PDA

View Full Version : The Death of Innocence: How the Crude Sexualisation of Pop Music, TV and Fashion is Destroying Childhood



Verðandi
Wednesday, February 21st, 2007, 02:38 PM
A generation of girls is being psychologically damaged by the sexualisation of toys, clothes and cartoons, experts have warned.

Exposure to sexy images from an early age as a devastating impact on mental and physical health, leading to low-self esteem, depression and the onset of eating disorders such as anorexia, research has shown.

It could lead to girls under-achieving in school and in the workplace and even contribute to paedophilia, a report by leading psychologists warns.

More... (http://forums.skadi.net/redirector.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dail ymail.co.uk%2Fpages%2Flive%2Farticles%2F news%2Fnews.html%3Fin_article_id%3D43734 3%26in_page_id%3D1770)

Bridie
Thursday, February 22nd, 2007, 01:27 PM
Not the sort of image that I want my daughters to aspire to, nor admire. :| I don't allow Bratz (slutz) dolls and associated mechandise in my home.... nor any other sexualising toys, clothes etc. I want all of my kids to be able to enjoy a carefree, fun, innocent childhood for as long as possible.


And is it just me... or do other people see the similarities here?

http://www.starstore.com/acatalog/Bratz-punk_L.jpg

AND....

http://www.radiopristis.com/top40/Pussycat%20Dolls.jpg


... problem is, Bratz dolls' target audience is girls under the age of about 8 years. :thumbdown

White_One
Friday, February 23rd, 2007, 10:42 AM
The generation of 'damaged' girls


A generation of very young girls is being psychologically damaged by inappropriate "sexy" clothing, toys and images in the media that are corrupting childhood, leading psychologists warn today.

They say marketing takes unfair advantage of children's desire for affection and the need to conform, leading to eating disorders, low self-esteem and depression.

Bratz dolls, The generation of 'damaged' girls
Bratz dolls: 'Obscene and tarty'

Their report echoes a warning by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, and follows a United Nations study last week saying that British children were the unhappiest and unhealthiest in the developed world.

The American Psychological Association's report says inappropriate marketing is leading to the sexualisation of children by a consumer society.

Apart from clothing for five- and six-year-olds, with old-fashioned frilly frocks replaced by mini skirts, plunging necklines and sequined crop tops, the report specifically criticises "Bratz dolls".

These outsell Barbie dolls in Britain by two to one and come dressed in miniskirts, fishnet stockings and feather boas.

MORE, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/02/20/ngirls20.xml

celticviking
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 06:08 AM
Bad influence? Toys like Bratz are marketed to young girls

Scroll through YouTube and you will see hundreds of little girls being filmed by their parents as they perform the explicit lyrics and sexy movements of Lady Gaga, Beyonce and Britney. The sort of sexually-charged performances that Ofcom apparently deem to be acceptable pre-watershed entertainment, if this week’s ruling that The X Factor’s most explicit performance ever did not breach broadcasting guidelines is anything to go by.

When I first had my two daughters, I made the mistake of assuming that if I didn’t dress them up like little Lolitas I could protect them from sexualisation. By not mentioning the word ‘diet’, I thought I could save my girls from believing a woman’s worth is linked to her dress size.

But despite my best efforts to press damp towels around the doorframe of my home, I soon found that sexualisation was like a gas that still seeped through.
When my older daughter, Lily, then eight, sang with 1,500 other school children at a charity fund-raiser at the Royal Albert Hall last Christmas, one of the numbers she was asked to sing — along with Silent Night — was Bad Romance by Lady Gaga.

Presumably no one had thought to question why primary pupils were being asked to perform a sexually-charged number about an abusive relationship.

But then, it’s all become so normal. Suggestive songs are the soundtracks to our children’s school discos. The words ‘bring your own make-up’ are the instructions on the party invitations from their classmates.

It’s a measure of how much sex is a part of their world that for the elder sisters of primary age girls, the word ‘slut’ is now a term of praise.
During the research for my book, Where Has My Little Girl Gone?, I came across one 16-year-old girl at a top public school so proud of the term she spelled it out in giant letters as her phone screensaver. She’s far from being the only one. On Bebo, there are more than 30,000 girls happily describing themselves the same way.

So how did sleaze become so acceptable that it’s now part of our girls’ childhoods?

And, painful though it may be to admit, is it time that we parents accept our fair share of the blame? What I discovered while writing my book is that we can’t put it all at the feet of the marketing men and the media. Nor can we leave it up to the Government to fix.

As the first gatekeepers who most influence our children’s values, attitudes and aspirations, we also have to look to ourselves to work out how it reached this state of affairs.

The initial starting point for my research was to speak to a wide range of families about their attitudes to sexualisation. I found they ranged from passive to permissive.

At one end of the spectrum, some dismissed it, saying every generation is shocked by what the next generation does. ‘We did all that in our day,’ they told me. ‘We went out with boys and tried on our mums’ high heels — and we turned out OK, didn’t we?’

That’s probably true, but the stakes have got much higher.

We may all remember rolling up our skirts the moment the school bell rang, but did we really dress to look like lap-dancers? With a bit of effort, we might have managed to look a couple of years older at 12, but did we really look 18?

Another common refrain I heard from parents was the free speech argument. These days, no parent wants to be cast in the role of the spoil-sport Mary Whitehouse figure, scandalised by today’s youth. We’d much rather look cool to our peers and our children’s friends.

Mums I spoke to were also afraid of raising concerns because they don’t want to appear as joyless, man-hating feminists. They felt other mothers would think they were over-reacting if they complained about make-over tents at school fairs — or proms at their children’s primary schools.

But it’s far too soon — and too dangerous — to fall into a state of paralysis. In the past, magazines and TV programmes were careful not to step over the line because they feared a parental backlash. Now, few object

Last year, the Prime Minister said the exploitation of children in advertising and marketing was deeply worrying and called for a clampdown. Yet the year before, the number of complaints the Advertising Standards Authority got from parents on the same subject was just 19.
Because we worried it would look ‘anti free speech’, we’ve said and done nothing for so long that now no one dares to speak up. As a result, the situation has slipped out of our grasp.

By allowing the internet to be almost completely unregulated on the grounds of freedom of information, pornography has entered the mainstream.

The ‘free speech’ we’ve so vigorously defended now allows women and teenagers — frequently dressed up to resemble primary-age girls — to be casually branded ‘dumb bitches’, ‘whores’ and ‘sluts’ on the web.

But why, as parents, aren’t we talking back? Starting by looking hard at ourselves. We need to ask if the creeping sexualisation of society has warped our values, too. After all, if we were born during the Sixties or after, we were the first generation to grow up in a world dominated by television.

As children we quickly picked up that, for a woman, being thin and beautiful equals sexy and successful. In our lifetimes, we’ve seen the explosion of reality stars, WAGs and manufactured girl bands who have sent out the message that you can be rich and famous without an iota of talent

As these celebrities have racked up continuous attention and impressive wealth — which reality TV has made seem within the grasp of everybody — have we also signed up to the idea that our daughters need to look a certain way to get on in life?

Without realising it, have we also come to covet a celebrity lifestyle for our own children?

The irony is that, at the same time, we have helped put the rich and famous on pedestals high out of reach, when we should have been asking what’s wrong with celebrities that makes them so needy for non-stop approval and attention.

For me, just how much modern parents are buying into the X Factor Society hit home when I spent the day at the Harley Street headquarters of a plastic surgery chain.

I was there to find out why the number of procedures is climbing at a record rate, and how, in the depths of a recession, so many people are still able to afford costly operations.

Before I went, I had no particular preconceptions — other than expecting to interview a lot of middle-aged women seeking tweaks and tucks.

Instead, as the waiting room filled, it was striking to see that more than half the patients were girls in their late teens and early 20s seeking boob and nose jobs ‘for confidence.’






Read more here
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1379683/X-Factor-sleaze-row-Sexualisation-pop-music-TV-fashion-destroying-childhood.html


http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t796361/

flâneur
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 07:03 AM
Well i dont think you can actually blame tv or the media for how your children turn out.

I take my childrens upringing in my own hands and also their education as regards art/culture etc and explain how it all works and why......i dont leave such important matters in the hands (or claws) of a cabal of disgusting semites and their cohorts....and am amazed that anyone in their right mind who has children would.

RoyBatty
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 08:18 AM
Well i dont think you can actually blame tv or the media for how your children turn out.


Perhaps not but it certainly doesn't help and it's a thankless and difficult task to try and insulate against it.



I take my childrens upringing in my own hands and also their education as regards art/culture etc and explain how it all works and why......i dont leave such important matters in the hands (or claws) of a cabal of disgusting semites and their cohorts....and am amazed that anyone in their right mind who has children would.

Great job, unfortunately ZOG are still able to dig their claws in during social engineering classes (the type they favour over and above all others) at the local re-education centers. You're so right about how parents could be so thick and lazy to leave these matters with the schools.... :(

flâneur
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 08:40 AM
Well as far as im concerned the off button on the TV remote is only a tiny movement away and takes far less effort than swatting a fly.
Just turn the electronic jew off....i wouldnt want kaffirs or jews,or liberals etc in my living room mouthing off their platitudes and dont want them via tv either....so i just turn it off...ignore it.
Neither would a put money into the hands of these rats by going and watching the tripe they churn out at the cinema either.

I dont see you have to have an iron will power either to decide not to partake in thier games (with fixed rules where we always lose)....i prefer not to play.

School is a bit of a problem but i give my kids the "real" history lessons and the alternate view on subjects that they are brainwas....erm taught at school.

RoyBatty
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 08:46 AM
Well as far as im concerned the off button on the TV remote is only a tiny movement away and takes far less effort than swatting a fly.
Just turn the electronic jew off....i wouldnt want kaffirs or jews,or liberals etc in my living room mouthing off their platitudes and dont want them via tv either....so i just turn it off...ignore it.


:thumbup

Eventually your kids will become older and start uhm.... commandeering the TV remote or go online wiv some kind of electronic device where the brainwashing starts all over again. However, whilst their young is probably the most critical period to shield them from terminal ideological contamination.



Neither would a put money into the hands of these rats by going and watching the tripe they churn out at the cinema either.


:thumbup

Fight them the way which really hurts and upsets them - don't feed them any $$$$.




I dont see you have to have an iron will power either to decide not to partake in thier games (with fixed rules where we always lose)....i prefer not to play.


:thumbup




School is a bit of a problem but i give my kids the "real" history lessons and the alternate view on subjects that they are brainwas....erm taught at school.

good job

flâneur
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 09:04 AM
remote or go online wiv some kind of electronic device where the brainwashing starts all over again.

The internet has been a god send in my opinion and until the jew can control its content (which i think is impossible) its the best form of getting information and getting access to obscure sources and people of like minded opinions.
(obviousley one must be aware of the dangers).

I imagine sites like this in a few years will have to be viewed using some sort of new WWW function,like they are trying to do in society anyone having opinions like ours needs to be marginalised and pigeon holed as thought criminals etc.
Much like the idea for people accessing porn will soon have to use XXX instead of WWW,something like that.....i think KKK should be an apt choice.;)

Jäger
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 09:59 AM
I take my childrens upringing in my own hands and also their education as regards art/culture etc and explain how it all works and why....
Children are brought up by the routine of society, the rest is conscious cognition on their part, depending on their intelligence they will fall for our contemporary idiocy or not, and even if they don't they still might discard their duty to life itself and degrade their intelligence to a mere accomplice of a career.
It is certainly the right thing on your part to educate them as good as you can, but the outcome won't be as much in your hands as you might think.

Wychaert
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 10:51 AM
It is the parent who doesnt care about our true culture, so they bring up their children the same way.
My wife and me simply removed all MTV like channels, and the left wing programs, like we have a news show 'het jeugdjournaal' we just turn them off!

The other problem is school and other children in the neighbourhood.
they also bring those fashion like bollocks to our kids.
Which we totaly ignore!:D

Heinrich Harrer
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 11:07 AM
It's probably best not to have a TV receiver at all. If they want to watch something, DVDs can be bought selectively. Mainstream TV these days is mostly trash and propaganda anyway.

Of course another problem is that their peers are still subject to these influences and will pass them on. I guess that's where the parenting part comes in.

Patrioten
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 05:23 PM
The problems that are caused if the trends in toys and children's entertainment become degenerate are immense. Childhood after a certain point is based upon likeness and commonality in references and toys. If these references are degenerate and unsuitable yet most children adopt them, then how is a parent supposed to withhold them from their own child, lest that child become an outcast and bullied? Childhood is not a time for individuality. If there are alternative trends that are less degenerate yet appeal to a sufficiently large segment among children then these problems migth become more managable, but I am not familiar with the realm of childhood of today so I don't know if there exists an alternative to Bratz and the accompaning degeneracy.

I think girls are worse off than boys in this department, boys, unless their parents are on an ideological quest to socially engineer their children in accordance with cultural marxism, still have their toy soldiers, plastic guns, lego and maybe increasingly video games as the kids grow older. But as this article suggests the type of toys that are sold to and bought for girls might have seen a turn for the worse.

Mööv
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 07:02 PM
lest that child become an outcast and bullied?

Yes this is a major problem. As you can teach your child to your liking at home however this can result in the child being outcasted and bullied by other children for being different. Also you cannot control what your child is watching, listening, etc. when it is away from home (schoolyard, friends house,...).
Society makes a great mark on any child's life and it is something that cannot be ignored or something you can't easily (if at all) run away from. So the target should be the society as a whole for if you only change your child it can only cause problems. I do block offensive and primitive things from inside of my house however some less offensive things that are popular among kids you just can't block because your child will suffer badly from such action.

Anyways, a friend of mine sent me a link to an interesting clip today that is related to the talk here:

UE0HTC89VPQ

Northern Paladin
Sunday, April 24th, 2011, 09:05 PM
The best thing to do is to not by bratz, or whatever else is out there... positive, young role-models are probably the best deal. There are many books you could buy your kid to inspire them to be smart instead of slutty/wiggerish.

BritishLad
Monday, April 25th, 2011, 05:07 PM
One of the problems is that corporations are now so focused on making money they don't give a damn who buys their products and can't be bothered spending money to try and stop kids from buying their products. Quite the opposite, they are now purposely making their products more racy and shallow to get kids to buy them!

I guess that's one of the joys of capitalism!

:thumbdown

Ælfrun
Monday, April 25th, 2011, 06:08 PM
. If these references are degenerate and unsuitable yet most children adopt them, then how is a parent supposed to withhold them from their own child, lest that child become an outcast and bullied? Childhood is not a time for individuality. I
I think girls are worse off than boys in this department, boys, unless their parents are on an ideological quest to socially engineer their children in accordance with cultural marxism, still have their toy soldiers, plastic guns, lego and maybe increasingly video games as the kids grow older. But as this article suggests the type of toys that are sold to and bought for girls might have seen a turn for the worse.

What a fantastic thread. I really agree with you on this in many different senses. Girls are getting bullied in school so much because of these false idols and bad role models. TV and media is destroying our society. It is giving women and men a bad self image. Women and men are not happy with their appearances- they are either too fat or too thin, etc. Also the "role models" that young women have are horrible influences. Young girls are dressing and acting like sluts. Girls are losing their virginities at 12, 13, 14 years old which is not right. The media also promotes multi culture and interracial relationships.

RoyBatty
Monday, April 25th, 2011, 06:09 PM
BritishLad:

Deliberate Corporate targeting of kids really took off in the early 1980's under Reagan in the US. I can't remember the exact details but legislation which inhibited the ability of advertisers to target kids was repealed and not soon thereafter the Corporations descended like a school of piranhas.

This eventually spilled over into other countries as well.

Today we (society) "accepts" this situation as being "normal" because we don't know any different and people just assume that this is the way it always was. However, this is not the case. It's a relatively (+- 3 decades or so) recent phenomenon but its effects have been catastrophic as any people-watching expedition to ones local shopping mall or high street will attest.

wittwer
Monday, April 25th, 2011, 06:38 PM
This is nothing but a cold calculated marketing move to increase profits at the expense of a humanized culture. The increased use of gratuitous sex and violence in media is but a symptom. We see more violent death, rape and promiscuity etc. in a year than most soldiers ever see, or the police or any one encounters in a lifetime. So what's going on? Is Art imitating Life or does life imitate art? Meanwhile, the culture continues to decline and violence and the like continues to increase in proportion.

And remember, profit is more important than cultural values. All the business men and the creators of such, are laughing all the way to the bank...

Æmeric
Monday, April 25th, 2011, 07:40 PM
UE0HTC89VPQ

Number 2, "Katie Perry" guest stared on Sesame Street thid pass year:


YHROHJlU_Ng

^ Pretty harmless but why is a kids show promoting someone like Perry? Though I get the impression its viewership is mainly children-of-color so why care?

As for Fashion "Abercrombie & Fitch" gained a lot of notoriety for their catalogs which featured nude models in sexual situations to sell clothes. As A&F pointed out all of the models were over 18, but the catalog is geared towards 12-18 year olds. A&F would deny this but the pre-18 demographic is a very important part of A&F's clientele -they know who is buying their clothes & looking at the catalog.


Padded Bikini Tops For Girls

Would you buy your pre-teen daughter a push-up bikini top? One major retailer hopes you will.

Abercrombie & Fitch, a popular store among teenagers, recently introduced the "push-up triangle," marketing the swim top to girls as young as 7 or 8.

But of the parents "GMA" spoke to, the reaction was unanimous -- no one would buy one for their child.

"I won't be buying them for my 8-year-old," one parent said.

"I thought it was a joke when I first heard about it. Then, I realized, it's so crazy, it must be true," Dr. Michael Bradley, a child psychologist, told "Good Morning America" on Saturday.

Bradley said the American Psychological Association has warned in the past that retailers were going after young girls.

They're targeting girls as young as age 4 to be sexualized creatures," Bradley said.

In response to the public outcry, Abercrombie renamed the top on its online store the "striped triangle." The padding remains, however, as does the outrage. Many viewers wrote in to the "GMA" shoutout board and Facebook page.

"Padded bathing suits for young school girls is vulgar," one person wrote. "Geez, we live in a scary society. I hope parents tell their children they are perfect the way they are!"

It's hardly the first time the racy company has strayed into controversial territory. A few years ago, Abercrombie offered thongs for the 10-year-old set with the words "wink, wink" stitched on the front. The company's advertisements have also raised concerns over the years for being too revealing.

And Abercrombie isn't alone. Earlier this year, Wal-Mart was criticized for its plans to introduce a line of make-up products directed at girls aged 8 to 12.



Abercrombie & Fitch Still Selling Padded Bikinis
Tweens spend roughly $24 million on beauty products each year.

Bradley said the consequences on young girls may be many.

"We're shaping their beliefs," he said. "We're actually teaching them that this is their primary value in this culture."

He also said it can shape their behavior, harms their body image and can add unnecessary anxiety.

The onus does lie with the parents, however, to keep their children out of the swimsuits, Bradley said. He advised to use the moment as a teaching moment if your child really wants the product. He said to avoid a shouting match by asking questions that spark a discussion.

"These guys really should be ashamed," said Bradley. "I hate to get this in their faces like that, but it's just wrong. It's hurting people."

Abercrombie has showed no signs they plan to pull the product from its store's shelves.

Source (http://abcnews.go.com/US/abercrombie-fitch-padded-bikini-top-year-olds-parents/story?id=13236904)

Mööv
Monday, April 25th, 2011, 07:49 PM
^ Pretty harmless but why is a kids show promoting someone like Perry? Though I get the impression its viewership is mainly children-of-color so why care?


Well you said it right. "Why do they promote her?"
They can do the same with the Gaga "thing" and make it look human but then kids who like the show go on internet and find the whole new primitive world and get attracted to it. So that way the show could get labeled as OK and the parents would be at ease while behind the scene lurks a monster.

theiamania
Monday, April 25th, 2011, 07:54 PM
Theyre all infected with the invalid philosophical position of egalitarianism and so theyre all trying to dumb down everyone to the lowest level, which is the mentality of the negro.

Intelligent, bright white kids are out trying to act like negros now. The overall intellectual output is diminishing since some of the kids end up ruined trying to dumb themselves down like theyre taught to do.

OnePercent
Tuesday, April 26th, 2011, 03:34 AM
I am really happy to see this thread today because I was just thinking about this very topic earlier this morning.

Allow me to let out my inner conspiracy-theorist for a moment here, for awhile now I have hypothesized that our corporate aristocracy is engaging in deliberate social engineering by "sexualizing" (using the terms of this thread) mainstream culture with the goal of creating new generations of dumbed-down, impulsive consumers to buy the worthless crap they produce at massively inflated prices.

For example, it seems to me that "hip hop" culture is like a capitalists wet-dream of the ideal values a mindless consumer should have: fixation on worthless ostentation, pathological selfeshness, distain for anything remotely intellectual, and an uncontrollable tendency toward impulsive behavior. Because of these convenient values media outlets like MTV (owned by Time-Warner last time I checked) are therefore directed to increase the amount of hip-hop they play, and even movies like "Alvin and the Chipmunks" feature soundtracks written almost entirely by foul-mouthed rappers like Pitbull.

Since, at least here in the US, upwards of 95% of all media outlets are owned by a couple of big corporations (some of whom are diversified into every other market imaginable, such as GE) it is not that hard to imagine a bunch of well-connected "marketing geniuses" getting together and setting a kind of informal agenda to promote trends and fashions that help to create the consumate consumer class. I am sure they even have a clever catch phrase for their hand-raised pet consumer group, maybe it is oft-mentioned "millennials" they seem to be so enamored with.

I think the part that disturbs me the most about this trend is how so many members of the younger generation just completely embrace this marketing scheme without even the slightest critical thought about it. In my generation ("gen x", wow I sound like an old man already) it seemed like the majority of kids my age (even blacks and hispanics) had a strong distain toward "selling out" and a kind of innate "bullshit detector" for anything that was too manufactured or corporate. Alas it seems like the younger generation is almost entirely brainwashed. Or maybe it is just that embracing the values of their corporate masters is their incomprehensible way of rebelling against previous norms, though I think that is just giving them too much credit.

dgirlc
Tuesday, April 26th, 2011, 02:52 PM
I saw a commercial for Sketchers SHOES that had a woman dancing around in underwear, and of course the camera was zoomed in on her ass for at least half of the commercial, o'h by the way the commercial was on Nickelodian, a kid's TV channel.. Children's TV channels have gone completely down hill, and themselves are very provocative at times, look at Icarly, or Victoria Justice, these girls are supposed to be in middle school yet wear clothing a fully grown woman would wear if she were to go to a bar in hopes of getting laid, it's ridiculous.. Now a days it is extremely hard for parents to 'shelter' their children's innocence because the very thing that destroys it is all over the radio, TV, and magazines.

vicorix
Tuesday, April 26th, 2011, 05:21 PM
with out changing society as it is and redefining it as a whole a parent can only do so much to keep these things away from their children. these influences comes from what is thought of that would sell. it all comes down to sex. to the people making money thats what sells. and now you have children seeing these toys and singers and so many other things that affect there views, because thats what their friends and everybody else likes. it is sad that society has fallen to advertising sex to the young when it is something that should be kept as sacred not flaunted around for money. as it goes back to prostitution being one of the oldest professions media moguls are just using it in other ways and r making a killing on it. what are we to do? other than doing my best to bring a child in this world and hoping that something i teach makes a lasting impression on them just to keep the world as it is at bay and take root in them. we change the world through our children maybe then can society be changed into something like it used to be. strong with virtues, honesty, and principles.

normanlady
Tuesday, April 26th, 2011, 06:46 PM
The Amish & LDS women know how to behave.

Roderic
Wednesday, September 7th, 2011, 04:46 AM
It is true that a society which is in clear and steep decline inevitably loses all elements of its moral compass before its ultimate collapse. Both our own culture in the United States, as well as that of the rest of the Western World, are adequate proof of that.

Indeed, the depths of cultural, moral, and spiritual degradation we have allowed ourselves to sink to scarcely appears to have any limits. We have allowed ourselves to accept torture as a justified method of ensuring our “security.” We have allowed ourselves to accept the murder of 51 million babies sold to us under the guise of a “woman’s right to choose.”

We are increasingly coming to accept the denial of healthcare services to the elderly under the justification that the costs are too high and that they aredraining away resources from those who are more deserving of them. We have accepted the slaughter ofmillions of innocent people in foreign wars resulting from a culture of fear, weakness, and intellectual laziness.

Unfortunately, all of these acts have been growing in its societal acceptability for some time with very little resistance to it among the general public.

However, through all of these engineered social changes and manipulated mass opinions, there was at least one shared value that did, at least up until this point, remain intact – that of an abhorrence of child molestation and pedophilia.

Unfortunately, one of the last strands of moral fiber left, the innocence of children and their protection from vampirical predators is now set to be removed from the national hive mind.

If the average American could slow down just a little bit, if they could turn off their televisions for only a second, they would see it coming as well. Absent the constant barrage of propaganda and programming, they would be able to see that there is a distinct increase in the attempts to sexualize young children and normalize pedophilia through the entertainment industry, scientific establishment, and mass media.

For instance, a recent article published in the UK’s Daily Mail entitled, “Modelling in her underwear at 12 and pregnant at 15 . . . and schoolgirl’s proud mother can’t wait for a new council house,” details the story of Soya Keaveney, the now-fifteen year old girl who has been modeling in her bikini since she was 12, and her mother, Janis Keaveney who has facilitated the modeling experience.

As Paul Sims writes for the Daily Mail, “Aged just 12, Soya was posing provocatively in a bikini for pictures her mother later posted on the internet in the belief it would launch the youngster’s modeling career.”

Janis Keaveney also allowed her daughter’s photographs to be published in Closer magazine in 2008. Under the headline, “My girl’s only 12 but she’s already dieting,” Soya posed in lacy underwear and a bikini.
The article says,

Soya had been going to discos at the age of seven and wearing make-up, mini dresses and revealing tops. By eight she was desperate for fame.

Aged 12, the youngster was exercising every day and never left the house without putting on eyeliner and mascara.

She had also started wearing padded bras, short skirts, cropped tops, high heels and fishnet tights.

There were nights out at under-18 discos and hours spent in front of the mirror getting herself ready in clothes regularly picked out by her mother.

One could no doubt fill pages with comments regarding the mental stability of the mother. However, while these comments would be justified, what is more shocking is the fact that the infrastructure that facilitated her pathetic and vicarious fantasies (or, at best, moral negligence) being realized through her daughter actually exists.

Keep in mind that there were photographers willing to take these photos. There were also magazines available to publish the girl’s photos, a move they certainly would not have taken unless these magazines were sure they would make some level of profit as a result of the publication. That is, of course, unless they had some kind of support from high places.

But the infrastructure of child sexuality in the UK goes a bit further than racy photos as another article in the Daily Mail, written by Tom Kelly, explains. Entitled “The Classes where children as young as THREE learn to pole dance,” details the dance studio classes that are popping up all over England for the purpose of teaching young girls, ages three to seven, to swing up and down poles and “moves including holding their legs in a V-shape while sliding down the pole.”

Under the guise of keeping the children fit and boosting their self-esteem, parents are able to pay a small fee at any number of “dance studios” with names such as “Little Spinners,” “Make Me Fabulous,” and “Trendy Monkeys.”

The latter specializes in children under 13 and seeks to “transform children with face masks, new hairstyles and lip gloss.” Kelly writes, “The pole dancing lessons take place in a room decorated with pink feather boas and sparkling mirrors. They are advertised on a website which also promotes adult lessons, features pictures of lingerie-clad women and describes pole dances as ‘sexy, relaxing, and invigorating.’”

Of course, the owner of one of the schools disagrees with the criticism she has received. She sees nothing wrong with her teaching young girls to simulate sex around a phallic symbol. After all, she claims she had to start the school out of demand from the children themselves – a rather familiar excuse that we have heard in the past from other questionable individuals.

“They wanted to join in because it is such fun. There is nothing sexual about it,” Miss Wilford says. “I am trying to remove the stigma from pole dancing and show that it actually helps children keep fit and learn balance much like gym classes.”

The girls, of course, learn fitness and balance in the same way that heroin abusers learn how to operate medical instruments. Indeed, if Miss Wilford truly believes there is nothing sexual about pole dancing, she might do well to explain the non-sexual aspect of it to those multitudes of men who waste a great deal of their money under the wrong impression.

Nevertheless, as appalling as these incidents are, the UK cannot be allowed the trophy in the contest of normalized pedophilia and sexualized children. The German government has even gone so far as to officially sanction it, along with incest, by issuing two booklets from the subsidiary of its Ministry for Family Affairs entitled “Love, Body, and Playing Doctor.”

These booklets, created and distributed by the German Federal Health Education Center (BZgA), are aimed at parents (in reference to children 1-3 years old in the first book, and 4-6 years old in the second book) andencourages parents to sexually massage the genitalia of their children.

In regards to children 1-3 years old, the first booklet reads, “Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. Their caresses too seldom pertain to these regions, while this is the only way the girls can develop a sense of pride in their sex.”

It goes on to say, “The child touches all parts of their father’s body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same.”

The pamphlet also suggests that parents permit children “unlimited masturbation” and that “Children should learn that there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body.”

Of course, there is nothing wrong with a child learning about his/her body in the proper manner. Treating sexuality and the human body as if it were the plague is certainly not being suggested here. However, in the context of the rest of the booklet and the shocking statements made within it, one should also view these statements with serious concern.

Suggesting that a parent massage the genitalia of their children and then offering that children should learn that “there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body” appears to be merely a method of cover-up for sexual abuse than a means to open dialogue between parents and children in regards to their body.

Regardless, the fact is that this is an invaluable lesson if your goal is to create a generation of children who do not even recognize when they are being abused.

Indeed, the goal appears to be a complete normalization of pedophilia within the culture of the general public. Increasingly sexualized behavior of children in movies,television, and music is becoming more and more common. Children are now being paraded around as if they were adults and being treated as such by real adults. Reality TV shows depicting children dressed as fashion models and acting like “little divas” has become acceptable viewing in the United States.

Even the language being used to describe the disgusting individuals that engage in child molestation is being watered down by virtue of our obsession with political correctness. Pedophiles are now called “minor attracted individuals” and child molestation is now referred to in many circles as “intergenerational sex.”

But the normalization of pedophilia has, up until this point, always remained largely hidden.

Unfortunately, that is beginning to change. Never to be outdone on the road to cultural depravity, the United States now has a group of “mental health professionals” and other activists who are dedicated to removing pedophilia from the American Psychological Association’s (APA) list of mental illnesses known as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).

The conference, which was scheduled to meet on August 17 in Baltimore, was made up of researchers from Harvard, John Hopkins University, University of Louisville, and the University of Illinois, as well as activists from the organization B4U-ACT, an group which is made up of pro-pedophile mental health professionals and other activists seeking to normalize the act of child molestation within the mental health community and society as a whole.

In all fairness, the conference is not funded or promoted by the US government. But it is important to keep in mind that many of those participating are most definitely part of the system and the establishment – particularly the mental health and the educational establishment. They are, after all, the “intellectuals” of society and those who are busy “educating” (more accurately described as “indoctrinating”) your children and America’s future leaders.

Not only does this speak to the fact that, once one moves up to a higher position in his/her field, pedophilia is much more acceptable than it is amongst the general populace (for now at least), it also represents an open stride toward normalizing as well as decriminalizing pedophilia in general and specifically removing its illegality in the eyes of the law.

This is because the US government, in its broad, overreaching and unconstitutional laws, takes the word of the APA to be fact, no matter how ridiculous its conclusions may be. The rights of the individual rarely, if ever, take precedence if they are even considered at all. As one child advocate put it, “It has been carried from the university to the law, going back to Kinsey.” This is true in many areas such as eugenics and other forms of quackery espoused by so-called intellectuals and academics.

The conference brochure states that the conference will look into “ways in which minor-attracted persons [pedophiles] can be involved in the DSM 5 revision process” and, as John Rossomando of the Daily Caller writes, “how the popular perceptions of pedophiles can be reframed to encourage tolerance.”

Rossomando continues, “B4U-ACT has been active attacking the APA’s definition of pedophilia in the run up to the conference, denouncing its description of ‘minor-attracted persons’ as ‘inaccurate’ and ‘misleading’ because the current DSM links pedophilia with criminality.”

In a July 25, 2011 press release for B4U-ACT, science director and pedophile Howard Kline stated, “It is based on data from prison studies, which completely ignore the existence of those who are law-abiding.”

In case Kline might have forgotten, pedophilia itself is a crime. So someone who is engaged in pedophilia cannot be law abiding.

Also, it should be made clear that calling Kline a pedophile is not an ad-hominem attack. That’s what he is. As he stated in his press release, “We can help them [the APA] because we are the people they are writing about.”

Indeed, B4U-ACT is made up of criminals, pedophiles, and other general miscreants. Unfortunately, so is academia and government. As conference panelist, Jacob Breslow, a graduate student of gender studies from the London School of Economics (big surprise there) wrote, “Allowing for a form of non-diagnosable minor attraction is exciting, as it creates a sexual or political identity by which activists, scholars, and clinicians can better understand Minor Attracted Persons.”

If you would like to understand more about “minor attracted persons,” better known as pedophiles or child molesters, you might find this video interesting.

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2061305218446628970&hl=en

http://www.bobtuskin.com/2011/09/02/social-engineers-continue-to-sexualize-children/

Horagalles
Wednesday, September 7th, 2011, 06:39 AM
Found this one interesting regarding the above:


The evidence for a tendency for same-sex attraction and sexual interest in children to cluster is very strong. This is the phenomenon that is of interest rather than whether there is an association between homosexuality and pedophilia since one could define a homosexual in a manner that makes it impossible for a homosexual to be a pedophile or child molester.
What accounts for the association between same-sex attraction and sexual interest in children? It is beyond the scope of this article to answer this question, but it is the same factor responsible for the clustering of atypical/paraphilic sexual interests, i.e., prenatal developmental disturbances leading to increased odds of multiple anomalous outcomes. Both sexual interest in children and same-sex attraction result from prenatal developmental disturbances....
http://www.homosexinfo.org/Sexuality/Pedophilia

Dropkick
Wednesday, September 7th, 2011, 03:44 PM
It seems like the father of the sexual revolution was a pervert, paedophile, liar, fraudster and funded by the Rockefeller foundation.

Kinsey had a massive impact on society and traveled the world advising governments.

hpJwru7I1aY

rAvF23WvoUc

MCP3
Wednesday, September 7th, 2011, 07:13 PM
http://www.whatsonsanya.com/news_images/4bd791cb64825d7d04e3b756_3.jpg

Soya and Janis Keaveney

http://img.allvoices.com/thumbs/image/111/111/86033412-the-promiscuous.jpg
One of the controversial images. Soya at 12.

Roderic
Wednesday, September 7th, 2011, 09:35 PM
The school system is teaching "sexual diversity" to first graders.

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en-EN&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bz-berlin.de%2Farchiv%2Fschulfach-schwul-article1207880.html

Frostbite
Wednesday, September 7th, 2011, 09:50 PM
What did I just read?? :-O

No wonder kids are so screwed up.

Edgard
Wednesday, September 7th, 2011, 10:04 PM
The school system is teaching "sexual diversity" to first graders.

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en-EN&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bz-berlin.de%2Farchiv%2Fschulfach-schwul-article1207880.html

Similar things have been produced for English school children. Social Marxism at work.

Van Wellenkamp
Thursday, September 8th, 2011, 01:27 AM
You should check out all the Halloween costumes for little girls. They all look slutty. What ever happened to witches and such. I wont let my little one get them.

paraplethon
Thursday, September 8th, 2011, 03:54 AM
Soya had been going to discos at the age of seven and wearing make-up, mini dresses and revealing tops. By eight she was desperate for fame.


The Cult of the Celebrity.

How sad...

...and pathetic.

OnePercent
Thursday, September 8th, 2011, 04:01 AM
Nevertheless, as appalling as these incidents are, the UK cannot be allowed the trophy in the contest of normalized pedophilia and sexualized children. The German government has even gone so far as to officially sanction it, along with incest, by issuing two booklets from the subsidiary of its Ministry for Family Affairs entitled “Love, Body, and Playing Doctor.”

These booklets, created and distributed by the German Federal Health Education Center (BZgA), are aimed at parents (in reference to children 1-3 years old in the first book, and 4-6 years old in the second book) and encourages parents to sexually massage the genitalia of their children...


This is beyond disgusting, the idea of a government printing information advising parents to molest their own children? Are we living in hell? That is what it is starting to seem like sometimes. The entire staff responsible for putting that filth into print should hang at the gallows as far as I am concerned.



Suggesting that a parent massage the genitalia of their children and then offering that children should learn that “there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body” appears to be merely a method of cover-up for sexual abuse than a means to open dialogue between parents and children in regards to their body.

Regardless, the fact is that this is an invaluable lesson if your goal is to create a generation of children who do not even recognize when they are being abused.


This explains it. The ZOG masters are preparing future generations of Germanics for their fates as slaves. They have already taught generations to ignore their abuses in our government and media, this is the next rational step. Now they want our children to be docile when their physical existences are abused in a similar manner.

Gray
Thursday, September 8th, 2011, 04:09 AM
I can't believe what I just read. "Caress your toddlers genitals"!!??

Seriously.

tisme
Thursday, September 8th, 2011, 01:48 PM
what the frig is wrong with people? :(

Ingvaeonic
Thursday, September 8th, 2011, 02:07 PM
What type of sick bastard advocates incest and the sexual molestation of one's children? This is so wrong. They make me sick. What is wrong with these people?:thumbdown:(

Heinrich Harrer
Thursday, September 8th, 2011, 02:42 PM
They're just implementing what they've already talked about for decades, take this video of Daniel Cohn-Bendit for example (from the late 60s or 70s I suppose):

CMRVChjjFgY

These radicals of the 70s have become our leading politicians of today, so it's not surprising to see our governments propagate these twisted things. :(

In the recent years a lot of sexual abuse cases, which happened in a leftist alternative school, have been made public. While the media reported about it, they seem to prefer to attack and bash the catholic church a lot more.

Edgard
Thursday, September 8th, 2011, 04:54 PM
They're just implementing what they've already talked about for decades, take this video of Daniel Cohn-Bendit for example (from the late 60s or 70s I suppose):

CMRVChjjFgY

These radicals of the 70s have become our leading politicians of today, so it's not surprising to see our governments propagate these twisted things. :(

In the recent years a lot of sexual abuse cases, which happened in a leftist alternative school, have been made public. While the media reported about it, they seem to prefer to attack and bash the catholic church a lot more.

The left are degenerate by their very nature. The line between homosexual and child abuser is not that wide and to promote one leads to the promotion of the other in time. I just hope that as they push this the natural revulsion of the common man will eject them as a body will eject poison it has ingested. The sick, sick greens. What has sex perversion and Marxism got to do with the environment? I care about the environment but could never side with such freaks.

Ælfrun
Thursday, September 8th, 2011, 07:05 PM
This is a very sad fact that is consistently happening all over North America as well. It is wrong that our modern society allows such a thing as child modelling to happen.

I constantly see young girls on the covers of teen magazines wearing "the most trendy" clothes and make up. This is a bad example to our youngsters, and it does not help that parents are supporting this sick cause.


If the average American could slow down just a little bit, if they could turn off their televisions for only a second, they would see it coming as well. Absent the constant barrage of propaganda and programming, they would be able to see that there is a distinct increase in the attempts to sexualize young children and normalize pedophilia through the entertainment industry, scientific establishment, and mass media.


I was watching a movie the other night and this commercial came up for a reality show about child models, and how much their parents pressure them. It made me feel absolutely sick.

What else is a young woman supposed to do with all of this pressure from fashion shows, school, and their own parents. These children and teenagers are innocent, and are easily influenced. Especially when there is a history of abuse involved.

My sister wanted to be a model ever since she was younger because her mother always pressured her about her looks. She made herself anorexic and actually ended up pregnant at 14.

This whole situation is psychologically damaging! It is so sick that our social structure is enabling this and that people think it is okay. By allowing our children to wear these clothes, and forcing pressure upon them; we are making it easier for sexual predators to target them, and also we are damaging their mentality and health as a whole.

Sexual abuse happens so frequently, that it seems to be abnormal now to not have been abused as a child. Especially in the newer generations. What is happening to people? Something is going completely wrong in the sense that society is silent and allowing this to happen. I am in no way a feminist, but we need to stand up against this.

I see the repercussion of this on women and children every single day because of my job. I am actually holding an event next week for women and children called "take back the night" which allows women (all ages) to be free from these sexual labels.

Roderic
Thursday, September 8th, 2011, 10:45 PM
Similar things have been produced for English school children. Social Marxism at work.

They are attacking all countries with an European foundation and heritage in the 4 continents promoting the moral decay and genocidal policies against our people.

Probably they think in their sick heads that they are fighting white supremacy.


Teach the pleasure of gay sex to children as young as five, say researchers

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1056415/Teach-pleasure-gay-sex-children-young-say-researchers.html


Outraged parents oust gay sex books from New Jersey school reading list

Outraged parents oust gay sex books from New Jersey school reading list | LifeSiteNews.com (http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/outraged-parents-oust-gay-sex-books-from-new-jersey-school-reading-list)


Canada’s feds paying full maternity benefits after abortion

Canada’s feds paying full maternity benefits after abortion | LifeSiteNews.com (http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadas-feds-paying-full-maternity-benefits-after-abortion)

pZVbrvfAn_Q

Northern Paladin
Friday, September 9th, 2011, 02:56 AM
Yet another thing to add to my list of: the impossible things I thought could never happen, that are actually happening.

And I mean impossible... I never thought I'd see the day. I actually thought seeing contact with extraterrestrials or even a reversal of the aging process in my lifetime was more likely than seeing serious talk about the legalization of pedophilia in the Western world. I had to look at my calendar, because this article read like some kind of cruel joke. :|

If complete legalization and normalization of pedophilia is really what they're shooting for, they will be met with too much resistance to succeed. The general public, no matter how brainwashed or brain-dead they become, will always possess their stronger natural instinct, including the instinctual need to protect their own children. If only their own children. They can make some of us colorblind, but they will never completely eradicate those natural instincts. Children have their place, the vast majority of people cannot deny that.

Feyn
Friday, September 9th, 2011, 08:42 PM
I agree with you, we tend to sexualize our children more and more : beauty competitions as young as 2-3 years old, but dressed as an adult, with lipstick and everything. That has DEFINITLY gone too far. Dont the parrents know who buys those magazines ? A good chunk of them are pedophiles. To them its legal child porn, as hard as this may sound, but its the truth. The thought alone that some pervert masterbaits to pictures of my niece sickens me bittime !!! But my brother would never let her do such a competition ! I cant understand any p0arrents who du such a thing. I guess most of them live their dreams through their children, and that is borderline abusive behaviour, even if some people think I exaggerate here. Just look how many hours those children have to spend training (ballet, walk training, general fitness training, pose training etc.etc.etc.). LET YOUR KIDS BE KIDS FOR CRYING OUT LOUD; CHILDHOOD ENDS EARLY ENOUGH !!!!!

On the other hand we have the exact other phenomenon, the whitch hunt against child molesters. I say whitch hunt because they too have gone way too far. I had once 4 mothers nearly attacking me, because i gave my niece a hug ! They saw that she came with her parrents. She fell of the swing and was crying. So i com forted her. I could understand if they ask in what relationship i stand to the child, but they where pissed as hell, and wanted to take her away from me, which a shorible for the kid. Imagine you are 6 on the playground and suddenly a few strange women shout bloody murder and try to take you away from your uncle. She was shellshocked the whole afternoon for lack of a better word (shaking, needed constantly to be carried, needed to cuddle all afternoon, as soon as you went to the toilett she was near a panic attack.)
Sorry but children need hugs, they need to cuddle with their parrents or uncles on the sofa when they watch a scary movie, or just because they like it. But we live in a climate now where every man has to constantly ask himself if what he does could be interpreted the wrong way. Children are not stupid, they realize you have a problem hugging them in public. But they are too young to understand why, so they look for the reason in their own behaviour, or otherwise in themselves, and become completely insecure and distraught. They start to feel unwanted, rejected, and that is pretty much the worst feeling a child can have.
I understand that parrents are carefull, since here in germany child molesters are an abiding theme. Constantly in the news, constantly in talkshows, constantly in docutainment (i dont know if that term exists in english speaking countries, its a mixture of entertainment und documentary, where correct information is constantly sacrificed to have better entertainment), even in german crime dramas it seems they hunt only child molesters. So no wonder parents are constantly on the verge of a panic attack. But thats exactly the wrong reaction, since it does way more harm then good as i have allready explained.

Parrents should teach their children how to react when they feel threatened, and to tell the parrents when something a teacher or so does makes them uncomfortable BUT its very important that they dont explain exactly what molestation is. They should be so vague that they only tell their children to tell the parrents if a behaviour makes them uncomfortable. If you go into too much detail, you might get a false positive, since the child feels somehow uncomfortable for a completely different reason (for example he is smelly and gets too close, but without any sexual component, or they fear the dog and feel threatened), and then remembers how you told them to discribe it. If you give them a script they will follow it, especially if they think that might help to loose the smelly teacher once and for all. Peoples lifes have been ruined because if that !!!!!
So be vague and DONT explain them ANY details (like does he want you to touch his junk is a no go, it can lead to a false positive). Simply say :
"if you feel uncomfortable with someone tell me, and tell me what he did that made you uncomfortable" THATS IT !!!! No discreiption whatsoever of what you want to know about!!!

I dont know how its outside germany, but here child molestation is constantly used to get strange laws through parliament, that otherwise would have never passed. But how can you vote against something that protects our children ? ESPECIALLY since you run the danger that your opponents might mention that you voted against it during election campaigns.
Sometimes they are even so audacious to have several laws in a single vote, one of them "impossible" to vote against, and the others are laws that on their own had never passed ! Especially internet controll laws are constantly argued in the context of protecting the children. But if you look how they are used in practise, its hardly ever to protect children, but more to attack websites that are politically unwanted. Thanks to the CCC they couldnt get quite a few through the parliament, since the CCC layed open what they are really used for, and how they will really be implemented, and that not a single child would be protected by them.




@Horagalles

As long as we dont know what causes homosexuality or what causes pedophilia its simple dishonest to make a connection there. I highly suspect that its more the religious views of the author that makes him draw that conclusion then actual evidence. The fact that he doesnt name any evicence supports that suspicion. I am allways very carefull with information from a source that has an obvious agenda in the matter, since they often subordinate the evidence to their agenda. They are NEVER objective in those matters.



@roderic and others :
first grade is DEFINITLY to early. At that age children arent attracted tp the other sex (or their own) yet, and such classes would more confuse the children then do any good. I know that some children start to play with themselves very early (some as early as 5-6), and perhaps that might be something to talk about, but anything else is WAY too early !!!


@OnePercent :

Do you have any links to those brochures ?

QUOTE:"and encourages parents to sexually massage the genitalia of their children.."

WTF ? You have got to fucking kidding me ! I am 100% certain that a kiddie fiddler is behind that and tries t justify his perverions that way !

UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE !!!!!

Sorry fore the language, but if that term was ever fitted the situation then its here!!


@ Ælfrun

I agree with you 100%. Thosew parrents are abusing their children, and nobody does anything about it, since society somehow supports it ! Thats simply sick ! Let children be children, they have to grow up early enough. But no, at that age they are much easier to influence, so they start early, to "programm" them completely after the parrents wishes. To those parrents children are a kind of expensive accessoir, not a living and breathing child they should love and care for. They only see their own wishes, and have no idea how much they damage their children with it ! The other day i read about a 6 year old that was anorexic because their parrents made her have onde diet after the other. She so wanted sweets, as any child would want, that she got the idea to simply barf them out againl, so they wont show when she got on the weighing-machine. HOW SICK IS THAT ?????

Dropkick
Saturday, September 10th, 2011, 12:17 AM
If complete legalization and normalization of pedophilia is really what they're shooting for, they will be met with too much resistance to succeed. The general public, no matter how brainwashed or brain-dead they become, will always possess their stronger natural instinct, including the instinctual need to protect their own children. If only their own children. They can make some of us colorblind, but they will never completely eradicate those natural instincts. Children have their place, the vast majority of people cannot deny that.

They're doing it already. Its very easy to brainwash people over time. Look at how fashion has changed over time. Different fashion come and go but the only constant thing is women are wearing less and less cloths. Some normal fashion these days would have been shocking a few decades back. Children these days are being bombarded with anything to do with sex and not only don't parents see whats happening but they go along with it thinking its normal behaviour.

Also standards of behaviour has dramatically dropped and its no wonder. If you look at all the people in the news they're most celebrities who are famous for having low standards of behaviour. The promoting rap "artists" is a good example promoting bad behaviour.

Northern Paladin
Saturday, September 10th, 2011, 09:47 PM
They're doing it already.

They might succeed with ephebophilia (sexual attraction to post-pubescent children under 18), but I'm pretty certain human nature will never allow true pedophilia to become widely normalized and accepted.

Berlichingen
Saturday, September 10th, 2011, 10:44 PM
The author's throwing mud at the wall hoping some of it will stick. This article has everything, from a potshot at abortion to holding up a very awful mother as a typical one to presenting some website's attempt to devise euphemisms for "pedophile" as a mainstream movement. You're all too smart to buy into this attempt to stir up moral panic. Maybe I'll redact this statement if someone were to, say, post a scan of the alleged German Ministry's booklet encouraging child molestation.

Sexualizing young teenagers hearkens back to a time when a girl's first menstruation marked her as an adult woman. Society's rules have changed but male hormones haven't. Are we to be surprised that it's still going on - especially given what a huge market children and teenagers are?

Also, I'm waiting for one of our resident Stormfront emigres to point out that the author of this piece is Jewish. Sorry, Mr. Tuskin, but Germanic peoples all over are shrugging off the oppressive anti-human Abrahamic religions in favor of secularism and paganism. And there's nothing you can do about it.

Nachtengel
Monday, July 10th, 2017, 02:52 PM
Commercialism is Normalizing Pedophilia

It’s a well known phenomenon, that in marketing, sex tends to sell. Or at least demands attention, resulting in businesses that abuse this principle, using the algorithm as an excuse for creating a culture of sexism, and objectification. This method of commercialism has proven to steer in directions that normalize pedophilia, abuse, and promoting sexualized images of young girls to older men.

Major corporations appear to have miscalculated several business factors, assuming first, that their prime audience is men, using heteronormative sex as a tool to lure in customers. And then deciding that demeaning women is a foolproof way to business. BMW launched an advertisement several years ago, promoting used cars, featuring a suggestive photo of a girl who looked to be about sixteen and the caption; You know you’re not the first, implying the girls virginity in comparison to the vehicle [image shown above].

Gluttonous companies have historically had no problem with comparing women to inanimate objects, or holding their value at the same level as a vehicle, creating the stigma that like used cars, non-virgins are damaged goods. Roger David, A men’s clothing company, has a pattern of using under aged models to promote their brand, contorting them into provocative poses, with the knowledge that their store is geared towards older men. Although it may appear to be indirect, this should be categorized as pedophilia, not to mention, blatantly disturbing for exploiting young girls.

The ongoing use of misogyny in marketing has blurred the lines of what is acceptable and what is not, to the point where people are unable to recognize pedophiliac behavior that surrounds them on the regular, labeling it as merely a marketing tool instead of a crime. It also projects the idea that girl’s sexualities don’t belong to themselves, rather than the people leering after them. It minimizes the opportunity of female empowerment, instead promoting girls’ virginities, and bodies, and experiences as catered to the male gaze, rather than their own.

Pedophilia has been bordering on becoming mainstream for a while now. Even typically classy magazines are guilty of taking advantage of “fresh faces”, and turning them into sexual objects before they’ve hit puberty. Of course, the problem is not the girls’ themselves, the problem is the audience and corporations that take advantage of their positions, imprinting the idea that this behavior is acceptable, and disguising the existence of the criminals that exist and digest pieces of media that feed into their culture.

It is humanities duty to protect the children in this world, and secure them from being raised into a world that accepts endangering their existence. Be aware of the subtle pedophilia that is attempting to fit into societal norms.
http://affinitymagazine.us/2017/05/11/commercialism-is-normalizing-pedophilia/

SpearBrave
Monday, July 10th, 2017, 11:51 PM
Reading through this thread and the recent addition by OoG I can't help but think how sick and rotten our society really is and how long will the average person take it and want something that will restore order and normal behavior.

There is a saying here in America when something has gone too far it is called "Jumping the Shark" it is reference to a TV show, but has this society "jumped the shark"? Have we gone to far? There is a rise in anti-Semitism in the US and rise of Nationalism in the world are we ready to push back? Are we ready with facts about truth and beauty and right and wrong? Do we have enough to hold up the torch and show people ?

sorry for ranting.