PDA

View Full Version : Human Race 'Will Be Extinct Within 100 Years', Claims Leading Scientist



Hersir
Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010, 07:47 AM
As the scientist who helped eradicate smallpox he certainly know a thing or two about extinction. And now Professor Frank Fenner, emeritus professor of microbiology at the Australian National University, has predicted that the human race will be extinct within the next 100 years. He has claimed that the human race will be unable to survive a population explosion and 'unbridled consumption.’

Fenner told The Australian newspaper that 'homo sapiens will become extinct, perhaps within 100 years.' 'A lot of other animals will, too,' he added. 'It's an irreversible situation. I think it's too late. I try not to express that because people are trying to do something, but they keep putting it off.' Since humans entered an unofficial scientific period known as the Anthropocene - the time since industrialisation - we have had an effect on the planet that rivals any ice age or comet impact, he said.

Fenner, 95, has won awards for his work in helping eradicate the variola virus that causes smallpox and has written or co-written 22 books. He announced the eradication of the disease to the World Health Assembly in 1980 and it is still regarded as one of the World Health Organisation's greatest achievements. He was also heavily involved in helping to control Australia's myxomatosis problem in rabbits.

Last year official UN figures estimated that the world’s population is currently 6.8 billion. It is predicted to exceed seven billion by the end of 2011. Fenner blames the onset of climate change for the human race’s imminent demise. He said: 'We'll undergo the same fate as the people on Easter Island. 'Climate change is just at the very beginning. But we're seeing remarkable changes in the weather already.'

'The Aborigines showed that without science and the production of carbon dioxide and global warming, they could survive for 40,000 or 50,000 years. ‘But the world can't. The human species is likely to go the same way as many of the species that we've seen disappear.'

Retired professor Stephen Boyden, a colleague of Professor Fenner, said that while there was deep pessimism among some ecologists, others had a more optimistic view. 'Frank may well be right, but some of us still harbour the hope that there will come about an awareness of the situation and, as a result the revolutionary changes necessary to achieve ecological sustainability.'

Simon Ross, the vice-chairman of the Optimum Population Trust, said: 'Mankind is facing real challenges including climate change, loss of bio-diversity and unprecedented growth in population.'

Professor Fenner's chilling prediction echoes recent comments by Prince Charles who last week warned of ‘monumental problems’ if the world’s population continues to grow at such a rapid pace. And it comes after Professor Nicholas Boyle of Cambridge University said that a 'Doomsday' moment will take place in 2014 - and will determine whether the 21st century is full of violence and poverty or will be peaceful and prosperous. in the last 500 years there has been a cataclysmic 'Great Event' of international significance at the start of each century, he claimed.

In 2006 another esteemed academic, Professor James Lovelock, warned that the world's population may sink as low as 500 million over the next century due to global warming. He claimed that any attempts to tackle climate change will not be able to solve the problem, merely buy us time.


Source http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1287643/Human-race-extinct-100-years-population-explosion.html

Irby
Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010, 08:01 AM
Looks like this guy knows what he is talikng about, I often can't help wondering how long it can go on for, certianly not ad infinitum.

Mouse Shadow
Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010, 08:04 AM
They need to put a no-sex drug in the chinese, indian, spew, african etc, water supply. :)

What's that formula again? ' HCN '

Rassenhygieniker
Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010, 08:08 AM
Should have been titled:

Germanic Race 'will Be Extinct Within 100 Years', Claims Leading Scientist

frippardthree
Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010, 08:15 AM
Well, it happened to the dinosaurs, so I'm sure that our day will come eventually, in a few thousand years. There is probably not a lot that we can do about it at this point. I have read quite a few decent articles, and I have watched quite a few credible documentaries, over the years, on this subject. One thing we can do is learn not to take the Al Gore, Danny Glover, Ultra-Liberal, Hollywood dominated view point too seriously. To quote George Harrison, "All things must pass".

Related Article:


10 Ways The Human Race Could Become Extinct
Published by The Auditor
June 30, 2008, Category: Physics

The frightening ways that showcase how fragile we truly are.

1. Global Pandemic
When an extremely virulent disease begins infecting large populations, a pandemic is declared by WHO (World Health Organisation). There have been many pandemics in the past, examples being ‘The Black Death’, which was a strain of bubonic plague striking Europe, and the ‘Spanish Flu’ in the 1910s. Influenza is a particular threat – it mutates rapidly and we cannot vaccinate ourselves against it. It has been responsible for decimation of entire populations and is still a threat today. If a hyper-contagious virus were released into the ecosphere it would spread rapidly along transport routes. Aeroplanes would become localised infections, the hosts carrying it to new places. New York, London and other large cities would quickly become abandoned. Pandemics also make excellent films, although the effects are usually exaggerated. (‘I am Legend’ particularly – no virus can turn a person feral while keeping them alive).

2. Extreme-adverse Weather
Either we could cause the weather or it could be a freak occurrence. Phrases like global warming and climate change are thrown around a lot these days and they can be responsible for some weather changes, but we underestimate nature’s resilience. Neither the less, a new ice age could emerge (although we are still in one), in which most surface life is killed. Again, films like ‘The Day after Tomorrow’ exaggerate the effects.

3. Gamma ray burst
Even we cannot dodge the light. Gamma rays are emitted from most stars, although our own is pretty docile in that respect, although if a star within a few thousand light years were to go Hypernova (a bigger supernova), the waves of radiation would reach us, practically cooking the surface of the planet. We would have to live underground to survive, but all plant life would certainly die, so we would have to rely on green houses and hydroponics. The frightening thing is that a star near us may have just gone Hypernova, but we won’t know about it until the radiation reaches us.

4. Nuclear War
Nuclear weapons are mankind’s stupidest invention. To quote terry Pratchett – “Never give the monkey the keys to the banana plantation”, and unfortunately we still don’t get on well with one another enough to get rid of them. On declaration of nuclear war, major population centres would be destroyed and satellites would be knocked out of orbit, rendering all devices such as mobile phones and computers useless. Another effect is the raising of several million tonnes of ash and dust into the atmosphere, blacking the skies and wiping out most life.

5. Asteroid Strike
One of the most well known doomsday scenarios is one we cannot really do anything about. Every year thousands of basketball sized objected hit the Earth. It only takes one a kilometre across to plummet through the atmosphere remains large enough to destroy a city. One that is a few kilometres in diameter hitting the Earth would release the energy of several million nuclear devices.

6. Strangelets
The least known method of human extinction, strangelets are the result of overly energetic ‘strange’ quarks mixing with ‘up’ and ‘down’ quarks. These stranglets on contact with ordinary matter will convert it to strange matter, and release another strangelet. If one were to hit the Earth, the planet would be reduced to a hot lump of strange matter. Currently they have only been created for thousandths of a second in particle accelerators.

7. Black Hole
Pretty obvious what would happen. If one were created on Earth the planet would be sucked in, along with the rest of the solar system. However, nobody really knows what goes on inside a black hole, so maybe we would be lucky.

8. Judgement Day
The Bible says in revelations that on Judgement day or Rapture, God will arrive on Earth to judge the living and the dead. Amusingly, if he arrived tomorrow, his work would be duly archived on the internet with thousands of mobile phone pictures and videos.

9. Re-orientation of Earth’s Axis
Also known as ‘pole shift theory’ this would happen if the Earth changed its axis (currently it rests at 23.5 degrees – this is the reason we have seasons). The north and south poles would flip, not only ruining the GPS system but also causing massive change to the environment and redistributing the oceans across inhabited landmass.

10. The Big Crunch
The one we cannot escape. Theorised as one of the methods of Universal decay, the Big Crunch is the reverse of the Big Bang. Gravity at the centre of the Universe will overwhelm the expanding force and begin to pull the Universe back to a singularity again. There is no chance of escape from this one – there is nowhere to go. Luckily it is only a theory, and would not happen for billions of years anyway, so we would be long gone.


Retrieved From:
http://scienceray.com/physics/10-ways-the-human-race-could-become-extinct/#ixzz0rYyCGgrY

OneWolf
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010, 04:08 AM
I don't know when humanity as a whole will cease to exsist but one thing
is for certain,it will happen.I believe there has been 5 major extinctions in
Earth's history and the last was the Dinosaurs.It would take either a Nuclear
War,Asteroid strike or a great plague to do the human race in.It is just way
to big now for just a few local events or even an Ice Age to do us in.

frippardthree
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010, 04:34 AM
Extinctions are believed to be a part of a normal cycle of occurrences within' the Earth's history.

Related Article:


Earth faces sixth mass extinction

19:00 18 March 2004 by Anil Ananthaswamy
The Earth may be on the brink of a sixth mass extinction on a par with the five others that have punctuated its history, suggests the strongest evidence yet.

Butterflies in Britain are going extinct at an even greater rate than birds, according to the most comprehensive study ever of butterflies, birds, and plants.

There is growing concern over the rate at which species of plants and animals are disappearing around the world. But until now the evidence for such extinctions has mainly come from studies of birds. "The doubters could always turn around and say that there's something peculiar about birds that makes them susceptible to the impact of man on the environment," says Jeremy Greenwood of the British Trust for Ornithology in Norfolk, and one of the research team.

Now there is concrete evidence that insects - which account for more than half the described species on Earth, are disappearing faster than birds.

"If we can extrapolate that pattern of the British butterflies to other British insects, and indeed to invertebrates across the planet, we are obviously looking at a very serious bio-diversity crisis," says team member Mark Telfer of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds in Bedfordshire, UK.

Major ecosystems

Six large sets of data collected over the past 20 to 40 years in England, Wales, and Scotland were analysed by Jeremy Thomas of the Natural Environment Research Council Centre for Ecology and Hydrology in Dorchester, UK and colleagues. More than 20,000 volunteers submitted over 15 million records of species.

The researchers found that populations of 71 percent of the butterfly species have decreased over the last 20 years, compared to 56 percent for birds and 28 percent for plants. Two butterfly species (3.4 percent of total) became extinct, compared to six (0.4 percent) of the plant species surveyed. None of the native breeding birds went extinct in the last 20 years.

Crucially, the decline in populations happened in all the major ecosystems and was distributed evenly across Britain, rather than in just a few heavily degraded regions.

The crisis could be foreshadowing a sixth mass extinction, warn the researchers. Life on Earth has already seen five mass extinctions in its four billion year old history. The last one, which wiped out the dinosaurs, happened 65 million years ago at the end of the Cretaceous period and was possibly caused by a giant meteor collision.

The current extinction is being precipitated by the widespread loss of habitats because of human activity, according to Tefler. The remaining habitats are small and fragmented, and their quality has been degraded because of pollution.

Nitrogen pollution

This claim is strongly supported, at least for plants, by a second study published alongside Thomas' paper in Science. Carly Stevens of the Open University in Milton Keynes, UK, and her colleagues studied the diversity of plants in 68 grassland sites in the UK. The number of species in each site varied greatly, from a mean of 7.2 to 27.6 species per site. Nitrogen pollution was found to blame for this variability.

"We found strong evidence that the decline in the species richness of grasslands within the UK was linked to nitrogen pollution," says Stevens. "In areas of high nitrogen pollution the species richness was much lower than in areas of low pollution, such as the Scottish highlands."

Atmospheric nitrogen pollution is caused mainly by the burning of fossil fuels and from intensive agriculture, especially from the volatilisation of animal waste. This nitrogen is deposited on the soil, favouring the growth of some species to the cost of others.

"Evidence of a global extinction crisis has come into stark focus with these important results," comments Mark Collins of the United Nations Environment Programme's World Conservation Monitoring Centre in Cambridge, UK.

Journal reference: Science (vol 303, p 1879)


Retrieved From:http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4797-earth-faces-sixth-mass-extinction.html

Hersir
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010, 04:45 AM
We are actually at the end of our time according to how long higher lifeforms has lived before. (A short history of nearly everything).

Ediruc
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010, 05:39 AM
Well, since the Germanic race has taken on such a defeatist and nihilistic state-of-mind, the human race might as well become extinct within a 100 years. Once Western civilization collapses entirely, that wicked East will eventually meet its demise. Sort of ironic, really. :D :thumbup

Rassenhygieniker
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010, 08:53 AM
Well, since the Germanic race has taken on such a defeatist and nihilistic state-of-mind, the human race might as well become extinct within a 100 years. Once Western civilization collapses entirely, that wicked East will eventually meet its demise. Sort of ironic, really. :D :thumbup

Not really, they will just be stuck in their own perpetualism and stagnation. As soon as Germanics are gone, the best of the non-germanic races will just be stuck in time with no new inventions to copy from us they will just replicate over and over the last pieces of technology that was left by Germanics whitout actually advancing foward, the lowest of the non-germanics will just stay the way they are or for the ones who live in Germanic countries revert back to their natural ways.

Oski
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010, 08:22 PM
I still believe we will prevail.

SaxonPagan
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010, 09:54 PM
I can't help feeling that somewhere amidst the teeming mass of humanity there would be some survivors, even in the worst scenarios, given that there are almost 7 billion human beings on the planet. The extinction of the relatively few Germanics is far more likely, however, which leads me to the question ...

Would you want any other races to survive after the Germanic ones have disappeared?

Speaking for myself, I'd say NO.

Ediruc
Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010, 11:31 PM
Not really, they will just be stuck in their own perpetualism and stagnation. As soon as Germanics are gone, the best of the non-germanic races will just be stuck in time with no new inventions to copy from us they will just replicate over and over the last pieces of technology that was left by Germanics whitout actually advancing foward, the lowest of the non-germanics will just stay the way they are or for the ones who live in Germanic countries revert back to their natural ways.

Exactly. Non-Germanic peoples have grown dependent on the Germanic inventions upon entering into the modern age. Whatever sort of civilization they attained from us will be lost. The East has always tried to conquer the West, and with the fall of the West, the East will have a huge population explosion & death and their governments spiral out of control and into anarchy and they'll have nowhere and no one else to turn to. It'll be like Christmas for me. :woohoo:

Agrippa
Thursday, June 24th, 2010, 01:13 AM
Let's start with George Carlin:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTbcLNhL174&feature=player_embedded

Like I wrote on another board on that issue:

Another scientist on the CO2-Climate Change hoax story....

First, that sentence is ridiculous:


Yes sure. How can a serious scientist claim that. Even now we had less of an effect on the planet than the major catastrophies of the past, at best a comparable one and our effect was actually slower and more stable in comparison.

The whole story is, that climate can't be "saved" because it changed all the time, regardless of the current change being significantly influenced by humans or not. If it doesn't change now, it will change in the future and the main policy we have today "against the climate change" is a huge hoax made up by the Plutocrats again, because the No. 1 issue is: They can control the states and people and make money with it, while the actual effect for the environment is very limited and other approaches would have been a better solution than this Capitalist-speculation approach with the certificates.

I'm afraid that this scientist just helps this agenda with what he said...

The only climate change we really should be afraid of - if ignoring Armageddon-like scenarios - is the next Ice Age.

THATS really a threat. "Global Warming" is nothing in comparison...

Don't know if that's true, don't think they need to do that now, but this is true in any case, since George Carlin was quoted, here what he says about the US of A and its people:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLRQvK2-iqQ&feature=related

especially the 2nd part, which directly refers to the Plutocratic Oligarchy and how this relates to the American people's condition and the downfall of the whole West - and probably world:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV1lZMTCqf8&feature=related

That's it.

And the whole method with which they use the "Climate Change" issue with certificates and speculation is just another mean for maximising power & profits.

I mean, after all, the elite of the Plutocratic Oligarchy is directly involved and promotes it - David de Rothschild:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2ahWHbUVVU&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtudNpL30BU

Can this eyes lie? :rolleyes:

And of course the Rockefellers:
http://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/who-we-are/our-focus/climate-environment

I might add, they don't need to starve the world population right now, but they want to control the food chain completely - Monsanto is at work and a lot of what they do is actually "against the climate and environment", but those who have to pay are those which are not "in their club" and of course it is a mean of control for states and people, the way it was built up in the last years...

EQ Fighter
Thursday, June 24th, 2010, 01:36 AM
We are actually at the end of our time according to how long higher lifeforms has lived before. (A short history of nearly everything).

Maybe
But no other animal that I know has walked on the moon, or sent probes out of the solar system.




Last year official UN figures estimated that the world’s population is currently 6.8 billion. It is predicted to exceed seven billion by the end of 2011.

He said: 'We'll undergo the same fate as the people on Easter Island.

'Climate change is just at the very beginning. But we're seeing remarkable changes in the weather already.'

'The Aborigines showed that without science and the production of carbon dioxide and global warming, they could survive for 40,000 or 50,000 years.

[/url]
This sounds vaguely like Leftist Environmentalist propaganda to me.
I would say the real problem is in fact NOT the population density but the lack of resources that we could have been getting from space had we forcefully made certain american leftist politicians extinct say in the 1970's. Using maybe the CIA.

Meaning not building the Space Shuttle, and sticking with the Saturn V we could be lifting 100 tone loads into space for the same cost we spent on the shuttle missions to lift 20 tones, for decades. :|

Also with the money we have wasted on Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, and the Cold War, Hell we could probably have built the planetary equivalent of the Star Ship Enterprise.

The real problem is NOT any one of the technological or environmental It is the fact that the majority of people are at their core irrational and support the emotional over the logical.

When we deal with that problem, and the politicians that propagate it, we will then be free. I say that humanity cannot go extinct unless we have decided we want to.

Mouse Shadow
Thursday, June 24th, 2010, 03:41 AM
The technology, finances and support we provide to third world 'over-breeders' is the foundation stone for destroying ones own fate.

It's like giving care to a tumor. Routing blood supply to it to keep it, then when it grows it starts to take over other vital organs, eventually it'll make it's way into the brain and heart (us). This infection back into our soil, into our region is the fault of us blindly giving aid to anyone who is not us.
The infection marches into our machinery of necessity and displaces our own tried and true functions, corrupting and damaging it as it spreads deeper into the muscles too (our workers).

Eventually the whole system will be out-of-sync and start collapsing other critical organs while trying to maintain it's predestined speed. Parts will scavenge others and so on, until the whole thing can give no more.

I still reckon there is hope. One must stop all blood flow to the cancerous masses. (Finances) And, instead divert it to the proper organs, (us).

I go by the old biblical ending, the Four Horseman of the Apocalypse, that'll show what happens to countries that allow overbreeders.

Famine. Obvious due to the number of mouths to feed vs the agricultural output.

Pestilence. Due to the landowners reverting to high yield/profit crops. Potentially one/few sources. Ie, a lack of diversity. So any biological invader, virus, pest or other can obliterate it.

War. Tied in with famine.

Chuck in a few communicable diseases for enthusiasm and Death is right at your doorstep.


Anyway, the brain 'signalers’ (currently the spews) are telling us to route supplies to unwanted 'diseases' aimed to destroy our people, making it appear as it's the right thing to do. It may be hard to change that, but I am confident soon that 'signal' will come undone, especially when reality interjects. And to help guide that, a new program (mental one) needs to be kickstarted. ;) Our neural net (interwebbies) is beginning to birth some very interesting ‘White cells’ (Killer Anti-viruses) . I reckon, pretty soon after that, the heart and brain might start joining together. :)


"So doctor, the patient isn't all dead yet. We can make him better, faster, stronger, smarter. It's just a matter of seeing the problem for what it is."

MotivationMan
Tuesday, June 29th, 2010, 11:14 PM
I don't know if I agree. I think it is far more likely for us to have a "genetic bottleneck" event where most of the human race dies off but a few hold on. Essentially what we are looking at over time is an imbalance between productive and unproductive humans. As the working class is squeezed to pay for the welfare class eventually they will no longer be able to and only those who can survive on their own will.

Ward
Wednesday, June 30th, 2010, 08:51 AM
Well, since I'll be an angel in heaven by that time, I shan't lose any sleep over this.

As long as I live an honorable life and continue to make the best case I can for what I believe is the best course of action for my people, I'll pass into oblivion with a clear conscience and a sense of inner peace.

I will say, however, that if our people continue their idiotic self-destructive behavior, then they deserve whatever horrific fate befalls them.

nordfrisk
Friday, July 23rd, 2010, 07:02 AM
I do not believe this claim. It is a ridiculious claim to assume that nothing will change the variables of our demise in the future. after all if you know your own demise would you not try to stop it? humanity has survived along with our primate ancestors for thousands of years and now we have become the most adaptable species known to earth able to makes tools to adapt to water, fire, and even space. this is hogwash.

Erbe
Friday, July 23rd, 2010, 10:13 AM
And i don't want a bad scene. Something unknown must happen, and maybe of the 7.000.000.000 humans a part survives. I got other problems to think about it for sure.

What is more concerning is the appereance of the homo sapiens on this earth.
Question: How did the homo sapiens evolve and why he appeared 100.000 B.C.??

Bittereinder
Friday, July 23rd, 2010, 10:48 AM
I might add, they don't need to starve the world population right now, but they want to control the food chain completely - Monsanto is at work and a lot of what they do is actually "against the climate and environment", but those who have to pay are those which are not "in their club" and of course it is a mean of control for states and people, the way it was built up in the last years...

And if need be they will use the food supply to run us and everyone else into the ground, it apears "higher ups" have a backup:


http://forums.skadi.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=105921&stc=1&d=1279878274

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard_Global_Seed_Vault


...A gift from friend and business associate, mega-investor Warren Buffett in 2006, of some $30 billion worth of shares in Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway put the Gates’ foundation into the league where it spends almost the amount of the entire annual budget of the United Nations’ World Health Organization.

So when Bill Gates decides through the Gates Foundation to invest some $30 million of their hard earned money in a project, it is worth looking at.

No project is more interesting at the moment than a curious project in one of the world’s most remote spots, Svalbard. Bill Gates is investing millions in a seed bank on the Barents Sea near the Arctic Ocean, some 1,100 kilometers from the North Pole. Svalbard is a barren piece of rock claimed by Norway and ceded in 1925 by international treaty...

Source (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529)

Does he know something we dont...

Agrippa
Friday, July 23rd, 2010, 03:41 PM
Such things are good anyway, because no matter who can use it, if it's needed it might help - the survival of the species on a higher level is the No. 1 priority.

Though one can be suspicious about whether they know something we should know too...

BritishLad
Wednesday, August 11th, 2010, 09:10 PM
At 6 billion? I beg to differ, mind you we will eventually be able to go beyond our system and we will have a sort of empire of systems controlled by/from Earth.

Neophyte
Friday, August 13th, 2010, 08:53 PM
I don't know when humanity as a whole will cease to exsist but one thing
is for certain,it will happen.I believe there has been 5 major extinctions in
Earth's history and the last was the Dinosaurs.It would take either a Nuclear
War,Asteroid strike or a great plague to do the human race in.It is just way
to big now for just a few local events or even an Ice Age to do us in.

But unlike those animals we have the ability to adapt our environment to suit our needs.

Neophyte
Friday, August 13th, 2010, 09:05 PM
The technology, finances and support we provide to third world 'over-breeders' is the foundation stone for destroying ones own fate.

---



Yes, but imagine what would happen if we, for some reason, were to pull back our support to them? That would be like pulling out the rug from underneath then and send them free falling back towards their natural state. When the Whites first came to Rhodesia there were -- if my memory serves me right -- something like half a million negroes there, today there are in excess of 11 million. Take away the vaccines, the oil, the fertilizers, the irrigation and the machines and there will be disaster.

So, actually, building up their populations to a level that they cannot support innately and locking them into a technological infrastructure that they themselves cannot sustain and then pulling back all support at once could prove to be a good way to radically reduce their numbers.

Northern Paladin
Friday, August 13th, 2010, 09:23 PM
BS, it's just another way the Jews are trying to get White people to stop having kids - by scaring them.

hyidi
Monday, August 16th, 2010, 02:33 AM
Should have been titled:

Germanic Race 'will Be Extinct Within 100 Years', Claims Leading ScientistGoing to say the exact thing!:-O

WW2 lost,doomed the Germanic race.....what makes me hungry,our own brothers went against us to seal the fate of our survival.
Brothers should have stood side by side,we won't be in this sad Delmar right now.
Another point,the ethnics never forced them selfs into our boarders,our own governments (after wwII) wanted diversity,don't know what for though,there is no purpose for this,the only thing I want is a White Germanic Europe...nothing more.

There will be some sort of humans in 100 years but our beloved Germanic's will not be inhabited this earth no longer in 100 years. :thumbdown