PDA

View Full Version : Race in History



Hanna
Wednesday, November 26th, 2008, 08:30 AM
" Renown British ethnologist Prof. A.H. Keane wrote: "These neo-lithic monuments, all of the stone cell and block types are found in Asia, Iran, Syria, Palestine, Arabia, Northern Africa, Ethiopia, the Crimea, the British Isles, and China."

"
This megalithic engineering is not found among the yellow or black races.

History itself may very well be considered the greatest evidence as to the inherent differences between the races in the capability of forming and/or maintaining civilizations. Just as we measure a student's performance in school on what grades he or she receives, we can also measure the performance of the human races on what they have accomplished throughout history. While most people are aware of the White origins of the ancient Roman, Greek, and Sumerian civilizations, fewer are aware of the White origins of the ancient Egyptian, Central American, Indian, Chinese, and Japanese civilizations. In essence, upon examining these civilizations, we can find not only that they were indeed created by White people, but that their decline and fall can be attributed to the fact that the creators of them intermarried with non-whites with the resulting offspring unable to maintain what their ancestors had created. Though we lack the space to cover this massive topic as thoroughly as it can and has been covered in other sources, I hope that the information which is provided below (from the book, White America) will enable you to understand that Race has played a crucial role in history, a role which our people would be wise to recognize lest we should continue our current path of "colorblindness", a path which can only result in the destruction of the civilization our forefathers created for us. Written records cover but a short last chapter in human history. To grasp the results of contact by races, it is necessary to push back the curtain of history and trace earlier events. Prehistoric migrations of the Whites since the dawn of time carried with them the germs of intellect and culture which would later develop. When races are in permanent contact, there is racial intermarriage creating a mongrel race. However, the language, carvings, statues, and monuments remain to prove that members of the White race once built the civilization. Members of the White race have always been in motion, being away from Europe almost as much as they have been there. Civilization dawned along the Nile and Euphrates. Early White people ventured out to Greece, Rome, and Carthage. To the East they travelled to India and on to Asia. These race movements can easily be followed by skeletal remains, skull formations, implements, burial mounds, etc. A sign of the ancient White man was his burial cell and block (which led to todays vault and tombstone).


Professor Keane wrote:
"The dominant position in society seems destined into the future to be held by the large and much convoluted brain of the White Caucasian people."


A branch of the White race followed a Northern route into Northern China, Mongolia, Korea, and to Japan. It is admitted that some people living there today are partly White. Furthermore, the early Chinese civilization has been linked to that existing in Babylonia (a White civilization) in prior centuries. The people of southern China and Indochina are a much darker race than the "Whiter" Asiatics to the north. The Japanese are of part White ancestry. Even to this day, the White "Ainus" people live in the mountains of northern Japan and are definitely White people. They are also found on the northern Japanese island of Yezo. The Chinese have the ability to hold on to science but not to advance it (which the Japanese--a more Whiter race--are efficient at). The Chinese suffer from arrest of mental development (further development of the brain) by the closure of the sutures of the skull (like the Blacks) at an earlier age than do the Europeans or Japanese. The Races of Man, by Deniker, page 363, states: "Southern Siberia and North Mongolia are covered with stone circles, barrows, burial places, skulls, iron and copper, which are of European origin." Early Chinese records refer to blond tribes and there remain fair-skinned blue-eyed people in Manchuria and Korea today. The rulers of China for the most part have been of hybrid-White descent. The Chinese civilization was more creative 2,500 years ago than it is today--especially in the southern provinces. Madison Grant, in his widely acclaimed book, The Passing of the Great Race, wrote: "The Chinese seem to be almost as incapable of progress as the Negroes themselves. The only essential difference being that the arrest of mental development comes later in life for the yellow man than for the black."



Why America Is More Advanced Than Mexico and South America



Far more slaves were brought to South America than to the U.S. The Blacks and Indians freely co-mingled with many of the original Spanish and the Portugese. Thus there was interbreeding on a massive scale. This is why a continent, far richer in natural resources, lags far behind the U.S. in progress. Garcia Calderon, a Peruvian diplomat in his book, Latin America, wrote: "The Negro is a formal influence in Latin America. They are revenged for their enslavement in that their blood is mingled with that of their masters. South American civilization is dependent upon the numerical predominance of the Spaniard over the mulatto, the Negro, and the Indian." As mentioned earlier, when the White and non-white intermix, the result will be offspring of with higher intelligence than the non-white parent, but intelligence lower than the White parent. Thus, the offspring are unable to continue the accomplishments of their White ancestors. This explains why America, with fewer natural resources than Mexico and South America, is so grossly superior in standard of living, culture, technology, etc.-not only do White people form a majority of America's population, but much less racial intermixing has taken place. In addition, it cannot be said that the deciding factor has been our Constitution and democratic ideals, since both Mexico and most of the Central and South American countries have Constitutions and democratic ideals quite similar to ours.

Interesting article, this is what happened when everyone claims being white.

Psychonaut
Wednesday, November 26th, 2008, 09:31 AM
This megalithic engineering is not found among the yellow or black races.

That's not really true. The Incas built enormous megalithic cities and monuments using stones that weigh hundreds of tons:

http://www.imagesofanthropology.com/images/Inca_walls_at_Sacsayhuaman_near_Cuzco_An des_Mts_Peru_copy.jpg

The Easter Islanders built megalithic heads:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a2/Moai_Rano_raraku.jpg

The Mongols left intricately carved megaliths as well:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/75/Deer-stone.jpg

There are plenty of examples of megalithic architecture across Europe, Asia, South America and even Africa.

BeornWulfWer
Wednesday, November 26th, 2008, 11:23 AM
Yeah, but that can be explained away by the absolute fact that blue-eyed, blonde haired Nordics invaded the world.

</sarcasm>

Jäger
Wednesday, November 26th, 2008, 12:13 PM
Yeah, but that can be explained away by the absolute fact that blue-eyed, blonde haired Nordics invaded the world.
Completely without sarcasm, this is a valid conclusion.

Hanna
Wednesday, November 26th, 2008, 03:52 PM
That's not really true. The Incas built enormous megalithic cities and monuments using stones that weigh hundreds of tons.
There are plenty of examples of megalithic architecture across Europe, Asia, South America and even Africa.

I forgot to insert the quotation mark, I just notice it, so I'm not the one who claimed that theory. But what is interesting here, is that who defines what is ''Engineering'' even in viking age you could see such architectures but it was never seen as vikings as 'Engineering'' geeks.:)

lei.talk
Sunday, November 30th, 2008, 04:58 PM
The Mongols left intricately carved megaliths as well:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/75/Deer-stone.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/75/Deer-stone.jpg
Yeah, but that can be explained away by the absolute fact that blue-eyed, blonde haired Nordics invaded the world.

</sarcasm>
Completely without sarcasm, this is a valid conclusion.
Deer stones are Mongolian ancient megaliths carved with symbols. The name comes from their carved depictions of flying deers. Their purpose and creators are unknown. Archaeologists have found around 500 deer stones around Mongolia. However, Cimmerian (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cimmerians) ruins also show deer stones and they were known to have expanded into the Mongolian area (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Mongolia#Prehistory) and other areas. The Cimmerians of the early 1st millennium BC left a small number (about ten are known) of distinctive stone stelae - Kurgan stelae (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurgan_stelae). Another four or five "deer stelae" dating to the same time are known from the northern Caucasus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasus).

Deer stones were probably originally erected by Bronze Age nomads around 1000 BC though further research into the Cimmerian stone stelae - Kurgan stelae should be taken into much consideration. Later cultures have often reused the stones in their own burial mounds (known as kheregsüürs (http://www.travelingmongolia.com/index.php?pid=62)) and for other purposes. Modern vandals have also defaced and even looted the stones.

In additions to images of flying deer, the stones also include a circle at the top and stylised dagger and belt at the bottom, which has made some scholars speculate that the stones were supposed to represent notable people. Some rare stones do have a human face carved at the top. The tallest of the stones is 15 feet tall.

- wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deer_stone)

Haereticus
Sunday, November 30th, 2008, 05:18 PM
Whilst the higher number of African slaves purchased were taken to the Southern continent certainly contributed to the problems now experienced in that part of the world, another part of the reason for the relative success of North America, when compared to Central and South America, is the attitude of the, primarily British, settlers in the North compared to the Spanish and Portuguese in the South. British settlers in North America, for the most part, intended to stay and build a new home. Portuguese and Spanish settlers were more inclined to try to exploit the newly found resources and to transfer that wealth to their homelands.