PDA

View Full Version : The City of Satan: Serpents versus Adamites



Frans_Jozef
Friday, May 14th, 2004, 10:28 PM
THE CITY OF SATAN!

In the article we sell entitled, Serpents versus Adamites, we take the reader back to a time prior to standard history and, from a Non-Indo-European and Non-Semitic view, present the issue of Serpents versus Adamites. The correct title of such an article, if we were to have used non-familiar words, would have been "Naga versus Preta." Here, this scholar presents a different view, which we agree partly with; that is, we knew the Hebrews originated in India. We knew this all along. He presents many similar words with similar meanings from Sanskrit and Hebrew. However it is also known that many standard Sanskrit words that meant good things, were kept in the early Hebrew, but with their meanings reversed. As such, a word for instance meaning "good wife" in Sanskrit may have meant "whore" in Hebrew.

The links in language and meaning that this scholar has located, despite being ancient, are not ancient enough. They belong to a period after the war with the Prachetases which predated 6000BC. The links the author makes with the Hebrew Kaballa are likewise mistaken since the foremost expert in Kaballa, Isaac Myers, admits that the Hebrews got this teaching from the Turanians. What is wholly absent in this scholar's research is the Ural-Altaic (Turanian) influence, although he mentions the "Turanian homeland of Central Asia" and "Mount Meru" later on - he has the wrong people living there. Dravidians did not live there, nor did Semites - it would have been far too cold for them. Archaeological finds back up what we are saying; not what he's saying on this issue of who lived there. Nor are hypotheses about Dravidians occupying the entirety of India correct if one checks with the more ancient texts. It is well known now for instance, (see Cavalli-Sforza) that Ural Altaic people inhabited Sumeria long before the Semites or Indo-Europeans ever got there. It is a pity that the Turanian influence is left out of such theorizing, primarily due to be being almost wholly unknown except in oral traditions. Even Max Muller dealt with it barely, finding it unknown. This poses a major problem! We who are Turanian have to rely on scholars to find out stuff and confirm our words: for example the information about Sumeria. The information written in Serpents versus Adamites about Turanians being there predates the FACTS discovered by scholars that verify the oral history that we wrote down in that article.

We present a part of this since it deals with a city called Satana.

We do not think that the word or name "Satan" derives from this city, but that the city was originally named after the concept of Sat. After all, concepts come first, then words, then the founding of cities and then, finally, naming the city. We think that "Satan" as an adversary derives from the Hebrew turning "upside down" certain meanings of words. SAT for instance, means Being, Boundless Darkness. Sata-rupa is Nature itself. Satta: sole Existence. Sattva: understanding. Satya: supreme truth. Satya-yuga: the golden age of truth and wisdom. Get our Serpents versus Adamites to find out much more - available - see our AD.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"Is There A Connection Between Ancient Indian And Hebrew Language?"

A scholar finds compelling evidence for ancient Indian influence on a global scale.

(ViewZone http://www.viewzone.com/matlock.html welcomes this highly researched work by scholar, Gene D. Matlock, which is part of his complete manuscript showing the global influence of ancient India's culture and language. We welcome your comments and thoughts.)

See original article at: http://www.viewzone.com/abraham2.html

From their website:

Had you been a cartographer and geographer working for the British East India company in the 17th and 18th centuries, you would have found all over India thousands of Hebrew-like place names with similar meanings in both languages as well. The map excerpt on this page shows a small section of ancient Seuna-Desa (Zion Land) in what is now Maharashtra (to right). At the bottom right of the excerpt is the city of Paithan, on the banks of the river Godivari. The Indo-Hebrews named the part of the river passing through Paithan's territory Paithan (Pison, Phison), according to their traditions. In the upper left-hand corner is the city of Satana. (SEE MAP) According to the legends of the Yadavas (Indo-Hebrews), [Note: the Yadava were descendents of Yadu. The founder of this line was Yadu, the son of King Yayati of the Somavansa race. They had a kingdom of Dwaraka in Guzerat and around 3100 BC the Yadava city was submerged by the ocean. The many outside the city survived.] Satana would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorah envious. The Seunas and the Satanas decided to resolve their moral and religious differences on the battlefield. The forces of "Satan" lost, but their defeat didn't dishearten them. Eventually, we came to think of "Satan" as a being who lost the battle but not the war. The bible tells us that such a peace treaty hasn't yet been signed between these two ancient enemies.

In that part of India, the holiest of holies for the Indians, the names of many towns end in the appendage gaon. In Hebrew, gaon means "genius; great rabbinical scholar." Also in this region is an area that was once the favorite of Yadava royalty: Nashik, the exact Hebrew name for "Royal Prince." Satan is near the district called Khandesh (Land of Cain). There is also a Kodesh. Kod and Khad are Sanskrit terms for "First," "The Beginning," or "God." In Hebrew, Khadesh = "The first day of a Jewish calendar month." Notice that all these names have similar meanings and religious connotations in both languages. I invite my readers to investigate this anomaly for themselves.

The similarity of these Indian and Hebrew names certainly traumatized European colonists. Unwilling to admit that the Jews had never sprouted spontaneously in the Arabian desert, or were from outer space as I read recently, but were from the East as the bible itself tells us, they merely erased these matters from their minds or convinced themselves that they were "coincidences," even though the "coincidences" numbered in the thousands and were peppered over every region in India.

A 19th Century British Scholar Explains Why the Western World Never Learned About the Indian Origins of the Jews.

Though not generally known in this day and age, Godfrey Higgins (1772-1833), archeologist, politician, humanitarian, social reformer, and author, was one of the most enlightened and educated men of early 19th century England. He was a well-known iconoclast, rationalist, and admirer of the Jews, who vehemently opposed any kind of persecution of this ancient religious group. He wrote two oversized volumes, totaling around 1600 pages of fine print, about the Jews' Indian origins. These two volumes, entitled Anacalypsis, are extremely rare. The last printing was done in 1965 by University Books, NY. It's a difficult book to read because the author painstakingly proved the minutest of details in his dissertation. Even good readers need several weeks to finish it.

The first printing consisted of only 200 copies, twenty of which he had to give away. Only a few of the remaining 180 copies were sold. For nearly thirty years, the religious communities of England and Europe quietly suppressed the book. It has since been reprinted three times, but including the first printing, the total copies printed never totaled over a thousand. Only occasionally can it be found in a library. Even so, many authors have quoted and plagiarized it. Not a few spiritual charlatans, such as fraudulent mystics, psychics, and the Presbyterian preacher who wrote the novel on which The Book of Mormon is based, used Anacalypsis to produce their respective heresies and agendas. The famous 19th century mystic and founder of Theosophy, Madam Blavatsky, took advantage of the world's nearly total ignorance of this magnificent document, using much of Higgin's information, to convince the gullible that she had acquired her "mystical knowledge" from "otherworldly" sources called "Akashic records."

Godfrey Higgins gave an opinion that I have always espoused, which explains in part why the similarities of peoples, languages, philosophies, and place names between India and the Middle East became lost to the memory of mankind after Christianity and Islam took over the West.

Aramaic, a language as similar to Hebrew as Spanish is to Portuguese, originated in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Both Afghanistan and Pakistan were once part of India. Afghanistan seceded from Indian in the 1700s. Pakistan was cut out of India when the two nations were partitioned after World War II. Aramaic also is the source of modern Hebrew's square alphabet, used in Israel today. The Hebrew square alphabet and the truth that Hebrew is just an Aramaic dialect confirm the Indian origin of the Jews.

Those Christian and Jewish authorities who don't want it to be true that ten to thirty million Jews once lived in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Northwestern India say that it is just a "coincidence" that so many tribes and places there have biblical names. Others insist that the Moslems christened all those tribes and places. As Godfrey Higgins tells us, many of those tribes and places had already received their so-called "biblical names" millenniums before Islam was a gleam in Mohammed's eyes and many centuries before those same names started showing up in the Middle East. Some of Israel's tribal and place names also started appearing in Afghanistan, Kashmir, and Northwestern India when Sargon II and Nebuchadnezzar exiled most of the Jews to that part of the world. The confusion about the origin of those tribal and place names will always exist as long as we stubbornly refuse to give the Indo-Hebrews their rightful place in history. The Aryans and Indo-Hebrews began to overrun parts of India and the Middle East around 2000 BC, perhaps more than a thousand years previously if there is any truth to the story about the progeny of Noah.

Somehow, our brainwashed minds blank out the fact that the Ancient Egyptian and Akkadian names for Hebrew, Habiru and Apiru were derived from Indo-Hebrew dialects and meant "Sons of Ophir." The truth about the origins of the Hebrews has been screaming in our faces for thousands of years, but our benumbed minds have chosen not to hear it


http://www.geocities.com/satanicreds/satan-city.html


Satanic reds:

Humankind is a social species, and only by putting People before unbridled profits can the New Age begin. Workers make everything that is used and enjoyed. The workers have nothing to lose but their chains. We have a world to win and in that sense only, we are "Reds." We have Being - SAT. But we must stretch forth and Become - TAN and in that sense only, we are SaTanists. Satanic Reds, SR., Social Realists. Are you one? See below and see our FAQ.

This is the Home of the Dark Doctrines

http://www.geocities.com/satanicreds/index.html

green nationalist
Monday, August 23rd, 2004, 06:30 AM
The idea of a "Red Satanist" is preposturous because satanism in itself is elitist, promoting individuality over the masses, its a master morality, what these guys are promoting is some kind of Communist/ Republic

Rubbish

Oskorei
Monday, August 23rd, 2004, 06:51 PM
The idea of a "Red Satanist" is preposturous because satanism in itself is elitist, promoting individuality over the masses, its a master morality, what these guys are promoting is some kind of Communist/ Republic

Rubbish
Some Laveyan Satanists (Barton I think?) have been interested in Bolshevism, which is elitism too.

Its a question of strategy I think. In a society with great social mobility the chances of joining the elite are good for the individual satanist. But as society gets old and senile, these chances diminish, and then the better way to gain power is revolution; "changing of the guards".

Besides, I think our present society is so disgusting that the only worthy alternative is to get rid of it altogether, but that is not a satanist point.

Grimr
Monday, August 23rd, 2004, 09:33 PM
Satanic reds:

Humankind is a social species, and only by putting People before unbridled profits can the New Age begin. Workers make everything that is used and enjoyed. The workers have nothing to lose but their chains. We have a world to win and in that sense only, we are "Reds." We have Being - SAT. But we must stretch forth and Become - TAN and in that sense only, we are SaTanists. Satanic Reds, SR., Social Realists. Are you one? See below and see our FAQ.

This is the Home of the Dark Doctrines

http://www.geocities.com/satanicreds/index.html

Pseudo-Satanic communists can find people to write articles for their badly designed web site! Can I find people to write articles for a well-designed Racist/Satanist web site? No! Thatís really ironic...

Evolved
Tuesday, August 24th, 2004, 05:56 AM
In the Qur'an, Iblis was somewhat racist, he held himself above Adam because Adam was made of mud. :P

NumberOne
Tuesday, August 24th, 2004, 11:01 AM
It is sad:~( that people are professing this kind of superstition.

green nationalist
Tuesday, August 24th, 2004, 12:04 PM
It is sad:~( that people are professing this kind of superstition.
Buddhism is superstition, satanism is cold hard reality.