PDA

View Full Version : The Rise of the Gaians - Are Racialists just pig-headed?



Louky
Wednesday, April 14th, 2004, 04:03 PM
Most racialists I've read seem to think that the result of the multiracialist and multiculturalist trends will be the absolute blurring of racial distinctions. They see one coffee-colored race dominating the earth. However, I wonder if, due to mate selection being strongly dependent on IQ, the result will be a stratification of color corresponding to social class: the upper class being predominately Caucasian with Mongoloid, and the lower class being predominately Negroid with Caucasian. Various combinations will form in the middle.

I call this new, world-wide race the Gaians, after the trendy earth godess, Gaia.

I see this development as the logical result of "judging everyone on the basis of their character, not their race," the color-blind mantra of egalitarianism.

I'd be interested in reading how racialists might oppose a seemingly "fair" re-alignment of the world's races, and I'd like your opinions on whether or not the rise of the Gaians would foster world peace.

Siegfried
Wednesday, April 14th, 2004, 04:10 PM
I don't think it'll ever come to that; multi-ethnic and multiracial societies tend to break down, and the West is already showing lots and lots of cracks.
As for world peace, I don't think that's feasible or even desirable; every man and culture has an innate will to power, and the power activity of individuals and cultures converges - and clashes. It's a rule of life.

Milesian
Wednesday, April 14th, 2004, 04:21 PM
I'm not really sure I understood the question.
If it was a One World Race then how could Caucasians predominate the Upper Classes as this would pre-suppose that the lower echelons of society were comprised of some thing else, hence it would not be a One World Race.

In any case, I believe that man is incapable of solving the worlds problems under his own power. Human efforts will always ultimately fail, as only fallible "solutions" can come from fallible creatures

Glenlivet
Wednesday, April 14th, 2004, 04:43 PM
Oh Lord our saviour :D.

Were the humans that wrote the Bible infallible?

Is it not better to make statements on pragamtic standards, based on empirical evidence?

On the other hand one should mention that science got its limitations when it comes to issues as if God exist or not. So it is not just because there is a lack of reality as we may see it.

How do you think that problems can be solved?



In any case, I believe that man is incapable of solving the worlds problems under his own power. Human efforts will always ultimately fail, as only fallible "solutions" can come from fallible creatures

Milesian
Wednesday, April 14th, 2004, 04:47 PM
How do you think that problems can be solved?

Answer:


Oh Lord our saviour

:rofl


Were the humans that wrote the Bible infallible?

Nope, they were fallible as well. However, the Church which defined the New Testament as the Word of God, was infallible ;)

Scrubber
Thursday, April 15th, 2004, 10:13 AM
We'll see affirmative action in mating before what you describe is allowed to happen. :(

Vestmannr
Thursday, April 15th, 2004, 07:48 PM
I've been mulling this over for along time. Most of our young people here in the states are brainwashed with this: that in the future everyone will be homogenous good-looking Hispanics if we all just 'mix Race'. Things, however, are far more complicated.

First, the only way to achieve a uniform population would be forced GM of humans. Forced breeding would not even work towards that goal: it could produce a melange, but not a uniformity. The desirability and problems of such an experiment have been edging me towards finally writing that Sci Fi novel I've always wanted to do (so far, I've never found an idea that was so frightening to me, especially because it is absurd in its logic, but so prevalent.)

Personally, I think that interracial breeding over time produces 'throwbacks' or stabilized blends. However, there will always be isolated communities that will filter down to specific genetic lineages. Those who hate the concept of racial division, have transferred that hate to the biological diversity of human races (called 'population groups' in their newspeak) and work towards the day when they will have 'erased all boundaries'. If they succeed, they will probably find the emergence of new races to replace those they have destroyed, much to their own horror. Evolution is arguably a natural event, and even the proponents of large-scale mixing would agree. However, their hypocrisy on this issue is that they do not trust that evolution has produced varieties of human beings that are specially adapted for life as it exists. Of course, I wont argue whom I think is the real culprit behind all this, and what the real motivation is (a contrary motivation to what would be imposed on others), but I'd rather not be seen as a conspiracy theorist ;)