PDA

View Full Version : Differences between the races - A simple breakdown



GreenHeart
Sunday, July 14th, 2002, 01:04 PM
In the 1958 edition of the World Book Encyclopedia, They have a section entitled "Races of Man" I have known about this for quite some time, but I thought it was finally time to share this important information with you all. I won't put the entire article in because it is really long and mostly liberal propaganda but here are the hard facts:

I hope you enjoy reading this as much as I do!

"The Principal Races of Man
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Racial Stocks and Subdivisions and Their Geographical Location
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Caucasoid

European

Nordic (Northwestern Europe) and
East Baltic (Northeastern Europe)
Alpine (Central Europe),
Dinaric (Southeastern Europe),
Armenoid and Iranian-Plateau (Asia Minor)
Mediterranean (Southern Europe),
Arabic (Asia Minor)
Indo-Dravidic (India)

-------

-Mixed Races-
Polynesian (western Pacific), Vedda (southern India and Ceylon), Ainu (Japan), Australoid (Australia and southern Asia; Tasmania

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Negroid

African Negro

Ethiopian or Hamitic (Northern and northeastern Africa)
Nilote and Sudanese (eastern Africa)
Bantu (southeastern and southern Africa)
Forest Negro (western Africa)

---

Oceanic Negro

Melanesian, Papuan (Melanesia)

---

Pygmoid

Negritos (central Africa and Malaysia)
Bushmen-Hottentot (southern Africa; may have mongoloid element)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mongoloid

Eastern Mongoloid

Siberic (Siberia)
Sinitic (China)
Mongols (Central Asia)

-------

American Indian

Pacific Forest and Central types (northcentral North America
Andean, Brazilian, Patagonian types (South America)
Marginal types (North and Central America)

Eskimo of northern North America and extreme northeastern Asia
Malaysians of Malaysian Islandsin East Pacific


======================================== =====
MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF THE THREE GREAT STOCKS OF MAN
======================================== =====


Negroid

Hair is coarse and it is wavy or even curly, it often coils in spirals.

Heads of most Negroid peoples are long and fairly narrow, although pygmies are usually round headed.

Skin colors of Negroes range from light to dark brown and black.

Nose is broad and flat with flaring wings. Nasal root is low and wide.

Lips are thick and turned out, Mouth is fairly wide in most Negroid peoples.

Eyes have no folds at the corners, although there may be a fold in the middle of the eyelid. Color is brown.

--------------------------------------

Caucasoid

Hair texture is fine and may be straight, or wavy or curly.

Head shapes range from long in Northwest Europe to broad in Central Europe and short in Southeast Europe.

Skin colors range from pinkish-white and olive to dark brown.

Nose and nasal root are high and narrow with pressed-in wings.

Lips are think and not turned out. Mouth is small to fairly wide.

Eyes of Caucasoid peoples have no corner or lid folds. Color of eyes ranges from light blue to dark brown.

---------------------------------------

Mongoloid

Hair texture of Mongoloids is coarse and entirely straight.

Head shape is typically round, although long-headed people are
frequently found in North China.

Skin color ranges from saffron-yellow to light shades of brown.

Nose tends to be intermediate, but tends to be closer to Caucasoid in shape.

Lips are fairly thin and not turned out. Mouth is wide to very wide.

Eyes have lid folds in inner corners which make eyes look slanted or almond-shaped. Color is dark brown.

-----------------------------------
======================================== =======
Principal Physical Characteristics of the three major Stocks of
Mankind
======================================== =======

White

Stature: Tall to medium tall

Head Form: Long to round

Skin color: White to light brown

Eye color: Dark brown to light blue

Hair color: Blond to dark brown

Hair form: Straight to wavy

Hair texture: Fine

Body hair: Profuse

Facial Contour: Oval to square

Facial profile: Straight

Cheekbones: Compressed

Chin: Prominent eminence

Eye ridges: Large

Nose: Narrow to moderate
bridge medium to high;
straight to convex

Lips: Narrow, straight

Palate: Small; breadth narrow to medium

Teeth: Small

Ear: Large, lobe very well developed

Leg: Lower leg short relative to thigh

Arm: Forearm short relative to upper arm

Foot: Arch high; foot large and broad

Body Build: Muscular

---------------------------------------------------

Black

Stature: Tends to tall, but very short (pygmy)
types are represented

Head Form: Tends to long

Skin color: Reddish to black brown

Eye color: Brown to dark brown

Hair color: Brown-black to black

Hair form: Wavy to woolly or frizzly

Hair texture: Coarse

Body hair: Sparse

Facial Contour: Tends to oval

Facial profile: Prognathous or slanting

Cheekbones: Moderately compressed

Chin: Weak eminence

Eye ridges: Moderate

Nose: Very broad; wide tip; wide bridge and root

Lips: Thick, turned out

Palate: Large and broad

Teeth: Large, especially first molar

Ear: Small; lobe moderately developed

Leg: Lower leg long relative to thigh

Arm: Forearm long relative to upper arm

Foot: Arch low, foot large and narrow

Body Build: Linear and muscular

------------------------------------------------

Yellow

Stature: Medium tall

Head Form: Tends to round

Skin color: Yellow to reddish brown

Eye color: Brown to dark brown

Hair color: Dark brown to brown-black

Hair form: Straight to wavy

Hair texture: Coarse

Body hair: Sparse

Facial Contour: Tends to square

Facial profile: Straight

Cheekbones: Laterally projecting and
prominent

Chin: Moderate eminence

Eye ridges: Small

Nose: Moderate breadth and root elevation;
medial epicanthic fold which makes eyes
look slanted

Lips: Moderate size and thickness

Palate: Small; breadth medium

Teeth: Small

Ear: Moderate in general size and proportions

Leg: Lower leg short relative to thigh

Arm: Forearm short relative to upper arm

Foot: Arch intermediate; foot small and narrow

Body Build: Muscular to linear"


---------------------------

What are everyone's thoughts on this?

Ederico
Sunday, July 14th, 2002, 07:47 PM
I found this post quite interesting, and a good introduction to racial differences for people like me ignorant on the matter. From what I have read it seems that probably the Caucasoid race is the mostly mixed in characteristics of the 3 main races. That is what makes our race beautiful in itself. Although we do not need characteristics of other races in our genepool, through miscegenation (which as far as I know is the mixing of genes between different races, or not?), because that would tend to make us lose our racial character and identity.

GreenHeart
Monday, July 15th, 2002, 02:33 AM
More of our people need to know what exactly defines us as a race so they can protect themselves against egalitarian lies that we're all the same.

Some people actually never had any idea that blue eyes are exclusively a White trait, which means only White people can have them, or those with predominantly White ancestry and a slight admixture. And then beyond just physical characteristics that separate us from the other races, there are important mental and spiritual differences as well. I could go on and on, but I won't do it here.

I hope this post will reach more people and get them informed on our racial characteristics, and what sets us apart from the other races.

Oswald Mosley
Wednesday, July 17th, 2002, 08:30 PM
Jennifer,

Your extract is entirely correct of course; the differences between races are obvious to all except liberals and 'do gooders' who would like us to be raceless mongrels.

Interestingly, Jews are composed of several races: mostly Arabic (Semitic), Armenoid, Hamitic and Mediterrenean, but also East-Baltic, Alpine, Dinaric and even Nordic in some cases!

Seppl
Thursday, July 18th, 2002, 03:00 AM
I believe we should refrain from the use of the term "Caucasian" to describe our Aryan Race, as it's another Jewish attempt to include non-aryans like Semites and Amernoids, as being "White"!
Only European subraces of the White/Aryan race such as Nordic/Fallish, Dinaric, Alpine, East Baltic and Atlanto-Mediterranean races are truely White (Aryan).
We created civilization and put a man on the moon, no other race on Earth has contributed so much to the World in Technology,Art,literature and genius as the Aryan race!!
Be proud to be Aryan, as if you not White you are not a real Human being!!!:D :)
88 14
Servus,

AryanKnight
Friday, July 19th, 2002, 12:25 AM
Great post. I remember reading somewhere that niggers are not actually homo sapiens, but are one of the lower homonid species. I think that would account for the differences in skeletal structure and the variences in the genetic codes

GreenHeart
Monday, July 22nd, 2002, 09:23 PM
Yeah, miscegenation means race mixing. Which is the worst sin there is - no matter WHO is doing it!!!

GreenHeart
Monday, July 22nd, 2002, 09:24 PM
Yeah, maybe niggs are really just a lower hominid species, because when you see a picture of "modern man" he doesn't resemble the negro one bit!

That would also explain a lot of other differences too!

Dzerzhinsky
Monday, July 22nd, 2002, 09:50 PM
We created civilization and put a man on the moon, no other race on Earth has contributed so much to the World in Technology,Art,literature and genius as the Aryan race!!

why don't you stop living off other peoples achievments. you did none of this. just because people of the white race have contributed much, doesn't mean that you are any better than anyone. would you say some drug-dealing low life who is white is better than a doctor who is black? of course not!

GreenHeart
Tuesday, July 23rd, 2002, 02:29 AM
Originally posted by Dzerzhinsky
We created civilization and put a man on the moon, no other race on Earth has contributed so much to the World in Technology,Art,literature and genius as the Aryan race!!

why don't you stop living off other peoples achievments. you did none of this. just because people of the white race have contributed much, doesn't mean that you are any better than anyone. would you say some drug-dealing low life who is white is better than a doctor who is black? of course not!

x_zzz

Did somebody say something?? *Yawns*

Turk182
Tuesday, July 23rd, 2002, 08:57 AM
Good post NordicPower88!

But i'm with Seppl on that one, Caucasian is not the right word to unite the White people. Caucasian Arabs are not White for example...

Again, good post..

GreenHeart
Friday, July 26th, 2002, 06:11 PM
Originally posted by Turk182
Good post NordicPower88!

But i'm with Seppl on that one, Caucasian is not the right word to unite the White people. Caucasian Arabs are not White for example...

Again, good post..

The definition is not my own, in all truth. It comes from the World Book encyclopedia, 1958 edition.

It is correct however, that arabs have quite a bit of White admixture in them. Not that it helps them much!! :rolleyes:

Ederico
Friday, July 26th, 2002, 06:24 PM
I do not like the Classification of Caucasian either, I much prefer the Classification Aryan since it excludes any connection with Arabs (which are the people that cause the most problem in our Nation). Obviously we cannot use the Classification as Aryan becuase it is Politically Incorrect, we cannot even use it to refer to White People because it means Noble Ones. I do not like the Classification White because it sounds a bit shallow to me, Aryan is much better.

Hail the Aryan Race!!!

Prometheus
Tuesday, July 30th, 2002, 03:55 AM
A good post. Seems to be pretty accurate.

NormanBlood
Thursday, December 11th, 2003, 06:27 PM
NordicPower, good post. There isj ust one thing on the description of non-whites that I didn't necessarily agree with. Of course you may not agree with this aspect as well as you did not right these definetions. Anyways, what I did not agree with was the description of "Yellows" hair. I have not once in my life seen an Asian(or related race) with anything but JET black hair and pretty much black eyes. Same with blacks..I have rarely seen a black person with brown eyes, their eyes are so dark (as are the eyes of other races) that on the whole you cannot see their pupils at all. Same thing goes for hair colour, I don't think I,ve seen a black or Arab etc. with brown hair.


Its kind of odd how the White race is in reality the only race with blonde/red/brown hair colours and blue/green/brown eye colours. Makes you wonder..

Glenlivet
Thursday, December 11th, 2003, 06:32 PM
I have seen some Arabs (mainly fromt the Levant, e.g. in Syria and Lebanon) who are blond and/or blue-eyed.

Arabs are quite diverse, although it is another thing if we want to discuss the original (if we can talk about such a thing) Arab (perhaps better to say Semitic, although that is also a small group of languages) physical type. They occupy a very vast area. Most phys. anthropologists believe that they were of the Arabid/Orientalid type which B. Lundman put among Western Europeans merely because of lower head.



I don't think I,ve seen a black or Arab etc. with brown hair.

Its kind of odd how the White race is in reality the only race with blonde/red/brown hair colours and blue/green/brown eye colours. Makes you wonder..

NormanBlood
Thursday, December 11th, 2003, 06:42 PM
I read an interesting article in the Journal of Indo-European studies. I will try to find it, I have it photocopied and puta way somewhere for an essay I wrote a while back. The author attributes some of the more modern "blonde+blue eyed"Arabs to something as simple as white mixture. When we consider that in the past few centuries there has been a large white persence in the region. Also considering Arab/White contact in pre-Christian times. I would not say those features are "native" to the Arab group. Oh well, an interesting topic though I'd say.

Glenlivet
Thursday, December 11th, 2003, 06:56 PM
That is a very good journal, and I would appreciate if you can tell us something about the article. Who is the author and which volume?



I read an interesting article in the Journal of Indo-European studies. I will try to find it, I have it photocopied and puta way somewhere for an essay I wrote a while back. The author attributes some of the more modern "blonde+blue eyed"Arabs to something as simple as white mixture. When we consider that in the past few centuries there has been a large white persence in the region. Also considering Arab/White contact in pre-Christian times. I would not say those features are "native" to the Arab group. Oh well, an interesting topic though I'd say.

Mac Seafraidh
Thursday, December 11th, 2003, 07:25 PM
I totally agree with that race chart and that is the Nord and Süd-Europaeischen should not argue. The Caucasioid race is the key factor not fighting like stupid moolinyanic(semi-coined word, i guess) gangs and stuff like that.