PDA

View Full Version : 'An Attack on Israel Would Be Considered an Attack on Canada'



Nachtengel
Friday, March 5th, 2010, 02:15 AM
Steven Chase

Junior Foreign Affairs minister Peter Kent is suggesting Canada stands ready to throw its full military weight behind Israel, telling a Toronto publication that “an attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada.”

His office says Mr. Kent, the minister of state for Foreign Affairs of the Americas, was merely “paraphrasing” what Stephen Harper has said in the past regarding Israel.

“It’s not too far from what the [Prime Minister] has said,” Norm McIntosh, Mr. Kent’s chief of staff, told The Globe.

But the junior minister’s statement would appear to be evidence that the Harper government is shifting to an ever more solidly pro-Israel stance.

Mr. McIntosh declined to confirm whether this means that Canada would automatically declare war on an aggressor that attacked Israel.

In an interview published in Shalom Life, dated Feb. 12, Mr. Kent said: “Prime Minister Harper has made it quite clear for some time now and has regularly stated that an attack on Israel would be considered an attack on Canada.”

Mr. McIntosh pointed to Mr. Harper’s statements from May, 2008, marking the 60th anniversary of Israel, where the Prime Minister said: “Our government believes that those who threaten Israel also threaten Canada, because, as the last world war showed, hate-fuelled bigotry against some is ultimately a threat to us all, and must be resisted wherever it may lurk.”

“In this ongoing battle, Canada stands side-by-side with the State of Israel, our friend and ally in the democratic family of nations,” Mr. Harper said. “We have stood with Israel even when it has not been popular to do so, and we will continue to stand with Israel, just as I have always said we would.”


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/bureau-blog/an-attack-on-israel-would-be-considered-an-attack-on-canada/article1470211/

Ralf
Friday, March 5th, 2010, 10:18 AM
You can see how the Jews are putting all the pieces into position for world war 3, Just as Hitler and others accussed them of arranging world war 1, (for the destruction of the Russian Monacy, the German power, the Britsih Empire, the start of thier Jew World Order, or One world governmnet in the shape of the league of nations, and of course the Balfour treaty letting them start to live in Palestine).

World war 2, (For the completion of the above empires that might stand in the way of thier coming empire, for the increase in scope of thier fledgling New World Order, this time in the form of the United Nations, and of course the Holohaox persuading the world to steal Palestine from the real descendants of Abraham and giving it to them).

As Albert Pike said, the third world war will be so terrible, people will be begging for a One World Government.

Old Winter
Friday, March 5th, 2010, 05:30 PM
And the other 50% support the arabs...

Where is the third option ? i want a country that give both sides the finger.

SaxonPagan
Friday, March 5th, 2010, 07:38 PM
If any further proof was needed that the (terrorist) state of Israel's existence has made the world into a tinderbox, I think it’s just been provided :oanieyes

I've never read such brazenly irresponsible nonsense in my life as “an attack on Israel is an attack on Canada” … NO IT IS NOT!!! Doesn’t this Junior Foreign Minister have a world map in his office??

I wonder how his compatriots feel about being summoned to defend a country that’s halfway across the planet? Mr. Kent is basically a war-monger of the worst kind but he must have the full backing of the Canadian government to have made such a statement.

The Jews will never forge civilised relationships with their neighbours as long as they know they can call upon the West's bully-boys whenever required. It just sounds like carte blanche for them to continue to act exactly as they please in the Middle East!

Hawx
Wednesday, August 25th, 2010, 12:38 PM
"In an interview published in Shalom Life, dated Feb. 12", Mr. Kent wouldn't wear the DEATH STAR by any chance?

VikingManx
Thursday, August 26th, 2010, 12:44 AM
The foolishness of our society is...wow.

The Juden truly run everything.

Svartljos
Thursday, August 26th, 2010, 05:07 PM
I always got the impression that our politicians were only pro-zionist because of the USA. We want to keep good relations with the Americans, for whom being against zionism is often a very bad thing. If we criticised Israel a lot, we would just get a rebuke from America for being Iran lovers.

I would say most "average people" are against it here, including most university educated people. If only they would hold a referendum before going to war, and we banned Fox News and CNN, etc.

Mouse Shadow
Saturday, August 28th, 2010, 02:00 PM
Actually, if you are faced with this situation, try it the other way around.


An Attack on Israel Would Be Considered an Attack on CanadaBecomes...

An Attack on Canada Would Be Considered an Attack on Israel

Oh, and what army would the sociopaths in Israel send to help?

I doubt they'd even send a 'Get well' postcard.

GroeneWolf
Saturday, August 28th, 2010, 04:37 PM
Actually, if you are faced with this situation, try it the other way around.

Becomes...

An Attack on Canada Would Be Considered an Attack on Israel



And that should indeed on the main points of the issue. Would Israel do the same thing for Canada. If not, then what geopolitical interests are being served by making Israel a protectorate of Canada. If the answer is none, then we can only conclude that other things are involved.

EQ Fighter
Saturday, August 28th, 2010, 05:03 PM
And the other 50% support the arabs...

Where is the third option ? i want a country that give both sides the finger.

Exactly!

Both Sides are Semites!
And the fact is it seems to me that for the most part Jewish Socialist have agitated the same anger in Arabs that they have in the west.

And their agitation and takeover of western institutions is well documented.

The western Saxon Nations are at this point a dead man walking and yet they still feel entitled to protection form the same society they continue to trash.

Amazing! Really Amazing!
:|

Old Winter
Friday, September 3rd, 2010, 10:03 AM
One point that is never raised is that every government/political party who have soldiers in Iraq, Afghanistan and are for other wars are all for multiculturalism and are anti-white, anti-Europe and everything related what makes the West the West (don't let the label ''conservative'' fool ya'', the so called ''left'' tried to label former president Bush as a neo-nazi conservative pro-white president but in reality he was and is a multiculturalist aka anti-white.

Why i am saying this is because the so called ''left'' tries to label the pro-American wars (for Israel) as something only supported by people who are in politics the opposite of them while in reality the warmakers are closer to them then to us, one of the reasons why they never or hardly attacked the British red left winged multiculturalist labour party, the no1 party that supported the war in Iraq and dragged England into this war.

Just like these Canadian politicans, multiculturalists who want Canadinans to die for Israel and multiculturalism.

Just my two cents.

Ragnar Lodbrok
Saturday, September 4th, 2010, 02:16 AM
One point that is never raised is that every government/political party who have soldiers in Iraq, Afghanistan and are for other wars are all for multiculturalism and are anti-white, anti-Europe and everything related what makes the West the West (don't let the label ''conservative'' fool ya'', the so called ''left'' tried to label former president Bush as a neo-nazi conservative pro-white president but in reality he was and is a multiculturalist aka anti-white.

Why i am saying this is because the so called ''left'' tries to label the pro-American wars (for Israel) as something only supported by people who are in politics the opposite of them while in reality the warmakers are closer to them then to us, one of the reasons why they never or hardly attacked the British red left winged multiculturalist labour party, the no1 party that supported the war in Iraq and dragged England into this war.

Just like these Canadian politicans, multiculturalists who want Canadinans to die for Israel and multiculturalism.

Just my two cents.

President Obama still has the operations in Afghanistan and Pakistan raging for the holy crusade of spreading democratic-capitalism and taking care of Isreal's enemy Bin Laden. Sure action in Iraq is over and done with...:-O

I'd keep boycotting Isreal-funded coca cola if I were you guys, I'm also trying to get myself into college this spring to avoid a potential draft.

However, if there was an invasion of Somalia instead of more operations over there, I would've considered joining to fund the college. :)

Vignir
Wednesday, September 8th, 2010, 01:48 AM
It is scary how less than a century ago such suggestions would have opened much of the euro-American continental masses up from the complacency of capitalistic life?
Now matters have become apathetic in the masses and such passed phrases of support of such a pariah upon the globe is made without even a hint of challenge from our would be regional and national representatives?!:thumbdown

Plantagenet
Thursday, September 9th, 2010, 08:37 PM
What I fail to grasp is how this one group of people, the Jewish people, and not even the entirety of their people, managed to achieve all of these feats. How? How could we gentiles not see? How did they manage to gain control, and more importantly will they ever let go before our nations are ruined?

Afrikanermag
Wednesday, September 29th, 2010, 01:51 PM
And the other 50% support the arabs...

Where is the third option ? i want a country that give both sides the finger.

Hey currently the Arabs are our biggest threat so i say for now the enemy of my enemy is my friend, at least till the arabs arnt a problem, and can i tell the canadians here that germanics in South Africa got more support from the jews than from Canada:thumbdown

Ingvaeonic
Wednesday, September 29th, 2010, 05:28 PM
Hey currently the Arabs are our biggest threat so i say for now the enemy of my enemy is my friend, at least till the arabs arnt a problem, and can i tell the canadians here that germanics in South Africa got more support from the jews than from Canada:thumbdown

Well, that's true. Israel was white-ruled South Africa's closest ally. The Republic of China on Taiwan, too, was closely allied with anti-communist white-ruled South Africa.

But not Australia, though we should have been. The Australian govt, and probably the Canadian, too, vociferously condemned South Africa and betrayed white South Africans, whether they were Anglophones or Afrikaners, by their speechifying and actions. Everyone knew what would become of South Africa when the blacks got majority rule. Ditto Rhodesia in the 1970s. I hope Ian Smith has 'I told you so' inscribed on his gravestone.

The dispossession of white Rhodesian farmers over the last 10 years has been an abomination, but did we condemn Mugabe's Zimbabwe as we did Smith's Rhodesia or Botha's South Africa? Of course not! The Australian govt was and still is made up of a lot of hypocrites.

But the Australian govt did not act in my name or in the name of others, I can assure you: I and many other Australians were always supporters of white rule in Southern Africa; indeed, I and others wrote letters to the papers here in the 1970s and 80s expressing that support. Alas, what we feared most for Southern Africa came to pass, in no small way due to the blatant hypocrisy and idiocy of the Australian govt.

Afrikanermag
Wednesday, September 29th, 2010, 05:55 PM
Well, that's true. Israel was white-ruled South Africa's closest ally. The Republic of China on Taiwan, too, was closely allied with anti-communist white-ruled South Africa.

But not Australia, though we should have been. The Australian govt, and probably the Canadian, too, vociferously condemned South Africa and betrayed white South Africans, whether they were Anglophones or Afrikaners, by their speechifying and actions. Everyone knew what would become of South Africa when the blacks got majority rule. Ditto Rhodesia in the 1970s. I hope Ian Smith has 'I told you so' inscribed on his gravestone.

The dispossession of white Rhodesian farmers over the last 10 years has been an abomination, but did we condemn Mugabe's Zimbabwe as we did Smith's Rhodesia or Botha's South Africa? Of course not! The Australian govt was and still is made up of a lot of hypocrites.

But the Australian govt did not act in my name or in the name of others, I can assure you: I and many other Australians were always a supporter of white rule in Southern Africa; indeed, I and others wrote letters to the papers here in the 1970s and 80s expressing that support. Alas, what we feared most for Southern Africa came to pass, in no small way due to the blatant hypocrisy and idiocy of the Australian govt.

It is good to hear that we still have some support in the world:thumbup
One just has to look at South Africa to realise it is heading to the same fate as old Bobs terror of a Zim:(. now is the time we realy need the worlds support.
Thankyou to those that do support us:thumbup

Ingvaeonic
Wednesday, September 29th, 2010, 06:23 PM
It is good to hear that we still have some support in the world:thumbup
One just has to look at South Africa to realise it is heading to the same fate as old Bobs terror of a Zim:(. now is the time we realy need the worlds support.
Thankyou to those that do support us:thumbup

I really hope that Mugabe's example is not copied in SWA-Namibia or in the RSA proper. And I hope black crime in SA is diminishing. White South Africans I know here and that I knew when I lived in Asia have told some horrific, nightmarish stories of rape, robbery, and murder. We all knew this would happen when white rule ended. Take care, Afrikanermag.