PDA

View Full Version : The Newer Sexual Inequality Emerges



Caledonian
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:21 PM
More than 60% of the nation’s wealth is controlled by women. Women control $4.3 trillion in U.S. spending and represent the largest economic force in the world.


A majority of college graduates are women, 57% of undergraduates and 59% at the graduate level. Women constitute the majority of our work force and their ranks are rising among middle managers and corporate executives, as well as entrepreneurs.




http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/print-edition/2010/11/19/Women-gain-wealth.html

It would seem that the federally enforced feminist imperatives are working great for women with all the government protections, handouts, and various enforced laws in place that exist for them.

Meanwhile it would seem that the alienation and isolation of men within the workplace as a agenda also seems to be quite effective as well.

I'm so very proud of this little matriarchy we've seem to have constructed for ourselves in western nations.

Lady Vengeance
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:24 PM
Oh, here we go again.

Caledonian, I usually like your posts...except when they're about women.

Caledonian
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:26 PM
Oh, here we go again.

Caledonian, I usually like your posts...except when they're about women.

Don't feel too bad there.....

I plan on restricting a majority of my posts on those subject particulars within this thread hence why I created it. ;)

Edgard
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:27 PM
http://www.bizjournals.com/charlotte/print-edition/2010/11/19/Women-gain-wealth.html

It would seem that the federally enforced feminist imperatives are working great for women with all the government protections, handouts, and various enforced laws in place that exist for them.

Meanwhile it would seem that the alienation and isolation of men within the workplace as a agenda also seems to be quite effective as well.

I'm so very proud of this little matriarchy we've seem to have constructed for ourselves.

I am with you on this one. We are to be weakened so men are supplanted by women. It is another attempt to upset social systems that have worked for all time.

Caledonian
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:29 PM
I am with you on this one. We are to be weakened so men are supplanted by women. It is another attempt to upset social systems that have worked for all time.

The disruption has become so blatantly obvious in our own times that as this agenda unfolds overtime it will become much harder to hide it let alone deny.

Northern Paladin
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:31 PM
In my experience, this article is probably talking about minority women.

hyidi
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:31 PM
I'm not all for the feminist.

Caledonian
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:33 PM
In my experience, this article is probably talking about minority women.

Not quite accurate Forrest.

Remember when it concerns minority protections our own women are included as well as they are also apart of the bridled oppressed of the evil oppressive racist white male patriarchy. [ That's their metanarrative anyways...]

White males in the metanarrative of social oppression or multiculturalism are illustrated as the proverbial boogeyman to which all these government protections are necessary to keep them chained up from unleashing their far reaching terror onto the rest of the world.

You will notice that out of all groups of people white males are the least protected under affirmative action apparatuses because it's believed that white males are the sole provocateurs of social oppression as a collective unit according to those who create or advocate these policies.


http://in-my-skin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/patchen_diversity1.jpeg

[Who is that in the middle of the typical pro diversity phot snap shot?]

Northern Paladin
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:39 PM
Not quite accurate Forrest.

Remember when it concerns minority protections our own women are included as well as they are apart of the bridled oppressed of the evil oppressive racist white male patriarchy. [ That's their metanarrative anyways...]

You are right, but at my graduation roughly 80-85% of the women I saw were non-White. Mostly Hispanic or various Asian. I imagine it's like this in all universities nation-wide, as well as on other continents.

Caledonian
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:41 PM
You are right, but at my graduation 75% of the women I saw were non-White. Mostly Hispanic or various Asian. Come to think of it, there were more women than men :(

Well as a general rule foreign ethnic women get the better government handouts and protections over our own women but when it concerns our women versus us as men they nonetheless receive levels of protections, entitlements, and privileges by institutions that we never receive.

Caledonian
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:48 PM
So it would seem that even amid economical crisis institutions still find the time to keep everything politically correct amongst the status quo by keeping more women within the workplace while leaving men as sacrificial lambs to be slaughtered collectively.

I'm so glad that amid this economical crisis we still have the time to enforce politically correct sensitivities.....


Excellent!


The global recession has hit men harder than women, so much so that some have even dubbed it the ''Mancession’.



Figures have revealed that women will have an easier time recovering from the recession than men.



Men have suffered the worst from the downturn and face a much more difficult road to recovery than their female counterparts, according to Newsweek magazine.



"Men are the victims of two thirds of the 11 million jobs lost since the recession began in 2007," the New York Daily News quoted the mag as saying.



Not only did more men work in the industries most severely impacted by the recession, but their higher salaries made them more vulnerable to cost-cuts and layoffs.



And it is believed that the effects of this downturn will be felt for years to come.



“When the economy recovers, five years from now, one in six men who are 25 to 54 will not be working," said Larry Summers, Obama''s chief economic adviser.

Women in the U.S. are already the "breadwinners or co-breadwinners" in two thirds of their households, and were hired for 75 per cent of the 8 million new jobs created in the European Union since 2000, say reports.



As women worldwide begin to see new opportunities for growth, prospects for men are not so bright.



Economists predict that by 2024, the average woman in America - and in several well-off European countries - will make more money than the average man.



And in the 15 sectors where experts predict the most jobs will be created over the next decade, 13 are dominated by women.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/mancession-recession-hits-men-more-than-w/643345/

Edgard
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:48 PM
Well as a general rule foreign ethnic women get the better government handouts and protections over our own women but when it concerns our women versus us as men they nonetheless receive levels of protections, entitlements, and privileges by institutions that we never receive.

Its all part of the plan to keep us down. Working in a female dominated work environment is awful. Soon white men will find it hard to get work. This is already the case for young white men in England.

This also attacks the white birth rate as it keeps women at work and away from raising children.

Dropkick
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:51 PM
Women are brainwashed into thinking they need to compete with men for money and power. No wonder relationships these days are not anywhere as positive as they were.

Caledonian
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:51 PM
Its all part of the plan to keep us down. Working in a female dominated work environment is awful. Soon white men will find it hard to get work. This is already the case for young white men in England.

This also attacks the white birth rate as it keeps women at work and away from raising children.

Indeed. It's like adding more pain to a already humiliated and deprived white male population of any western nation where this has become a hallmark trait of society.

Edgard
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 05:54 PM
Indeed. It's like adding more pain to a already humiliated and deprived white male population of any western nation where this has become a hallmark trait of society.

I want to have a traditional family unit and my future wife wants the same but paying for it in a world where women work and property prices reflect this seems nearly impossible. I may be able to manage this outside the English speaking world due to specialist skills but it will be hard.

Autosomal Viking
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:05 PM
I don't mind our women receiving special government protection that I do not. I would rather them receive it than neither me nor them receive it. I will just have to learn to work in an environment 60%+ female due to my occupation. But I do agree it has the effect of hindering natural family unit dynamics.

Caledonian
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:06 PM
I don't mind our women receiving special government protection that I do not. I would rather them receive it than neither me nor them receive it. I will just have to learn to work in an environment 60%+ female due to my occupation. But I do agree it has the effect of hindering natural family unit dynamics.


I don't mind our women receiving special government protection that I do not. I would rather them receive it than neither me nor them receive it. I will just have to learn to work in an environment 60%+ female due to my occupation.

Your kidding, right? :|

Caledonian
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:10 PM
For the first time in the US, more women will be working than men, but they're still not earning the same amount of pay.

The following is not a full transcript; for full story, listen to audio.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, we're soon likely to see a major shift in the gender balance of the working world. As early as this November, it's projected that for the first time in US history, more women will be working than men.

Add to this the fact that 78 percent of the people laid off in the recent recession were men, and one sees a whole new picture of America's workforce.

Beth Kobliner, author of "Get a Financial Life: Personal Finance in Your Twenties and Thirties," says the forces changing the demographics of the working world influence both men and women.

"It's just sort of this dramatic revolution that's taking place but nobody's really talking about it that much," said Kobliner. "Also, we're seeing that more married women have unemployed husbands than ever before, a record 21 percent ... so the question is: are we going to start seeing the real 'Mister Moms' -- men doing the laundry and taking care of all those household jobs?"

Kobliner doesn't believe that this is necessarily a good development for women, as they remain the primary caretaker at home, and still do not earn as much as men in the workplace.

Sharon Meers, a former Goldman Sachs executive and co-author of "Getting to 50/50: How Working Couples Can Have It All by Sharing It All," agrees that the current shifts alone won't bring new opportunities for women.

"The numbers are saying 80 percent of job losses are male and it's largely because they were in more vulnerable, high-earning positions," said Meers. "So women are getting to keep their jobs as nurses and teachers which ... typically are part of the equation that has women earning less than men for the same hours of work.

"But what I think is good about this is a reminder that women really matter as breadwinners, that families rely on women's ability to earn a good wage, and we often forget that."

Meers asserts that husbands need to understand the value of having a wife with a good income, and that men need to contribute to taking care of the household.

According to Meers, a 2006 study published by the University of Chicago said, "… the couples with the lowest divorce risk with the highest probability of staying married, are the couples who most evenly share both earnings, and housework."

"The Takeaway" is a national morning news program, delivering the news and analysis you need to catch up, start your day, and prepare for what’s ahead. The show is a co-production of WNYC and PRI, in editorial collaboration with the BBC, The New York Times Radio, and WGBH.



http://www.pri.org/business/economic-security/more-women-working-then-men1634.html

Autosomal Viking
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:10 PM
Your kidding, right? :|

No, not really. I don't consider our women our enemies that we should be competing against. They are our blood.

SaxonPagan
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:12 PM
It’s always surprised me how women are referred to as a “minority” group when logic would dictate there are the same number of them as men (in fact, slightly more due to a longer life expectancy) but anyway, I digress …

When I worked in teaching it was noticeable how men were being phased out in order to make way for women and the profession has now been taken over by a new breed of vicious feminists that have just come through university. Let me say, these are not representative of women in general but to get past the vetting procedure you usually have to embrace the PC ideals of today and parrot all the buzz words that go with them before they let you anywhere near a classroom!

The effect on the pupils is quite devastating – especially on young boys who come from one-parent families and don’t have any male adult figures in their lives until well into adulthood. We’ve now had a whole generation of them who see women as authority figures (or not, as the case may be, because ethnics in particular have no respect for women and I’ve been in schools where they openly sneer at them!) but it’s quite true what Cally says; men are being replaced in the workplace.

The other part of the agenda is of course to keep these women immersed in their careers. This "independence" then makes relationships superfluous, or even a hindrance, as they pursue their professional goals but anyway, even if they did have time for men, it goes without saying that they’re hardly likely to find a partner at work (which is where many couples initially meet) if there are so few available to choose from!

I fear that many of them will end up as elderly, frustrated spinsters :(

Caledonian
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:12 PM
No, not really. I don't consider our women our enemies that we should be competing against. They are our blood.

What happens in a world where there are more employed women and better employed foreign ethnic men over Germanic male candidates?

There is nothing positive about this at all. Your optimism or empathy fails with this.

Cuchulainn
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:14 PM
Seems like its probably due to the fact that the unworking male "minorities" now vastly outnumber the male workforce. That being said, think I'll go look for my sugar-mama:D;)

Autosomal Viking
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:16 PM
It’s always surprised me how women are referred to as a “minority” group when logic would dictate there are the same number of them as men (in fact, slightly more due to a longer life expectancy) but anyway, I digress …



'Minority' does not literally mean minority. It means not a white man, as in a protected demographic group with special rights that white men do not have. This is easily demonstrable by the fact that there are more women on the planet than men and more women in the workplace (?) than men.

Caledonian
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:16 PM
Seems like its probably due to the fact that the unworking male "minorities" now vastly outnumber the male workforce. That being said, think I'll go look for my sugar-mama:D;)

Except for that ethnic male minorities are still hired onto positions before our own male bretheren by applicable federally mandated affirmative action apparatuses which is just a matter of fact.

SaxonPagan
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:22 PM
Autosomal Viking : 'Minority' does not literally mean minority. It means not a white man, as in a protected demographic group with special rights that white men do not have. This is easily demonstrable by the fact that there are more women on the planet than men and more women in the workplace (?) than men.

Yes, my point entirely! ;)


Caledonian : What happens in a world where there are more employed women and better employed foreign ethnic men over Germanic male candidates?


A good point, because women are only one group being used to supplant the indigenous White male with ethnics being another tool used to achieve this.


Cuchulainn : That being said, think I'll go look for my sugar-mama

Ah, a nice try and I wish you well but sexual dynamics don't quite work this way :D

Rocky v
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:23 PM
I can only go on my experience...

There was a time when my wife and I both worked outside the home. She even made more than me and we earned a very comfortable living. However, our quality of life was zero. We never had time for eachother or the home and sometimes she had to travel for work. Her boss (woman) also was always trying to fill her head with ideas that she did'nt need a husband and that I was some kind of neanderthal.

Long story short she quit, we lost more than half our income, and our quality of life went up only 1000% now that we live a "traditional" life with her at home to hold down the fort and me struggling in the world.

Autosomal Viking
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:27 PM
What happens in a world where there are more employed women and better employed foreign ethnic men over Germanic male candidates?

There is nothing positive about this at all. Your optimism or empathy fails with this.

I agree that the system is bad and creating non-desirable effects. But I don't hold it against our women one bit. Call it a healthy demeanor or ambivalence toward the opposite sex. We should not be fighting or holding contempt among ourselves along gender line, that only weakens us and our family units further. Women are not the enemy of men just as men are not the enemy of women, or at least that's how it's supposed to be. I would hope they would return us the same favor. To hate the women instead of the system is to only cause us more harm. And this is a good attitude for me, considering I'll have to be working with a lot of women (hopefully more of ours and less of other women).

Edgard
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:28 PM
Except for that ethnic male minorities are still hired onto positions before our own male bretheren by applicable federally mandated affirmative action apparatuses which is just a matter of fact.

True we are being pushed out of all positions of influence as subtly as they can. We have already had the education system set up in a way that favours girls over boys. They have created a system to dumb down men and make them docile and controllable.

SaxonPagan
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:31 PM
Rocky v : Long story short she quit, we lost more than half our income, and our quality of life went up only 1000% now that we live a "traditional" life with her at home to hold down the fort and me struggling in the world.

So a good decision, with you now having that solid base which is a stable HOME. Well done :thumbup

And anyway Rocky, you're the first lawyer I've ever met who is (as you put it) "struggling" ;) :D

Northern Paladin
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 06:57 PM
Some women are positively hostile when it comes to their carrers if you dare approach them about it. They feel entitled. Male bashing on the media isn't helping. Males (especially White males) are often portrayed as dumb, unorganized, child-like, sports-watching, video-game playing, bear-drinking neanderthals (for lack of a better word), while women and minorities are portrayed as strong, civilized, career-oriented individuals. When women see this, of course they're going to develop feelings of contempt for White males. It isn't getting any better for us White males, sadly.

That being said, I think intelligent women will realize what's going on sooner or later, because most women still want to be mothers, and have a family. It's in their blood, you can't kill instinct. Most women aren't lesbian feminazi-types, deep underneath the cold facade. This negation of natural laws cannot last forever.

Edgard
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 07:15 PM
Some women are positively hostile when it comes to their carrers if you dare approach them about it. They feel entitled. Male bashing on the media isn't helping. Males (especially White males) are often portrayed as dumb, unorganized, child-like, sports-watching, video-game playing, bear-drinking neanderthals (for lack of a better word), while women and minorities are portrayed as strong, civilized, career-oriented individuals. When women see this, of course they're going to develop feelings of contempt for White males. It isn't getting any better for us White males, sadly.

That being said, I think intelligent women will realize what's going on sooner or later, because most women still want to be mothers, and have a family. It's in their blood, you can't kill instinct. Most women aren't lesbian feminazi-types, deep underneath the cold facade. This negation of natural laws cannot last forever.

You are totally correct. My future wife is about the most intelligent women I have ever met and after a very short time working a high presser job in London she decided that it is no way to spend a life and a good family home is worth so much more. She sometimes feels a bit down when her friends boast about their jobs but then she says they are wasting their life and when do they expect to find a man and have children. All they do with their money is spend it on restaurants and bars that are massively overpriced and flash clothing. What is the point.

Æmeric
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 08:38 PM
More women then men may be attaining advance degrees but those diplomas are not worth what they use to be. Also a disproportionate number of women (along with racial minorites) end up working in the public sector or in the non-profit sector, which depends heavily on government grants. They are not adding to the national prosperity.

The one group that has benefited the most from the new gender inequality is Jewish women.

Ocko
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 09:01 PM
In courses I do I encounter a lot of women most of them have some feminist background. It seems that a lot of them came to terms with them being feminine and are not on a warpath anymore with men.

It seems there has been a lot of rethinking in that group.

Not being constantly attacked (though the old points of view that men have been powerful and oppressive) as a men gives some space to a 'normal' relationsship with women.

Politics do not reflect that because of a different agenda.

As most women want to marry someone who has a higher social status the air is getting thin there for them. So they are not happy either. They work themselves into their own spinsterhood . After their physical attractiveness is gone, no desirable men looking at them then what is in there for them?

Alcoholism, yoga and spiritualism.

Edgard
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 09:32 PM
In courses I do I encounter a lot of women most of them have some feminist background. It seems that a lot of them came to terms with them being feminine and are not on a warpath anymore with men.

It seems there has been a lot of rethinking in that group.

Not being constantly attacked (though the old points of view that men have been powerful and oppressive) as a men gives some space to a 'normal' relationsship with women.

Politics do not reflect that because of a different agenda.

As most women want to marry someone who has a higher social status the air is getting thin there for them. So they are not happy either. They work themselves into their own spinsterhood . After their physical attractiveness is gone, no desirable men looking at them then what is in there for them?

Alcoholism, yoga and spiritualism.

That is a very good point. Women hate marring men less successful than themselves and as the advance the number who fit that description increase. This means are most able women are being removed from the gene pool. This era sucks :(

Thors Hammer
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 10:27 PM
Whenever I see borderline misogynistic posts from men, my first instinct is to say something like "Stop bitching and grow some balls, of course some strong woman ain't gonna respect you for crying", however alot of the men here have actually gave reasonable reasons for their displeasure. However I still disagree with the view that women should be better suited to traditional roles of staying at home and if some women want to take on men competitively in the workplace I'm all for it. However the modern world and it's blatant misandry (try typing this in “Word” for an example) denies any natural competition as men are demonised as keeping women down, the image is rooted in truth as women have been devalued since the adoption of Judeo-Xtianity (It's hilarious how Jews use the White women oppressor image on White men, as women hatred is a major theme in Judaism), but as religion today is practically non-existent women have more freedom to do things. White men are seen as haters of women, yet what is ignored is the fact that skraelings (mostly negroids) commit the most rapes, attacks and murder of women, we even see White extreme feminists hanging around with the biggest rapists Negroids, hating on White men for being rapists??? These women must be looking at rape reports if they are complaining about it, yet they ignore the major culprits.

It’s a shame that with the almost destruction of oppressive religions and concepts in the west, the degenerate modern world denies men and women actually working together for productive means, by duping many women into believing they are only of any worth if they are at the top, and by demonising White men. As someone else said the modern world is designed to make White men docile and controlled, which is why my instinct is to always say "Grow Some Balls White Men!".


It’s always surprised me how women are referred to as a “minority” group when logic would dictate there are the same number of them as men (in fact, slightly more due to a longer life expectancy) but anyway, I digress …
Women should always been viewed as a minority as our existence depends on them, or at least the breeding part does as the fighting part depends on men. 80% of White men could be killed off tomorrow but we could still quickly rebuild the race (I'm talking about a homogenous society here so there is no danger of racial inter-mixture) due to polygamous relationships and general breeding programs. But 80% of White women being killed off is much more dangerous for us to continue to exist, their would no doubt be many fights for women where we'd end up killing each other all over again and become divided, and rebuilding the race would take a much longer time.

Hersir
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 10:29 PM
Oh, here we go again.

Caledonian, I usually like your posts...except when they're about women.

Lady V, check this out http://www.reddit.com/r/Mensrights

Caledonian is not talking about women, he is talking about angry feminists who hate men.

Midgård
Tuesday, May 24th, 2011, 10:51 PM
Lady V, check this out http://www.reddit.com/r/Mensrights

Caledonian is not talking about women, he is talking about angry feminists who hate men.

Women and feminists who hate men are the same thing according to LV. She is one.

wm mauer
Wednesday, May 25th, 2011, 12:14 AM
So it would seem that even amid economical crisis institutions still find the time to keep everything politically correct amongst the status quo by keeping more women within the workplace while leaving men as sacrificial lambs to be slaughtered collectively.

I'm so glad that amid this economical crisis we still have the time to enforce politically correct sensitivities.....


So much makes sense to me when I just remember that everything has its reason.

White men have valiantly defended nation & family as long as the noble Aryan has been trodding this planet. They are seeking to extirpate White men & our seed from the face of this planet. If they ever achieve their goal of removing us men through all of their means, then our remaining families will be left defenseless.

They will never stop. Will we always resist?

Caledonian
Tuesday, June 21st, 2011, 06:04 PM
If a woman can’t afford to support her children she gets government assistance. If a man can’t afford to support his children he gets government jail.



WASHINGTON (AFP) - The US Supreme Court ruled Monday that states did not have an automatic duty to provide counsel in civil courts in the case of a divorced father who was jailed for failing to pay child support.

By a majority 5-4 vote, the justices found that while the South Carolina father's rights had been violated because he was not given free counsel, US states did not have to provide such advice in all civil contempt cases.

The case was being highly watched and had become emblematic of what civil rights groups have called a trend towards "debtors' prisons" in America.

In the case before the Supreme Court, Michael Turner had been ordered to pay $51.73 a week in child support. But he had regularly fallen behind, and spent short spells in prison.


On his fifth infraction, the South Carolina family court sentenced him to six months in jail. But on his release he was $5,728 in arrears, and was then sentenced to 12 months in jail.

Turner appealed arguing his constitutional rights had been violated as he had not been given access to free counsel -- as is normal in criminal cases -- to argue that he had been unable to pay the funds due during his jail term.

In Monday's majority decision, the court ruled that a constitutional amendment "does not automatically require the State to provide counsel at civil contempt proceedings to an indigent noncustodial parent who is subject to a child support order, even if that individual faces incarceration."

It found that such a requirement could put the other parent at a disadvantage if they could not afford a lawyer creating "an asymmetry of representation that would alter significantly the nature of the proceeding."

Instead, recognizing that ability to pay is key in many child support cases, it called on the government to ensure safeguards were put in place, to significantly reduce the risk of an erroneous deprivation of liberty."

The ruling triggered a sharp response from the Constitution Project, a bipartisan group working for reform of the justice system.

The ruling "undermines the fundamental fairness of our justice system, putting Americans in danger of losing their liberty simply because they cannot afford a lawyer," it said in a statement.

"Michael Turner was incarcerated for one year because of his failure to pay court-ordered child support. Although his inability to pay would have constituted a legal defense to incarceration, Mr. Turner was unable to prove his inability to pay to the court.

"With this decision, the Supreme Court has effectively endorsed the expansion of the unjust use of debtors' prisons in America," it added.


http://www.activistpost.com/2011/06/no-automatic-right-to-lawyer-in-us.html

Blackened_Might
Tuesday, June 21st, 2011, 09:47 PM
No, not really. I don't consider our women our enemies that we should be competing against. They are our blood.

They may share our blood, but the vast majority are rapidly becoming detrimental to the survival and advancement of our race by competing for dominance which thus, technically, makes them our rival and potential enemy. May I add almost totally expendable as sex seems to be the only thing most women have to offer nowadays. It's funny how it works really. A once warm, tidy, loving, and loyal species turned cold, filthy, and (self-) loathing. Women don't seem to fathom that they were more productive and lived longer when they maintained the household than when they perambulated the streets adorned in a pair of trousers in search of employment. Women don't even need to be well dressed, experienced, or have great work ethic to obtain a position somewhere. They only position they must assume is "doggy style" on the hiring manager's desk and they're in. Simple. When me and an old female friend would go out on a job hunt, she would more often than not, despite her having worked a job for 10 months longer than me at the time, get the job over me and this was back in 2007. I can only imagine how far modern feminists have gotten by now. It must be hell to get an on- the- books job. After all, most of her hiring managers were horny men who were obviously desperate for some action. Fair enough though (in this context of course). In 2008, I applied for a local grocery store and my interview with this blonde woman couldn't have lasted any longer than what, possibly 5 minutes worth of talking? And all I did was just smile and sit there and answer promptly and politely and she had a big ole grin as she asked me the questions (no. It wasn't a fake smile. I can tell it was pretty genuine), so I guess at least back then it worked both ways at times. I'm not so sure about this phenomenon these days.

Caledonian
Wednesday, June 22nd, 2011, 09:55 AM
Thomas Ball [now deceased] was a man who set himself on fire in protest outside of a court house because of facing jail time due to child support owed while being unemployed.

GB2C-2dhcsE

jJwXe13fTa4

wOc4jQAQEE0

Caledonian
Wednesday, June 22nd, 2011, 10:12 AM
LUcgv-ARX2k

h6Ypotxm1mc

10atNgm_Cy8

i_ycphyls-w&NR=1

4adcVCT1maw&NR=1

kOIhFgTO-Cw

6ZAuqkqxk9A