PDA

View Full Version : Genetic Engineering Can Improve Our and Other Racial Stock



ozhammer
Tuesday, July 5th, 2011, 02:51 PM
Since about 2001 the BBC have reported that the first homo sapien child was born and healthy to with altered genes. If I recall in 2006 about 6-7 Spaniard Children with genes altered were born.

Since then I have heard a lot of research in other mammals on this but not much news on Homo Sapiens involved in this great advancement in science. If Anyone has please comment below

Infact doing some more research on wikipedia i noticed this "It is speculated that genetic engineering could be used to change physical appearance, metabolism, and even improve mental faculties like memory and intelligence, although for now these uses seem to be of lower priority to researchers and are therefore limited to science fiction."

So it is possible and seeing as genetically altered children have been born it is definetly possible to not just alter but improve our stock continuously.
It would be great if more Govt funding could go into researching the ability to improve our genes in every facility and then with positive results implace this on test subjects

I am sure though from the minds of all commenting that they would love to see their children to be able to learn calculus by 10, finish university by 15, perhaps run 3 times quicker, process food more efficiently and even rid us completley or make us immune to any or such diseases.

Comments from all on this especially Medical students or Geneticists/Genetics students

EQ Fighter
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, 02:19 AM
Since about 2001 the BBC have reported that the first homo sapien child was born and healthy to with altered genes. If I recall in 2006 about 6-7 Spaniard Children with genes altered were born.

Since then I have heard a lot of research in other mammals on this but not much news on Homo Sapiens involved in this great advancement in science. If Anyone has please comment below

In fact doing some more research on wikipedia i noticed this "It is speculated that genetic engineering could be used to change physical appearance, metabolism, and even improve mental faculties like memory and intelligence, although for now these uses seem to be of lower priority to researchers and are therefore limited to science fiction."

So it is possible and seeing as genetically altered children have been born it is definetly possible to not just alter but improve our stock continuously.
It would be great if more Govt funding could go into researching the ability to improve our genes in every facility and then with positive results implace this on test subjects

I am sure though from the minds of all commenting that they would love to see their children to be able to learn calculus by 10, finish university by 15, perhaps run 3 times quicker, process food more efficiently and even rid us completley or make us immune to any or such diseases.

Comments from all on this especially Medical students or Geneticists/Genetics students

Well Realistically I would say that illumination of disease genes should be the main priority in improving humans.

This will have the ultimate effect of improving ourselves in a more natural way by removing the corruption.


if more Govt funding could go into researching the ability to improve our genes in every facility and then with positive results implace this on test subjects

That WILL NEVER HAPPEN, and here is why.

The Government IS NOT on the side of health, or preservation of ethnicities, and never will be. They are on the side of Mudd-culturalism because it enforces their control over the stupid masses.

That means other avenues will have to be found to circumvent their access to such technology which if left in .GOV hands will be turned in to a weapon against the people/Germanic's.

Hilderinc
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, 02:33 AM
It is possible to improve our stock without genetic engineering, and it has been practiced in the past!


Ah, but what a shame it is that eugenics is evil (http://forums.skadi.net/showthread.php?t=139641). So don't get your hopes up thinking that we can better the genetic makeup of humans any time soon.

Edie
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, 11:11 AM
What purpose would having a population of super brainiacs serve? It's just an excuse to pat ourselves on the collective back for being so great. Super duper intelligent people don't stay back to help their communities, they're not going to sit around and be smart for the novelty of it, they need to channel their intelligence into something -- such as massively destructive technology and other pointless things like that. I doubt that highly intelligent mutants would feel any emotional connection to their country or their folk, so creating them might not guarantee the great future for your people you seem to think it will. And a population of genetically modified beauties would only set the bar higher and ensure that certain people, who are no less a part of the folk than the 'new' types, go without a partner and don't get to breed their un-genetically modified untermensch children.

That said, I'm all for the eradication of certain diseases, and I support selective breeding for other improvements, but let's not take it too far, eh? We would end up doing it for its own sake.

Meister
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, 11:35 AM
Just like the Muslims we need to operate on our own outside the law/culture/customs.

I would like to think there are scientists doing these works in our favour secretly.

Edgard
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, 11:50 AM
I know for a fact they know how to make people more muscular with a genetic treatment, you would never have to go to the gym again but would be 30% stronger I think.
The DNA treatment uses a virus to re-write your DNA and has been successfully tested on mice and fish.They also know how to reset the sperm to make the trait hereditary. :thumbup

Still it is not an available treatment and will eventually be available in the form of a drug that replicates the effects of the genetic treatment but that leaves the DNA unaltered by basically giving a synthetic version of blocker or what ever it was.
The drug is undergoing human testing with a view to helping people with muscle wasting problems. Don't expect the gene therapy to be used as it would be less money for the drugs companies and so not in their interest for it to be made available. :thumbdown

ozhammer
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, 06:24 PM
Well Genetic Engineering is Eugenics except more safer, more quicker and more efficient.

But some say for me to not hold my breadth well for those in doubt of its return look at this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhryKnRyqTk
Peter Lund idiot tries to belittle the GREAT PROF NYBORG and Fails

Prof Nyborg as shown how IQ from our genes effects all and has said for a return to these policies and what better way then through Genetic Engineering?

It makes sense - Why risk going lower when you can go higher with science to?!

Eugenics was never refuted and from a long thought holiday is returning in defence of the germanic and nordic peoples. But dont be fooled though about intelligence only being for intelligence! Danish women are besides Aussie women(some who are also Danish) the most beautiful in the world and the Peoples of Denmark good workers and greatly skilled that is prior to immigration from the 3rd world

So as you see there is a great opportunity for Genetic Engineering and as Nationalists or Preservationists it should be considered our duty to promote it in the science world

ozhammer
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, 06:45 PM
"What purpose would having a population of super brainiacs serve? It's just an excuse to pat ourselves on the collective back for being so great. Super duper intelligent people don't stay back to help their communities, they're not going to sit around and be smart for the novelty of it, they need to channel their intelligence into something -- such as massively destructive technology and other pointless things like that. I doubt that highly intelligent mutants would feel any emotional connection to their country or their folk, so creating them might not guarantee the great future for your people you seem to think it will. And a population of genetically modified beauties would only set the bar higher and ensure that certain people, who are no less a part of the folk than the 'new' types, go without a partner and don't get to breed their un-genetically modified untermensch children."

The 1st line is quite obvious better living from better inventions!
"they dont stay back" they are smart enough to realise that a society is a sum of its parts and thus that individualism is a failure and I am of IQ 132 and am very much in favour of fighting for my people as it helps my genetic existence! The "destructive technology" is good work in the wrong hands
"emotional connection" is not the point here and many great inventors are please seeing their work put in place but I want it to be clear as a race "emotion" is secondary to survival and advancement needs.

What I should also count is if 1 family had this it would be implaced for all the families of that racial type so we would be simply placing a already if not un-perfect people to a lesser state of un-perfection.
But this last point I have to stress very much so avoiding from.
You say "would feel any emotional connection to their country or their folk" as if to presume intelligent peoples are less inclined to be preservationists! Well then if this is the case our idea is doomed as any theory which cannot stand to argument doesnt deserve supporting. However this is hardly the case Darwin, Galton especially had massive IQs Galton at 150+ and was the founder of Eugenics! Being more intelligent you come to realise in the face of the Force of the Universe that emotions or do-gooders(full of stupid emotions) are illogical and that Life is Struggle for each Genetic Variation to Continue with only the Fittest surviving.

But look What am I stating? For the efficient and effective advancement of our sub-species and hardly any preservationist can disagree with that!

ozhammer
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, 06:55 PM
Well Meister with enough $, enough land and the right scientists a superior stock could be commissioned. It would also be interesting to see if exponential gene could be implanted with this particular gene activating when those of identical stock(range of course) are mated. So as to say for Intellectual or Physical Ability if 2 genes of this range are supplanted a mutated gene would result like a series
So starting with 1 and 1, 2 then in the next mating generation 2 and 2 with both feeding off the first series. So it would have increased by a factor of 8 in less then 3 generations!

Obviously with the governed nurturing consistent results would be achieved and the results beyond imagination

ozhammer
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, 07:07 PM
For that video I posted I hope you are not embarrased with the quality or their lack of from Nyborg's opponent Lund he somehow stated that Intelligence is not related to IQ?...

Of course Lund cant deny the IQ tests which is an average and is incorrect on brain size as hardware of my and your laptops clearly as an impact of the amount or their lack of the software that can be implemented!

Another good point is why would any nation or genotype of a high IQ wish to include a genotype of an inferior IQ? Why would it un-neccessarily spend resources when if it is possible through good nutrition/culture/nurture the home nations of these immigrants could or should provide this service?
Why take neccessary funds away from already talented or potentially talented home-grown citizens?

Despite this there is some very good interactions out there and studies on eugenics of which Nyborg is a leading talent in Europe

GroeneWolf
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, 07:51 PM
Super duper intelligent people (...), they're not going to sit around and be smart for the novelty of it, they need to channel their intelligence into something -- such as massively destructive technology and other pointless things like that.

And of course the computer you are using, the Internet you are using. And probably a lot of other 'pointless' things. But it sounds like you are semi-neoluddite (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-Luddism).


I doubt that highly intelligent mutants would feel any emotional connection to their country or their folk, so creating them might not guarantee the great future for your people you seem to think it will.

This has more to do with that beyond a certain distance in the intelligence scale there can little effective communication between two persons, so the rest are viewed as dull at times. And I have not seen a breakdown of those on the far right range of the bell curve and their political believes.

Also does not really help that most groups for people on that section of the curve have a tendency to censor research and viewpoints that do not fit with a more Boasian anthropological (http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Boasian_Anthropology) view of things. And try to keep political talk pretty mainstream.

However here on Skadi there are some very intelligent posters, so stating that highly intelligent people would not care about such things is not completely accurate.


The drug is undergoing human testing with a view to helping people with muscle wasting problems. Don't expect the gene therapy to be used as it would be less money for the drugs companies and so not in their interest for it to be made available. :thumbdown

There probably would be an underground market for the gene therapy, and no doubt the worlds military commands will also show a strong interest in it (can you say supersoldier).

Edie
Wednesday, July 6th, 2011, 08:31 PM
ozhammer and GroeneWolf

My intention was not to imply that preservationists are less intelligent, and I know that the posters on Skadi tend to be a cut above in terms of intelligence, but in my experience, it is the smart people who are mentally equipped and indeed, culturally conditioned to intellectualise away the most obvious truths in favour of a leftist view. I think I may have spoken too soon though; I understand that this is a result of a certain level of training and association and not necessarily intellect. But nevertheless, many smart people are vain about it, and want to maintain a certain culturally approved image, which in my opinion is a major obstacle to getting preservationist ideas into the mainstream. I am sure I am not the only one here who used to be a leftist because of this type of vanity. For some kind of super intelligent breed to work to our advantage, there would have to be a major cultural shift. But I suppose the very existence of such people presupposes that.

I appreciate your responses and I understand the points you have both made.

ozhammer
Thursday, July 7th, 2011, 02:22 PM
The problem is the leftwing terrorists have hijacked our universities and schools with very few nationalist academia left. And for Humanities they are all poftas or loonies.

We have to take our education back! But as for socialist thinking nothing is wrong with that it is a matter of realising that nationalism protects socialism or justice of the workplace by securing its labour. In Australia we had the White Australia Policy(which needs to be brought back) until the late 70s and early 80s it worked wonders and we had a better economy for it now we are headed for a certain recession again.

But dont forget many people(including smart) have not correctly learnt what preservation means they are conned and pre-positioned time and time again until it becomes normal. Of course many Foreigners go to University even more hurting our chances but it is here that as A Nationalist movement in Australia we will need to demand the end of privatisation of our universities so to put Aussie youth first to skill them up with Aussie lecturers you can understand giving great experiences.

However why I brought up this topic was to focus on how Genetic Engineering can achieve what we have always wanted a more stronger future version of our peoples.