist ploy by jewish financiers, the Rothschilds Inc., to change the world so they have total control.


With the GCM / the global compact on migration they are installing the New World Order / NWO. Briefing A global compact on migration - European Parliament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/614638/EPRS_BRI(2017)614638_EN.pdf)


Mass Migration is simply vote rigging to seize power and hold it. Once they have it they won’t be relinquishing it.


The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir?bu=41sk&from=yandex.ru%3Bsearch%2F%3Bweb%3B%3B&text=&etext=1938.R9Nl4bLrHAqTUFD5cS1SaGBEJOvCc KhzQ_6K5azn3gs.d86858e97d97b570918ebbe53 1e621060247d064&uuid=&state=PEtFfuTeVD5kpHnK9lio9WCnKp0DidhEKp iDEeQH_O9YI8TdD27791YsGsX6t97sv9bnykFJOp OUZI5Je3Ue6rDGymH2ufmXuC2kqRgnKVb5ZEyEpi 5PuEuWDLZsu_25aZxPnOqNtLM,&&cst=AiuY0DBWFJ5Hyx_fyvalFLFfOiIpZKkuWKuM iVL_0z28AblzcHUSfuja-jiqeyewQQddZS3BAoQPojIw5QTBJIWt9Tn3y30SL yj8_1GdXw_PojPwAThqRccRPY7206gRUPmi10rnw 0NrxLvD6ix6pDnP7dvszRfGGNYRQ2NKhCnzoUEGG ipqa2he-g6GRC_o06woroTcW_MHKvghM1w8ruSdnrOez_fkY Tv29xsCHO_ljMINu-ZIrH6eyD9rLXp-wyB63SIpPaqeCn1jjbBKLWiXF1leOdp6etNI7ViJ bkdNsvreMcUdsr_ZimLItPLt&data=UlNrNmk5WktYejY4cHFySjRXSWhXUDdjWEd TR2JFejB2cnFZVzJTNnZHZ0NFRGNNQ3JQY3VTNkN GRXVoVzljcDFnRTZXTjg2WS12cWJWcm1lTjE1aWJ 1VTgxNk9IX2o1VVljVzhjRGRzeG8s&sign=ba36d997d7c52a140ae37536583572a8&keyno=0&b64e=2&ref=orjY4mGPRjk5boDnW0uvlrrd71vZw9kp3Qa0 kidg-xaRI6BKEHLNUaZR_0eibkjc0gDQKOAdslar7OEQ5 0UYAQ,,&l10n=ru&rp=1&cts=1539339710437&mc=4.730388542207535&hdtime=3576117.5) (OIC) (formerly Organization of the IslamicConference) is the second largest inter-governmental organization after the United Nations which has membership of 57 states spread over four continents.

Gareth Lee Hunter
Friday, October 12th, 2018, 03:10 PM
My thoughts regarding the UN:

113706

jagdmesser
Wednesday, October 24th, 2018, 11:10 AM
A United Nations summit in Korea this week adopted a global “action plan” (http://outreach.un.org/ngorelations/files/2016/05/FinalAA.pdf)demanding a planetary “education” regime to transform children around the world into social-justice warriors and sustainability (http://www.thenewamerican.com/rio-20/item/12008-the-real-agenda-behind-un-%E2%80%9Csustainability%E2%80%9D-unmasked)-minded “global citizens.” Among other elements, that means the UN-directed global education must promote “integrated development” of the “whole person,” including the formation of their ethics, values, and spirituality, the final document declared. The global-citizenship programs, with definitions to be incorporated in curricula worldwide, should also indoctrinate children so that they understand their responsibilities to “protect the planet,” and promote what the UN and its member governments consider to be the “common good.”



The controversial action plan, approved by the UN's propaganda department and a group of largely government-funded “non-governmental organizations” (NGOs) on June 1 in Gyeongju, Republic of Korea, is aimed at helping the UN impose its Agenda 2030 scheme to “transform the world.” (http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism) In fact, the title of the summit gave away the agenda: “Education for Global Citizenship: Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals Together (http://outreach.un.org/ngorelations/files/2016/02/CN2016.pdf).” As The New American has documented extensively, the UN Agenda 2030 plan, also known as the “Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs), was approved by governments and dictators last year as a road map toward global control (tyranny). From national and international wealth redistribution to government healthcare and legal abortion for all, the controversial Agenda 2030 vows repeatedly to leave “no-one behind.”



However, globalists and the UN know that to achieve their vision of global totalitarianism, the minds of the young must be captured via “education.” Agenda 2030 actually has an entire goal dedicated to UN-guided “education.” And so the latest summit in Korea, organized for NGOs by the UN Department of Public Information, or UN DPI, was aimed at defining what that “education” regime will look like — and how NGOs can help. “Education is a human right, essential to well-being and dignity, and is key to achieving Agenda 2030,” reads the action plan adopted this week. “Further, an ethos of global citizenship is required in order to fulfil [sic] this bold, people-centered, universal, and planet-sensitive development framework.”



In the “spirit of global citizenship,” the document declares that “our primary identity is that of human beings.” But the agenda is much broader than attacking nationalism and patriotism. The UN DPI and the Astro-Turf “NGOs” that surround it, styling themselves "Civil Society," explained that what they call “education” must also be about more than what people normally think of as education — literacy, numeracy, and so on. In the UN's view, according to the “Gyeongju Action Plan” adopted in Korea, “education must advance the cause of global citizenship.” That means a lot more than one might think, too.



Among other points, this education for global citizenship must promote “integrated development of the whole personemotionally, ethically, intellectually, physically, socially, and spiritually,” the action plan declares. (Emphasis added.) Of course, parents, families, communities, tribes, churches, and more have traditionally been responsible for much of that. When or under what authority government-run, UN-approved schools became responsible for children's physical, ethical, spiritual, emotional, and social development was not made clear. The implications, though, should trouble anyone who values liberty, diversity, national sovereignty, and parental rights.



The “education” pushed by the UN must also be “imbued with an understanding of our roles, rights and responsibilities for the common good in service to humanity and the advancement of a culture of peace, non-violence, freedom, justice, and equality,” the action plan continued, using rhetoric about the "common good" that has been the rallying cry of countless tyrants. The globo-education must inculcate “a sense of care for the earth, reverence for the interdependent kinship of all life, and stewardship of all ecological systems for future generations.” It should also strengthen “the societal relationships among individuals, institutions, communities, states, humanity, and the planet.” And finally, it should nurture “a sense of solidarity and empathy in order to end poverty, protect the planet, ensure human rights, and foster prosperous and fulfilling lives for all.”



To those not well-versed in globalist-speak, that all might sound fine and dandy. However, when the UN's agenda is examined more closely, the real agenda becomes more clear. Consider, as just one point among many, what the UN means when it speaks of “human rights.” In Article 29 of the UN's “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” the government signatories claim "rights" can be limited “by law” under the guise of everything from “public order” to “the general welfare.” In other words, you have no rights, only privileges (http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/19851-united-nations-exploits-pseudo-human-rights-to-attack-u-s). Separately, the same article claims that everyone has “duties to the community” and that “rights and freedoms” may “in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.” Compare that to the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, which outline and protect God-given, inalienable rights.



Further down, the global action plan explains that the “education” agenda intends to shape every aspect of human life and civilization. “Education for global citizenship is an essential strategy to address global challenges as well as to promote gender equality, facilitate the eradication of poverty and hunger, build skills, eliminate corruption, and prevent violence, including violent extremism,” the document says. “It promotes truly sustainable production and consumption, mitigating climate change and its effects, protecting our waters and biodiversity, and preserving indigenous knowledge.”



If “tradition” and individual cultures get in the way of that agenda for UN-defined “human rights” and “global citizenship,” then “educational understandings” of those things will have to be “enhanced,” the action plan declares. The document also makes clear that this must be a worldwide effort, saying the global-citizenship scheming must be incorporated in school curricula worldwide and that “equitable quality education,” as defined by the UN, must be provided to “allpeople.” (Emphasis in original). The signatories vowed to work at the local level, too, to “incorporate education for global citizenship in educational systems.”



The signatories of the action plan, developed at the “66th United Nations Department of Public Information (DPI)/Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) Conference,” also committed to pushing global education that promotes a number of controversial concepts. “We commit to an education that teaches conflict resolution, a deep appreciation for diversity, ethical reasoning, gender equality, human rights and responsibilities, interdependence, multilingual and multicultural competence, social justice, sustainable development, and values,” it said. Those values, of course, are very unlikely to reflect the values of most parents around the world, whether they be Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, or any other major religious tradition. Instead, the values will be the values guiding the UN: globalism, pseudo-environmentalism, socialism, and more.



The UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, or UNESCO, is at the center of the UN's global “education” machinations. In addition to a partnership signed with Common Core-financier Bill Gates, UNESCO has been hard at work in its efforts to standardize and dumb-down education around the world (http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/20922-un-plots-future-of-education-creating-green-global-citizens). Among other schemes, it runs global programs on “Education for Sustainable Development,” “Educational for Global Citizenship,” and much more. It also has a “World Core Curriculum,” dedicated to and inspired by influential occultist Alice Bailey (http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/17930-common-core-and-un-agenda-21-mass-producing-green-global-serfs), that it hopes will guide schooling around the world in the years to come.



At a previous UN education summit, held last year in Korea, UNESCO boss Irina Bokova, a Bulgarian Communist Party operative who PR agents claim is among the “frontrunners” to lead the broader UN (http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/20884-bulgarian-communist-is-now-frontrunner-to-lead-un), also declared the UN's intentions. “We have the collective duty to empower every child and youth with the right foundations — knowledge, values and skills — to shape the future as responsible global citizens, building on the successes of the past 15 years,” she said, adding that education would “transform lives” and contribute to “breakthroughs on all the proposed sustainable development goals.” In other words, the UN — not parents, families, or communities — believes that it has not just the right, but the “collective duty,” to shape your children’s values.



The latest conference on pushing Agenda 2030 through globalist indoctrination of children masquerading as “education” is a crucial follow-up to the adoption of the agenda itself (http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism). “Children and young women and men are critical agents of change and will find in the new Goals a platform to channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world,” the official Agenda 2030 agreement explains.



The sort of activists that the UN hopes to make your children into is also explicitly defined in the agreement. “By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development,” the global plan for 2030 states. Considering what the UN means by “sustainable development” — population control, central planning, global governance, and more (http://www.thenewamerican.com/rio-20/item/12008-the-real-agenda-behind-un-%E2%80%9Csustainability%E2%80%9D-unmasked) — the agenda for your children takes on an even more sinister tone.



“Sustainable” children for global citizenship in the new order (http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/17930-common-core-and-un-agenda-21-mass-producing-green-global-serfs) will be accomplished via what the UN, the Obama administration, and others misleadingly refers to as “education.” In the UN document the word “education” alone is mentioned more than 20 times. And throughout the agreement, the UN openly advocates the use of schools to indoctrinate all of humanity into a new set of values, attitudes, and beliefs in preparation for the new “green” and “sustainable” world order. The UN’s education agenda also puts sex “education” front and center. “By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services [abortion and contraception], including for family planning, information and education,” the document also explains.



For now, Americans, Europeans, and people around the world still have many options to protect their children from the global brainwashing campaign being pushed by the UN — home education, private schools, Christian schools, and more. However, the UN realizes that, too. And so, in recent years, under the phony guise of “human rights,” the UN has started agitating for government control and regulation of private and alternative forms of education (http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/21341-un-gov-t-must-control-private-schools-because-of-human-rights) in addition to its grip on "public" schools. The UN also continues to push international education agreements and schemes (http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/20922-un-plots-future-of-education-creating-green-global-citizens)on everything from sex education and reading pedagogy to values and beliefs.



There is a good reason the UN is ridiculed by critics as the “dictators club.” (http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/north-america/item/23275-un-human-rights-body-run-by-dictators-ridiculed-in-congress)Most of its member governments cannot be considered “free,” even under the most generous definition of the term. Allowing the UN to make and shape education policy is not just dangerous, then, it is crazy. Instead, education should be a job for families, communities, churches, charities, schools, and more — but primarily parents. The future of liberty literally depends on it.



Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU (https://twitter.com/ALEXNEWMAN_JOU). He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


UN Adopts “Education” Plan to Indoctrinate Children in ... (https://www.blacklistednews.com/UN_Adopts_%E2%80%9CEducation%E2%80%9D_Pl an_to_Indoctrinate_Children_in_Globalism/51671/0/38/38/Y/M.html)

Related articles:


UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism (http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism)

UN: Gov’t Must Control Private Schools Because of “Human Rights” (http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism)

UN Plots Future of Education: Creating Green “Global Citizens” (http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/20922-un-plots-future-of-education-creating-green-global-citizens)

Common Core and UN Agenda 21: Mass Producing Green Global Serfs (http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/17930-common-core-and-un-agenda-21-mass-producing-green-global-serfs)

Schooling for World Government: UNESCO’s Global Citizenship Education Forum (http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/20038-schooling-for-world-gov-t-unesco-s-global-citizenship-education-forum-kicks-off-2015-agenda)

UN, Obama, and Gates Are Globalizing Education Via Common Core (http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/17925-un-obama-and-gates-are-globalizing-education-via-common-core)

The Real Agenda Behind UN “Sustainability” Unmasked (http://www.thenewamerican.com/rio-20/item/12008-the-real-agenda-behind-un-%E2%80%9Csustainability%E2%80%9D-unmasked)

UN Pushes Common Core-style Global Education Regime (http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/20657-un-pushes-common-core-style-global-education-regime)

UNESCO Report: Sex Guidelines for Kids From Birth (http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/631-unesco-report-sex-guidelines-for-kids-from-birth)

UN Academic Impact Joins CFR to Infiltrate U.S. Classrooms (http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/17019-un-academic-impact-joins-cfr-to-infiltrate-u-s-classrooms)

UNESCO’s Rotten Track Record (http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/13845-unesco%E2%80%99s-rotten-track-record)

Bulgarian Communist Is Now “Frontrunner” to Lead UN (http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/20884-bulgarian-communist-is-now-frontrunner-to-lead-un)

United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S. (http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/19851-united-nations-exploits-pseudo-human-rights-to-attack-u-s)

United Nations Plan: Teach Masturbation to 5-Year-Olds (http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/family/item/498-united-nations-plan-teach-masturbation-to-5-year-olds)

UN Pushes Agenda 21 Priorities in Elementary Classroom Curriculum (http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/education/item/21301-un-pushes-agenda-21-priorities-in-elementary-classroom-curriculum)






If we don't defeat the 'globalists' it's the end of the European races. It's that simple.

Only Europe and North America are targeted. No other continent or country is threatened by this 'globalist' BS about equality, democracy and open borders.

If these people in africa, the middle east, India etc. choose to have bourgeoning populations then it's their responsibility to look after them not our's in Europe.

jagdmesser
Thursday, October 25th, 2018, 05:09 PM
Saudi Arabia's rejection of a term on the UN Security Council likely reflects its view of itself as helping to establish an alternate international order based on Sharia law. The 56-member Organization of Islamic Cooperation is already the largest international organization after the UN. For Islamists, the UN, like all secular international organizations, lacks legitimacy.



A stated Islamist goal, to replace Western civilization's liberal democratic order with a Sharia-governed Ummah [community of Muslims], now seems to involve an effort to delegitimize Western international organizations, as seen this week by Saudi Arabia's refusing a seat on the United Nations Security Council. Saudi Arabia's refusal likely reflects its view of itself as helping to establish an alternative international order based on Sharia law. For Islamists, the United Nations, like all secular international organs, lacks legitimacy.


OIC vs. UN

The Islamic world threw down the gauntlet to the secular international order in 1990 when it drafted an alternative declaration of human rights, the Cairo Declaration, based on the Sharia law. The 56 countries of what was then called the Organization of Islamic Conference, since renamed the Organization of Islamic Cooperation [OIC], criticized the UN's 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights as being insensitive to religious concepts of the non-Western world. In Saudi Arabia's UN Ambassador Abdallah al-Mouallimi's October 13, 2013 statement, explaining the sudden and unprecedented rejection of a seat on the Security Council, he cites Saudi Arabia's "historical responsibilities toward its people, Arab and Islamic nations as well as toward the peoples aspiring for peace and stability in the world." The Saudi explanation continues by enumerating a litany of UN failures to solve problems in the Mideast. This statement underscores Saudi Arabia's role as the capital of a shadow-caliphate alternative to the current liberal democratic international order.

Riyadh's sentiment was preceded by last summer's rebuttal -- which revealed the global scope of Islamist objectives -- by the Pakistani Taliban fugitive, Adnan Rashid[1] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftn1), to the UN address by the heroic Pakistani Malala Yousafzai (then 15 years old), shot by the Taliban for having asked for women's education. In a letter, Rashid denounced Malala's naiveté for placing trust in an international organization that he claimed is a tool of the West with which to punish Islamic nations.

Rashid's riposte, however, has an unwritten corollary. He and his fellow Islamists bear allegiance to an alternate network that exists in parallel with the institutions of the current international order, the most visible symbol of which is the OIC.[2] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftn2)The OIC, which promotes Islamic social, economic, and political solidarity, is, in fact, already the second-largest international organization after the UN. It has not only attempted to negotiate disputes among Islamic factions in Muslim-majority countries, such as Iraq and Somalia, but has also helped to mediate disputes between non-Muslim-majority states and their Islamic minorities, as in the Philippines and Thailand. In adjudicating these disputes, the OIC has employed, as the legal frame of reference, the principles of Sharia law rather than international law.

One has only to examine the flag and the logo of the OIC to realize its ambition. A crescent moon encompasses the entire globe. The earth rests on a sea of green, the color of Islam, with the Kaa'ba in the center of the globe. The flag resembles the national banner of the al-Saud Kingdom (the only country among all the embassies in Washington D.C. that, on 9/11, did not lower its flag). The OIC, however, is just one of several all-Islamic multinational organs that parallel secular international community structures. There is also, for example, the International Association of Islamic Banks and several other organs for cooperation, such as the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and the Islamic States Broadcasting Organization.

Jihadi terrorists, as a matter of targeting policy, strike at representative symbols of the existing international order. One of the initial targets of Iraq-based al-Qaeda terrorists was the United Nations Special Commission in Iraq.[3] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftn3) Pakistani and Nigerian Muslim terrorists have routinely assassinated international volunteers, even those working to eradicate deadly diseases such as polio. The most extreme assassinations have occurred in Sharia-governed northern Nigeria and Pushtun tribal areas in northwestern Pakistan, where, in both places, the murders closely followed sermons that vociferously denounced ongoing inoculation campaigns. Any form of assistance from international organizations is rejected by Muslim extremists as part of a Western conspiracy to influence Muslims to abandon their faith. Inoculations against polio, for instance, have been described by Islamic extremists as a plot to sterilize Muslim children.[4] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftn4) It is more likely, however, that the radical clerics who urge believers to renounce such aid efforts are more concerned about losing control of their constituency.


Allah: Chastiser of Nations


The theological rationale for replacing the Western system of the nation-state rests in the Koran. Allah made it clear to Muhammad that all nations have a term and that all nations will be judged. The Koran contains frequent references to two pre-Islamic nations who have disappeared following the judgment of God: Ad and Thamud, two Arab-related people. The citizens of Ad are described as abnormally tall and were descendent from the biblical Noah. Ad was allegedly a powerful country, which stretched from Oman to Hadramaut (the southernmost province of Yemen, and homeland of Osama bin-Laden). Allah dispatched the Prophet Hud to warn the Ad that they must abandon their worship of false gods. Unheeding of the warning, the Ad people vanished from the world stage. The Koran asserts that the Thamud people met the same fate: oblivion.

The Koran describes Muslims as the chastisers of godless nations that refuse to amend their evil ways, and who give their hearts to Satan. In a possible attempt to explain why political tyranny triumphs temporarily, Koranic scholars agree that Allah permits nations to practice their corrupt and perverse pleasures until their tyranny and transgression reach extraordinary proportions. "We (Allah) opened the gate of all things (for them) …until they rejoiced in which (what) they were given (but) we seized them suddenly; then lo, they were in despair."[5] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftn5) This reference of course is embraced by some Muslims, who may hope that eventually the scales of justice will be balanced and that even the "Great Satan" (America) will have its day of judgment when Allah decides. Osama bin-Laden used to taunt the al-Saud rulers of Arabia that, because of their illegitimate nature and having failed to adhere to the ways of Allah, they too will soon disappear. Bin-Laden would call upon the Saudi ruling clique "to fight in Allah's way and to urge believers on because the might of Allah is stronger as is His punishment."[6] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftn6)

Some Arabs and Muslims may have derived a sense of confidence that they are Allah's new chosen people; that they will be raised by Allah to become a great nation in a manner similar to the one God promised Abraham. The Koran, for instance, describes how Allah sent 3000 angels to bolster the outnumbered Muslims against the Mecca-based Quraysh forces at the Battle of Badr in 624 A.D.[7] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftn7) Thereafter, Muhammad consolidated Muslim power throughout the Arabian Peninsula. The early Muslims were then confronted with the hostility of the world's two greatest powers, Rum (Byzantium) and Persia (Sassanid Dynasty). Both attacked Islam first, but Allah again came to the rescue, and Rum and Persia were conquered. Muslim commentators also recall how fierce were the Mongols, who devastated the Baghdad-based Abbasid Caliphate but who ultimately were converted to Islam. These historical lessons are applied to present day enemies of Islam as well.


The Umma Trumps the Nation-State


The 1648 Peace of Westphalia elevated the concept of national sovereignty above all other claims of loyalty by a country's citizens.[8] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftn8) This international agreement ended a century of warfare, which had been fueled by religious differences and the conflicting dynastic claims of the principal royal houses of Europe. The sovereignty principle was the cornerstone of the modern nation-state system, and curtailed the ability of Europe's dynastic families to exploit religious differences within European principalities as an instrument to augment their power. The Westphalia arrangements also helped to establish Western civilization's principle of the separation of church and state by acknowledging the political leadership as a society's primary power rather than the officials of the dominant religious denomination of each principality. This documentary precedent ultimately facilitated the development of a liberal, democratic, and secular order in the West. And it is this order that political Islam intends to expunge, replacing it with a new global system ruled by Islamic Sharia.

Muslim states have not emulated the West's example. In Islamic countries there is no separation of religion from politics. Moreover, the nation plays a minor role in governmental administration and legislation. Koran-based legality is the law of the land. Parenthetically, the majlis in Islamic countries is a consultative assembly lacking the authority to create law, unlike the legislatures in non-Muslim governments. In political Islam, law-making is the prerogative of Allah alone.

Islamist clerics preach that loyalty to the worldwide Muslim community, or umma,transcends any ethnic or cultural attachment to one's native land. National borders are seen as artificial constructs of the West -- certainly true of several Mideast countries, the boundaries of which were set arbitrarily by European imperial powers. This historical reality helps Islamists justify their effort to create a separate Islamic emirate that ignores the current borders between, for example, Iraq and Syria, and makes it difficult for the Islamic faithful to integrate fully into the body politic of their native lands -- as in, say, the case of U.S. Army Major Nidal Hassan.[9] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftn9)

Extremist Muslims occasionally boast that the Soviet Union, one of the modern two superpowers, disappeared a decade after its invasion of Afghanistan. Muslims attribute this victory to their fighting in the cause of Allah -- a type of conflict that is, by Koranic definition, a jihadist-led defensive war fought by mujahedeen[freedom fighters]. To fight this defensive war is a fard, or individual obligation, incumbent upon Muslims from all over the Islamic world. It was this dynamic that energized Muslims to fight U.S. forces in Iraq, the troops of the secular dictator Qaddafi of Libya, and the forces of Bashar al-Assad in Syria. The rhetoric of jihadists is replete with the same confidence in ultimate victory over the world's remaining superpower, the United States.


Restoring Muslim Lands to Islamic Governance


Nations as diverse as Israel, India and Spain also have no legitimacy in the Islamist worldview. Many Muslims believe that these countries have been unjustly ripped from the Dar al-Islam [The Abode of Islam] by the military power of polytheists and infidels. According to this Islamist axiom, the Islamist effort to return Spain to "the glorious era" of al-Andalus is well under way; it is viewed as having been stolen from the Muslims by King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella in 1492. And Israel is also regarded as land stolen from the Ottoman Turkish Muslims. Both al-Andalus and Israel are therefore viewed as forever part of the waqf [the entitlements of Allah]: land that once belonged to Allah, still belongs to Allah, and that can never revert. Northern India, condemned as being the world's most flagrant violator of the principle of Islamic monotheism, is also seen as eventually returning to the Muslim sovereignty that once flourished under Mughal [Mogul] dynastic rule.[10] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftn10)

Although Muslim numbers continue to grow, in large part through the proselytizing efforts enabled by oil revenues from the Arab Gulf states, many Muslims seem concerned about the challenge to Islamic values presented by the secular aspects of globalization, and the corrosive impact this may have on the faithful.

Dr. Lawrence A. Franklin is a former Iran Desk Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and USAF Reserve Colonel Military Attaché to the U.S. Embassy in Israel.



Notes


[1] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftnref1) Adnan Rashid, a former Pakistani Air Force officer, was serving a life sentence in a prison in Bannu, Pakistan for his role in a 2003 plot to kill the then President of Pakistan Pervez Musharraf. The Taliban freed him from prison last year along with about 400 other prisoners.
[2] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftnref2) The OIC, headquartered in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, was established in 1969 as a vehicle to speak for the entire umma, the community of the world's estimated 1.6 billion Muslims (OIC estimate). The OIC is an administrative substitute for the Ottoman Caliphate that was abolished in 1924.
[3] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftnref3) The truck bomb outside the UN offices killed 17 people on August 19, 2003.
[4] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftnref4) The Daily Beast, March 1, 2013, "Radical Islam Aids and Abets Polio" by David Frum.
[5] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftnref5) The Koran, Al-Anam (The Cattle), Sura 6, Verse 44.
[6] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftnref6) The Koran, Sura 4, Al-Nisa (The Women), Verse 84. See also Bin-Laden's article in Nida'ul Islam, October/November issue, 1996, Australia.
[7] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftnref7) The Koran, Al-Anfal (The Spoils), Sura 6, Verse 9.
[8] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftnref8) Burns, Edward, Western Civilizations: Their History & Their Culture Volume II, W.W. Norton & Co., New York. 2002. p. 527. The Peace of Westphalia officially ended the Thirty Years War (1618-1648). It began as an internecine Christian struggle between Catholic and Protestant interests in West Europe. It ended with the primacy of the political power of nation-states firmly established.
[9] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftnref9) Hassan was gradually drawn to embrace the 'higher calling' of his Muslim faith over his loyalty to the United States in his role as an Army officer. Hassan allowed himself to be swayed by the terrorist siren dawa -- call to wage Jihad against his fellow soldiers -- by the internet-based jihadist propaganda of Anwar al-Awlaki.
[10] (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic#_ftnref10) Much of India was ruled by a series of Turko-Afghan Muslim dynasties culminating in the cultural zenith of Islamic rule of the Mughals. The Mughal Dynasty (1507-1707) was of Turkic-Mongol origin, invading the sub-continent from Afghanistan. The Muslim Mughals ruled in over the vastly more numerous Hindu population. On occasion the Mughals respected Hindu values but at other times treated native Indian religions with an iconoclastic intolerance.


Saudi Arabia, the UN and the OIC - Gatestone Institute (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4031/saudi-arabia-un-oic)






1400 years of history prove that islam is mankind's greatest ever scourge. There is no question that it is getting worse, that's evident.

The fact that islam and the mass migrant invasion of the West is supported rather than confronted shows how in league our politicians are with the globalists, UN, EU, SOROS and the OIC / the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation.

Herr Rentz
Thursday, October 25th, 2018, 06:16 PM
This reads like the Communist Tenets describing their long-term goals.

It is exactly what is happening in the US currently and has been going on since the 30's. It is also partly the cause of the fall of Rome in the 300-400's CE.

There is no voting them out. It is already too late for that, but too early to start shooting. At least in this day and age.

Shots were fired for much less than is going on now a couple of hundred years ago.

jagdmesser
Friday, October 26th, 2018, 06:59 PM
Global Free Movement: UN Chief Calls Migration a ‘Right’ in a ‘World on the Move’


https://media.breitbart.com/media/2017/10/Ceuta-migrants-640x480.png


Global free movement and “safe”, orderly mass migration should be a right for all poor and unskilled migrants from the third world, according to the director general of the United Nations’ Migration Agency.


Penning an article for International Migrants Day entitled (https://www.iom.int/migrantsday), “Our Right of Passage Should Be Safe Migration”, International Organization for Migration (IOM) chief William Lacy Swing opined that the right of “safe migration” should not be limited to the “global elite” – of which the “privileged” caste he believes to include tourists, students, and legal migrant workers – but should be extended to those who would “have no chance of getting a visa or work permit”. “While we live in a time when a privileged elite considers global mobility virtually a birth-right, it is denied to countless others, trapped in hopelessly bad economic or conflict circumstances,” Swing writes, lamenting that “hundreds of millions who are not part of the growing, truly global labour talent market find themselves outside looking in, and looking onto a world they can only dream of.”


Swing, a former U.S. ambassador, has previously demanded the European Union (EU) open her borders to migrants and described endless third world migration to Europe as “inevitable (http://www.iom.no/en/hidden-menu-blog/49-why-europe-needs-to-make-immigration-easier-by-william-lacy-swing-direcotor-general-of-iom)”.



Heralding the advent of the smartphone as the “great leveller” in mass migration by giving migrants “intimate knowledge” of “elite” goings on, the open borders proponent said it was “no surprise” that “vast armies of hopeful young migrants” were “vulnerable to the siren song of social media” and began travelling en masse to Europe.


In fact, the International Organization for Migration ( IOM )is actively contributing to the call of global free movement after the UN organisation launched (http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/12/19/un-launches-app-empower-migrants-migrate-safely/) ‘MigApp’ on Monday – a mobile phone app developed to “empower” migrants which informs them of their rights and allows them to share their migration stories with other “migrants-to-be”.


Asserting that the world is “on the move” and mass migration cannot (https://www.iom.int/news/un-migration-agency-dg-makes-urgent-call-safe-migration-world-move-international-migrants-day) be stopped – only “managed” – Swing believes the best way to handle the “toxic issue” of chaotic, uncontrolled migration of unvetted people is to organise the “global mass movements” so they are seen to be “orderly, normal and beneficial for all” – implying citizens of sovereign, Western nations would not notice continents of people on the move if undertaken in an efficient manner.


“It should be possible to find some common rules in order to allow many more to travel, migrate and return home freely and safely,” he writes, comparing mass, mostly permanent, migration of people from alien cultures to administering airline flights.

Breitbart, 20 Dec 2017.




William L. Swing - Wikipedia
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_L._Swing)

en.wikipedia.org (https://en.wikipedia.org/)›William L. Swing (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_L._Swing) William Lacy Swing (born September 11, 1934 in Lexington, North Carolina). He is a diplomat and former United States Ambassador, and United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary-General and Under Secretary General


Arrest the Rothschilds, the bankers and their minions: Soetoro aka obama, Bushes, Clintons, Soros, etc.
Apply the law to the MSM and those in education and this chaos will quickly stop.

jagdmesser
Wednesday, October 31st, 2018, 11:49 AM
Government fears the loss of Austrian sovereignty on immigration policy.


Austria will not sign the United Nations agreement on migration in December, joining the United States and Hungary in backing out of the global pact.
“We have decided that we will not join the pact,” Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz told ORF radio Wednesday, according to Reuters (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-un-migrants-austria/austria-to-withdraw-from-u-n-migration-agreement-apa-idUSKCN1N50JZ) and German media, citing the government’s concerns over a blurring of the lines between legal and illegal migration.

The 34-page U.N. treaty on migration lays out a common approach to international migration, and includes 23 objectives to better organize the flow of refugees and define their rights more precisely. Participating countries agree, for example, to limit the pressure on countries with many migrants and to promote the self-reliance of newcomers.


While the pact is not legally binding, Kurz said that he feared the treaty would be at the expense of countries’ sovereignty.


In July, all 193 U.N. member states, except the U.S., expressed their support for the agreement. Later, the Hungarian government of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán renounced the agreement. Poland is considering withdrawing, too.


The U.N. migration pact is due to be signed in December in Marrakesh and voted on next year. Austria will not send a representative to Morocco and will abstain from the 2019 vote. “We will (…) abstain in the vote at the UN General Assembly in the year 2019,” said Kurz, an immigration hard-liner who governs in coalition with the far-right Freedom Party.


Kurz has previously joined other EU countries, including Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic, in pushing back against compulsory refugee quotas within the bloc.
.


Austria will not sign UN migration treaty – POLITICO (https://www.politico.eu/article/austria-migration-europe-will-not-sign-un-treaty/) 31 Oct 2018.

jagdmesser
Friday, November 2nd, 2018, 12:28 PM
FORMER PRESIDENT OF Ireland Mary Robinson has been appointed as chair of The Elders, an international non-governmental organisation of public figures noted as elder statesmen and human rights advocates.

The group of global leaders advocating for peace and human rights was founded by Nelson Mandela in 2007.

Robinson, the former United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights has become The Elders’ third chair, following in the footsteps of Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Kofi Annan.

Robinson said taking up the role at “such a critical moment for peace, justice and human rights worldwide” is a huge honour.

journal.ie (http://www.thejournal.ie/mary-robinson-appointed-as-chair-of-the-elders-4318427-Nov2018/), 02 Nov 2018


Of all the high horse positions they have for her, this is the highest. Can’t wait for the ‘let the immigrants in to your country or else your racist’ speech.



For the last thirty years the Irish president has been little more than a UN or EU mouthpiece. This is the reward they get for being such. Cronyism.

jagdmesser
Tuesday, November 6th, 2018, 11:36 AM
UN funds:

The U.S. is the largest overall funder at $14.1 billion per year, providing 22 percent of the sample’s resources. The U.K. is the second-largest funder at $7.6 billion (12 percent), followed by Japan at $5.4 billion (9 percent) and Germany at $4.4 billion (7 percent). These four countries contribute approximately 50 percent of the total funding, and the top 32 funders account for 95 percent. Notably, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the 17th largest funder and provides more than $880 million per year.


Who actually funds the UN and other multilaterals? (https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2018/01/09/who-actually-funds-the-un-and-other-multilaterals/)






20,000 Migrants ‘Almost All Armed with Knives’ To Cross Europe’s External Border

A breakthrough of more than 20,000 migrants preparing to cross the Bosnia-Croatia border and on to European Union (EU) nations is imminent, according to Austrian intelligence, which warns many are “armed”.


Migrant attempts to break into the EU have grown increasingly (https://www.euronews.com/2018/11/02/on-the-ground-at-the-bosnian-croatian-border-where-migrant-tensions-are-rising) bold and forceful, with police and illegal immigrants injured in several clashes since the middle of October, when hundreds began camping at the border — reportedly (http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/migrants-and-refugees-gather-on-serbia-s-and-bosnia-s-border-with-croatia-10-23-2018) after having been given misinformation that Croatia was set to open its frontiers.


According to Italian news agency ANSA, local media reports (http://www.ansamed.info/ansamed/en/news/sections/generalnews/2018/10/25/migrants-and-police-injured-in-bosnia-croatia-border-clashes_3b2f3e45-0600-40b5-870f-cd55b9e70ad2.html) the groups send numbers of young people and children towards the police line to chant “open border, open border”, while clashes see mobs of young men charge at police, and throw stones and other projectiles.

“The Croats are trying really hard to handle this alone, and have even positioned special forces in the area”, but authorities in the Balkan nation are struggling to cope with worrying developments at the border, according to sources at the Austrian Interior Ministry reported (https://www.krone.at/1801367) by Austrian bestselling newspaper Kronen Zeitung. “More are arriving — there are no more families and there are hardly any women left,” sources at the ministry’s migration department are claimed to have said. “Ninety-five per cent of these migrants who are trying to break through are young men, almost all of whom are armed with knives. A border policeman has already been stabbed,” the source said (https://www.krone.at/1801367), adding that [I]“the majority come from Pakistan but there are also many Iranians, Algerians and Moroccans”.


In terms of migrants’ maintenance and day-to-day living costs, ministry sources said the supply of provisions to the masses of people was being “fairly well-coordinated”, reporting that many of them have been equipped with prepaid debit cards provided by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). According to the refugee agency’s website, such cards are supplied (http://www.unhcr.org/uk/news/briefing/2016/12/5853b3ed4/unhcr-programmes-direct-cash-aid-displaced-reaches-record-430m-2016.html) to migrants as part of its “programmes for direct cash-aid to the displaced” in cooperation with Mastercard, which in 2016 announced (https://newsroom.mastercard.com/2016/06/20/mastercard-prepaid-debit-cards-provide-refugees-with-mobility-flexibility-and-dignity/) it was distributing prepaid debit cards to provide migrants travelling towards EU nations through Serbia with “mobility, flexibility and dignity”.

While the mainstream media has repeatedly scorned rumours that George Soros is helping finance illegal immigration to Europe and the U.S., Mastercard reported (https://newsroom.mastercard.com/press-releases/mastercard-and-george-soros-to-explore-private-sector-solutions-to-societal-challenges/) last year it was partnering with the open borders-backing billionaire on ventures to “catalyse and accelerate economic and social development for … refugees and migrants”.


In August, Breitbart London highlighted (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/08/01/croatian-police-warned-open-border/) reports by local media that open borders activists were threatening Croatian police, demanding that officers disobey orders related to protecting the country’s frontiers or else face increasing pressure from foreign NGOs, and the subsequent scrutiny that would follow from global media outlets and the so-called international community.



Breitbart (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/05/report-20000-migrants-almost-all-armed-with-knives-to-cross-europes-external-border/), 06 Nov 2018.




All funded by the globalist UN. Of course we’re paying for our own destruction.

jagdmesser
Thursday, November 8th, 2018, 07:40 PM
Are you willing to become everything you should hate and detest?


By now most habitual readers of the alternative Internet media have started connecting the dots and figured out that there is a massive criminal conspiracy at play in the the world today, one that has plagued America from its first major infiltration in 1913.

When John F. Kennedy was president, he characterized it this way:

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence–on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system that has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

JFK realized that this Criminal Cabal was responsible for ALL major events: the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, Soviet Russia, WW2 and Maoist Communism which followed WW2.

The Cabal’s power is centered in the private central Fiat banking System:

JFK was certain that this massive criminal conspiracy was centered in the private central banking system, and he also realized it was aligned with and used the secret societies for cover.

Evidence for his belief of this is supported in one of his final executive order EO 11110 which produced American debt free money that bore no interest due to the private City of London foreign bankers.

The $5 bill JFK authorized and issued as legal tender outside of the illegal, unConstitutional Federal Reserve System, which is owned by foreign based interlocked Cabal families. Note the term Federal Reserve does NOT appear on this bill and the date of issue is 1963.

This executive order 11110 began the process of returning the issuing of US Dollars back to the US Treasury without involvement in the Federal Reserve System and without bearing interest to be charged to American taxpayers.

EO 11110 was soon rescinded by Lyndon Johnson after he was illegally sworn in for president. There is clear and indisputable evidence that LBJ ran much of the cover-up of the JFK Assassination. But LBJ also played an important part in the assassination’s planning with GHWB, the man who ran this CIA OP40 operation and was rewarded for this by being appointed to run the CIA and then given the US Presidency.

It is generally believed that JFK’s issuing of real US bill outside of the Federal Reserve System was one of the main factors that led to his assassination, and perhaps the final straw after deciding to pull out of Vietnam and cut off the oil depletion allowance and separate from LBJ in the next election.


Since George Herbert W Bush’s successful deployment of the JFK Assassination, the Bush faction has been promoted to a prominent control position for the Cabal and to this day is now hanging on for dear life, attempting to put forth its candidate for president to maintain its high position of power in the Cabal. JFK was also aware that this massive criminal conspiracy used the CIA for most of their extra-legal operations designed to destroy the sovereignty of America and he had decided that the CIA must be shattered into a thousand pieces if America was ever to survive.

Before America is fully "Globalized” the masses must be deeply and successfully mind-kontrolled by the Major Mass Media.

Before the Cabal can complete its evil Globalist NWO Agenda, it must change the hearts and minds of We The People to neutralize any mass opposition we might have to their roll-out of their Globalist NWO System which requires an end to American Sovereignty including its prior borders, language and culture.

The best way to do this is to “dirty up” a population with the proliferation of pornography, destroy belief in traditional religious values, destroy normal sex roles and one man/one woman marriage, destroy normal borders, language and culture, and promote diversity and political correctness. Actually this is a main tenet of Bolshevism, to transform the state into Big Brother.

“No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.” — Samuel Adams, American Founding Father.


Why is it so difficult for Americans to wake up and see what is going on – that their government has been infiltrated and hijacked by a vast criminal conspiracy? J. Edgar Hoover, himself compromised and a captive of this Criminal Cabal remarked:

“The individual is handicapped, by coming face-to-face, with a conspiracy so monstrous, he cannot believe it exists.The American mind, simply has not come to a realization of the evil, which has been introduced into our midst . . . It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy, which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.”

The philosophy and goals of this Criminal Cabal is so contrary to what the average American stands for that the mindset of this Criminal Cabal is unimaginable to most. The average American wants to believe that the US/Gov is a benevolent parent figure which serves their best interest as citizens. But the Cabal is run by a Select Few top Policy-makers who live in a world of inhuman opposites and serious goals to enslave, tyrannize and consume the masses in order to attain their incredibly evil age-old inter-generational Globalist NWO Agenda.

The Criminal Cabal has fully infiltrated and hijacked all the major institutions in America including the USG and the monetary manufacturing and distribution system (which is private). This Criminal Cabal attempts to control most elections and those it can’t it works hard to compromise or neutralize the influence of those candidates elected who will not serve them.


Unless the unexpected occurs, the Cabal works hard to see presidents elected who will fulfill two important objectives for them:

1- The Cabal’s first and most important objective in the election of any US President is to do everything possible to make sure that any President who is elected will maintain complete cover-ups of all previous major crimes of the Cabal that are simmering beneath the surface. This is essential to the Cabal’s long term survival because if these serious crimes are completely exposed such could expose and neutralize the cabal’s power base with We The people.

It is vitally important for the Cabal to make sure the elected and appointed US/Gov officials maintain the cover-up of the Cabal’s outrageous RICO crimes including the numerous false-flag terror ops inside America as well as their criminal use of the American military machine to commit serious war crimes in aggressive foreign wars for the Cabal.

Obviously as JFK pointed out, without abject secrecy this massive criminal conspiracy would not be able to function because at some point We The People would rise up at every level and do whatever was necessary to route these infiltrators and traitors out of control positions in our US/Gov and institutions.

Bohemian Grove 1915 – a secret society still in operation

This need for the ability to falsely impose “national security” as an immediate cover-up mechanism explains why the Cabal has used the Secret societies and the Intelligence agencies, especially the CIA as it main vehicle to many of it covert crimes inside America which have been used to advance it Globalist NWO Agenda.

This Globalist NWO Agenda is so hateful, so evil and involves such inhuman acts such as pedophilia, murder, mass-murder by engineered wars of aggressive, torture, anonymous drone strike murders of thousands of innocent women and children, that is is unfathomable and unimaginable by most Americans.

It would be easier to convince the average dumbed-down naive America that one’s mother belonged to a secret cannibal cult and kidnapped and chopped up little kids after pedophiling them and torturing them. Surprisingly, this is exactly what the top Cabal leaders actually do in their Luciferian (Satanic) black mass rituals.

Don’t believe it, then do your own research. In order to understand these creatures of the night who run the Cabal, one needs to understand the sophisticated recruitment process which occurs in stages and involves the selection of those who either have no souls in the first place or will give them up for big money, big power and big status. (a good source of background information is Kay Griggs personal video testimony, a lady who has been completely vetted and proved to be legitimate in about 95% of her claims). You can find her testimony by searching on www.youtube.com (http://www.youtube.com/).


2 - The Cabal spends a lot of money to elect Presidents who will work to promote and advance their Globalist NWO Agenda of Free Trade, destruction of America’s language, borders and culture and US Sovereignty.

This Globalist NWO Agenda involves making progressive but extreme changes to American society which will change the average person to mold them into what the cabal calls a “Global Citizen”. A good Global citizen has a new set of Globalist style expectations for human behavior, his/her society and the nation they live in.

The new society is one where there are no definite or predetermined sex roles, traditional one man/one woman marriage and family systems are a thing of the past. Sexual perversion is taught as normal and even preferred. Traditional religion is trashed and viewed as obsolete. Situational, relative morality and “the end justifies the means” is the new modus of “right and wrong”. Political correctness is the new governing philosophy of public criticism which means the only criticism that is okay is that against the traditional order, another opposite.

The Cabal expects their Presidents to appoint Cabal-linked officials to their cabinet and appointments, folks who will advance the Globalist NWO Agenda which is to create a One-world system which the Cabal completely controls.


Conclusion

Global zombie uniformity

The bottom line to all this is that if you refuse to allow yourself to be “Globalized”, that is to be freely mind-kontrolled and molded into a Global Citizen, a person that will easily accept the Cabal’s Globalist NWO One-world system Agenda, then you are going to become a target for surveillance.

On the other hand if you have allowed yourself to be mind-kontrolled and Globalized, this transformation the Cabal is now attempting to impose on America, you will like what is coming. That is until the full agenda is rolled out which will involved drastic depopulation measures using starvation from 2020 to 2030. If the Cabal’s intended kill-off doesn’t occur fast enough, then they plan to deploy biowarfare to speed it up, until their 90% quota is met.

Now for the good news. Lately the Cabal has stumbled with Brexit and with the creation of BRICS, the AIIB, the SCO. The SCO is the new Shanghai Cooperation Agreement with China, Russia, and now Pakistan and India, previous long term enemies brought together at the time of the Brexit vote by a common rejection of the Cabal’s private central FIAT Banking system which they expect to fail. And there are numerous new trade deals between many nations that are not based on the use of the now doomed US Petro Dollar. All these nations involved in these new banking and trade systems without the US Petro Dollar are now forming a strong financial firewall against private Fiat western central banking.

A significant portion of the nations of the World are now hip to what the Cabal is and how it is empowered by the private central banking system which has been their main financial parasite. These nations have reacted and responded by forming their own private trade arrangements and alternative banking systems.

If Americans continue to wake up in mass as has started, thanks to the deep penetration of the Internet’s Alternative Media, this will add to the pressure now being exerted by the rest of the world on the Cabal. Such pressure can actually break the control systems of the Cabal not only at the alphabet agency level but at the street level too.

The key to all this is for Americans to realize that the TV Nightly News and other Network news they listen to is actually a tightly controlled, censored, pre-scripted system of mind-kontrol that utilizes big lies, false-narratives and Cabal propaganda. The American major Mass media is actually a Media Cartel comprised of six major media corporations which are all controlled by a large Cabal-controlled investment house which claims to be on the Vanguard of investments.

This same large investment house was recently linked to the financing of a great deal of terror and the purchase of a large number of crude oil tankers used to transport stolen Syrian crude oil for ISIS, a creation of the CIA, Senator John McCain, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and others.

So we all must make a choice, are we going to persist by allowing the Cabal’s Controlled Major Mass Media to mind-kontrol us and take way our Republic, Constitution and Rule of Law from us, or are we going to take it all back as is our collective right and obligation to do?


Bottom line. It’s now time for all Americans to make a choice. Are we going to allow ourselves to be Globalized into “good NWO Global Citizens” and easily give up our US Sovereignty, or are we going to take our country back from the foreign banking parasites we call the Criminal Banking Cabal? Are we going to restore America to the Republic our Founding Fathers fought and died to establish for us? Are we going to fully restore the US Constitution, Bill of Rights and Rule of Law and take back everything the parasitic “Select Few” wrinkled up old men with shrunken brains that are nearing death have stolen from us all?


Are you willing to become a NWO Global Citizen ... (https://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/07/03/are-you-willing-to-become-a-nwo-global-citizen/comment-page-1/) VeteransToday, By Preston James, Ph.D on July 3, 2016




"Sexual perversion is taught as normal and even preferred. Traditional religion is trashed and viewed as obsolete."


We are experiencing the breaking down of society and everything we hold sacred…. in a decadent plan, the City of London Rothschild’s have concocted and continue to carry out to establish the NWO.


MSM news is a monopolised, third rate propaganda show to keep us misinformed.


Why does the MSM and those that are running government find it necessary to lie and withhold information, AND WHY DO THEY GET AWAY WITH IT?


Only the West that pays for running the UN. It's time Europe and the US realised that the globalist UN's secret agenda is to replace all white Europeans with brown savages from the 3rd world. The UN which is filled with 3rd world leaders, many from Islamic countries, with their own agenda to take over Europe with their own people, should simply be disbanded.

Gareth Lee Hunter
Thursday, November 8th, 2018, 08:05 PM
To many people, regardless of age, ignorance and apathy are bliss. To others, they have been so extensively indoctrinated (brainwashed) they will actually resort to violence to silence anyone who attempts to provide them with the truth. And then there are those who go about their daily lives knowing something just isn't right, yet they hope others will work everything out right for them in the end.

It is truly a sad situation for those of us who know what kind of evil deeds are transpiring right under our noses, but our numbers are too insignificant to effectively change the outcome, which literally involves the enslavement of the vast majority of mankind by an exclusive clique composed of elitist monsters who care only about what benefits them.

jagdmesser
Monday, November 12th, 2018, 01:02 PM
The United Nations, in a non-binding agreement that almost all UN member states will sign at a ceremony (http://www.un.org/en/conf/migration/) in Morocco in early December, is making migration a human right.



https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/pics/3595.jpg
A new UN agreement, which almost all member states plan to sign in December, propagates the radical idea that migration -- for any reason -- is something that needs to be promoted, enabled and protected. Pictured: Migrants walk through fields towards a holding camp in the village of Dobova, Slovenia on October 26, 2015.

The finalized text of the agreement, the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (https://www.un.org/pga/72/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2018/07/migration.pdf), although officially non-binding, “puts migration firmly on the global agenda. It will be a point of reference for years to come and induce real change on the ground…” according (https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/nocat-uncategorized/un-finalizes-first-ever-global-compact-for-migration.html) to Jürg Lauber, the representative of Switzerland to the UN — who led the work on the agreement together with the representative of Mexico.


One immediate irony, of course, is that few countries have entry requirements as restrictive as Switzerland’s. If one wishes to stay more than three months, not only is a “residence permit” required (https://www.internations.org/switzerland-expats/guide/moving-to-switzerland-15502/residence-permits-for-switzerland-3), but, “In an effort to limit immigration from non-EU/EFTA countries, Swiss authorities impose strict annual limitations on the number of residence and work permits granted to foreigners.” These hard-to-come-by-residencies have, unsurprisingly, become (https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/society/hundreds-of-rich-foreigners-buy-swiss-residency-thanks-to-derogation/42951460) a source of income as “[r]ich foreigners ‘buy’ Swiss residency.”

The UN agreement, on the other hand, notes:

“Refugees and migrants are entitled to the same universal human rights and fundamental freedoms, which must be respected, protected and fulfilled at all times.”

(Preamble, section 4)

It cannot be stressed enough that this agreement is not about refugees fleeing persecution, or their rights to protection under international law. Instead, the agreement propagates the radical idea that migration — for any reason — is something that needs to be promoted, enabled and protected. Almost all UN member states, except for the United States, Austria, Australia, Croatia, Hungary and possibly also the Czech Republic and Poland, are expected to sign it.


The UN has denied that migration is being made into a human right.
“The question of whether this is an invidious way to start promoting a ‘human right to migrate’ is not correct. It’s not in the text; there’s no sinister project to advance that,” Louise Arbour, the UN special representative for international migration, recently said (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/01/austria-criticised-not-signing-un-global-migration-compact-european-commission).

The UN has no interest in admitting that the agreement promotes migration as a human right; until recently there has been little debate about it. More debate might risk jeopardizing the entire project. The wording of the agreement, as documented below, leaves little doubt, however, that with the signing of the agreement, migration will indeed become a human right.


The agreement is divided into 23 objectives toward which the signatories apparently wish to work. Objective number three, for instance, envisions the promotion and enabling of migration through a number of means. Signatory states commit to:

“Launch and publicize a centralized and publicly accessible national website to make information available on regular migration options, such as on country-specific immigration laws and policies, visa requirements, application formalities, fees and conversion criteria, employment permit requirements, professional qualification requirements, credential assessment and equivalences, training and study opportunities, and living costs and conditions, in order to inform the decisions of migrants.”

States, in other words, are not only supposed to open their borders for the migrants of the world, but should also help them pick and choose their future country by providing them with comprehensive information about each country they may wish to settle in.

The service level envisioned to facilitate more migration is also high. Countries are called upon to:

“Establish open and accessible information points along relevant migration routes that can refer migrants to child-sensitive and gender-responsive support and counselling, offer opportunities to communicate with consular representatives of the country of origin, and make available relevant information, including on human rights and fundamental freedoms, appropriate protection and assistance, options and pathways for regular migration, and possibilities for return, in a language the person concerned understands.”

Once migrants have arrived at their chosen destination, the signatory countries commit to:

“Provide newly arrived migrants with targeted, gender-responsive, child-sensitive, accessible and comprehensive information and legal guidance on their rights and obligations, including on compliance with national and local laws, obtaining of work and resident permits, status adjustments, registration with authorities, access to justice to file complaints about rights violations, as well as on access to basic services.”

Migrants are, evidently, citizens of a new world, in which all countries must spring to the assistance of anyone who has chosen to travel and reside there for whatever reason. Borders may exist in theory, but the UN — comprising nearly all governments of the world — is working hard at making them disappear in practice.

Migrants, according to the agreement, must also be “empowered to realize full inclusion and social cohesion” in their new countries (objective 16). This means, among other things, that countries must:

“Promote mutual respect for the cultures, traditions and customs of communities of destination and of migrants by exchanging and implementing best practices on integration policies, programmes and activities, including on ways to promote acceptance of diversity and facilitate social cohesion and inclusion.”


All cultures are equal and must be equally respected. Presumably, this means that, for example, the tradition of female genital mutilation (FGM), which almost all Somali women experience (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2018/07/20/most-girls-in-somalia-experience-genital-mutilation-the-ritual-just-killed-a-10-year-old/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ed16056a52e2) in Somalia, must be acknowledged in London and Paris as deserving of “mutual respect” in the same way that it would back in Mogadishu.

The agreement goes on to enumerate the work that states must initiate to accommodate migrants.

“National… policy goals regarding the inclusion of migrants in societies, including on labour market integration, family reunification, education, non-discrimination and health” should be developed. In addition, the host country should facilitate “access to decent work and employment for which they are most qualified, in accordance with local and national labour market demands and skills supply.”

In other words, newly arrived migrants in, say, Europe, should have the same, or at least very similar, rights to education, the labor market and health care, as Europeans, who have worked hard and paid taxes for half a century to gain access to those very same things. Europeans, of course, will have to pay for all of this out of their tax money.

The authors of the agreement evidently do not expect it to go down all that well with their populations. An agreement to facilitate mass migration into primarily Western countries from the rest of the world (there is no migration to speak of in the opposite direction) may prove a bit much for people in the West. The agreement therefore clearly signals that any disagreement with the agenda will not be accepted and that the signatory states will work to dispel “misleading narratives that generate negative perceptions of migrants.”

To make this objective a reality, the signatory states first commit to:

“Promote independent, objective and quality reporting of media outlets, including internet-based information, including by sensitizing and educating media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology, investing in ethical reporting standards and advertising, and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants, in full respect for the freedom of the media.” (Objective 17)

This is Orwell on steroids. Almost all UN member states will sign an agreement that says media outlets that disagree with government policies will not be eligible for public funding? On top of this, the agreement claims, bizarrely, that it is being written “in full respect for the freedom of the media”, as if that is going to make anyone actually believe it.

Second, the signatory states commit to:

“… eliminate all forms of discrimination, condemn and counter expressions, acts and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, violence, xenophobia and related intolerance against all migrants in conformity with international human rights law.” (Objective 17)

The agreement, conveniently, offers no definitions of what constitutes “racism” or “xenophobia” in this context. What, for example, is “related intolerance”? Is criticism of UN migration policies, for instance, “intolerance”?

Originally, all UN member states, minus the United States, had approved (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-migration-pact/u-n-countries-agree-on-pact-to-manage-mass-global-migration-idUSKBN1K32YW) the finalized text of the agreement and appeared ready to sign it in December. Recently, however, more states have announced that they are withdrawing from the agreement.

In July, Hungary withdrew from the agreement. Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto described (https://www.dw.com/en/hungary-joins-us-in-refusing-uns-safe-global-migration-compact/a-44733306) it as “entirely against Hungary’s security interests,” and added:

“This pact poses a threat to the world from the aspect that it could inspire millions [of migrants]. Its main premise is that migration is a good and inevitable phenomenon. We consider migration a bad process, which has extremely serious security implications.”

In July, Australia also indicated that it would withdraw from the agreement, at least in its present form. According (http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/jul/25/dutton-says-australia-wont-surrender-our-sovereignty-by-signing-un-migration-deal) to Minister for Home Affairs Peter Dutton:

“We’re not going to sign a deal that sacrifices anything in terms of our border protection policies… We’re not going to surrender our sovereignty – I’m not going to allow unelected bodies dictate to us, to the Australian people.”

In November, both the Czech Republic, and Poland announced (https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1040349/poland-un-global-compact-for-migration-united-nations) that they were very likely to withdraw from the agreement and Croatian President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic wrote in a statement that she would not be signing the agreement. “Our sovereign principles on securing our borders and controlling migration flows are absolutely the priority for us”, said (https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/poles-and-czechs-follow-austria-and-hungary-in-rejecting-un-migration-pact-1.3684210) Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki.

Also just this month, Austria announced (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/austria-un-migration-global-pact-agreement-us-hungary-sebastian-kurz-freedom-party-a8610161.html) that it also would not be signing the agreement. “We view some points of the migration pact very critically, such as the mixing up of seeking protection with labour migration,” Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said.

The European Union immediately criticized Austria’s decision. “We regret the decision that the Austrian government has taken. We continue to believe that migration is a global challenge where only global solutions and global responsibility sharing will bring results” said (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/01/austria-criticised-not-signing-un-global-migration-compact-european-commission) an unnamed spokeswoman from the European Commission.

This is, by the way, the same EU that is supposedly (https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1015529/EU-news-migrant-crisis-juncker-state-of-union-speec) going to be “cracking down” on migration. If you are “cracking down” on migration, why are you signing agreements that will facilitate and exponentiate it as a human right?


UN Member States: Migration Is a Human Right (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13263/un-migration-human-right) , 12 Nov 2018.




'Migration is a human right' is the battleplan and warcry of the 'globalist's' army coming to conquer us.

Why doesn't the UN impose birth control on the third world by making it a condition of aid and trade. Problem solved.

No Western country should be in the UN or give it any financial aid. The UN is anti-Western and just a 'globalist' institution.

jagdmesser
Tuesday, November 13th, 2018, 11:44 AM
Eastern European Union member state Bulgaria has become the latest nation to either signal or confirm that it would be withdrawing from the United Nations (UN) Migration Compact, following a growing exodus from the plan led by the United States.


The announcement came in Bulgaria’s parliament, with a debate set to take place on Wednesday. The ruling coalition holds a two-seat majority which means the motion will probably pass, with centre-right politician Tsvetan Tsvetanov telling the floor Monday: “the position of the Bulgarian government will be not to join the United Nations’ global pact on migration.”

The so-called Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, commonly known as the UN Migration Plan, will be formally ratified at a meeting of UN member states in Marrakech, Morocco in a months time. But half a dozen nations have now said they will not attend the summit, despite all UN members states except the United States of America having initially said they would sign.

President Trump rejected the document which he characterised as envisioning a world where there would be “no borders, everyone can come in”. The White House later said the plan was “simply not compatible with US sovereignty”.

Hungary (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/07/19/hungary-rejecting-un-migration-pact/) was the first to formally signal it would not be joining after the U.S. when it said in July that “This document is entirely against Hungary’s security interests… Its main premise is that migration is a good and inevitable phenomenon … We consider migration a bad process, which has extremely serious security implications.”

Austria (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/10/31/austria-follows-trump-and-withdraws-from-un-migration-treaty-to-preserve-sovereignty/) also cited concerns over national sovereignty when it announced it would withdraw from the pact in October when the government was reported as having raised serious concerns about the “content and objectives” of the UN compact.

In advance of the decision, Austrian Chancellor Kurz said: “We view some of the points in this agreement very critically. We will, therefore, do everything to maintain the sovereignty of our country and ensure that we as the Republic of Austria can decide for ourselves on migration issues.”

Poland (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/10/12/poland-un-migration-pact-country-safe/), the Czech Republic (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/02/czech-prepare-exit-un-migration/), and Croatia have also signalled they would not be participating. Defenders of the UN plan insist the document is not legally binding.


Bulgaria is Latest Nation to Withdraw From UN Migration Pact Following U.S., Hungary (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/12/bulgaria-is-latest-nation-to-withdraw-from-un-migration-pact-following-u-s-hungary/) 13 Nov 2018.




NWO Globalism can only be accomplished with the destruction of the races and nation states through mass migration of africoons and muslims.

jagdmesser
Wednesday, November 14th, 2018, 04:36 PM
The co-leader of opposition party Alternative for Germany (AfD) has lashed out at the German government and their stance on the UN Global Compact on Migration. He said his party he urges the government not to sign the document as it isn’t in the interest of the German people.


“If this Global Compact is just a political declaration, which has no consequences for the national parliaments and the law then why are we seeing resistance from everywhere on the rise against it, all of a sudden?” Gauland says.

According to the AfD leader, “The interests of the receiving society are left completely unmentioned” and “the document will supersede national law”.

“We pledge to fulfil the goals mentioned in the global pact and obligations in accordance to our vision and our guiding principles”, it is so written there. The wording alone “we pledge” appears dozens of times in the paper, Gauland continues.

He adds that the document can lead to migrants being encouraged to come and claim benefits as a human right. “For example we pledge, that all migrants notwithstanding their migration status are able to exercise their human rights through a safe entry to standard benefits. Less sensitive people call this migration into the social benefits systems. “So the Federal Government wants to pledge itself to this. But of course non-binding. Non-binding obligations.

Dear ladies and gentlemen, wooden steal.

Dear ladies and gentlemen on the government bench: How stupid do you actually think we all are and your voters out there?”

Later Gauland says the migration pact will undermine sovereignty and lead to a renewed influx of migrants:

“The milestone this pact talks about lies in the way of the betrayal of sovereignty of our nation. Millions of people from crisis regions are encouraged to hit the trail.

“Left dreamers and globalist elites want to secretly transform our country from a national state into a settlement region."



https://youtu.be/5f2hFLp1tmU




VOICE OF EUROPE (https://voiceofeurope.com/author/voice-of-europe/)

UN Migration Pact encourages millions of migrants to come and claim benefits – German AfD leader (https://voiceofeurope.com/2018/11/un-migration-pact-encourages-millions-of-migrants-to-come-and-claim-benefits-german-afd-leader/)





All MSM news is engineered propaganda. Look at the facts and think for yourself.

The vid is worth watching.

jagdmesser
Tuesday, November 20th, 2018, 11:09 AM
Opposition within Germany’s Christian Democratic Union to a UN Global Compact for Migration has grown despite Chancellor Angela Merkel's backing.


There are growing reservations within Angela Merkel's Christian Democratic Union (CDU) about Germany signing onto the United Nations' migration pact.

Health Minister Jens Spahn, who hopes to lead the CDU when Merkel steps down as party leader later this year, has suggested that Germany should not sign the pact and called for further debate on the issue. Other CDU members have also criticised Germany's participation in the pact, which is set for ratification in December. Spahn and other members of Germany’s governing coalition of the CDU, Social Democrats and Bavarian Christian Social Union (CSU) who have gone rogue on asylum policy, are apparently taking cues from the country’s neighbours — Poland, the Czech Republic, Austria, and Hungary, who have already pulled out of the pact.

Meanwhile, leading Christian Democrats are hitting back at Spahn’s and others’ idea of not signing the pact, which in part "intends to reduce the risks and vulnerabilities migrants face at different stages of migration," according to the UN.
"To put off signing the migration pact would be a lack of leadership that Germany cannot permit," Norbert Rottgen, who heads the Bundestag's foreign affairs committee, told the daily broadsheet Bild.

He added that the agreement, which is not legally binding, would be an important step by the international community in controlling migration and was therefore in Germany's best interest.

This may not be enough to convince the right-leaning members of Germany’s ruling coalition though. In an interview with the daily newspaper Die Welt, CSU Bundestag deputy Peter Ramsauer, who opposes the pact, said that "throughout the entire document, there's a stance that sees migration as something normal and even desirable”.

The non-legally binding Global Compact for Migration was finalised in July and is set to be adopted by UN member states in December.The pact urges countries to take voluntary measures to help improve the conditions in migrants' countries of origin that are frequently cited as the primary motivators of emigration, as well as to help destination countries better assimilate migrants and provide them with sustainable conditions.

Eight countries, including the US, Australia, and Italy, have either already withdrawn or have signaled an intention to withdraw from the pact. The United States was the first to announce it would not join the pact. It was followed by Hungary, Australia and Austria, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Italy who have signalled they may withdraw as well.


Gone Rogue: Merkel's Coalition Split on UN Migration Plan (https://sputniknews.com/europe/201811191069922943-germany-un-plan-split/)20 Nov 2018. (https://sputniknews.com/europe/201811191069922943-germany-un-plan-split/)




“As long as there is this book [the Quran], there will be no peace in the world.” Prime Minister of Great Britain William Gladstone.

When asked about the problem of Africa, Harold Macmillan, Prime Minister of the UK, suggested building a high wall around the continent and every century or so removing a brick to check on progress. Over entire millennia, the view would prove bleak and unvarying.

jagdmesser
Wednesday, November 21st, 2018, 05:39 PM
Australia will not be signing up to the UN migration pact, Prime Minister Scott Morrison has said, explaining he was not willing to risk the government’s successes in fighting people trafficking.


“The compact would risk encouraging illegal entry and reverse Australia’s hard-won successes in combating the people smuggling trade,” he said (https://www.9news.com.au/national/2018/11/21/08/36/scott-morrison-refuses-to-sign-united-nations-migration-pact-border-security) in a joint statement with Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton and Foreign Minister Marise Payne. “We believe that the compact is inconsistent with our well-established policies and not in Australia’s interests,” asserted the ministers, adding that the document “fails to adequately distinguish between people who enter Australia illegally and those who come to Australia the right way, particularly with respect to the provision of welfare and other benefits”. “We do not believe that adopting this agreement will add anything to enhancing our capacity to control our borders and manage our successful migration program.”


Mr Morrison was a major architect of Australia’s ‘Operation Sovereign Borders’ policy that brought (https://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/02/08/operation-sovereign-borders-900-days-migrant-boat-australia/) an end to asylum seeker arrivals at sea, and the accompanying drowning deaths, by turning the boats back and building offshore processing centres in the Pacific islands.

“I would never allow something to compromise our borders, I worked too hard to ensure that we weren’t in that position,” the Australian premier, who is a devout Christian, told (https://www.2gb.com/population-woes-will-scott-morrison-cut-the-migrant-intake/) 2GB Radio on Tuesday.


Mr Dutton outlined some of the government’s concerns about signing up to the Global Compact on Safe and Orderly Migration in an interview with Sky News, noting that “certain obligations could be imposed [on signatories] where we needed to support people once they’d been returned back to a country of origin”. “We’re concerned about whether or not it starves us as a sovereign nation of the ability to decide the way in which we can return people under the compact,” the Home Affairs Minister said.

Australia is the latest in a fast-growing list of countries which are refusing to commit to the UN agreement, with the government’s withdrawal coming shortly after announcements from Poland (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/21/un-migrant-pact-poland-crisis/) and Israel that their governments were pulling out of the compact, which is due to be signed in Marrakesh next month.

Australia Leaves UN Migration Pact — Won’t Risk ‘Hard-Won’ Border Control Success (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/21/australia-migration-risk-border-success/), 21 Nov 2018.





Good on ye mate.

UN and EU are two, completely globalist, organizations run by unelected appointees.

If she’s still PM then, Sharia May will sign up the UK.

jagdmesser
Thursday, November 22nd, 2018, 09:52 PM
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-f5qgllmOi_0/W_VGaSY2GmI/AAAAAAADPc4/HVG7xIcSWgYjebkcpSRxV4sTe2cTHCJJgCLcBGAs/s640/DEM%2BOBAMA%252814%2529.jpg

jagdmesser
Friday, November 23rd, 2018, 03:14 PM
A new UN agreement, which almost all member states plan to sign in December, propagates the radical idea that borders must be opened and a “new world” created, where mass migration – for any reason – is something that must be promoted, enabled and enshrined as a “human right.”


The agreement also directs national governments to de-fund and suppress all forms of counter-expression to mass migration within their countries. Critics who oppose migration and open borders should undergo “sensitization training”, according to the text of the agreement. Free speech will die.


Unsurprisingly, none of the countries that plan on signing the migration agreement have consulted their citizens regarding whether they want to open their national borders to mass migration. The global pact is being signed in secret, without public debate.


The unelected UN elites and their obedient vassal states understand that public debate risks jeopardizing their project. But do not be deceived into thinking the agreement will hold little power if it is allowed to proceed. The creators of the agreement are even boasting about the “real change” that will result from the secret global pact.


The finalized text of the agreement, the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration (https://www.un.org/pga/72/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2018/07/migration.pdf), is a major step towards the elimination of functioning borders and “puts migration firmly on the global agenda. It will be a point of reference for years to come and induce real change on the ground…” according (https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/nocat-uncategorized/un-finalizes-first-ever-global-compact-for-migration.html) to Jürg Lauber, the representative of Switzerland to the UN — who led the work on the agreement together with the representative of Mexico.


It cannot be stressed enough that this agreement is not about refugees fleeing persecution, or their rights to protection under international law. Instead, the agreement propagates the radical idea that migration — for any reason — is something that needs to be promoted, enabled and protected. Almost all UN member states, except for the United States, Austria, Australia, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel and Poland, are expected to sign it.


Gatestone reports (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13263/un-migration-human-right): The UN has denied that migration is being made into a human right. “The question of whether this is an invidious way to start promoting a ‘human right to migrate’ is not correct. It’s not in the text; there’s no sinister project to advance that,” Louise Arbour, the UN special representative for international migration, recently said (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/01/austria-criticised-not-signing-un-global-migration-compact-european-commission).


The UN has no interest in admitting that the agreement promotes migration as a human right; until recently there has been little debate about it.


More debate might risk jeopardizing the entire project. The wording of the agreement, as documented below, leaves little doubt, however, that with the signing of the agreement, migration will indeed become a human right.


The agreement is divided into 23 objectives toward which the signatories apparently wish to work. Objective number three, for instance, envisions the promotion and enabling of migration through a number of means. Signatory states commit to:
“Launch and publicize a centralized and publicly accessible national website to make information available on regular migration options, such as on country-specific immigration laws and policies, visa requirements, application formalities, fees and conversion criteria, employment permit requirements, professional qualification requirements, credential assessment and equivalences, training and study opportunities, and living costs and conditions, in order to inform the decisions of migrants.”


States, in other words, are not only supposed to open their borders for the migrants of the world, but should also help them pick and choose their future country by providing them with comprehensive information about each country they may wish to settle in.


The service level envisioned to facilitate more migration is also high. Countries are called upon to:
“Establish open and accessible information points along relevant migration routes that can refer migrants to child-sensitive and gender-responsive support and counselling, offer opportunities to communicate with consular representatives of the country of origin, and make available relevant information, including on human rights and fundamental freedoms, appropriate protection and assistance, options and pathways for regular migration, and possibilities for return, in a language the person concerned understands.”


Once migrants have arrived at their chosen destination, the signatory countries commit to:
“Provide newly arrived migrants with targeted, gender-responsive, child-sensitive, accessible and comprehensive information and legal guidance on their rights and obligations, including on compliance with national and local laws, obtaining of work and resident permits, status adjustments, registration with authorities, access to justice to file complaints about rights violations, as well as on access to basic services.”


Migrants are, evidently, citizens of a new world, in which all countries must spring to the assistance of anyone who has chosen to travel and reside there for whatever reason. Borders may exist in theory, but the UN — comprising nearly all governments of the world — is working hard at making them disappear in practice.


Migrants, according to the agreement, must also be “empowered to realize full inclusion and social cohesion” in their new countries (objective 16). This means, among other things, that countries must:
“Promote mutual respect for the cultures, traditions and customs of communities of destination and of migrants by exchanging and implementing best practices on integration policies, programmes and activities, including on ways to promote acceptance of diversity and facilitate social cohesion and inclusion.”


All cultures are equal and must be equally respected. Presumably, this means that, for example, the tradition of female genital mutilation (FGM), which almost all Somali women experience in Somalia, must be acknowledged in London and Paris as deserving of “mutual respect” in the same way that it would back in Mogadishu.


The agreement goes on to enumerate the work that states must initiate to accommodate migrants. “National… policy goals regarding the inclusion of migrants in societies, including on labour market integration, family reunification, education, non-discrimination and health” should be developed. In addition, the host country should facilitate “access to decent work and employment for which they are most qualified, in accordance with local and national labour market demands and skills supply.”


In other words, newly arrived migrants in, say, Europe, should have the same, or at least very similar, rights to education, the labour market and health care, as Europeans, who have worked hard and paid taxes for half a century to gain access to those very same things. Europeans, of course, will have to pay for all of this out of their tax money.


The authors of the agreement evidently do not expect it to go down all that well with their populations. An agreement to facilitate mass migration into primarily Western countries from the rest of the world (there is no migration to speak of in the opposite direction) may prove a bit much for people in the West. The agreement therefore clearly signals that any disagreement with the agenda will not be accepted and that the signatory states will work to dispel “misleading narratives that generate negative perceptions of migrants.”


To make this objective a reality, the signatory states first commit to:
“Promote independent, objective and quality reporting of media outlets, including internet-based information, including by sensitizing and educating media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology, investing in ethical reporting standards and advertising, and stopping allocation of public funding or material support to media outlets that systematically promote intolerance, xenophobia, racism and other forms of discrimination towards migrants, in full respect for the freedom of the media.” (Objective 17)



This is Orwell on steroids.


Almost all UN member states will sign an agreement that says media outlets that disagree with government policies will not be eligible for public funding? On top of this, the agreement claims, bizarrely, that it is being written “in full respect for the freedom of the media”, as if that is going to make anyone actually believe it.


Second, the signatory states commit to:
“… eliminate all forms of discrimination, condemn and counter expressions, acts and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, violence, xenophobia and related intolerance against all migrants in conformity with international human rights law.” (Objective 17)


The agreement, conveniently, offers no definitions of what constitutes “racism” or “xenophobia” in this context. What, for example, is “related intolerance”? Is criticism of UN migration policies, for instance, “intolerance”?


Originally, all UN member states, minus the United States, had approved (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-migration-pact/u-n-countries-agree-on-pact-to-manage-mass-global-migration-idUSKBN1K32YW) the finalized text of the agreement and appeared ready to sign it in December. Recently, however, more states have announced that they are withdrawing from the agreement. In July, Hungary withdrew from the agreement. Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto described (https://www.dw.com/en/hungary-joins-us-in-refusing-uns-safe-global-migration-compact/a-44733306) it as “entirely against Hungary’s security interests,” and added:
“This pact poses a threat to the world from the aspect that it could inspire millions [of migrants]. Its main premise is that migration is a good and inevitable phenomenon. We consider migration a bad process, which has extremely serious security implications.”


In July, Australia also indicated that it would withdraw from the agreement, at least in its present form. According (http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/jul/25/dutton-says-australia-wont-surrender-our-sovereignty-by-signing-un-migration-deal) to Minister for Home Affairs Peter Dutton:
“We’re not going to sign a deal that sacrifices anything in terms of our border protection policies… We’re not going to surrender our sovereignty – I’m not going to allow unelected bodies dictate to us, to the Australian people.”


In November, both the Czech Republic, and Poland announced (https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1040349/poland-un-global-compact-for-migration-united-nations) that they were very likely to withdraw from the agreement and Croatian President Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic wrote in a statement that she would not be signing the agreement. “Our sovereign principles on securing our borders and controlling migration flows are absolutely the priority for us”, said (https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/poles-and-czechs-follow-austria-and-hungary-in-rejecting-un-migration-pact-1.3684210) Polish Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki.


Also just this month, Austria announced (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/austria-un-migration-global-pact-agreement-us-hungary-sebastian-kurz-freedom-party-a8610161.html) that it also would not be signing the agreement. “We view some points of the migration pact very critically, such as the mixing up of seeking protection with labour migration,” Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/01/austria-criticised-not-signing-un-global-migration-compact-european-commission).


The European Union immediately criticized Austria’s decision. “We regret the decision that the Austrian government has taken. We continue to believe that migration is a global challenge where only global solutions and global responsibility sharing will bring results” said an unnamed spokeswoman from the European Commission.


This is, by the way, the same EU that is supposedly (https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1015529/EU-news-migrant-crisis-juncker-state-of-union-speec) going to be “cracking down” on migration. If you are “cracking down” on migration, why are you signing agreements that will facilitate and exponentiate it as a human right?


UN Global Pact Vows To Open Borders, Make Migration... (https://newspunch.com/un-global-pact-borders-migration/) 23 Nov 2018.







UN breakdown and how its used


UN 193 countries: 57 muslim, 56 african, 28 EU (plus US, Australia, Russia, Ukraine etc)

The UN is a muslim and black institution. Of course they only want their own self interests.

The universal problem today is ‘overpopulation.’ Who is overpopulating? The blecks and the muslims.


The UN’s aim is one world government and the one world government will be the UN.

This Human Rights "Freedom of movement" is a globalist ploy by jewish financiers, the Rothschilds Inc., to change the world so they have total control.


With the GCM / the global compact on migration they are installing the New World Order / NWO. Briefing A global compact on migration - European Parliament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/614638/EPRS_BRI(2017)614638_EN.pdf)


Mass Migration is simply vote rigging to seize power and hold it. Once they have it they won’t be relinquishing it.


The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir?bu=41sk&from=yandex.ru%3Bsearch%2F%3Bweb%3B%3B&text=&etext=1938.R9Nl4bLrHAqTUFD5cS1SaGBEJOvCc KhzQ_6K5azn3gs.d86858e97d97b570918ebbe53 1e621060247d064&uuid=&state=PEtFfuTeVD5kpHnK9lio9WCnKp0DidhEKp iDEeQH_O9YI8TdD27791YsGsX6t97sv9bnykFJOp OUZI5Je3Ue6rDGymH2ufmXuC2kqRgnKVb5ZEyEpi 5PuEuWDLZsu_25aZxPnOqNtLM,&&cst=AiuY0DBWFJ5Hyx_fyvalFLFfOiIpZKkuWKuM iVL_0z28AblzcHUSfuja-jiqeyewQQddZS3BAoQPojIw5QTBJIWt9Tn3y30SL yj8_1GdXw_PojPwAThqRccRPY7206gRUPmi10rnw 0NrxLvD6ix6pDnP7dvszRfGGNYRQ2NKhCnzoUEGG ipqa2he-g6GRC_o06woroTcW_MHKvghM1w8ruSdnrOez_fkY Tv29xsCHO_ljMINu-ZIrH6eyD9rLXp-wyB63SIpPaqeCn1jjbBKLWiXF1leOdp6etNI7ViJ bkdNsvreMcUdsr_ZimLItPLt&data=UlNrNmk5WktYejY4cHFySjRXSWhXUDdjWEd TR2JFejB2cnFZVzJTNnZHZ0NFRGNNQ3JQY3VTNkN GRXVoVzljcDFnRTZXTjg2WS12cWJWcm1lTjE1aWJ 1VTgxNk9IX2o1VVljVzhjRGRzeG8s&sign=ba36d997d7c52a140ae37536583572a8&keyno=0&b64e=2&ref=orjY4mGPRjk5boDnW0uvlrrd71vZw9kp3Qa0 kidg-xaRI6BKEHLNUaZR_0eibkjc0gDQKOAdslar7OEQ5 0UYAQ,,&l10n=ru&rp=1&cts=1539339710437&mc=4.730388542207535&hdtime=3576117.5) (OIC) (formerly Organization of the IslamicConference) is the second largest inter-governmental organization after the United Nations which has membership of 57 states spread over four continents.




Did Nero fiddle while ROME burned? For one thing, thefiddle didn’t exist in ancient Rome. Music historians believe the viol class of instruments (to which ... The Roman historian Tacitus wrote that Nero was rumored to have sung about the destruction of Troy while watching the city burn.


Of course the UK will sign up and there will be no public debate about the UN pact.

Put these this first post together with the second which I have copied from before and you get the picture.
Arab countries take on migrants or refugees. No migrants or refugees would go to Africa or Asia.
This is about the Globalists remaking Europe as the euSSR without Europeans.

jagdmesser
Saturday, November 24th, 2018, 11:22 AM
How many more countries will reject the UN’s attempt to flood first world nations with unlimited immigration, especially from the Muslim world?


So far, the United States, Hungary, Austria, Czech Republic, Poland, and Croatia have announced their intention NOT to sign the United Nations Global Migration Pact, which is scheduled to take place in Morocco in December.

Peter Dutton of Australia has also just said: “We’re not going to surrender our sovereignty – I’m not going to allow unelected bodies dictate to us, to the Australian people.

So far, Canada appears ready to sign, but what about the rest of Western Europe? I wonder if any of the oil-rich Arab countries will refuse to sign, considering that none of them have agreed to accept even one Muslim refugee?

The UN Pact To Dump Millions of Third World, Culturally Incompatible State Dependent Leeches into your Neighbourhood on your Watch




https://youtu.be/pYn09wrL9vw


COLLAPSING? How many more countries will reject the UN’s ... (http://barenakedislam.com/2018/11/10/collapsing-how-many-more-countries-will-reject-the-uns-attempt-to-flood-first-world-nations-with-unlimited-immigration-especially-from-the-muslim-world/)





UN = NWO politburo

How many countries will it take to pass this?
Will it pass if it is unanimous?
Will the countries that do not sign it, be obligated to follow it?
Will Brazil, China, Denmark, Italy, Japan, Russia and Switzerland sign?




UN 193 countries: 57 muslim, 56 african, 28 EU (plus US, Australia, Russia, Ukraine etc)

The UN is a muslim and black institution. Of course they only want their own self interests.




193 – 10 (approx) = pass

The africoon and muslim nations will vote for it, because it’s in their interests, but it’s meaningless for them and will not negatively effect them.

jagdmesser
Saturday, November 24th, 2018, 05:31 PM
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said that European Union (EU) member states must be prepared to transfer powers over to Brussels at a debate on the ‘tensions’ between globalisation and national sovereignty.


“Nation states must today be prepared to give up their sovereignty,” Merkel said, speaking at an event (https://www.kas.de/veranstaltungsberichte/detail/-/content/-das-herz-der-demokratie-) organised by the Konrad Adenauer Foundation in Berlin on Wednesday. “In an orderly fashion of course,” Merkel said, explaining that — while Germany had given up some of its sovereignty in order to join the EU, national parliaments were in charge of deciding whether to sign up to international treaties.


Trust and the willingness to compromise are vital in addressing tensions between sovereignty and globalisation, asserted the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) leader, highlighting the controversial UN migration pact, debate over which has continued to split her own party.


Merkel condemned the fact that, in discussions over whether Germany should join a fast-growing number of nations pulling out of the agreement, “there were [politicians] who believed that they could decide when these agreements are no longer valid because they are representing The People”.“ the people are individuals who are living in a country, they are not a group who define themselves as the [German] people,” she stressed.


Earlier in the day, the Chancellor had previously (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/21/merkel-defence-win-migration-pact/) accused critics of her plans to sign up to [B]the Global Compact for Safe and Orderly Migration, which declares migration ‘inevitable, necessary and desirable’, of advocating “nationalism in its purest form”. “That is not patriotism, because patriotism is when you include others in German interests and accept win-win situations,” insisted Merkel, paraphrasing her French counterpart Emmanuel Macron, who recently claimed (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/11/french-president-emanuel-macron-nationalism-is-treason/) that “patriotism is the exact opposite of nationalism [because] nationalism is treason”.



Battling disastrous (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/18/popularity-emmanuel-macron-france-25-per-cent-poll/) poll ratings at home in France, as well as massive protests, Macron travelled to Berlin at the weekend, where he told the Bundestag that “the Franco-German couple [has] the obligation not to let the world slip into chaos and to guide it on the road to peace”. “Europe must be stronger… and win more sovereignty,” the French president said (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/18/macron-franco-german-couple-stop-world-descending-chaos-warns-against-nationalism/), demanding EU member states surrender national sovereignty to Brussels over “foreign affairs, migration, and development” in addition to “an increasing part of our budgets and even fiscal resources”.



MERKEL: EU STATES MUST PREPARE TO HAND NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY OVER TO BRUSSELS (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/23/merkel-eu-hand-sovereignty-brussels/) 24 Nov 2018.






Merkel, the jewish, Polish Bolshevik who hates Germany, and sidekick Macron are MAD globalists who should both be in an asylum.

What does that say for those that voted for them.

I am convinced that this Mad Dictator Merkel is setting up another war, first civil which will then become global.

jagdmesser
Sunday, November 25th, 2018, 12:47 PM
While debate on the UN migration pact rages worldwide, with a growing number of nations following (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/22/world-follows-trumps-lead-nations-abandon-legal-framework-building-un-migration-pact/) the United States in withdrawing, the major deal has seen little discussion in the United Kingdom.



Britain’s ruling Conservative Party made pledges to reduce immigration “from the hundreds of thousands to the tens of thousands” in the 2010, 2015, and 2017 general elections, a promise (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-39960311) they have not yet made significant progress in keeping. Indeed, net migration to Britain still runs at over 270,000 a year, and former Tory chancellor George Osborne has suggested the party’s leadership never intended (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2017/05/17/osborne-boasts-tories-never-intended-keep-immigration-promises/) to honour the pledge.

Either way, signing the United Nations’ so-called Global Compact on Migration for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration would be a major step away from ever realising that commitment, a campaign group has said. British peer Lord Green of Deddington submitted two parliamentary questions to the government this week in which he requested information on whether, and how, the globalist pledge to ease and “enhance” migration would fit with the Conservatives’ long-standing promise to bring it under control and reduce it.

Several (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/05/02/poll-brits-favour-migrants-cultural-groups-connected-uk/) recent polls have indicated that controlling immigration levels remains an important topic (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/05/30/report-most-brits-say-immigration-divided-communities/) for British voters. A press release by Migration Watch UK, the London-based campaign group which Lord Green leads, said of the pact: “The UK Government should make it clear that it will not sign… If they have any regard for their election promises it would be entirely hypocritical to do so.”


Alp Mehmet, vice-chairman of Migration Watch UK, remarked on the UN deal itself, saying: “The Compact appears to have been drafted by diplomats whose aim seems to be to ‘normalise’ mass immigration from the developing world to the West at a time when the public are very clear that they find the scale and pace of such flows to be unsustainable and unacceptable.”

During drafting, British negotiators called for clauses recognising that it is the right and obligation of states to control their own borders, and that there should be a distinction between refugees and economic migrants, but they were not incorporated into the final text.

While legal professionals have said the compact acts will create a legal framework that lawyers will interpret at the national level to advance mass migration, it has received little attention or debate in the United Kingdom, where the political space remains consumed by Brexit.

Yet as the UK works to extract itself from one multinational framework and makes a bid for freedom, it may have inadvertently sleepwalked into another, signed by an ostensibly conservative government which pledged to the people in three consecutive elections to control immigration levels.

Breitbart London has reported (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/22/world-follows-trumps-lead-nations-abandon-legal-framework-building-un-migration-pact/) on the several nations which have decided the document makes an unacceptable grab on national sovereignty and the right to self-determination, however, following the decision of U.S. President Donald Trump to withdraw his country from the compact in December 2017. President Trump said at the body’s New York headquarters in September: “Migration should not be governed by an international body unaccountable to our own citizens. “Ultimately, the only long-term solution to the migration crisis is to help people build more hopeful futures in their home countries: make their countries great again.”

Others nations withdrew after the final text of the agreement was set, declaring they would not be signing up to the compact in December. Among those that have confirmed, or indicated they are rethinking joining, are Australia (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/21/australia-migration-risk-border-success/), Poland (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/10/12/poland-un-migration-pact-country-safe/), Israel (https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Israel-joins-US-and-European-countries-in-pulling-out-of-migration-pact-572361), Switzerland (https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/switzerland-delays-final-decision-migration-pact-59337944), Austria (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/02/austrias-populist-leader-on-migrant-pact-pullout-we-are-only-committed-to-our-own-people/), Hungary (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/03/05/hungary-un-plan-mass-migration/), the Czech Republic (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/14/after-teasing-move-czech-republic-confirms-it-will-withdraw-from-un-migrant-pact/), Bulgaria (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/12/bulgaria-is-latest-nation-to-withdraw-from-un-migration-pact-following-u-s-hungary/), and Croatia. (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/15/eu-juncker-un-migration-pact-populists/)



‘Hypocritical’ UK Govt to Sign UN Migration Pact Despite Pledge to Control Borders (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/25/hypocritical-uk-govt-to-sign-un-migration-pact-despite-pledge-to-control-borders/) 25 Nov 2018.





Globalism = SLOW KILL of Europeans by Population replacement
Globalists = Bankers & Ruling elite + most of Parliament.
Meantime - Panem Et Circum (multicult MSM, Social media, booze, dope and porn ) to sedate the people. And we wonder why so few object or protest.

jagdmesser
Wednesday, November 28th, 2018, 11:29 AM
40% of Germans say they fear the UN Migration Pact will give migrants additional asylum rights.


The Insa Institute carried out a survey of 2,062 Germans between Friday and Monday, asking them to respond to the statement: “I fear that the signing of the UN Migration Pact could lead to additional claims for asylum.”

Deutsche Presse-Agentur reports (http://www.maz-online.de/Nachrichten/Politik/Werte-Union-Buerger-befuerchten-neue-Asylansprueche-durch-UN-Migrationspakt) that 40% responded they feared the UN declaration would give migrants greater rights to asylum in Germany and almost an equal number either responded “don’t know” or did not answer, while just 22.7 % said they did not perceive any risk of increased asylum seekers.


The migration pact, due to be signed between the 10th and 11th of December in Marrakesh, Morocco, would require signatories to open up welfare systems to illegal aliens as well as “commit to eliminat[ing] all forms of discrimination” with measures including state promotion of “diversity” and the prevention of “hate speech.”

While the United Nations claims the agreement is non-binding, legal experts have said (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/22/world-follows-trumps-lead-nations-abandon-legal-framework-building-un-migration-pact/) that it is drafted in a way that creates a framework for asylum laws and occupies a “legal grey area.”


The survey was conducted for the Union of Values — a union of thousands of conservative members of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party the Christian Social Union (CSU) — with its Federal President Alexander Mitsch saying that the CDU/CSU must take its members’ concerns seriously and ensure the Bundestag and Federal Government do not make commitments that could become binding. “Therefore, at least in a protocol statement to be adopted, should it be stipulated that Germany rejects any future legal liability as a consequence of the pact,” Mr Mitsch said.

The CDU are set to meet for their party conference in early December — before the signing of the UN document in Morocco — but Chancellor Merkel has already signalled in the strongest terms her support for the compact, attacking (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/21/merkel-defence-win-migration-pact/) concern over the controversial agreement as “nationalism in its purest form.”



Breitbart London reported (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/26/exclusive-german-populist-leader-slams-merkel-for-un-migrant-pact-deception/) that internal documents from the Federal Foreign Office revealed Merkel’s government was the main architect of the pact, claiming they had been working on the agreement since 2016 — shortly after the chancellor unilaterally suspended the EU’s asylum rules and invited over one million migrants from the Global South into Europe.


40 Per Cent of Germans Fear UN Migration Pact Will Result in More Migrants (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/28/40-per-cent-german-fear-un-migration-pact-will-result-more-migrants/) 28 Nov 2018.




The EU/UN/globalists plan to continue swamping Europe with more and more immigrants (VOTERS) in order to hold democratic control. They want to increase the replacement so that it will be beyond stopping.

Will there be a 'Germany' after Merkel?

jagdmesser
Thursday, November 29th, 2018, 10:52 AM
The populist Italian coalition government has announced they will not be signing the controversial UN global migration pact and that the matter will be voted on in parliament instead.



Interior Minister Matteo Salvini announced, “the Italian government will not sign anything and will not go to Marrakesh, it must be sent to the chamber to discuss it. The Italian government will make parliament choose,” Il Giornale reports (http://www.ilgiornale.it/news/politica/litalia-non-firma-patto-onu-che-dar-diritto-migrare-1608553.html).



The statement was backed up by Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte who added, “We, therefore, consider it appropriate to put the debate to parliament and to put the definitive choices back on the outcome of this discussion, as was decided by Switzerland. In Marrakesh, the Government will not participate, reserving the right to adhere or not to the document only when parliament has pronounced itself.”



The populist-conservative Brothers of Italy, which is a traditional ally of Salvini’s League despite not being in the ruling coalition, have also pushed for Italy to renounce the pact but say they fear a parliamentary vote could see the Five Star Movement (M5S) and left-wing parties vote to sign it. “Salvini says that if there is no agreement with the M5S, we will return to parliament, but if we vote freely, the M5s and the left would say yes,” Giorgia Meloni, leader of the Brothers of Italy (FdI) said and added that she hoped the parliament would vote no to the pact.



Italy has become just the latest country to reject the UN migrant pact, which Breitbart London revealed earlier this week had been developed (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/26/exclusive-german-populist-leader-slams-merkel-for-un-migrant-pact-deception/) by the German government under Chancellor Angela Merkel since 2016.



Italy joins the United States, Hungary, Austria, Australia, Israel and several other countries who have also rejected or signalled they would reject the pact with Hungarian Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó saying (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/24/hungary-attacks-un-pact-attempting-legalising-migration-populist-claims-criticism-migration-criminal/), “The goal of the UN Global Compact for Migration is to legalise illegal immigration, which is totally unacceptable and violates the sovereignty of member states, including that of Hungary.”


Populist Italian Government Latest to Back Out of UN Migration Pact (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/29/populist-italian-government-latest-to-back-out-of-un-migration-pact/) 29 Nov 2018.




“Salvini says that if there is no agreement with the M5S, we will return to parliament, but if we vote freely, the M5s and the left would say yes,” Giorgia Meloni, leader of the Brothers of Italy (FdI) said

- in every European Country it should be PUT TO A NATIONAL REFERENDUM.

jagdmesser
Wednesday, December 5th, 2018, 04:27 PM
The signature by Belgium of the United Nations pact on migration, promised to the assembly by prime minister Charles Michel in New York in September, looked to be in jeopardy this week as the coalition party N-VA threatened not to back the proposal to sign.


“We will not sign off on this text,” said a spokesperson for Theo Francken, federal secretary of state for asylum and migration and a man tipped as a future N-VA leader. According to the party, the Global Pact for Migration is in conflict with the Belgian government’s own governing accords, established in 2014. The pact would also help perpetuate the “illegal migration chaos” which is at present “destroying Europe,” the spokesperson said.



The migration pact rises out of an idea launched two years ago by the former UN secretary-general Ban Ki Moon,” explained Nicolas Van Nuffel, part of the advocacy team for the NGO partnership CNCD-11.11.11. “There were long negotiations lasting two years between the member states, resulting in an interesting text which defines 23 objectives to be attained to allow migration to take place correctly in the interests of everyone.”



The discussion of the pact, Van Nuffel said, represented a return to multilateralism, with all parties seated at the table until two months ago, when two member states pulled out – the United States and Hungary, both of whose leaders – Donald Trump and Victor Orban – have taken a hard-line approach to migrants entering their territory from neighbouring lands.



Not only were NGOs in the field consulted as part of the negotiation, the Belgian government detailed a senior diplomat to cover nothing else – a sort of migration attaché. In addition, government representatives – including none other than Theo Francken – also took part in negotiations.



The lack of the backing of the N-VA, the largest party in the government, places Michel in a difficult situation. Back in September, he took to the podium in the UN and said “My government will sign the global pact on migration in Marrakesh in December.” Without the backing of his main coalition party, he will not have the authority to do anything of the sort, leaving Belgium in the unenviable company of Trump’s America and Orban’s Hungary.



Speaking to the RTBF, Nicolas Van Nuffel tried to place the pact in context: “You have to understand that this is a declaration which is absolutely not binding. This is not a new Geneva Convention which is mandatory on states. The interesting thing about a declaration like this, at a time when multilateralism is ill, and our migration policies are ailing, is that it changes the way of looking at things, and puts in place long-term objectives to allow us to treat migration for what it is: a phenomenon deeply anchored in the history of humanity.”


N-VA torpedoes plans to sign Belgium up to UN migration... 15 Nov 2018. (http://www.brusselstimes.com/belgium/politics/13143/n-va-torpedoes-plans-to-sign-belgium-up-to-un-migration-pact)




Article 19 Human Rights Charter, United Nations:
"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."


Speech is NOT free, if it's vetted by Political Correctness.



Tyrant Merkel is going quietly through her fourth term but she is only more determined to be absolutely ruthless on flooding Europe with third world leech invaders.

jagdmesser
Wednesday, December 5th, 2018, 11:11 PM
Petitions (https://petition.parliament.uk/)UK Government and Parliament

Petition


The UK should not agree the UN's Global Compact for Migration

The UN's Intergovernmental Conference will be held in Marrakech, Morocco on 10 and 11 December 2018. Like Hungary, the UK should not sign.


Parliament will consider this for a debate


Sign this petition


108,287 signatures




100,000
Parliament considers all petitions that get more than 100,000 signatures for a debate
Waiting for less than a day for a debate date

Theunissen
Thursday, December 6th, 2018, 03:09 PM
Cultural Marxists have fully infiltrated most positions of power. When I realised this it was a horrific black pill.

The way I see it is we have a few options; cut ourselves entirely from their systems, or infiltrate them ourselves. Sadly I see neither happening, all I’m seeing is them being ridiculed but still gaining more and more power.
The problem is that they've infiltrated and infected institutions of education. That's why it isn't really possible to get rid of them by only changing government. They'd persist after that.
Examples on which fields they are strong:
- Universities, especially social sciences and humanities departments have a lot of cultural Marxist professors.
- Schools / The teachers come from those universities and were educated and influenced by cultural Marxists.
- Churches / The clergy has been trained by Cultural Marxists and hence they changed their teaches in this regard.

That system gets self-perpetuating. The professors train the teachers, the teachers train and influence the pupils, those pupils become students, of those students become teachers and some even professors, positions from where they can influence students and pupils again.

To get rid of that, you'd need something like a decent purge.

schwab
Thursday, December 6th, 2018, 10:18 PM
ABOLISH the UN, which stands for United Nonsense.

jagdmesser
Sunday, December 9th, 2018, 07:15 PM
“Marrakech C’est Non!” says one of the banners wielded by the Gilets Jaunes at the protests in Paris this weekend: “No to Marrakesh!”



This refers, of course, to the United Nations conference in Marrakesh, Morocco later this week: the one where the world’s nations are being asked to sign away their sovereignty, their freedoms and their identity in one of the most pernicious agreements ever devised by the UN: the justly infamous UN Global Compact on Migration.

https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/12/Macron-May-Merkel-420x315.png

Lots of countries have already announced that they are not going to sign, among them the U.S, Hungary, Poland, Austria, Italy, Israel, Bulgaria and Australia.

There’s a clue as to how toxic this compact is: when even a country as emasculated and politically correct as Australia finds it too much to swallow.

But perhaps a bigger clue as to its toe-curling, achingly right-on, surrender-monkey awfulness is offered by the countries which are planning on signing up to it. These include Leo Varadkar’s Ireland and Justin “President Bieber” Trudeau’s Canada: arguably the two Western nations you’d least want to be living in right now because they are currently in the hands of politically correct bedwetters bent on destroying every last vestige of their national identity and replacing it with some kind of squishy, globalist melting pot where people of all colours and creeds hold hands under a rainbow.



Another country which is planning on signing it is the United Kingdom. Which is bizarre to the point of incomprehensibility when you discover what this UN Global Compact on Migration entails.

Essentially it’s a globalist masterplan for making migration easier. Much, much easier.

Not the kind of migration that you or I might approve of: say, eager computing graduates from the universities of Cluj Napoca coming to bolster our tech economy with their Python programming skills; me spending a few years in Singapore/Costa Rica/Switzerland/the U.S. or wherever in order to ride out the coming Corbyn terror; kids like my eldest boy moving to the low tax, entrepreneur-friendly environs of Hong Kong to make their fortune; win-win situations which work to the advantage both of the migrant and the host nation…

I mean the kind of migration we most of us dread: the one where hordes of mostly unskilled, sometimes criminally deviant males of fighting age descend on our civilised home nations from their considerably less civilised countries – at best to overburden our infrastructure and exploit our overgenerous welfare systems, at worst to destroy us from within.

It’s happening right now across the West: the stone-throwing, wall-scaling, MS-13 tattooed migrant caravans swarming towards the U.S. southern border; the gangs of sullen youths who’ve turned St Denis – the cathedral where most of France’s kings are buried – into a cross between Lagos and Mogadishu; the Muslim ghetto kids who’ve helped Malmo in Sweden become the rape and grenade-attack capital of Europe; the hassly Africans who dog your every step through the tourist sites and beaches of Italy, importuning you to buy stuff you don’t want; the millions of migrants Angela Merkel invited into Germany, now adding impressively to the country’s rape and murder statistics…

You’ll never guess what the United Nations’ solution to this problem is. Actually, knowing the UN as we all do, you probably will.

Yep: the UN’s solution is to make it illegal to talk about this problem.


Here is the relevant section of the UN Global Compact on Migration (https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/sites/default/files/180713_agreed_outcome_global_compact_for _migration.pdf):


OBJECTIVE 17: Eliminate all forms of discrimination and promote evidence-based public discourse to shape perceptions of migration

33. We commit to eliminate all forms of discrimination, condemn and counter expressions, acts and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, violence, xenophobia and related intolerance against all migrants in conformity with international human rights law. We further commit to promote an open and evidence-based public discourse on migration and migrants in partnership with all parts of society, that generates a more realistic, humane and constructive perception in this regard. We also commit to protect freedom of expression in accordance with international law, recognizing that an open and free debate contributes to a comprehensive understanding of all aspects of migration.

To realize this commitment, we will draw from the following actions:
a) Enact, implement or maintain legislation that penalizes hate crimes and aggravated hate crimes targeting migrants, and train law enforcement and other public officials to identify, prevent and respond to such crimes and other acts of violence that target migrants, as well as to provide medical, legal and psychosocial assistance for victims.


The excuse being bandied about by defenders of this outrageous document is that it is not legally binding. No, indeed. But that’s the excuse that believers in one-world government always use to mask their sinister scheming. It was the same with the UN’s Agenda 21 all those years ago at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit. People signed up to it because it supposedly wasn’t binding. But it very quickly became an excuse for all manner of green lobbyists and politicians and left-leaning pressure groups and local governments to force through policies as if it were binding.


If you want to read more about the threat of the UN Migration Compact, this piece (https://www.julesgomes.com/single-post/Traitor-Theresa-May-signing-UN-migration-pact-is-moral-blackmail-and-national-suicide) by UKIP’s David Kurten is a good place to start. It’s still more thoroughly discussed and dismantled by Stefan Molyneux in this hour-long video. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WRszRZBfYw&feature=youtu.be) Molyneux comes up with some pretty shocking statistics on the damage done by mass migration – and the unpopularity thereof in the countries that have to put up with it.


78% of European citizens want tighter control of immigration.

50% of Kenyans say they would move to another country (and they don’t mean Somalia or Zimbabwe, by the way) if they could.

12 Germans have to work in order to pay the costs of every one of the two or three million migrants Angela Merkel invited into the country.

In 2017 the Swedish government spent $18.6 billion paying for refugees – 19% of its annual budget.

Why would any country on earth sign up to a deal so very obviously against the interests of its nationals?

It’s very simple: the globalist political elite doesn’t respect nation states nor does it give a damn about the views of ordinary people. Indeed, it despises them so much that it would much rather make their views illegal than listen to what they have to say.

That’s why the Gilets Jaunes are setting France ablaze; that’s why thousands of protestors are out on the streets of London following Tommy Robinson and the #BrexitBetrayalMarch; that’s why they elected Matteo Salvini in Italy, Viktor Orban in Hungary, Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil; that why Donald Trump is president of the USA.


We are living in an era of world revolution. And the globalists – as embodied by the kind of George-Soros-financed campaign groups pushing that suicidal UN Global Compact for Migration – are on the wrong side of history.


No to Marrakesh! – The UN’s Sinister Blueprint for Globalist (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/09/uns-global-compact-on-migration-is-sinister-dangerous-and-wrong/) 09 Dec 2018.





Our UK government is completely ignoring the petition to not sign up to this UN Migration Pact, despite the fact that is has passed 140,000 signatures. When a petition reaches 100,000 it legally should be discussed in parliament.
Our political representatives are bribed, told what to do with the guise 'you know better' and 'it's for the common good.'

Wuotans Krieger
Sunday, December 9th, 2018, 07:39 PM
ABOLISH the UN, which stands for United Nonsense.

And what if anything would you replace it with? It is the only collective organisation which can oppose the Washington-Tel Aviv axis.

Wuotans Krieger
Sunday, December 9th, 2018, 07:41 PM
Our UK government is completely ignoring the petition to not sign up to this UN Migration Pact, despite the fact that is has passed 140,000 signatures. When a petition reaches 100,000 it legally should be discussed in parliament.
Our political representatives are bribed, told what to do with the guise 'you know better' and 'it's for the common good.'

That is incorrect. It can be considered for debate but Parliament is under no legal obligation to debate it.

jagdmesser
Monday, December 10th, 2018, 10:44 AM
More UN Chicanery.



The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration -- which seeks to criminalize criticism of migration -- is nothing more or less than a dangerous effort to weaken national borders, to normalize mass migration, to blur the line between legal and illegal immigration, and to bolster the idea that people claiming to be refugees enjoy a panoply of rights in countries where they have never before set foot.
One thing about the agreement, in any event, is irrefutable: almost nobody in the Western world has been clamoring for this. It is, quite simply, a project of the globalist elites. It is a UN power-grab.






It is something else, too: it is an effort to enhance the clout of the UN's largest and most influential power bloc -- namely, the Arab and Muslim states. Briefly put, whatever this deal is or is not, it is definitely not good news for the West, for freedom, or for national identity and security.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/pics/3595.jpg

The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration -- which seeks to criminalize criticism of migration -- is nothing more or less than a dangerous effort to weaken national borders, normalize mass migration, blur the line between legal and illegal immigration, and bolster the idea that people claiming to be refugees enjoy a panoply of rights in countries where they have never before set foot. Pictured: Migrants walk towards a holding camp in Dobova, Slovenia on October 26, 2015. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)





In Britain, the rage over Muslim rape gangs and Theresa May's Brexit foul-up is spreading. In Germany, anger about Merkel's recklessly transformative refugee policies is mounting. In France, the growing cost of immigrant freeloaders to taxpayers has sparked the most sensational public demonstrations since 1968. In Italy and Austria, opponents of the Islamization of Europe now hold the reins of power. Elsewhere in Western Europe, more and more citizens are standing up to their masters' open-borders dhimmitude.


Yet much of this principled and patriotic resistance may turn out to be for naught, thanks to the so-called Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, which is scheduled to be signed by representatives of the UN member states at a December 10-11 conference. Supporters of the compact are quick to reassure its critics that it is not a binding treaty and that it reaffirms the concept of national sovereignty. Nevertheless, when you come right down to it, it is nothing more or less than a dangerous effort to weaken national borders, to normalize mass migration, to blur the line between legal and illegal immigration, and to bolster the idea that people claiming to be refugees enjoy a panoply of rights in countries where they have never before set foot.


As for the 34-page-long document (https://www.un.org/pga/72/wp-content/uploads/sites/51/2018/07/migration.pdf) itself, it is written in the kind of numbing, abstraction-heavy prose that will be familiar to anyone who has ever read anything issued by the UN. It declares that "migration is a defining feature of our globalized world, connecting societies within and across all regions, making us all countries of origin, transit and destination." It states that the goal of the Global Compact is "to create conducive conditions that enable all [!] migrants to enrich our societies through their human, economic and social capacities, and thus facilitate their contributions to sustainable development at the local, national, regional and global levels." It also affirms that:

"[w]e must save lives and keep migrants out of harm's way. We must empower migrants to become full members of our societies, highlight their positive contributions, and promote inclusion and social cohesion. We must generate greater predictability and certainty for States, communities and migrants alike. To achieve this, we commit to facilitate and ensure safe, orderly and regular migration for the benefit of all."


There is a lot more where this came from, and it is not entirely clear what most of it means. Is it just a load of empty, feel-good rhetoric, or is it meant to commit signatories to specific action? What does it mean to say that the Global Compact "mainstreams a gender perspective" or that "a whole-of-government approach is needed to ensure horizontal and vertical policy coherence across all sectors and levels of government"? On the other hand, the document certainly does appear to encourage illegal migration. It unambiguously urges governments to feed their citizens propaganda about the delights of migrants and migration and to "sensitiz[e] and educat[e] media professionals on migration-related issues and terminology" and, in effect, to strong-arm journalists who refuse to play ball. Some readers of the document say that it calls for the criminalization of any criticism of migration, although its backers deny this.


One thing about the agreement, in any event, is irrefutable: almost nobody in the Western world has been clamoring for this. It is, quite simply, a project of the globalist elites. It is a UN power-grab. As the Guardian reported (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/dec/03/donald-trump-pulls-us-out-of-un-global-compact-on-migration) last year, Louise Arbour, the hack put in charge of this project, "regards the global compact as a chance to shift world opinion on the need to address future migration, in the same way that the UN had managed to persuade the world it needed to address climate change." In short, this is yet another reminder that the UN is run by power-hungry busybodies who see it as their job not to respond to and act upon world opinion but to shape it and, if necessary, punish it.


It is something else, too: it is an effort to enhance the clout of the UN's largest and most influential power bloc – namely, the Arab and Muslim states. Just check out the UN website (https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/migration-compact) devoted to this Global Compact -- it's illustrated by a picture of a young man and woman holding their index fingers and thumbs together to form a heart. She is in hijab. Repeat: she is in hijab. Briefly put, whatever this deal is or is not, it is definitely not good news for the West, for freedom, or for national identity and security. It seems fitting that the December 10-11 signing ceremony will take place in Marrakesh, Morocco.


US President Donald J. Trump, to his credit, saw through this mischievous piece of work last December, when he announced that the U.S. wanted nothing to do with it. He got flak for that move. In a UN vote this past July, the Global Compact was approved by every member nation except for the U.S. But then at least some media starting paying attention and a resistance formed. In recent weeks, more and more governments have said that they are not going to sign the deal after all. So far, the list includes Australia, Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, the Dominican Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Poland, Slovakia, and Switzerland.


In several other Western European countries, the issue is still being debated. I suspect the situation in Norway, where I live, is not unique. Most of the political parties here ardently support the Global Compact and, in the run-up to the signing ceremony, have striven -- with the collaboration of the country's mainstream media -- to keep this potentially controversial agreement out of the public eye in the run-up to the signing ceremony. After a handful of alternative news and opinion websites sounded the alarm about the deal, however, it was reported on December 5 that the Progress Party had forced the government to allow a parliamentary discussion of the proposed accord.


Alas, the Big Three countries of Western Europe are all in. Theresa May has committed her government to the deal. Ditto Angela Merkel. Emmanuel Macron has stuck to his line that the Global Compact is "admirable." What's more, thanks to Justin Trudeau, whose mantra continues to be "diversity is a source of strength," Canada is on board as well.


So while there is no need to worry that the Global Compact will supersede the U.S. Constitution any time soon, there is legitimate reason for concern that this devious deal will constitute yet another obstacle to citizens of the free world who care about protecting and preserving their countries -- but whose elites are dead set on thwarting their will.


More UN Chicanery (https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/13397/united-nations-chicanery) Dec 9 2018.



Chicanery is using cleverness to cheat people.

Merkel, May and Macron – the childless 3, intent on making a Stauffenberg, a Cromwell and a Robespierre.

jagdmesser
Tuesday, December 11th, 2018, 10:37 AM
The British government has finally issued a response to the rapidly growing official petition (https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/232698) against the United Nations Global Compact for Migration which was rubber-stamped in Marrakesh on Monday.



Petitions reaching 10,000 signatures are entitled to a Government response, while petitions reaching 100,000 signatures must be considered by the Backbench Business Committee of the House of Commons for a full parliamentary debate — the petition (https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/232698) against the UN Compact for Migration has already passed 120,000 signatures.



Just days before the United Kingdom signed up to the controversial agreement, the Government finally issued its response. Curiously, the task fell not to the Prime Minister herself, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) which deals with international relations, or the Home Office which is tasked with managing immigration, but the unpopular Department for International Development (Foreign Aid).

The department has come under criticism in the past for doling out over £14 billion a year to countries including China (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5658151/Why-Britain-gives-47MILLION-China-foreign-aid-despite-promise-stop-eight-years-ago.html), an arguably hostile superpower governed by a Communist dictatorship, North Korea (https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/04/18/uk-gave-4-million-foreign-aid-north-korea-past-six-years/), an unarguably hostile power governed by a Communist dictatorship, and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/pakistan-set-to-launch-space-programme-to-keep-an-eye-on-indian-side-report/articleshow/63960052.cms), a nuclear-armed state which is about to launch its own space programme.


The choice of DfID as petition respondent may do little to assuage signatories’ concerns that the UN Compact forms part of a wider globalist agenda on migration.

In its response, the Government is clear that its confidence in the compact has not been dented, and that it still has their full backing. “The Compact is not legally binding,” the response assures, before adding vaguely: “It creates a framework to allow countries to work together to make global migration more beneficial for everyone.” The Government also insists that the compact “respects the sovereignty of all states to decide who enters their territory” and “does not establish a ‘human right to migrate’ or create any new legal categories of migrant.”

This stands in stark contrast to the assessment of the United States, which pulled out of the compact last year: “We will decide how best to control our borders and who will be allowed to enter our country,” the Americans insisted. “The global approach in the [compact] is simply not compatible with U.S. sovereignty.”

The British government notes in passing that it is “aware that a small number of countries have chosen not to endorse [the Global Compact].” This rather underestimates the scale of the revolt against the UN scheme, as the United States has been joined by Australia, Hungary, Austria, Poland, Croatia, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Slovakia, Latvia, and the Czech Republic in rejecting it, with Matteo Salvini’s half of Italy’s populist coalition government also declining to endorse it and the Belgian coalition government actually breaking up (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/10/belgian-government-un-migration-pact/) over the prime minister’s decision to back it.

All this would tend to suggest it is more than the non-binding, aspirational, and essentially toothless document that its proponents — including the British government — have sold it as.

The Backbench Business Committee is yet to announce when or if it will arrange for the compact — which the UK agreed to in Marrakech on Monday and will sign officially in New York on December 19th — to be debated.

"The British government notes in passing that it is “aware that a small number of countries have chosen not to endorse [the Global Compact].”
What cunning f cks the British gov are. Yes, it's a "small number" among the entire 193 countries who endorsed this evil pact - the vast majority being 3rd world shiitholes - but it's a significant number among the white western countries who are the countries that these shiithole invaders are stampeding into and the countries that these globalist f cks want to flood with these fecund freeloaders. British people this evil pact will be your end - STOP THIS NOW.

UK FOREIGN AID DEPT RESPONDS TO UN MIGRANT PACT PETITION (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/10/uk-foreign-aid-dept-responds-petition-against-un-migration-compact/) 11 Dec 2018.

Wuotans Krieger
Tuesday, December 11th, 2018, 10:40 AM
Chicanery is using cleverness to cheat people.

Merkel, May and Macron – the childless 3, intent on making a Stauffenberg, a Cromwell and a Robespierre.

Wasn't Hitler also childless?

jagdmesser
Saturday, December 15th, 2018, 04:23 PM
Open letter says French citizens have another reason to “revolt”


A group of French military generals have written an open letter to Emmanuel Macron accusing the French President of committing “treason” by signing the UN migration pact.

The pact, which was signed by 164 nations on Monday, including France, is not legally binding but greases the skids for unlimited migration to be treated as a human right and criticism of mass migration to be treated as hate speech.

A letter written by General Antoine Martinez and signed by ten other generals, an admiral and a colonel, as well as former French Minister of Defense Charles Millon, warns Macron that the move strips France of more sovereignty and provides an additional reason for “an already battered people” to “revolt”.

The letter accuses Macron of being “guilty of a denial of democracy or treason against the nation” for signing the pact without putting it to the people.

“The French state is late in coming to realize the impossibility of integrating too many people, in addition to totally different cultures, who have regrouped in the last forty years in areas that no longer submit to the laws of the Republic,” states the letter, adding that mass immigration is erasing France’s “civilizational landmarks”.

According to British MEP Janice Atkinson, the UN pact would lead to Europe being flooded with 59 million new migrants within the next 6 years.


Warning that the plan would lead to European countries having their “culture and identity crushed,” Atkinson also pointed out that the pact could lead to hate speech laws that make it illegal to use the term “illegal migrants,” replacing it instead with “irregular migrants”.

“It will be illegal not to use their prescribed language,” warned Atkinson, adding that European citizens could “say goodbye to your democracy and your way of life” if the pact is implemented.

President Macron’s approval rating has sunk to 18% amidst a wave of protests riots against a number of issues, including fuel taxes and mass immigration.



Read the full letter from the French generals below


Mister President,

You are about to sign the “Global Compact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration” on 10 and 11 December, which establishes a genuine right to migration. It may impose itself on our national legislation through pre-existing treaties or the principle of common responsibility set out in this pact.

It seems to us that the only sovereignty that will remain with France will consist in freely setting the way in which the objectives of the pact will have to be implemented. You can not give up this new part of the national sovereignty without a public debate whereas 80% of the French population considers that it is necessary to stop or regulate drastically the immigration. By deciding alone to sign this pact, you would add an additional reason for revolt to the anger of an already battered people. You would be guilty of a denial of democracy or treason against the nation.

In addition, the finances of our country are drained and our debt is growing. You can not take the risk of an expensive call for air migration without first showing that you will not have to resort to more taxes to meet the objectives of the pact. On the other hand, you must be able, in terms of security, to curb the consequences linked to the arrival of extra-European populations. Finally, you can not ignore that the very essence of politics is to ensure security on the outside and harmony within. However, this concord can be obtained only if it maintains a certain internal coherence of the society alone capable of allowing to want to do together, which becomes more and more problematic today.

In fact, the French state is late in coming to realize the impossibility of integrating too many people, in addition to totally different cultures, who have regrouped in the last forty years in areas that no longer submit to the laws of the Republic.

You can not decide alone to erase our civilizational landmarks and deprive us of our carnal homeland.
We therefore ask you to defer the signing of this pact and call by referendum the French to vote on this document. You are accountable to the French of your actions. Your election is not a blank.

We support the initiative of General MARTINEZ against the signature of this pact which must be adopted by the Member States of the UN at the Intergovernmental Conference of Marrakech.


General Antoine MARTINEZ

Charles MILLON – Former Minister of Defense

General Marc BERTUCCHI

General Philippe CHATENOUD

General André COUSTOU

General Roland DUBOIS

General Daniel GROSMAIRE

General Christian HOUDET

General Michel ISSAVERDENS

Admiral Patrick MARTIN

General Christian PIQUEMAL

General Daniel SCHAEFFER

General Didier TAUZIN

Colonel Jean Louis CHANAS

French Generals Accuse Macron of “Treason” Over UN Migration Pact (https://www.prisonplanet.com/french-generals-accuse-macron-of-treason-over-un-migration-pact.html) 15 Dec 2018.



All European leaders are guilty of Treason, with the few notable exceptions.
There can only be one outcome and that is serious civil strife.
ALL globalists and globalist supporters are guilty. The day will come too when they are made pay.

jagdmesser
Sunday, December 16th, 2018, 04:58 PM
https://youtu.be/5WRszRZBfYw



10% of the world's population CANNOT PAY FOR or CARE FOR the other 90% as well as themselves. There's only one way it can end - in serious conflict.

jagdmesser
Sunday, December 16th, 2018, 07:36 PM
Police have deployed water cannon during a rally against the controversial UN migration pact in Brussels. Officers were seen scuffling with protesters, who threw firecrackers before facing off with law-enforcement.

The rally was dubbed the ‘March against Marrakech’ in reference to the city where the pact was signed earlier in December. It was organized by the right-wing Vlaams Belang party which has long been a vocal opponent of the agreement.

While having initially kicked off peacefully, the demonstration started to heat up with some of the participants burning firecrackers and hurling bottles as they marched down the street.

Part of the crowd who rallied on Sunday, also vented their anger by rooting out and throwing around traffic signs and what appeared to be parts of some fences.

Riot police marched out in full riot gear to quell the unease. They later moved in with water cannon against some of the protesters.

At least two of them were seen being sprayed with water cannon right in their faces. It is not known whether any serious injuries have been caused by the hit.

One of the videos from the unrest shows how a chain of riot police sprint towards a small group of people (presumably demonstrators). Just moments later at least two of them are being encircled by the riot officers and beaten with batons. A male also gets a direct pepper spray hit in the face from the closest range. After walking just a few meters – apparently completely disoriented – he then collapses on the pavement, with police running past him.

Police said (https://twitter.com/zpz_polbru/status/1074271867740004352) that at least 5,000 have gathered in the Belgian capital. A separate counter-demonstration of around 1,000 people, organised by left-wing groups and non-governmental organisations, also took place in the city centre.

The UN-backed pact promoting an international approach to safe and orderly migration was formally approved in Marrakech, Morocco earlier in December. The accord split global powers, with Austria, Hungary, the US, Israel and several other countries rejecting the pact. Its critics claim that the deal is inadequate for managing global migration flows.

The Belgian government suffered a blow after the center-right New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) quit the ruling coalition because of its disapproval of the accord. Prime Minister Charles Michel announced that his government was set to continue as a minority.


Water cannon, firecrackers as thousands rally against UN migration pact in Brussels (https://www.rt.com/news/446590-brussels-protest-migration-pact/) 16 Dec 2018.

jagdmesser
Monday, December 17th, 2018, 12:04 PM
They lied.


For months proponents of the UN Migration Pact told us that the pact was non-binding. The response to the many citizens of nation states worldwide having signed country specific petitions was that it was non-binding so there was nothing to worry about, it was going to be good.



The immensely opposed and disastrous document declares unlimited migration to be treated as a human right, thereby deprecating the term ‘illegal migrants’, and criminalises any criticism of migration as hate speech.

The points that raised alarm for most was that it seeks to eliminate all forms of dissent. Media organisations for example, should they criticise anything to do with migration would lose access to state funding. People would be labelled as racists or guilty of hate speech which will now be criminalised. This pact will literally erase our borders.

The question I’ve been asking is if the countries that refused to sign, are they still bound to it being members of the UN. Most people were of the mind that it would only affect the signatories.

Now we know. In a frank exchange with Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel, Mr. Hebner of the AfD drew out an admission that it is, in fact, legally binding. As well, that the UN Migration will be adopted as rule for all UN Member states once enacted.

Mr. Hebner asks: “You can see for yourself clearly that during the conference, the spokesperson for Morocco emphasised that the agreement was legally binding. He said clearly, in a literal sense, that there is a corresponding legal bond for all nations taking part as well as an obligation of implementation. You and your delegation did not raise a single word of objection to that statement but idly accepted it. I would like to emphasise that the parliamentary motion was not presented at the conference. “

Ms. Merkel’s response not only confirmed what we at Voice of Europe have been suspecting all along, the claim it is indeed binding, but that once voted and accepted it will be valid for all:
“So then, during the UN General Assembly next week, the pact will once again be up for debate and a decision will be made on whether to accept it. At this time, a member state can demand a vote. When two-thirds of the represented countries agree then it is valid for all. That’s how majority decision-making works.”



https://youtu.be/XnX6uBFySEY


They lied: The UN Migration Pact IS legally binding and could be valid FOR ALL countries (https://voiceofeurope.com/2018/12/they-lied-the-un-migration-pact-is-legally-binding-and-could-be-valid-for-all-countries/) 17 Dec 2018.




Of course Genghis Khan Merkel lied. Merkel is determined not to finish without destroying Europe.

Theunissen
Monday, December 17th, 2018, 03:23 PM
10% of the world's population CANNOT PAY FOR or CARE FOR the other 90% as well as themselves. There's only one way it can end - in serious conflict.
Try to get that into the brains of somebody that "Feels Good", because he's transferring money and resources from the 10% to that unproductive 90%. It's easy to play nice uncle with the money of other people.

Concerning the migration pact and similar efforts, the premise the proponents are using is a general interchangeability of all people, regardless of who or what they are.

velvet
Monday, December 17th, 2018, 04:43 PM
There's only one way it can end - in serious conflict.

Which is after all the very point of the exercise: engulf Europe in Civil War and replace the peoples of Europe with Kalergi's mixed breeds and non-Europeans.

As Thomas Barnett had pointed out in "The Pentagon's New Map", every resistance against this replacement must be beaten down and killed. The brutality we see against protesters now is proof that the globalists are willing to follow that line.

jagdmesser
Thursday, December 27th, 2018, 04:39 PM
Support for Belgium’s two largest Flemish nationalist parties, who are both anti-mass migration, has exploded after the collapse of the government due to disagreements over the UN migrant pact.


When combined, the conservative New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) and the populist Vlaams Belang now account for a massive 42 percent of the vote in Flanders according to a poll released by Belgian newspaper Het Nieuwsblad earlier this week Le Soir reports (https://www.lesoir.be/196711/article/2018-12-20/un-premier-sondage-dapres-crise-donne-la-n-va-et-le-vlaams-belang-plus-de-40).


The poll was conducted just after the New Flemish Alliance resigned from the coalition government following their vocal opposition to the country signing the controversial UN migrant pact in Marrakech earlier this month. Shortly afterwards, Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel offered his resignation (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/19/belgian-pm-resigns-anger-un-pact/) to Belgian King Philippe.


While the N-VA expanded their support, Vlaams Belang, the Flemish populist party that sits in the same European Parliamentary group as Matteo Salvini’s Lega and Marine Le Pen’s Rassemblement National (RN), doubled their support from six to twelve percent.


The UN migration pact, which led to the collapse of the Belgian coalition, has been rejected by several European Union member states including Austria, Hungary and the populist government of Italy who refused to sign the agreement (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/29/populist-italian-government-latest-to-back-out-of-un-migration-pact/) saying that it would be voted on in the Italian parliament instead.


Even in countries where the government has been supportive of the agreement, such as France under President Emmanuel Macron, there have been severe criticisms of the pact. The populist Gilets Jaunes (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/08/mounted-police-and-apcs-deployed-as-act-iv-of-yellow-vest-protests-unfolds/) (Yellow Vest) movement has made the pact one of its criticisms of the Macron government with members demanding France opt out of the agreement.


Macron has also faced opposition from current and former high ranking members of the French armed forces over the issue as well. Several French generals, along with former Defence Minister Charles Millon, signed a letter (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/19/french-generals-disciplinary-action-labeling-macron-traitor-migrant-pact/) that referred to the French president as a “traitor” for signing the pact.



Nationalists Surge After Belgian Govt Collapse Over Migrant Pact 27 Dec 2018.




Globalist and EU 'Remainer' PM May signed the UK up without debate or question.





https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-E_wAMifw3gI/XB2mvkEQYEI/AAAAAAADShs/nqIBn6Xg9yk5PtE8OPV4AtqWWKQnP0KNwCEwYBhg L/s1600/%2521%2BCOMMUNISM%2B%252810%2529.jpg

velvet
Thursday, December 27th, 2018, 05:20 PM
Some things important to note:

While the public enrages over the "migration pact", they also signed into being on the same day the "refugee pact" in Marrakesh. These signings themselves are not yet "legally binding", which is what the politraitors told all along.

The legal obligation however will be implemented at the General Assembly (not sure, some day end of December iIrc, today maybe?) of UN, and -if/when ratified with a simple majority vote - then will be legally binding for ALL countries regardless of whether they signed the pacts or not!

Theunissen
Thursday, December 27th, 2018, 05:21 PM
Which is after all the very point of the exercise: engulf Europe in Civil War and replace the peoples of Europe with Kalergi's mixed breeds and non-Europeans.

As Thomas Barnett had pointed out in "The Pentagon's New Map", every resistance against this replacement must be beaten down and killed. The brutality we see against protesters now is proof that the globalists are willing to follow that line.

Do you have the exact quote on this?

velvet
Thursday, December 27th, 2018, 05:54 PM
"Kill resistance to Globalism and race mixing" has been formulated by so many people meanwhile, Sutherland (UN), Nikolas Sarkozy, Macron and many many more. Why is there still doubt about this? It is formulated in the very founding document of the EU, which was founded by PanEuropa, which was founded by Richard Koudenhove-Kalergi based on his 1924/25 tractise "Praktischer Idealismus". The EU is not a product of cooperation between nations, it is a private club of Freemasons, financed mostly by (((US bankers))). The EU Commission (Juncker etc) is not elected, it is not a council of national representatives, it can not be held accountable, it is not removable.


Jew Sarkozy explains that race-mixing is an obligation, and if voluntarism does not work, it has to be enforced through the state:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRHtBG9pqIE

schwab
Thursday, December 27th, 2018, 06:03 PM
[QUOTE=velvet;1256007]"Kill resistance to Globalism and race mixing" has been formulated by so many people meanwhile, Sutherland (UN), Nikolas Sarkozy, Macron and many many more. Why is there still doubt about this? It is formulated in the very founding document of the EU, which was founded by PanEuropa, which was founded by Richard Koudenhove-Kalergi based on his 1924/25 tractise "Praktischer Idealismus". The EU is not a product of cooperation between nations, it is a private club of Freemasons, financed mostly by (((US bankers))). The EU Commission (Juncker etc) is not elected, it is not a council of national representatives, it can not be held accountable, it is not removable.
QUOTE]

Abolish the UN. It is the Headquarter of 3rd world Countries, it is the Headquarter of globalism, it is the Headquarter of racism and whatever else........
Evict the building and make room for charities......

Wuotans Krieger
Thursday, December 27th, 2018, 07:45 PM
The United Nations is not perfect but there is a reason for its existence-two disastrous and unnecessary world wars and now we are in the nuclear age. The only two countries that seek its removal are Israel and its global enforcer, the USA.

schwab
Thursday, December 27th, 2018, 08:03 PM
I wish you would layoff "Israel". Islamic Nations are much more of a thread...............

velvet
Friday, December 28th, 2018, 06:46 AM
The United Nations is not perfect but there is a reason for its existence-two disastrous and unnecessary world wars and now we are in the nuclear age. The only two countries that seek its removal are Israel and its global enforcer, the USA.

The UN overshadows/deactivates the Rights of Nations (Völkerrecht) that existed before the UN. The USA never was a "full member" of UN, they "withdrawed" over some bullshit recently and still psychicNikkiHaley presides over the meetings. Ever wondered why? Because the USA runs the UN. And one of its stated goals is to make "antisemitism" a crime worldwide.

It's sad that still people fall for the trick&treat nonsense of "outraged" Israel (with never a single consequence to all the countless "condemnations") or the US.

The UN is one of the pillars of and for the New World Order, which is forming right before your eyes, but you still call it a "conspiracy theory", just as you have been conditioned to to look the other way.
UN / UNO
IMF
World Bank
Vatican (beware chrislam)
and hundreds of other more shady organisations which all work unisono for the One World Order

One World Currency
https://www.discerningtheworld.com/images/wpi/OneWorldCurrencyCoin.jpg
https://iamisatthedoors.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/global-currency1.jpg

Wuotans Krieger
Friday, December 28th, 2018, 03:24 PM
I wish you would layoff "Israel". Islamic Nations are much more of a thread...............

Interesting! Why do you want me to "lay off Israel"? Is this to do with your religion? Christianity is after all based upon Judaism. It incorporates the Jewish Bible as its 'Old Testament' and is based upon a Jewish literary/mythological construct. Or is it to do with the pro-Israel policies of your country, the USA?


The UN overshadows/deactivates the Rights of Nations (Völkerrecht) that existed before the UN. The USA never was a "full member" of UN, they "withdrawed" over some bullshit recently and still psychicNikkiHaley presides over the meetings. Ever wondered why? Because the USA runs the UN. And one of its stated goals is to make "antisemitism" a crime worldwide.

It's sad that still people fall for the trick&treat nonsense of "outraged" Israel (with never a single consequence to all the countless "condemnations") or the US.

The UN is one of the pillars of and for the New World Order, which is forming right before your eyes, but you still call it a "conspiracy theory", just as you have been conditioned to to look the other way.
UN / UNO
IMF
World Bank
Vatican (beware chrislam)
and hundreds of other more shady organisations which all work unisono for the One World Order

One World Currency
https://www.discerningtheworld.com/images/wpi/OneWorldCurrencyCoin.jpg
https://iamisatthedoors.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/global-currency1.jpg

The USA has not 'withdrawn' from the UN, only the UN Human Rights Council. This does not surprise me as the USA has no regard for human rights. One only has to consider the unlawful incarceration of detainees without trial at Guatanama Bay and its routine practice of illegal torture.

The USA is a full member of the UN and has been since 24 October 1945 making it a founder member. Nikki Haley does not preside over meetings of the UN. That is part of the functions of the President of the UN, the current one being Maria Espinosa of Ecuador (since 18/9/2018). Haley is currently the US Ambassador to the UN.

I am aware of the UN's shortcomings but one of its strengths is to publicly demonstrate the partisanship of the USA towards the illegal apartheid rogue State of Israel and the US government's subservience to Tel Aviv.

schwab
Friday, December 28th, 2018, 06:19 PM
Interesting! Why do you want me to "lay off Israel"? Is this to do with your religion? Christianity is after all based upon Judaism. It incorporates the Jewish Bible as its 'Old Testament' and is based upon a Jewish literary/mythological construct. Or is it to do with the pro-Israel policies of your country, the USA?

Stay in your dark world if this makes you whole and happy.

Wuotans Krieger
Friday, December 28th, 2018, 06:22 PM
Stay in your dark world if this makes you whole and happy.

My world is filled with light-the light of truth, not the darkness of ignorance.

We are still waiting to hear why you are seeking to protect Israel?

schwab
Friday, December 28th, 2018, 06:36 PM
By reading your posts you don't seem to be fulfilled with "light-the light of truth", you sound rather angry. Your light looks very dim.
Don't use the "we are...." because many don't share your views. So why should I discuss anything with you?

Wuotans Krieger
Friday, December 28th, 2018, 06:46 PM
By reading your posts you don't seem to be fulfilled with "light-the light of truth", you sound rather angry. Your light looks very dim.
Don't use the "we are...." because many don't share your views. So why should I discuss anything with you?

There is plenty to get angry about but I dare say that at 82 anger has now passed you by.
As I said we/I are/am waiting as to why you support the concept of "laying off Israel"?

GroeneWolf
Saturday, December 29th, 2018, 05:26 AM
I wish you would layoff "Israel". Islamic Nations are much more of a thread...............

Demographically the Islamic Middle East is more of a treat to Europe, not much the USA. However it is well documented the pro-Israel lobbies (https://www.amazon.fr/Israel-Lobby-U-S-Foreign-Policy/dp/0374531501/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1546060883&sr=8-1&keywords=the+israel+lobby) have an enormous influence on US foreign policy ever since Eisenhower left the office.

schwab
Saturday, December 29th, 2018, 06:03 AM
[QUOTE=GroeneWolf;1256169]Demographically the Islamic Middle East is more of a treat to Europe, not much the USA.......QUOTE]

......not much the USA....... they just fly into some towers and kill thousands.........that's not much of a threat. Right?

GroeneWolf
Saturday, December 29th, 2018, 10:56 AM
......not much the USA....... they just fly into some towers and kill thousands.........that's not much of a threat. Right?

Please read what I have written. First off all I mentioned demographics. There are about 3-4 times more Muslims living in the EU then in the USA. And thanks to the short sighted American interventions in the Middle East large scale migration streams have started heading towards Europe and going on to this day. For example when the West decided to remove Gadaffi in Lybia which also lead to the mutely beneficial deal Italy had with them that also included helping to stem illegal immigration. Or the 'refugee' streams caused by the neocon desire to remove Assad, which also included arming groups (https://consortiumnews.com/2016/09/29/how-the-us-armed-up-syrian-jihadists/). Which includes the Syrian branch (https://consortiumnews.com/2016/09/13/al-qaedas-ties-to-us-backed-syrian-rebels/) of a group that you might heard of, namely Al'Qaida. So yeah, basically under Obama the US started supporting the very group that planned and carried out the 9/11 attack.

Now I understand that 9/11 has a strong emotional resonance for Americans. However there have been more Jihadist attacks in Europe (https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/europe-attacks.aspx) then in America (https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/american-attacks.aspx) since 9/11. And also notice that I did not say, not a treat to the US, just that demographically spoken it is a bigger treat to Europe then the USA.

Wuotans Krieger
Saturday, December 29th, 2018, 11:06 AM
......not much the USA....... they just fly into some towers and kill thousands.........that's not much of a threat. Right?

Militant Islamism is a symptom of Zionism and its hold upon western governments, most especially upon the White House who has consistently supported the rogue State of Israel since its illegal conception in 1948. It is not the cause of our problems but just another symptom. When you cure an illness you focus on the causes, not merely the symptoms or the patient will not recover.

Zionism pushes the 'Holocaust' guilt agenda not only upon Germany and Austria but upon the entire 'western' world and has received billions of shekels in 'reparations' from the said two countries and that gravy train continues today. Political Correctness is the bastard child of the 'Holocaust' industry and the cries of "oi vey, never again" are used to shackle any nationalist dissent and ensure that all the agencies of Zionism are obeyed.

Western governments enforcing Tel Aviv's foreign policy which is nothing less than the extension of that country's influence and the creation of 'Greater Israel' have killed many more men, women and children than the odd 'terrorist' atrocity. Let us not forget that many of these terrorist organisations have been created by the US government as part of its policy of creating chaos in the Middle East and regime change in those countries who refuse to do Washington's and Tel Aviv's nefarious bidding. If you want to stop 'terrorism' then you must bring to a halt the terrorist actions of the US government and its vassal States such as the United Kingdom and France.

The current alignment of nationalism, most especially civic nationalism has taken a dangerous turn with its support of Zionism and its obsession with antagonising every aspect of Islam, Muslims and the Islamic world. See my article: http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.com/2018/10/the-perilous-state-of-english.html

jagdmesser
Saturday, December 29th, 2018, 11:43 PM
German Chancellor Angela Merkel told an audience in Berlin that “nation states should be willing to give up their sovereignty” and that governments shouldn’t listen to their own citizens on matters of immigration.



During an event aimed at combating populism entitled Parliamentarism in the Tension of Globalization and National Sovereignty, Merkel brazenly said that “nation-states should be willing to give up their sovereignty today” and this should be done via an “orderly process”.


Responding to criticism of the UN Migration Pact, which greases the skids for mass migration to be treated as a human right, Merkel said that international agreements took precedence over the will of the people within individual countries.

“There were [politicians] who believed that they could decide when these agreements are no longer valid because they are representing The People,” she said.

“[But] the people are individuals who are living in a country, they are not a group who define themselves as the [German] people,” she stressed.


Merkel’s forthright denunciation of sovereignty and her continued support for mass immigration comes despite both issues leading to a massive collapse in her own approval numbers.

Earlier this year, a YouGov survey also found that almost half of Germans want to leave their own country “for a more stable political situation”.

Angela Merkel: Nation States Must Be Willing to “Give Up Their Sovereignty” (https://www.prisonplanet.com/angela-merkel-nation-states-must-be-willing-to-give-up-their-sovereignty.html) 28 Dec 2018.



"governments shouldn’t listen to their own citizens on matters of immigration" what an evil dictatorial
criminal Merkel is.

Why is the White race and no other race targeted for extinction, by the whole political and social field : Rothschild banking system, UN, EUssr, NATO, MSM, the whole liberal Marxist left political field, disorganized religion, the education system from beginning to end, etc.?

Globalism RULES.

Astragoth
Sunday, December 30th, 2018, 01:26 AM
Demographically the Islamic Middle East is more of a treat to Europe, not much the USA. However it is well documented the pro-Israel lobbies (https://www.amazon.fr/Israel-Lobby-U-S-Foreign-Policy/dp/0374531501/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1546060883&sr=8-1&keywords=the+israel+lobby) have an enormous influence on US foreign policy ever since Eisenhower left the office.
Thats one way to put it. Another way to put it is that the jews have such a stranglehold on the USA that were essentially occupied territory. Thats what the "deep state" is.

Wuotans Krieger
Sunday, December 30th, 2018, 10:39 AM
Thats one way to put it. Another way to put it is that the jews have such a stranglehold on the USA that were essentially occupied territory. Thats what the "deep state" is.

In a sense you are right and I am glad that you recognise the Tel Aviv-Washington axis but I believe the 'stranglehold' goes deeper than this and is to be found in the spiritual beliefs of the early settlers from England who likened themselves to the Jews of the Old Testament being guided by their god to a new 'promised land', a new 'Israel if that makes sense? That belief has become engrained within the collective unconscious of their descendants. I have coined a term for this-The Pilgrim Fathers Complex and it goes someway to explain the prevalence of male circumcision in the USA and to a lesser extent Canada. There are deep seated religious beliefs for the Americans practice of circumcision, rooted in the Old Testament and many Americans no longer realise why they do this for it has become an engrained cultural instinct. See my articles: http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.com/2017/04/usa-israel-and-pilgrim-fathers-complex.html
and http://aryan-myth-and-metahistory.blogspot.com/2018/08/american-circumcision-indication-of-its.html

jagdmesser
Tuesday, January 8th, 2019, 09:29 PM
KALERGI PLAN: THE ULTIMATE SECRET OF THE UN’S AGENDA 21



https://i1.wp.com/www.nteb.me/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/germany-angela-merkel-calls-up-4000-troops-muslim-migrant-isis-crisis.jpg



In Europe today and elsewhere, the dissolution of the Caucasian race has finally made it to the top of the power-elite’s prioritized task list. The most frightening aspect is that most people are not willing to accept that the premeditated destruction of Caucasians has been the plan for quite a long time. This nefarious plan has existed for well over half a century and got incorporated into the power-elite’s agenda in the 1950s. It is called The Kalergi Plan.


The detailed Kalergi Plan can be found in the writings of Richard Kalergi, the genocidal eugenicist who, in his book “Practical Idealism”, stated that he “wanted to completely destroy the face of Europe” and that “Europeans are to become Asiatic-Negroid mongrels.”





https://ufospotlight.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/e0e10-migrants-immigratia.jpg?w=656



The Invasion of Europe Exposed
“Boil The Frog Slowly”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hL-vFNzOA0c (https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/r2/?url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hL-vFNzOA0c)


Although Soviet Europe’s public never consented to any cross-breeding plan, in the 1950s, Kalergi’s plan was adopted as Soviet Europe’s ethno-forming policy, intentionally designed to destroy the ethnicity of Europeans. The very same plan was reaffirmed by French President Nicolas Sarkozy when he told the conservative Brussels Journal in 2009:


“… if the French do not interbreed of their own free will, it will be necessary for the French regime to resort to even more forcible measures.”


Kalergi stated that future Europeans “would resemble ancient Egyptians,” but he was adamantly opposed to asking Europeans for their consent to cultural suicide, which is precisely what his plan entailed all along, and WHY IT HAS remained a secret to most people.


The biennial Kalergi Prize is an award bestowed in recognition of major concessions made toward achieving The Kalergi Plan. Its recipients included German Chancellor, Angela Merkel (what a “coincidence”, eh?), Helmut Kohl, Herman van Rompuy and Jean-Claude Juncker, but the exact concessions each recipient made in order to gain the award are kept secret from Soviet Europe’s duped public.




https://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/richard-n-coudenhove-kalergi.jpg?w=500&h=314
Richard N. Coudenhove-Kalergi




Soviet Socialist Architect of the Kalergi Plan




http://golden-dawn-international-newsroom.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-genocide-of.html (https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/r2/?url=https://ufodigest.com//article/http://golden-dawn-international-newsroom.blogspot.com/2013/01/the-coudenhove-kalergi-plan-genocide-of.html)




We are now at a stage in history when we can read the power-elite’s entire agenda online and then go and compare it to what is happening or else to what becomes history twenty years hence. Our separate races and cultures are all beautiful and we are called upon by the Creator to look after the Earth and retain our natural “patchwork quilt” of nations and varieties. Today, we are being socially engineered by the power-elite for glorious-soviet Technocracy and our separate races and cultures are being deliberately mixed in order to mitigate the potential backlash against world sovietization through “Technocracy.”



*******




https://theuglytruth.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/ct3miekvaaajwsi.jpg?w=656


Barbara Lerner Spectre calls for destruction of Christian European ethnic societies


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ (https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/r2/?url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ)



There follows a brief analysis of today and tomorrow as the author sees it (some readers may find it reminiscent of the Leonard Cohen lyrics: “I’ve Seen The Future, Brother; It Is Murder”).


If you simply read the power-elite’s agenda which they have published openly for centuries, you can easily see how the following may soon unfold in accordance with that agenda. When some or all of the following milestones have come true, the public will finally realize that the agenda was real and that they have been lied to by mainstream news like no other generation before, but by that time it may be too late to reverse the damage done:


The Kalergi Plan To Destroy The Caucasian Race Exposed

https://i0.wp.com/ufodigest.com/sites/default/files/styles/image980x360/public/field/image/Muslims%20Yes-%20Caucasian%20No.jpgIn 2016, preventable disease is rife in the western world, and it is on its way to bankrupting the middle-class. This is part of the published agenda whereby the middle-class is to be subjected to “asset-stripping” and destroyed, because the most effective method of destroying any country or people is to first destroy its middle-class. Once “asset-stripping” is complete, only two classes will remain: sharks and shark-food.That is analogous to the agenda documents that call for gratuitous over-regulation of medium-sized companies to drive them out of business, so that only two classes of enterprise survive: sharks and shark-food.


If an underprivileged person lands in hospital today, the medical commissars already have a secret points system that gauges what value that person has to society (those who largely consume have much lower scores than those who largely produce) so the white-coats know to slap a DNAR order (Do Not Attempt to Resuscitate) on that person so that he can be more easily euthanized if the opportunity arises. Ultimately, the only reason for maintaining preventable disease is for genocide. Obvious correctives would include placing higher taxes on junk-food (along the lines of the original idea behind taxing hard liquor) but no such corrective is favored by the power-elite because it goes against their published agenda for genocide.



In 2017, one anemic apple gives one-eighth the goodness (nutrition and minerals) of a 1937-apple, so you will need eight 2017-apples to match one 1937-apple. This one-to-eight-rule after eight decades also applies for anemic tomatoes, anemic carrots and other vegetables, and the power-elite regard this as a major point scored for Team Genocide against humanity. Vitamin supplements of any real potency have been outlawed. This is in accordance with the power-elite’s published agenda which calls for massively reduced nutrition in food, as also published in the genocidal UN’s Codex Alimentarius, which also calls for irradiating all agricultural produce under the guise of extending its shelf-life. Because food is medicine, the power-elite knew well that they first had to manipulate the food supply so as to more easily cull their herd.



Around 2020, if not sooner, the world financial crises the power-elite designed by means of ruthless deregulation, merciless money-printing and flattened yield curves has finally led to The Great Bail-In whereby most middle-class savings are bailed in to pay for the unhindered fraud committed by unregulated hedge funds and too-big-to-fail banks. The massive haircut leads to the biggest wealth-transfer in history. Those who used to have a bank account now pay by “smart”-card and every transaction is tracked for the Technocratic commissars. This is in keeping with the power-elite’s published plan to create a “cashless society” with a carbon-dioxide-based currency and a system of energy-credits, effectively replacing most currencies worldwide with a single world currency.




The most stable structure known to mankind is a pyramid but, after around the 1980s, the power-elite redesigned the financial system to resemble an upside-down pyramid (the most unstable structure), so they were able to create larger and larger financial crises each time until they could finally sovietize the entire system so as to make way for Technocracy.


Meanwhile, exorbitant taxes and fraudulent fees charged to owner-occupiers destroy all remnants of what was the middle-class. Like both communism and national-socialism, Technocracy’s agenda is to create top-down-driven collectivism and it is backed up by establishment-sponsored pseudoscience and non-science in the areas of economics, psychiatry, behavioral psychology, eugenics and genetics. System-critical dissidents or citizens who prefer free speech to political-correctness can easily be forced to toe the party line by curtailing the energy-credits paid onto their “smart”-cards at the start of each month.


In 2025, a 25-year-old female meets a 25-year-old male, both of whom were raised on GM-food and both 70-times-vaccinated microwave-phone users and consumers of water and soft drinks from plastic bottles. Although deceptive Hollywood love bells sound, the only thing the power-elite really care about is that the probability of these two ever having a single normal child is close to zero because, as everyone knows, genocidal vaccines, microwaves, GM-food and plastic bottles (laced with bisphenol-A) are all intended for sterilization. This is in keeping with the power-elite’s published agenda that calls for zero “wild breeding” after 2030, thereafter only the totalitarian Technocratic state is to have sole authority over the decision on who will be granted a “breeding license”.


After 2025, thanks mostly to genocidal vaccines, the number of autistic children in the USA exceeds the number of non-autistic children for the first time (this has already been conceded by the USA’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and written extensively about by Dr Stephanie Seneff, senior research scientist at MIT). In this way, the power-elite make a mint through their deathcare system (which they orwellized to “healthcare”) while simultaneously achieving their depopulation agenda and increasing their overall control. The extra-profits each new autistic child brings them are published in BigPharma’s own internal reports. Who fell for this idea anyway, from livestock-farming, that vaccinating humans was ever “normal”?


Starting around 2040, the generation born after 2000 becomes the first generation since WW1 to predecease its parents. But most parents today simply do not care. If they did, they would be protesting or doing something to protect their children. Instead, they are brainwashed by new-age-positive-thinking slogans like “Go With The Flow”, “Go Along To Get Along” or “Don’t Worry Be Happy”.


This is in keeping with the power-elite’s published agenda which calls for a maximum world population of 500 million after a “century of change” (which is a power-elite inside joke meaning a century of genocide), and calls for high levels of ignorance about the genocidal methods being deployed to achieve it.


After 2050, human settlement is confined to Agenda 21’s “habitat areas” only, i.e. domed “smart-cities” (an “Orwellism” for dumb cities, smaller than their current sizes and covered by geodesic domes) where the remaining population can be more easily controlled or microwaved using the mobile-phone towers currently being completed worldwide for this purpose and, as usual, under the guise of a fake (ostensibly benevolent) purpose.The food given to the remaining population is also to be manufactured in the same domed cities and not in the countryside, which, after 2050, is being subjected to “rewilding.”


This is part of the power-elite’s already published Agenda 21, signed in June 1992 by the bribed and compromised autocue-readers of 194 regimes, but never shouted from the rooftops by the compromised and controlled corporate dinosaur-media.


After 2075, countries, borders and even continental trading-blocs have all become irrelevant (because they were only ever a means to the same genocidal end). The only remaining populated areas on Earth are “world city states” (Agenda 21’s domed habitat areas or “sustainable” centers of civilization), with plenty of vegetation and wildlife in between. Only the power-elite and their top Technocratic nomenklatura will be permitted a house or a hunting-trip in the country. Tourism is all but dead (except voyaging by virtual reality) because ordinary people are to be permitted essential travel only.


Meanwhile, The Kalergi Plan, secretly adopted by Soviet Europe in the 1950s for mixing all races, has been extended to all “world city states,” which now feature a fairly homogenous mixed-race of people.


After 2100, the power-elite may have separated themselves from the lower-order people, as eugenicist Plato once boasted they would. Their glorious-soviet Technocratic system of apparatchiks controls the remaining people, who live in the “habitat areas”, get pacified by fluoride and other poisons in the air, water and food and are kept undernourished so as to more easily control them. The more sophisticated form of slavery advocated by countless power-elite moguls since the 1890s is now a reality and the power-elite’s version of “permanent peace” is now well-established, which means total control and predictability of all citizens of the Technocratic World Union (TWU).


In the proposed TWU, artificially intelligent robots, or automatonic Cyborgs will do most of the work.


The Truth does not fear investigation, so the reader has nothing to fear. In today’s world, most things worth knowing are couched in lies. If the Truth is news to you, then spread the word. Just like all generations without any exception, this generation too will have to choose to either pray for hope or fight for life to secure its freedom.



Barbara Specter Lerner calls for Dissolution of the Caucasian Race
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ (https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/r2/?url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ)



https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-30gF6WB-GY/maxresdefault.jpg
The Death of Germany
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-30gF6WB-GY (https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/r2/?url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-30gF6WB-GY)
Brave German Woman Rebukes Islam – Breaks The Curse of Islam
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kd3NxYmFS1w (https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/r2/?url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kd3NxYmFS1w)
*******
Sweden Is Collapsing – Is Sweden Waking Up?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gVL-qtyHrY (https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/r2/?url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gVL-qtyHrY)
*******



THE KALERGI PLAN: THE ULTIMATE SECRET OF THE UN'S … (http://ufonewshub.com/the-kalergi-plan-the-ultimate-secret-of-the-uns-agenda-21/) 04 Jan 2019.




Its gradually happening too.

jagdmesser
Friday, January 11th, 2019, 12:36 PM
The British Parliament has refused to debate a petition to reject the UN compact on migration as it “has already been agreed by the UK Government.”


https://media.breitbart.com/media/2019/01/boat-migrants-640x480.jpg


The petition (https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/232698), which has nearly 130,000 signatures, called on the Government to follow countries like the United States, Hungary, and Australia and reject the United Nations Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration, which is the first attempt at the “global governance” and institutionalisation of migration.


“The Committee has decided not to schedule a debate on this petition because the UN Global Compact on Migration has already been agreed by the UK Government,” said the response. “The final text of the Compact was agreed by the UK Government in July last year. It was adopted by the UN General Assembly in December,” it added, before claiming that the compact is “not legally binding and cannot compel the UK Government to change its own immigration policies” despite legal experts warning that the agreement exists in a legal “grey area” and could be used to interpret national immigration law.


While Britain committed to the agreement at the Intergovernmental Conference in Marrakech, Morocco, on December 10th, the minimum number of signatures needed to trigger Parliament’s Backbench Business Committee to consider it for a full debate — 100,000 — had been reached (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/12/06/uk-mps-must-consider-petition-against-un-migration-compact-smashing-100000-signatures/) a week before then, with Parliament only rejecting the debate Wednesday.


There has already been a precedent set for a country withdrawing from it, less than one month after it was formally endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly in New York City: Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro, who assumed office on January st, pulled out of the compact Wednesday, saying (https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2019/01/09/bolsonaro-pulls-brazil-out-u-n-migration-pact-we-will-define-our-rules/) that his country would set its own immigration policy. “Brazil is sovereign in deciding whether or not to accept migrants … Not anybody can come into our home, nor can anybody enter Brazil via a pact adopted by third parties. NO TO THE MIGRATION PACT,” President Bolsonaro wrote.

Parliament REFUSES Petition to Reject UN Migrant Pact: ‘Already Been Agreed’ (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/01/11/parliament-refuses-petition-debate-migrant-pact-already-agreed/) 11 Jan 2019.



Everywhere there's Democracy ALL the politicians, sooner or later, become bought globalist, neo liberal, pro-immigration traitors.
That's the Democracy that MSM sell to the public to worship.

jagdmesser
Sunday, January 13th, 2019, 08:48 PM
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-CdzZdP9QSls/XDlbMtXnTOI/AAAAAAADUJU/-vVGisyRN0UDknZ_RTxAmiBV6-9plYrEQCLcBGAs/s640/COMMUNISM%2B%252813%2529.jpg




https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-L6SX-dNaCIw/XDlfVTJM8gI/AAAAAAADUYc/GFqKRT19qRAGqvrEqi6SD5URNpN_XpjsgCLcBGAs/s1600/UN.jpg


SNIPPITS AND SNAPPITS (http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com/) 12 Jan 2019.

jagdmesser
Sunday, February 3rd, 2019, 08:16 PM
UN, EU & United States-circles planned mass migration for decades.


"In politics, nothing happens by chance.
If something happens, you can be sure
that it is also in this way it was planned.“

Franklin D. Roosevelt (U.S. President 1933-1945)


The main stream media almost on a daily basis of lies and deception transformed the incessant onslaught of millions of people from Asia and Africa to as the "refugee crisis" is caused by sudden violent wars, crises and famines in their home countries. The total Opening of the borders, so, too, Chancellor Merkel, is a simple matter of humanity, of Christian charity and of universal human rights. Many Germans voted spontaneously and emotionally to welcome the new arrivals, jubilantly.

Hardly anyone wanted to be noticed, that the new comers were less fleeing families, but rather to 70-80% were, well-fed young men of military age and young people, who had more or less thrown away their passports, but all were equipped with mobile phones. Also including Yes, Islamic terrorists had also to be brought in among those from the Middle East people.

Heart without a reason doesn’t leads to anything Good. The political caste in Germany, however, as part of the globally interconnected Elite knows, or believes, what she's doing. And the believer in drip-fed by the mass media, not Hanging notice how they are abused. Who does not look beyond the horizon to bigger contexts, is not at the height of the action and is kept in illusions.

It is included in the Following global efforts, in their entirety, a talking picture of result what is behind the current mass migration.
I Geopolitical Aspirations


1. UNO 1999

Shine a light on the objectives of the UN's dominant elites to words of the UN special envoy in Kosovo, Sergio Vieira de Mello, 1999, 2002, UN high Commissioner for human rights and advocacy, George W. Bush's UN special Ambassador to Iraq, where he in the post-war turmoil on 19.8.2003 a bomb attack to the victim fell. On 4. In August of 1999, he said in a radio broadcast on the US radio station of PBS (Public Broadcasting System):

"I repeat: Unmixed peoples are, in fact, a Nazi concept. This is exactly what the allied powers in the 2. World war combat.The United Nations was founded, in order this concept to combat, which, since decades, also happens. That was exactly the reason why NATO is in Kosovo fought. And that was the reason why the security Council of the United Nations such a strong military presence in Kosovo demanded – namely, a System of ethnic purity to prevent.” 1 Today none of the people of the lineage of "ethnic purity", but the preservation of the cultural specificity and identity of the people. Since the absorption of people of other Nations and races, if it happens in moderation, with real Integration, not a Problem. The horrors of national socialist racism is consciously used to operate in truth, through the complete mixing of the dissolution of the peoples and their cultures at all.


2. UNO 2000

Already on 21. In March 2000, the United Nations published a study in which Considerations are made, such as the Shrinking of the population, in particular children in poor countries met and their components could be obtained by an appropriate Migration. In the study, said: "The concept of conservation-Migration refers to the immigration from abroad, which is required for the population decline, Shrinking working-age population and the General Ageing of the population." 2

In order to keep the population in working age (15 to 64 years) constant, the numbers in the study, the following annual Immigration is considered necessary: for Italy, 372.000, Germany 487.000, and the whole of the EU 1.588.000.
The "potential support ratio", i.e. the ratio between the number of people in purchase to receive of working age (15 to 64 years) and the number of seniors (65 years of age or older), may be for Italy a year 2.268.000 immigrants to Germany a year 3.630.000 and for the whole of the EU each year, 13.480.000 required.

Finally, it means, among others: The migration flows that would be needed to the ageing of the population balance (i.e., the potential support ratio to maintain) are extremely large, and it would have to, in all cases, much higher immigration numbers than in the past.“ 2


3. Tony Blair

was the first country followed by the government of great Britain the requirements of the UN. 23.10.2009 covered the "Telegraph" on how the Swiss Express newspaper writes, "that it is in the UK already since the end of 2000, a deliberately secret held immigration project . No less a figure than Andrew Neather, adviser to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair (1997-2007), has confirmed the Operation to the newspaper. According to Neather, the goal was to make the Kingdom under social democratic rule, a absolutely multi-cultural country`. Against this Background, in the UK alone have left at the beginning of the new Millennium, about 2.3 million new immigrants into the country.“ 3


4. Secret plan of the EU

The "Daily Express" reported on 11.10. In 2008, of a "secret plan" of the Brussels Economists in a report by the EU statistics authority Eurostat, according to which by 2050, in the EU, 56 million immigrants from Africa to Europe fetched to be made to the population decline:
"In the report of the French MEP Françoise Castex, calls for immigrants legal rights and access to social benefits such as allowances. Mrs Castex said: It is urgent that the member States of the immigration will be a sound approach. To say "Yes", we need immigration ... it is not a new development, we must accept it.`
In the statement, the EU is urged to support African governments in establishing migration information centres to manage labour mobility between Africa and the EU`. The first is the on Monday in Bamako, the capital of Mali, opened the employment office. More centres are soon to be in other West African States and later in North Africa opened.
"The French immigration Minister Brice Hortefeux has represented all the 27 EU States ... in a series of lightning visits by West Africa, to the realization of the strategy."
"French President Nicolas Sarkozy wants to implement by the end of the year in 2008, an EU-wide immigration plan before his term of office as Chairman of the Council of the European Union expires." 4


5. Nicolas Sarkozy

The true motives behind the advanced labour shortage was expressed by Nicolas Sarkosy bluntly on 17.12.2008 before the elite University "Ecole polytechnique" in Palaiseau, a suburb of Paris:
"so What is the goal? The goal is the mixing of the races. The challenge of mixing of the various Nations it is the challenge of the 21st century. Century. It is not a choice, it is a commitment!!! It is mandatory!!! We can not do otherwise, we run the risk of otherwise confrontations with very big problems ... and that's why we need to convert us and change us. We will change all at the same time: business, government, education, political parties, and we will commit ourselves to this goal. If this is not done by the people voluntarily, then we will apply national mandatory measures!!!“ 5


6. Declaration of the European Masonic lodges 2015

Sarkozy is a Freemason, however, in spite of the many indications has not been established. But he has an undeniable proximity to many of the members of the occult Lodge of the Grand Orient, whose strong influence on the policy of France is in the last few centuries, commonly known. Thus, in 2012, in Sarkozy's election campaign entourage of 13 were counted Freemasons, 8 of them were Ministers in his Cabinet. Sarkozy himself is closely associated with Alain Bauer, Grand master of the Grande Orient of France.6
It is noteworthy that 28 of the Masonic lodges of Europe from Turkey to Portugal, from Italy to Ireland and Poland in a joint press statement from the 7.9.2015 open borders for unlimited immigrationrequest and to comply with the policies of the EU and the UN, reveal. Equal cover, as she's officially been in this extent between Freemasonry and political decision-makers rarely so openly expressed. The Flooding of the European peoples and their mixing must have for your objectives of an exceptional significance and importance.7


7. UN special representative for Migration Peter Sutherland

As one of the most influential global strategists within the EU and the UN, was the Irishman Peter Sutherland (* 25.4.1946; † 7.1.2018). He was a European Commissioner, head of the WTO, Chairman of Goldman Sachs, Chairman of the Trilateral Commission Europe, a member of the steering Council of the Bilderbergers and of 2006-2017 UN special envoy for Migration.8
In a survey conducted by the sub-Committee for internal EU Affairs of the house of lords in June 2012, said, among others: An aging or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU was the "key argument and, I hesitate which word to use, because it is the object of attack was – for the development of multi-cultural States." 8 in other words, demographics is the key, the mass migration to justify and to bringthe goal is the resolution of homogeneous peoples, and the development of multi-cultural States.
30. September 2015 was load P. Sutherland to a meeting on the theme "A global response to the refugee crisis in the Mediterranean" in the US Think Tank "Council on Foreign Relations". There he said inter alia:


"But the Tweets (on Twitter)that I get are absolutely terrible. But the more fearful you are, the more fun it is for me, because any Idiot who reads and / or Non-Idiot who reads it, therefore, comes and tells me that I have decided would be the homogeneity of the peoples, to destroy, damn you are absolutely right! ("dead bloody right") I!(Applause, Laughter). If I could do it tomorrow, I would destroy you, my own people included.“ 9


8. EU commissioners

The Dutch social-Democrat Frans Timmermans The first Vice-President of the EU Commission and the EU Commissioner for "Better regulation, the rule of law and Charter of fundamental rights", called on during the so-called "fundamental rights Colloquium of the EU" in October of 2015, members of the EU Parliament to strengthen their efforts, "mono-cultural States of America erasing" and to accelerate the process of implementation of the "multi-cultural diversity (diversity)" in every Nation in the world. The future of mankind, based no longer on individual Nations and cultures, but to a mixed super-culture.European culture and European heritage were merely social constructs. Europe has always been a continent of migrants and European values meant that one had to accept the multi-cultural diversity, otherwise you peace in Europe into question. The mass immigration of Muslim men to Europe was a means to this end. No country should escape the inevitable mingling, rather, the immigrants are to be encouraged,"to reach the most distant places of the planet, to ensure that no more homogeneous societies.“ 10

The EU Commissioner for Migration Dimitris Avramopoulos said according to a report in the Salzburger Nachrichten from 3.12.2015, due to the greying of Europe "in the next two decades, ( ... ), more than 70 million migrants." 11 so That's 3.5 million a year. On 18.12.2017 he wrote in the from the U. of Brussels, the local newspaper Politico, which is located to the residents of the European government district, an article under the title "Europe's migrants are here to stay ". It States:


"It is time for the truth. We can, and the Migration will stop never. The refugee crisis in Europe could weaken, but global Migration is not going to stop. ... It is silly to think that the Migration will disappear, if you use a harsh language. It is naive to think that our companies remain homogeneous and migration-free if you built fences. ... we also need to ensure that they (the migrants) can find a home. This is not only a moral imperative. It is also an economic and social imperative for our aging continent and one of the biggest challenges for the near future. ... Finally, we must all be ready, Migration, mobility and diversity as the new Norm, to accept our policy accordingly to make.“ 12


9. UN-Secretary-General

of The Portuguese Antonio Guterres, from 1999 to 2005, President of the Socialist International and from 2005 to 2015 High Commissioner for refugees of the United Nations, had already been on the 22.11.2016, shortly after his election as the new Secretary-General of the UN, in Lisbon, is exactly the Same. He said that "Migration is not the Problem, but the solution". The European Nations would have no right to your borders to control, you would have to instead mass-the poorest people in the world. "It must be recognised that Migration is inevitable and will not stop." "We [the Europeans] to convince you that the Migration is inevitable, and that it is multi-ethnic societies are also multi-cultural and multi-religious, prosperity." The politicians should these "values" are higher than the majority of voters will.13

We will see what are the true goals of the EU and the UN to track, and that all are different Statements, especially those that talk about securing the EU's external borders, lies and deceptions.


II U.S. geostrategy


1. Migration as part of the war strategy

In 1992, called for Steven R. Mann in an article a paradigm shift in the strategy of national security of the United States. He propagated a strategy of "controlled Chaos" move. Complex potential for social Conflict that exist in candidate countries, should be controlled in order to companies into a drift in a chaotic phase, because they were then in the interest of the United States malleable. The more potential for conflict was present, the faster and easier you could follow in a society to a desired state change.With regard to the conflict potential, one can think of the support of the opposition anywhere in the world, to support "moderate rebels" or also to refugee and migrant flows, which will increase the potential for conflict in a country is obvious.14
Steven R. man is not just anybody. He is a Diplomat of the highest rank, an excellent graduate of the National College, the only top graduates of the military-academies, which have proven themselves in the war effort. You will be scheduled for the most important strategic tasks of the United States. Steven R. Mann graduated in 1991, the Elite forge for strategists with award. And in 1992, his article on the strategy of controlled Chaos came out, apparently a summary of his thesis, approved and awarded by the US strategists at the highest level.14


2. War leadership of the fourth Generation

In Parallel, refugee flows and mass migration occurred as a part of modern conflicts in the perception of war theorists with coining the term "war leadership of the fourth Generation", was used in 1989 by a Team of American military analysts, with the participation of the military Advisor to William S. Lind. The term refers to a conflict strategy, in which the boundaries between war and politics, combatants and civilians and blurred to be exceeded.

You wanted to warn but rather the USA prior to strategy of other, in particular, of Islam.15

Lind wrote on 15.1.2004, about the consequences of the war in Iraq is reflective: "the war of The fourth Generation is also characterized in that, here, cultures and not only to States in conflict. We face now the oldest and most steadfast opponent of the Christian West, Islam. After about three centuries, the strategic Defensive, following the Failure of the second Turkish siege of Vienna in 1683, the Islam of the strategic Offensive again, and in all directions extended. In the war of the third Generation canthe Invasion by immigration to be at least as dangerous as Invasion by a state army.“

"In fact, a whole nationality can be a military weapon. The war through Migration is not less effective than against the Roman Empire. ... The most immediate challenge is Islam, and here the challenge will hardly be a peaceful. Islam spreads today of its traditional core areas in each and every direction. (...) What is America's response? We condemn European measures to control immigration, threaten the Serbs on behalf of Bosnian Islamists, and warn Russia against any attempt to control, in the South. At least, this means that a change in the strategic Situation is not understood. Some call it a cultural death wish.“ 16

Apparently, he had no idea that it is also the strategy of the United States itself.


3. Clash of Civiliazations

in 1993, had Samuel Huntington in Foreign Affairs, the mouthpiece of the Council on Foreign Relations(CFR), the Central think tank of the United States, a programmatic essay, "The Clash of Civilazations?" was published. He predicted in a scientific framing what you bring about intended: a global confrontation with Islam. In addition, in 1993, of the CFR-Geostratege Brzezinski warned in a book before, Islamic fundamentalism could take advantage of the religious hostility to the american way of life, some Pro-Western governments in the Middle East, undermine, and, finally, American interests in the Region at risk.17

"As ordered, the events of 11.9.2001, without proof as a fundamental attack by Islamic fighters on the USA ("America have been shown to be under attac"), opened with a giant Bang, the prophezeihten the fight of Islam against the Western civilization. Allegedly by hit – media in the world into the consciousness of the people burned – aluminum-aircraft thickness of the steel beam and brought the resulting fire, the fire-resistant towers of the World Trade center and struck the high-rise No. 7 to the (harmonic) collapse.... The US Elite behind President Bush jr. took the event as an occasion to announce the global fight against Terror as something of a third world war, in which there is only a For or a America could give.“ 17


4. Race mixing

Thoma, B. M. Barnett, graduate of Harvard, and from 1998 to 2004, the military strategy researcher and Professor at the U.S. Naval war College, the naval Academy, the U.S. Navy, had also already before the attack in 2001, the radical Islam as a possible future main enemy of the world power USA . "This theoretical approach has been first of all hardly of interest, but gained by the events of September 11. September 2001 surprisingly important.“(Wikipedia) Only a few days after 9/11, was Barnett's transfer to the Pentagon issues as a consultant of the Secretary of war Rumsfeld for strategy.18

In a number of publications from 2004 onwards, he propagated the idea of a comprehensive globalization, which he referred to as a System of mutual dependencies, the result is that Nations and the ongoing economic processes as well as of the individual do not act more self-determined, but only by influences from the outside are controlled, the Nations resolve in the end. This should be due to a mixing with other races happen, the are of course associated with provoked refugee movements of Muslim people. The resistance against the race mixing, the approximation of the cultures, and the task of ethnic identities is irrational, amoral, and meaningless. "Yes, I reckon irrational actors in my view of the world explicitly. And if you are of the global order, violence threatening, then I say to you.“ 19

Wesley Clark, commander-in-chief of Nato forces in the Kosovo war, and 2004 presidential candidate, said at the beginning of this war: “There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure States. This is an idea from the 19th century. Century, and we are trying to make the Transition into the 21st century. To make a century, and we are going to do with multi-ethnic States.“ 20


5. Migration as a weapon

of 2008 appeared a study by the "Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs" at Harvard University, whose Director Graham Allison, the Deputy Minister of defense in the Clinton Administration, with the title "Strategic development of the Migration as a weapon of war". The study of the author, Kelly Greenhill has been in Civil Wars Journal (civil war Journal) published, apparently because of migration flows easily in civil wars as a result.21 The Harvard graduate Prof. Kelly Greenhill and today teaches at the universities of Stanford and Taft, and was awarded in 2011 for her book about the migration weapon, "Weapons of mass migration," the "Best Book of the Year Award" (Wikipedia).

In her book, leads Kelly Greenhill, the Express newspaper writes, "contexts, such as a description of read, what the time in Germany and other European countries happened. The importance of this research, but also in other directions, as Greenhill illuminates the motivation for the US-French war against Libya, the new, and suggests that this weapon was led gear solely because they wanted to tear down the in-Libya-by-step migration of the wall for Europe.“ 22


Gaddafi had once again asked the EU for assistance, "the army to stop African migrants" who were crowding into his country. However, only Italy granted him a billion dollars. And he knew what to do with Libya was up to and said in 2011:"If you want me to beset, and to destabilize the situation, you will donate your confusion, Bin Laden play into the hands of the armed and in favor of the rebels pile. The following will happen. You will be swamped by a wave from Africa, which spills over from Libya to Europe. No one will be there to stop them.“ 23 But this was the planning.

Both with the refugee flows triggered by the US wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, as well as with the Opening of the gate for African migrants two objectives to be controlled: the mixing of races and peoples, as well as the confrontation of Europe with Islam. Both should lead to the elimination of the European peoples and their cultures.


6. Unique Experiment,

The German-born Harvard Professor of Political theory Yascha Mounk said on 26.9.2015 to the mirror: "first of all, it's more than a short, tourist-friendly summer fairy tale. In Western Europe, an Experiment in the history of the Migration unique: countries, which have defined as mono-ethnic, mono-cultural and mono-religious Nations to be running, you need to convert your identity. We don't know if it works, we only know that it must work.“ 24
On 20.2.2018 he repeated this in the daily issues of the ARD with the Variation that he said in respect of the carriage of the experiment of the "we". He said that one of the reasons for the disintegration of democracy and the rise of "right-wing populism" in Germany, "that we have here is a historically unique Experiment, a mono-ethnic and mono-cultural democracy in a multi-ethnic transform. The flap, which is, I believe, also, but it's also, of course, to many distortions.“ 25


What can be unique on a global planning?


The many "do-gooders" get in "subjective well-being of their moral claims, you are to be the measure of political sanity raise", the actual do not Happen in the misty view of what the philosopher Rudolf Brandner as the psycho-pathology of the "political moron" diagnosed.26 However, this is not only a personal Dilemma, but the tragedy of the whole country, with its culture, and to the paradoxical phenomenon of modern media-to-go democracy on the way. If in time enough people Wake up, the fate of Central Europe.
------------------

The above article is a streamlined and expanded version of the 2.4.2016 published essay, "global planning of mass migration".

Related article for the control and steering of mass migration:
Managed to Escape (https://fassadenkratzer.wordpress.com/2016/04/14/gelenktes-fliehen-verursachung-und-steuerung-von-flucht-und-migration/)
The network of George Soros (https://fassadenkratzer.wordpress.com/2016/04/28/das-netzwerk-des-george-soros-fuer-grenzenlose-migration-in-europa/),
The organized rescue (https://fassadenkratzer.wordpress.com/2016/07/04/die-organisierte-seenot-rettung-als-bestandteil-der-schleuserwege/)

Notes:


1 Cf. Express newspaper of February, 2018, p. 10; Peter Helmes 8.9.2016 (http://w55241n5q.homepage.t-online.de/Identititatenzertorung.civit.5.9.16.pdf)
2, Only the press statement (https://www.unric.org/de/pressemitteilungen/4637) is available;
or large parts (http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.shtml) in English
3 Express Newspaper 14.2.2018 P. 13
4 express.co.uk 11.10.2008 (https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/65628/Secret-plot-to-let-50million-African-workers-into-EU)
5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8QsOz4u54M
6 katholisches.info 1.2.2012 (https://www.katholisches.info/2012/02/der-schatten-der-freimaurer-uber-dem-elysee-palast/)
7 katholisches.info 12.9.2015 (https://www.katholisches.info/2015/09/die-freimaurer-befehlen-der-eu-grenzen-auf-fuer-immer-mehr-einwanderung/)
8 in Detail: Wikipedia (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Sutherland)
9 To Friederike Beck:
https://plus.google.com/102362902270752381288/posts/NagD4Nej5sE
10 Cf. quer-denken.tv 6.5.2016 (https://quer-denken.tv/vizepraesident-der-eu-kommission-monokulturelle-staaten-ausradieren/) and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9_VSp3_564
11 sn.at 3.12.2015 (https://www.sn.at/politik/weltpolitik/eu-kommissar-brauchen-ueber-70-mio-migranten-in-20-jahren-1917877)
12 politico.eu 18.12.2017 (https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-migration-migrants-are-here-to-stay-refugee-crisis/)
13Inselpresse.blogspot.de 26.11.2016 (http://1nselpresse.blogspot.de/2016/11/der-neue-generalsekretar-der-un-sagt.html)
14 Cf. analitic.de 25.10.15 (http://analitik.de/2015/10/25/strategie-des-gelenkten-chaos/)
15 Cf. http://www.dnipogo.org/fcs/4GW_another_look.htm
16 original.antiwar.com 15.1.2004 (https://original.antiwar.com/lind/2004/01/15/understanding-fourth-generation-war/)
17 Cf. The U.S. strategy of confrontation to stage (https://fassadenkratzer.wordpress.com/2018/02/26/die-us-strategie-konfrontationen-zwischen-staaten-und-kulturen-zu-inszenieren/#more-4669)
18 Cf. Note. 3, p. 17
19 Quoted by Express newspaper 14.4.18, p. 18
20 http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc0904/article_805.shtml
21 stratetic-culture.org 26.10.2015 (https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/10/26/strategic-engineered-migration-as-weapon-of-war.html)
22 how note. 19 p. 19
23 heise.de 23.4.2015 (https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Ihr-werdet-von-einer-Immigrationswelle-aus-Afrika-ueberschwemmt-werden-3371456.html)
24 spiegel.de 26.9.2015 (http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-139000005.html)
25 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFLY0rcsBGQ
26 Cf. mesop.de (http://www.mesop.de/mesop-zur-psychpatholgie-des-politischen-trottels-rudolf-brandner-analytik-des-gutmenschen/)


eva.herman 1

Eva Herman - Die offizielle Webseite - Politik, Medien... (https://www.eva-herman.net/)

eva-herman.net (https://www.eva-herman.net/)

The global migration Pact of the UNO comes on quiet soles and defamation club

UNO comes on quiet soles and defamation club

03 Feb 2019.





"The United Nations is nothing but an immense concentration camp. We pretty much control the U.N."

~ Harold Wallace Rosenthal, Zionist, The Hidden Tyranny but a trap-door to the Red World's

jagdmesser
Wednesday, February 27th, 2019, 02:15 PM
AGENDA 30



https://beforeitsnews.com/contributor/upload/106013/images/proxy_duckduckgo_com(482).jpg



The New American (https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/31542-at-world-government-summit-globalists-push-un-agenda-2030?vsmaid=3507&vcid=5495&fbclid=IwAR1f1D51ra-K-OZ4z0e5pWGPu3zqrK3HulZtHyQjv6e5UtaBlaw_R 2kOl9k)


Top globalists are coming out of the closet. Thousands of leading globalists, communists, Islamists and others from around the world converged on the Arabian Peninsula this month for the World Government Summit (https://www.worldgovernmentsummit.org/). Their goal: promote technocratic globalism and plot the future of what they often call their “New World Order.” Senior officials from the United Nations, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the European Union, Communist China, central banks, and even the Trump administration showed up to mingle with heads of state and advocates of Islamic Sharia law from across the region. Even Pope Francis delivered a message. As usual, despite top U.S. media outlets partnering with the summit, the establishment press in the United States largely failed to inform Americans about it.



News releases promoting the World Government Summit — yes, it is really called the World Government Summit — boasted that the event “is setting the agenda for the next generation of governments.” And one of the key goals of the summit was advancing the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), often referred to as UN Agenda 2030 (https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism). UN Deputy-Secretary General Amina Mohammed opened the summit by demanding that the radical UN scheme be implemented to avoid “life-threatening consequences for billions of people.” UN “High Commissioner for the 2030 Agenda” Cristina Gallach echoed the hysteria. And throughout the summit, more than a few speakers touted the controversial UN agenda as if it were the key to saving humanity from every problem under the sun.



The UN goals, as this magazine has documented, include national and global wealth redistribution, government control over the economy, globalist indoctrination of all children, surrendering more sovereignty to global institutions, and much more. They are essentially a “master plan for humanity,” as UN bosses put it, to build a global technocratic government that would dominate every facet of human existence (https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism). Unsurprisingly, the mass-murdering Communist dictatorship enslaving China boasted that it played a “crucial role” in developing the UN agenda. And dictators from around the world celebrated the plan as well. The World Government Summit formally launched its SDG’s in Action @ WGS platform in 2016 in partnership with the UN, the World Bank, and other outfits.



And the line-up of speakers was universally supportive of the agenda. In an address delivered to the World Government Summit (http://w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/events/event.dir.html/content/vaticanevents/en/2019/2/10/world-government-summit.html)after signing (https://www.sheila.media/prophecy-on-fire-one-world-pope-and-top-imam-sign-deal-with-astonishing-implications/) a controversial agreement with a top Sunni Muslim imam, Pope Francis, a fervent advocate of UN Agenda 2030, offered his “best wishes” for the work of summit attendees. Urging cooperation to address the “problems of each person in the global village,” the pope called for more environmentalism while using leftist rhetoric to drive a wedge between “people” and “capital and economic interests.”



Pope Francis also specifically promoted sustainable development, which is the ideology underpinning the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals that seeks to limit the human population and fundamentally transform civilization under the guise of saving the planet. “We cannot really speak of sustainable development without solidarity,” he said, using a buzzword that, along with “fraternity,” has become a staple for the pope and has raised alarm even among Catholic scholars (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/popes-claim-that-god-wills-many-religions-seems-to-overturn-gospel-church-h). “We could even say that the good, if it is not the common good, is not actually good….I hope that your efforts at the service of the common good may bear fruit.”



The pope’s blessing of the World Government Summit was especially bizarre considering that in 2017, the event took place under the shadow of a replica of the Roman arch in front of the pagan Temple of Ba’al. (https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/25998-alex-newman-world-government-summit-brings-globalists-together-under-baals-arch) The monument to the demonic idol, who is frequently referenced in the Bible, originally stood in Palmyra, Syria, a city known in the Bible as Tadmore. Among other concerns, this false pagan god demanded child sacrifices and other horrors that outraged the God of the Bible. While a number of replicas were planned, the very first was prominently displayed at the 2017 World Government Summit, attracting fierce criticism and deep concern among religious scholars — especially in light of the “World Government” motif.



As in previous years, some celebrities showed up to lecture humanity about the alleged need to submit to global governance and sustainable development to supposedly save the planet from humanity. Actor Harrison Ford (shown), for instance, went on a tirade against “nationalism” and “isolationism” after a bizarre segment in which he pretended to speak for “nature.” “I could give a damn with or without humans, I’m the ocean,” Ford said, pretending to be “nature” while speaking in a strange voice. “I covered this entire planet once, and I can always cover it again.” It was not clear whether he intended to refer to the biblical flood of Noah’s time or some other period during which he believes the oceans may have covered the entire planet.


Ford, a lifelong Democrat, also slammed President Donald Trump for allegedly denying “science” on climate change. “Around the world, elements of leadership including in my own country to preserve their state and the status quo, deny or denigrate science,” Ford said as whistleblowers and scientists from the UN continued to expose the UN’s lies and pseudo-science. “They are on the wrong side of history.” According to UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change sea-level reviewer Dr. Nils-Axel Morner, however, who resigned in disgust when the UN IPCC refused to correct its false information, the lies underpinning the man-made global-warming hypothesis will inevitably be exposed. (https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/31472-un-ipcc-scientist-blows-whistle-on-un-climate-lies)



Globalists were everywhere at the event. IMF boss Christine Lagarde, who suggested the IMF might be moved from Washington to Beijing, was a key speaker. Other leading globalist managers speaking at the summit included the scandal-plagued chief of UN WIPO Francis Gurry, who has come under fire for retaliating against whistleblowers and trying to have a reporter prosecuted. UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) chief Audrey Azoulay, a socialist working to standardize the indoctrination of children worldwide, spoke as well. UN Development Program (UNDP) boss Achim Steiner, UNICEF boss Henrietta Fore, UN General Assembly President Maria Espinoza, World Food Programme chief David Beasley, totalitarian-minded UN SDG peddler Jeffery Sachs, World Economic Forum (WEF) boss Klaus Schwab, and numerous other globalist leaders spoke there, too.


Among the prominent “media partners” of the World Government Summit listed on the website were The New York Times, the Financial Times, Bloomberg, CNBC, the “fake news” kingpins at CNN, Sky News (owned by the owner of Fox News), and many others. It was not clear how they were expected to maintain impartiality about the agenda while also sponsoring the summit. Arianna Huffington of the fringe left-wing website Huffington Post and CNN International anchor Becky Anderson even spoke there, along with other media personalities. But as usual, there was very little coverage of the event in American media, perhaps because top globalists tend to openly promote globalism in a way that would alarm the U.S. public and jeopardize the agenda.



Consider, for instance, the speech delivered by Rwandan President Paul Kagame, who spent much of his time promoting the subversion of sovereignty via “regional and continental integration,” as he put it (http://paulkagame.com/?p=14194), to create a united African continent. “We will only realize our full promise, by joining together our historically fragmented markets, and making it easier for people, goods, and services to move across our continent,” he said, boasting of efforts by the globalist African Union (AU) to smash nation-states. “That is why the African Union adopted the African Continental Free Trade Area, which is due to enter into force later this year. We have also adopted a Protocol on the Free Movement of People.”



Of course, as leading globalist luminaries such as former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger have explained, regional governments such as the EU, the AU, and more are a critical component of the globalist vision for the “New World Order.” (https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/30542-creating-a-new-world-order-out-of-regional-orders)That is why the EU, the U.S. government, and the Communist Chinese government have been pouring money into the AU and other emerging regional governments (https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/africa/item/21494-in-african-union-globalist-agenda-becomes-clear). Even Russian strongman Vladimir Putin is in the process of building a “Eurasian Union,” as globalists in the United States pursue deeper integration of “North America” via NAFTA and the USMCA. (https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/north-america/item/30208-new-nafta-text-of-u-s-mexico-canada-agreement-usmca-revealed)



Also attending the World Government Summit was Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan, who urged investors to invest in Pakistan even while boasting about the glories of a welfare state. “I am really against this neo-liberal economics where you have 62 people owning as much wealth as 3 billion people on this Earth,” he told the audience, arguing that governments must take responsibility for taking care of poor people. Former Colombian President Juan Santos, who tried to hand his country over the Marxist terrorists with help from key globalists (https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/south-america/item/26220-u-s-taxpayers-fund-takeover-of-colombia-by-marxist-terrorists), spoke as well.



Aside from the major media outlets, Big Business partnered with the World Government Summit were Mastercard, KPMG, Deloitte, McKinsey & Company, and many other Big Business affiliates. A broad array of “global governance” institutions partnered with the World Government peddlers, too, including the UN, the IMF, the World Health Organization, the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the World Trade Organization, the UN World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), and more.



Among the more than 4,000 participants from 140 countries were a number of high-profile Americans. Among those who spoke on stage was U.S. Energy Secretary Rick Perry, a Bilderberg attendee, who announced a robotics competition from the stage. Daniel Kaniewski, the deputy administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), was also there. Disgraced EPA boss Lisa Jackson (https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/14564-epa-ex-boss-jackson-caught-breaking-law-scamming-us-taxpayers)from the Obama administration, who still serves on the disgraced Clinton Foundation board, was at the globalist summit as well. And former Trump Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s chief of staff Margaret Peterlin spoke, too.


While the establishment media keep Americans divided and distracted with deception and frivolity, ignoring real news such as the “World Government Summit,” globalists are dropping the mask and coming out of the closet for all to see. It seems everyone is welcome in the emerging New World Order — globalists, communists, Islamists, technocrats, Big Business, and more — except patriotic Americans and Christian conservatives. Liberty-loving Americans must expose the subversive globalist agenda before it snuffs out liberty, prosperity, and Western Christian civilization worldwide.


At “World Government Summit,” Globalists Push UN... (https://beforeitsnews.com/v3/prophecy/2019/2503711.html) 27 Feb 2019.





Immigration is a form of war by invasion in which violence is only postponed.


"In multiracial societies, you don't vote in accordance with your economic interests, you vote in accordance with race and religion." - Lee Kuan Yew (Founder of Singapore)

SaxonPagan
Friday, March 22nd, 2019, 12:52 AM
Surprise! EU Report Declares UN Migration Pact Legally Binding After All
Internal documents reveal that Brussels plans to incorporate the controversial UN migration pact into the EU’s legal framework “through the back door”, Austria and Hungary have warned.

Earlier this week, Austrian Foreign Minister Karin Kneissl told Brussels the government was opposed to a report by the European Commission’s Legal Service declaring that the UN compact should have legally binding consequences for every EU member state including those which withdrew from the agreement. The compact describes mass migration as “inevitable, necessary and desirable”.

As an increasing number of countries, including a handful of EU member states, began to have doubts about the UN compact in the weeks and months leading up to its signing in December last year, figures including Germany’s Angela Merkel insisted to its opponents that the document was non-binding, while media outlets attacked any suggestion to the contrary as “far-right conspiracy theory”.


---------------------

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/03/21/austria-eu-report-un-migration-pact/

jagdmesser
Sunday, April 7th, 2019, 07:06 PM
This year, the world commemorates the anniversaries of two key events in the development of the global monetary system. The first is the creation of the International Monetary Fund at the Bretton Woods conference 75 years ago. The second is the advent, 50 years ago, of the Special Drawing Right (https://www.imf.org/en/About/Factsheets/Sheets/2016/08/01/14/51/Special-Drawing-Right-SDR) (SDR), the IMF’s global reserve asset.

When it introduced the SDR, the Fund hoped to make it “the principal reserve asset in the international monetary system.” This remains an unfulfilled ambition; indeed, the SDR is one of the most underused instruments of international cooperation. Nonetheless, better late than never: turning the SDR into a true global currency would yield several benefits for the world’s economy and monetary system.


The idea of a global currency is not new. Prior to the Bretton Woods negotiations, John Maynard Keynes suggested the “bancor” as the unit of account of his proposed International Clearing Union. In the 1960s, under the leadership of the Belgian-American economist Robert Triffin, other proposals emerged to address the growing problems created by the dual dollar-gold system that had been established at Bretton Woods. The system finally collapsed in 1971. As a result of those discussions, the IMF approved the SDR in 1967, and included it in its Articles of Agreement two years later.


Although the IMF’s issuance of SDRs resembles the creation of national money by central banks, the SDR fulfills only some of the functions of money. True, SDRs are a reserve asset, and thus a store of value. They are also the IMF’s unit of account. But only central banks – mainly in developing countries, though also in developed economies – and a few international institutions use SDRs as a means of exchange to pay each other.


The SDR has a number of basic advantages, not least that the IMF can use it as an instrument of international monetary policy in a global economic crisis. In 2009, for example, the IMF issued $250 billion in SDRs (https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2015/09/14/01/49/pr09283) to help combat the downturn, following a proposal by the G20.


Most importantly, SDRs could also become the basic instrument to finance IMF programs. Until now, the Fund has relied mainly on quota (capital) increases and borrowing from member countries. But quotas have tended to lag behind global economic growth; the last increase was approved in 2010, but the US Congress agreed to it only in 2015. And loans from member countries, the IMF’s main source of new funds (particularly during crises), are not true multilateral instruments.


The best alternative would be to turn the IMF into an institution fully financed and managed in its own global currency – a proposal made several decades ago by Jacques Polak, then the Fund’s leading economist. One simple option would be to consider the SDRs that countries hold but have not used as “deposits” at the IMF, which the Fund can use to finance its lending to countries. This would require a change in the Articles of Agreement, because SDRs currently are not held in regular IMF accounts.



The Fund could then issue SDRs regularly or, better still, during crises, as in 2009. In the long term, the amount issued must be related to the demand for foreign-exchange reserves. Various economists and the IMF itself have estimated (https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/resetting-international-monetary-nonsystem) that the Fund could issue $200-300 billion in SDRs per year. Moreover, this would spread the financial benefits (seigniorage) of issuing the global currency across all countries. At present, these benefits accrue only to issuers of national or regional currencies that are used internationally – particularly the US dollar and the euro.



More active use of SDRs would also make the international monetary system more independent of US monetary policy. One of the major problems of the global monetary system is that the policy objectives of the US, as the issuer of the world’s main reserve currency, are not always consistent with overall stability in the system.


In any case, different national and regional currencies could continue to circulate alongside growing SDR reserves. And a new IMF “substitution account” would allow central banks to exchange their reserves for SDRs, as the US first proposed back in the 1970s.

SDRs could also potentially be used in private transactions and to denominate national bonds. But, as the IMF pointed out (https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Policy-Papers/Issues/2018/04/11/pp030618consideration-of-the-role-the-sdr) in its report to the Board in 2018, these “market SDRs,” which would turn the unit into fully-fledged money, are not essential for the reforms proposed here. Nor would SDRs need to be used as a unit of account outside the Fund.



The anniversaries of the IMF and the SDR in 2019 are causes for celebration. But they also represent an ideal opportunity to transform the SDR into a true global currency that would strengthen the international monetary system. Policymakers should seize it.


* * *



And just like that, the world is once again being primed and propagandized to desire this inevitability. Coming just a day after the Saudis threatened to end the Petrodollar, (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-04/petrodollar-panic-saudis-threaten-dump-usd-oil-trades-over-opec-anti-trust-bill) Ocampo's op-ed is well-timed to say the least.

.

The UN becomes Central Planners....like the Fed....
globalism in full bloom by the unelected who "mission creep" and self author their powers.

Authored by José Antonio Ocampo, formerly United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs, (https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/imf-special-drawing-right-global-currency-by-jose-antonio-ocampo-2019-04)via Project Syndicate (https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/imf-special-drawing-right-global-currency-by-jose-antonio-ocampo-2019-04).

It Begins: Former UN Under-Secretary-General Calls For One World Currency (https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-05/it-begins-former-un-under-secretary-general-calls-one-world-currency) 07 Apr 2019.






Control the MONEY and you control everything.

DISBAND THE UN.

STOP DENOTING to the UN and END MEMBERSHIP.

jagdmesser
Wednesday, May 8th, 2019, 12:14 PM
The United Nations has produced a report (https://www.ipbes.net/) warning that a million species are threatened with extinction.



Here is why you shouldn’t take it seriously.


It’s politics, not science


The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), which produced the report, is a political organisation not a scientific one. Just like its sister organisation the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — IPCC — in fact.

As Donna Laframboise notes here (https://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2019/05/06/ipcc-clone-predicts-doom/), both exist purely to give a fig leaf of scientific credibility to the UN’s ‘sustainability’ agenda.

When the IPBES was established in 2010, we were informed (https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jun/11/un-ipcc-for-nature-biodiversity) point blank that its purpose was “to spearhead the battle against the destruction of the natural world.”

In other words, there’s all sorts of deception here. This is no sober scientific body, which examines multiple perspectives, and considers alternative hypotheses. The job of the IPBES is to muster only one kind of evidence, the kind that promotes UN environmental treaties.

That’s how the United Nations works, folks. Machinations in the shadows. Camouflaging its political aspirations by dressing them up in 1,800 pages of scientific clothing.



This is the usual suspects crying wolf. Again

No one would dispute that habitat loss is a problem for plants and animals. But it’s a big stretch from there to suggest that a million species are ‘threatened’ with actual extinction. The ‘E’ word has long been overplayed by environmentalists because it’s so dramatic and final and because everyone has heard of the dodo. There is no evidence whatsoever, though, that the world is heading for its so-called Sixth Great Extinction. As Willis Eschenbach once pertinently asked at Watts Up With That? – Where Are The Corpses? (https://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/04/where-are-the-corpses/)

Harvard ecologist EO Wilson once estimated that up to 50,000 species go instinct every year. How did he calculate this? Using the same method the IPCC uses for its junk-science prognostications on catastrophic climate change: computer models.

Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore exploded this myth long ago:

Moore said in 2000: “There’s no scientific basis for saying that 50,000 species are going extinct. The only place you can find them is in Edward O. Wilson’s computer at Harvard University. They’re actually electrons on a hard drive. I want a list of Latin names of actual species.” Moore was interviewed by reporter Marc Morano (now with Climate Depot) in the 2000 Amazon rainforest documentary (http://www.google.com/url?q=http://www.climatedepot.com/a/1846/Climate-Depot-Report-Rainforest-Factsheet-ClearCutting-the-Myths-About-the-Amazon-and-Tropical-Rainforests&sa=U&ei=3idxTa_EKI3UgAfc0PxP&ved=0CBEQFjAB&usg=AFQjCNGiUYKTW_uGQx1QRCsZMILTs_eaow):

Environmental activist Tim Keating of Rainforest Relief was asked in the 2000 documentary if he could name any of the alleged 50,000 species that have gone extinct and he was unable.

“No, we can’t [name them], because we don’t know what those species are. But most of the species that we’re talking about in those estimates are things like insects and even microorganisms, like bacteria,” Keating explained.

R-i-g-h-t. So there are all these species going extinct. But we don’t know what they are because we haven’t yet discovered them. Hmm. Sounds terrible. Let’s cancel Western Industrial Civilisation right now, just in case.


Seriously, these people are like a stuck record


Here – h/t Dennis Ambler at Homewood’s place (https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2019/05/07/nature-crisis-humans-threaten-1m-species-with-extinction-bbc/#comments) – is the Independent from 2006 (https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/earth-faces-catastrophic-loss-of-species-5329887.html):

Life on earth is facing a major crisis with thousands of species threatened with imminent extinction – a global emergency demanding urgent action. This is the view of 19 of the world’s most eminent biodiversity specialists, who have called on governments to establish a political framework to save the planet.

Scientists estimate that the current rate at which species are becoming extinct is between 100 and 1,000 times greater than the normal “background” extinction rate – and say this is all due to human activity.

Anne Larigauderie, executive director of Diversitas, a Paris-based conservation group, said that the situation was now so grave that an international body with direct links with global leaders was essential.

The scientists believe that a body similar to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change could help governments to tackle the continuing loss of species.

They get away with presenting it as “news” every time because the mainstream media is so thoroughly compliant and dutifully bigs up each scare every time it appears.


“Nature is in its worst shape in human history’

This is exactly the kind of scaremongering claim the report was designed to generate. It gives environmental correspondents from on-message outfits like the BBC and CBC the excuse to put in a call to their favourite eco-alarmists, who helpfully respond with hysterical drivel like this (https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/un-global-biodiversity-report-1.5124089):


“Humanity unwittingly is attempting to throttle the living planet and humanity’s own future,” said George Mason University biologist Thomas Lovejoy, who has been called the godfather of biodiversity for his research.


Actually, as Patrick Moore notes (https://www.climatedepot.com/2019/05/06/here-we-go-again-un-media-recycle-climate-species-exintinction-fears-dredge-up-discredited-paul-ehrlich-for-interviews/), there have been many worse times for species extinction.


Moore, in an interview with Climate Depot, refuted the claims of the species study. “The biggest extinction events in the human era occurred 60,000 years ago when humans arrived in Australia, 10-15,000 years ago when humans arrived in the New World, 800 years ago when humans found New Zealand, and 250 years ago when Europeans brought exotic species to the Pacific Islands such as Hawaii,” Moore explained.


“Since species extinction became a broad social concern, coinciding with the extinction of the passenger pigeon, we have done a pretty good job of preventing species extinctions,” Moore explained.


“I quit my life-long subscription to National Geographic when they published a similar ‘sixth mass extinction’ article in February 1999. This [latest journal] Nature article just re-hashes this theme,” he added. Moore left Greenpeace in 1986 because he felt the organization had become too radical.


Polar Bears and Tigers

By curious coincidence perhaps the two most overhyped of all doomed species are now enjoying a remarkable recovery, not least because – contrary to the claims of environmentalists – humans actually do care about flora, fauna and diversity and have made great strides in preserving them.

It has been a century since the last species of any significance – the passenger pigeon – died out. Almost all the species extinctions that have occurred in the last two centuries have been on islands, the result of predation by invasive species such as rats or cats accidentally introduced by sailors.


Polar bear populations (https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2018/03/01/susan-crockford-polar-bears-keep-thriving-alarmists-keep-pretending-theyre-dying/) have exploded from about 5,000 60 years ago to around 26,000 now – making a mockery of their status as an emblem of man-made environmental catastrophe.


Meanwhile, the number of tigers in India has risen dramatically in the last decade, according (https://www.irishtimes.com/news/environment/india-s-tiger-population-up-30-new-report-finds-1.2072575#.XNGZT9rHQKc.twitter) to the Irish Times:

The estimated population of the endangered big cat has increased from 1,411 in 2006 to 2,226 in 2014, according to the report published by the Indian government’s National Tiger Conservation Authority (https://www.irishtimes.com/topics/topics-7.1213540?article=true&tag_organisation=Tiger+Conservation+Auth ority).


Read the small print

When you get to the bottom of the scaremongering report, the authors show their true colours.

Here is the BBC’s summary:

The study doesn’t tell governments what to do, but gives them some pretty strong hints.

One big idea is to steer the world away from the “limited paradigm of economic growth”.

They suggest moving away from GDP as a key measure of economic wealth and instead adopting more holistic approaches that would capture quality of life and long-term effects.

They argue that our traditional notion of a “good quality of life” has involved increasing consumption on every level. This has to change

Yes, we’re back to our old friends – Agenda 21 and sustainability – the UN’s code phrases for a new world order in which technocrats of the international elite impose their globalist agenda of wealth redistribution, regulation, enforced renewables, higher taxes and enforced rationing on sovereign nations in the name of ‘saving the planet.’


If the UN really cared about species extinction, of course, it would be doing the exact opposite.

As Jo Nova (http://joannenova.com.au/2019/05/a-million-species-face-extinction-time-to-burn-fossil-fuels-to-save-them/) points out:

1. The worst pollution is in countries with a low income per capita — when people are hungry they raze forests. The most polluted cities (https://www.livescience.com/40983-worlds-10-worst-polluted-places.html) are in places like Ghana, Ukraine, Bangladesh, Zambia, Argentina, and Nigeria. The most deforestation occurs in Brazil, Indonesia, Russia, and Mexico. (https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/worst-countries-for-deforestation-by-woodland-area-losses.html) The worst air is in India and China (https://www.livescience.com/40983-worlds-10-worst-polluted-places.html).

2. Only rich nations have the resources to save the environment.

3. Countries that produce more CO2 are richer.


Ignore everything the UN tells you about the environment. It’s drivel – and dangerous drivel at that.




The top 10 polluted rivers which, on top of chemical pollution, also spew the highest quantities of plastic into the oceans, are also in China, Africa and Asia. The oceans are acidifying and warming because of this pollution, not climate change.
But these truths are too hard, aren't they. Recycling milk bottles is pathetic in the face of the real polluters. And while we're at it, addressing the human population overload would also go a long way to cleaning the planet.
The West has done its bit over the last 50 years. We're only 8% of the global population. (We used to be 15%). What about the rest of you. The West cannot fix the mess you're making. You can't afford to keep doubling your population.



Six Reasons Why You Should Ignore the UN’s Species Extinction Report (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/05/07/un-species-extinction-report-is-enviro-loon-hysteria/) 08 May 2019.





Notice the importance and effectiveness of MSM selling this BS to the public without any analysis or proof. That’s the object of MSM, to tell us how to think. Remarkable how the sheeple believe it and react.


UN an organisation of blecks and mo slums, whose overpopulation is the real problem, are delighted that it's WHITE PEOPLE who are in the most serious danger of extinction because of globalist imposed 3rd World migration.


DISBAND the UN and STOP FUNDING it.

jagdmesser
Tuesday, May 14th, 2019, 08:32 PM
https://voiceofeurope.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/cash-card-702x401.png



Over two million migrants have received anonymous debit cards at a cost of €1.55 billion, according to the Hungarian government.


“Over two million migrants have received anonymous debit cards. The equivalent of 500 billion forints (1.55 bn euros) has been spent in this manner”, Chief Security Advisor to the Prime Minister György Bakondi said on Hungarian M1 television.


Mr. Bakondi said that the cards are unlawful (http://www.kormany.hu/en/news/over-1-55-billion-euros-has-been-spent-on-the-migrant-cards), because European citizens cannot own anonymous banking cards, they cannot be monitored, and no public procurement procedure was launched for their issuing.


“This solution, which has not been thought through and is unlawful, and other efforts on the part of the European Union to legalise illegal migration such as the migrant visa and the establishment of legal channels for immigration, represent a security risk with healthcare, economic and cultural consequences for Hungarian and European citizens”, he stated.


In the Chief Security Advisor’s opinion, the EU doesn’t want to stop migration, but legalise it.

“Hungary, however, does not agree with this. Hungary’s opinion is that the problem must not be brought into Europe, but that instead, assistance must be provided to enable problems to be solved on site”, he added.


Mr. Bakondi also mentioned that the good weather has led to an increase in the number of migrants on the Balkan migration route.


Hungary: The EU has provided 2 million migrants with unlawful cash cards worth 1.55 billion euros in an effort to legalise illegal migration (https://voiceofeurope.com/2019/04/hungary-the-eu-has-provided-2-million-migrants-with-unlawful-cash-cards-worth-1-55-billion-euros-in-an-effort-to-legalise-illegal-migration/) 14 May 2019.






“We have only one task, to stand firm and to carry on the racial struggle without mercy”. Heinrich Himmler.



Our problems today are not "American" problems, "British", "French", "German" "European", "African", “Arab” or “Asian”problems - they are problems of SURVIVAL FOR ALL WHITE PEOPLE. If we will not defend our own White Children , who will?

jagdmesser
Sunday, May 26th, 2019, 12:14 PM
Authorities in Ireland “tried very much to introduce something like an amnesty” for thousands of asylum seekers, but “did not dare” call it that because politicians knew such a move would be electoral poison, it has emerged.


Former High Court judge Dr Bryan McMahon made the revelation while giving evidence to the Oireachtas (https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/joint_committee_on_justice_and_equality/2019-05-22/3/) (legislature of Ireland) Committee on Justice and Equality this week, as the United Nations ordered politicians to improve the quality of life for asylum seekers in the country.


Dr McMahon, whose eponymous 2015 report predicted an “upward trend in the number of new applications” for asylum in Ireland, described how efforts to regularise the migration status of 4,000 people were set back by politicians’ fears that “the word ‘amnesty’ … is not a prospect that would go down well with the public”.


He said: “With regard to an amnesty for those who have been in the system for more than five years, we tried very much in our discussions to introduce something that was like an amnesty but we did not dare call it an amnesty. “To some extent, the word is taboo in the discussion because it will not fly [so] the administrators tried to do it in another way,” Dr McMahon added, stressing that the move “had to be done without using the word ‘amnesty’.”


The head of the Irish branch of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR), Enda O’Neill, had complained (https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2019/0522/1050950-direct-provision/) to the committee over the length of time migrants were having to wait to have their applications processed. Other issues raised included that newcomers, who are now allowed to work while seeking asylum thanks to rule changes supported (https://www.thejournal.ie/asylum-seeker-tourism-jobs-3-3930993-Apr2018/) by big business (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/02/04/guinness-sorry-racist-national-pride/), were being placed in taxpayer-funded accommodation which was considered too far away from urban areas to be considered convenient for finding employment.


In September, Ireland announced (https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/politics/new-amnesty-scheme-for-5500-immigrants-37419340.html) an amnesty to regularise the status of an estimated 3,500 to 5,500 illegal immigrants who arrived in the country as international students between 2005 and 2010 — a move hailed by open borders groups such as Right to Remain. The Britain-based NGO, which works to dismantle immigration restrictions in Britain, lauded the decision, alleging that “support for amnesty schemes is mainstream in Ireland”. “Major Irish political parties have advocated regularisation schemes, including in election manifestos, and the main opposition party welcomed the move,” the group said (https://righttoremain.org.uk/ireland-announces-immigration-amnesty-scheme/)on its website.


But a number of factors suggest there is far less consensus on the topic than the Irish establishment claims, including that politicians and the country’s almost uniformly left-liberal mainstream media enforces (https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2019/04/14/sunday-times-ireland-must-shatter-immigration-taboo/) a tough line against anyone who would discuss mass migration or its consequences in less than glowingly positive terms.



At recent elections, discourse around immigration has been controlled by the European Network Against Racism (ENAR), an NGO funded (https://www.enar-eu.org/IMG/pdf/annualreport_2017_final.pdf) by Hungarian-American billionaire George Soros and EU taxpayers, while a centrist politician was smeared (https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/david-quinn-dont-mention-sustainable-immigration-2rs7srzxg) as a “dog-whistling” extremist for commenting that “there needs to be sustainable levels of immigration in this country, it needs to be managed”.


The gap in attitudes between Ireland’s elite and the people who they are supposed to represent was exposed (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/05/02/ireland-establishment-mass-migration/) in a survey earlier this year, which found that not one of the country’s TDs (the equivalent of British MPs) wanted to reduce immigration.


Despite half the respondents admitting that mass migration was regularly brought up on the doorstep as a topic of concern, 65% said (https://www.newstalk.com/podcasts/highlights-from-newstalk-breakfast/exclusive-newstalk-td-survey-immigration-ireland-2019) they were happy to see immigration remain at its current level while 35% stated they would like to see it increased further.



Ireland Sought to Give Thousands of Migrants ‘Amnesty Under Another Name’ (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/05/26/ireland-migrants-amnesty-another-name/) 26 May 2019.






Always the same culprits: the UN and the EU behind the underhand population replacement of Europeans.


Ireland, UK, France, Belgium, Holland, France, Germany, Sweden, etc. are lost because of this globalist, marxist migration madness.

jagdmesser
Tuesday, June 4th, 2019, 07:59 PM
EU nations must surrender immigration controls to Brussels and have their borders opened wide to mass migration from outside the continent because Europe “has been enriched throughout its history by diversity”, according to Antonio Guterres.



Receiving the anti-national sovereignty Charlemagne Prize, previously awarded to globalist figures including (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2016/05/06/awarded-prestigious-charlemagne-prize-pope-blasts-weary-aging-infertile-europe/) Pope Francis, Angela Merkel, and (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/05/12/macron-integration-eu-migrant-quotas/) Emmanuel Macron, the UN secretary general began his acceptance speech with the warning that many voters in Europe were “turning inward, mired in the memory of a golden age that probably never was”. Assimilating several culture[s] and legacies was the starting point of European culture,” Guterres told an audience in Germany last week, noting (https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2019-05-30/the-secretary-generals-address-the-international-charlemagne-prize-of-aachen-for-the-unity-of-europe) that the Charlemagne Palace in Aachen “borrowed several elements of Roman and Byzantine civilisation”.



But Europeans would not be able to “protect [the continent’s] rich heritage” without adhering to globalist demands including mass immigration, slashing carbon emissions to zero by 2050, and “boosting the [UN] 2030 Agenda and its Sustainable Development Goals” which include calls for abortion on demand, equality of outcome based on gender, and the promotion (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/04/26/poland-lgbt-gender-ideology-threat/) of LGBT lifestyles to young children, he claimed. Declaring that Europe “cannot be premised on ‘us’ versus ‘them’”, the Portuguese socialist said there was “no alternative” but to open the bloc’s borders, alleging that “closing our doors to asylum seekers does not protect but shame this heritage”.


“All societies tend to be, or are already, multi-ethnic, multi-cultural, and multi-religious. This must be considered as a richness, not as a threat,” Guterres insisted, before demanding Brussels tear down EU nation states’ external frontiers and force taxpayers to send money to the Global South in order to achieve a “balanced approach addressing the root causes of migration while preserving the rights and dignity of migrants”.


The UN boss underlined so-called anthropogenic climate change, mass immigration, and xenophobic “hate speech” on the internet — the third of which he claimed in the address, which made no mention of Islamic extremism, is “fueling terrorism through social media” — as “three unprecedented challenges” which “knock on our doors” at “this time of great geopolitical disorder”.


After complaining that [I]“the Human Rights [sic] agenda has been losing ground to the national sovereignty agenda”, Guterres went on to talk a little about the medieval ruler and first Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne, who had united the western part of Europe by the 9th century. Comparing the struggle of the man dubbed ‘Father of Europe’, whose “inability to write was the … frustration of a lifetime” to third world refugee children imported to Europe, the former leader of Portugal added that “like Charlemagne, Europe had to learn from Jerusalem, Athens, Rome, and so many other cultures”.


In Britain, the UN leader’s speech was described as “necessary reading” by the Church of England leaders declaring support for the far-left eco-movement, Extinction Rebellion.


In a pastoral newsletter (https://www.lichfield.anglican.org/news/2019/06/03/let-rebellion-begin/)for June, which made no mention of Jesus but instead heavily pushed for more establishment-promoted globalism, the diocese of Lichfield blasted the existence of “pockets of climate change deniers” who dared “portray protestors as misguided and even members of an ‘eco mob’” demanding Christians instead “salute” the aggressive (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7099301/Extinction-Rebellions-lawyer-admits-plan-close-Heathrow-drones-bad-idea.html), ‘eco-anarchist’ group “for prioritising the future of our planet over the comfort of their armchairs”.



Let's start with opening your doors to whomever wants to access your home and take it from there.


It's open borders for the 'plebs' and gated communities for his sort.
Personally, I would prefer it to be a gated community of a more restrictive kind for his sort (of the '99years to life' kind; with a little rock breaking for daily exercise).



UN CHIEF: EU NEEDS OPEN BORDERS, BECAUSE ANCIENT ROME (https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/06/04/un-demands-open-borders-europe-enriched/) 04 Jun 2019.




Regardless of the amount and type of education a lot of Europeans are just STUPID, will remain so and believe this 'globalist' crap.


He’s well paid for these BULLSHIT speeches and he doesn’t mean or believe a word of it.

jagdmesser
Wednesday, June 5th, 2019, 01:44 PM
Second Nigerian president of the UN 193-member policy-making General Assembly.


https://global.unitednations.entermediadb.net/assets/mediadb/services/module/asset/downloads/preset/assets/2019/06/04-06-2019_NICA-809841_GA_Tijjani-Muhammad-Bande.jpg/image1170x530cropped.jpg


Ambassador Tijjani Mohammad Bande, newly-elected President of the 74th session of the United Nations General Assembly.




Members of the United Nations General Assembly have chosen the Nigerian ambassador to the world body as its next president.

They elected Tijjani Muhammad-Bande on Tuesday to preside over the 74th UN session for one year, starting in September.

He is the second Nigerian president of the 193-member policy-making General Assembly.

Joseph Nanven Garba was president during the 1989-1990 session.

Mr Muhammad-Bande succeeds Maria Fernanda Espinosa of Ecuador.

The incoming president told General Assembly members that when the United Nations convenes in September, its highest priorities will include climate change, universal health coverage, gender equality and the eradication of poverty and hunger.

The 61-year-old career diplomat is a native of Zagga in north-west Nigeria and has a master’s degree in political science from Boston University.





Nigerian ambassador chosen as next UN General Assembly president (https://www.independent.ie/world-news/nigerian-ambassador-chosen-as-next-un-general-assembly-president-38180700.html) 05 Jun 2019.





The people of America and Europe race along with no concern for the future, no understanding of what countless millions more 3rd world immigrants mean to our civilization and no comprehension or regard of what their children’s future will be as a result.



UN is a black and mu slum club set up to further the interests of blacks and mu slums.
Tijjani Muhammad-Bande is black and mu slum.