How is an 'Aryan' supposed to look like?

[tnbt]

This is how I think they are suppose to look like in terms of the head.

Well the skull has to be thin,long and angular.

The lips have to be thin not full,the nose has to be long but not big.

The eyes not slanted.

The hair texture wavy or straight.

The skin color light but not pale, but with a pink or reddish tint to it.

The eye color blue,green or grey.

The hair color from red to blonde.

Agree?

[Moody]

That is similar to Gunther's basic description, with the important additions of;

hair colour;'golden fair',

face width; 'narrow',

nose width; also narrow, and

height; - Nordics are TALL.

[see Gunther's, 'The Racial Elements of European History']

[Hermod]

Originally posted by Moody Lawless
That is similar to Gunther's basic description, with the important additions of;

hair colour;'golden fair',

face width; 'narrow',

nose width; also narrow, and

height; - Nordics are TALL.

[see Gunther's, 'The Racial Elements of European History']


If the term Aryan means "noble" than
nothing can persuade me that Gunthers type is more Aryan than Roman type.
Marcus Aurelius, victor over Germanics was superb and more "noble" to the hordes of the North.
In fact Rome had far more trouble with Mongolian Huns than with military ignorant nordics.
The term Aryan as the tribal name has nothing to do with the population of Northern Europe, Its traditional Persian name.
I use it as the synonym for all European races, and the attempt to steal that name and use it only for the Historic marginal types such as Scandinavians in very naughty indeed.

[Azdaja]

<< I use it as the synonym for all European races, and the attempt to steal that name and use it only for the Historic marginal types such as Scandinavians in very naughty indeed. >>

Actually is was anthropologists of the late 19th - early 20th centuries that began using the term "aryan" to apply to:
1) Indo-Europeans
2) The descendants of Indo-Europeans, whom the anthropologists said were the Nords.
It is using the term "aryan" to apply to all "white people" which is very recent, not using it for the "historic marginal types" as you call them.

[Ross]

Originally posted by Hermod
If the term Aryan means "noble" than
nothing can persuade me that Gunthers type is more Aryan than Roman type.
Marcus Aurelius, victor over Germanics was superb and more "noble" to the hordes of the North.
In fact Rome had far more trouble with Mongolian Huns than with military ignorant nordics.
The term Aryan as the tribal name has nothing to do with the population of Northern Europe, Its traditional Persian name.
I use it as the synonym for all European races, and the attempt to steal that name and use it only for the Historic marginal types such as Scandinavians in very naughty indeed.

In fact the war record of Germans and Scandinavians is not that impressive. French and Spaniards are way better... not to mention Russians :D

[Hermod]

For Germans the conquest of Scandinavia was a piece of cake. Germans which are not just Nodics but also Alpine and Dinaric found no resistance amongst this imaginary super race. Just compare a strong Russian resistance for instance with the lame Scandinavian.
lol
Even mixed countries like Greece gave Germans more headache.

I also fail to understand the stand that Nordics are creators of culture. Where are Vikng aqueducts, Viking palaces, Viking roads, Viking temples and colossal statues?
They are in fact culturally pour people. If there was not cultural influence from Southern Europe they would remain total primitives even in this millennium.

[Ross]

Originally posted by Hermod
.
I also fail to understand the stand that Nordics are creators of culture. Where are Vikng aqueducts, Viking palaces, Viking roads, Viking temples and colossal statues?


I gather, everything was devastated by our forgotten kin - Polabian and Elba Slavs... Slovens of Novgorod have contributed a lot too - in a furious raid with Karelians they've devasted the first Swedish capital/fortress - Sigtuna, never to be restored...

And don't forget, they were conquered by our ansectors and got the Aryan language from them, thou they've bastardized it...

PS. Visited the Vineta site, Hermod?

[NordicPower]

Originally posted by Hermod
For Germans the conquest of Scandinavia was a piece of cake. Germans which are not just Nodics but also Alpine and Dinaric found no resistance amongst this imaginary super race. Just compare a strong Russian resistance for instance with the lame Scandinavian.
lol
Even mixed countries like Greece gave Germans more headache.

I also fail to understand the stand that Nordics are creators of culture. Where are Vikng aqueducts, Viking palaces, Viking roads, Viking temples and colossal statues?
They are in fact culturally pour people. If there was not cultural influence from Southern Europe they would remain total primitives even in this millennium.

You think we didn't have all this? You are sorely mistaken. You have no clue about our noble history.

The Teutons were NOT mixed with alpines or dinarics, they were the ones who drove them into the mountains in the first place.

[Hermod]

Originally posted by NordicPower88
You think we didn't have all this? You are sorely mistaken. You have no clue about our noble history.

Than please in lighten me or admit the simple truth that superior culture is the product of Southern Europeans, Middle Europeans and even Eastern Europeans than culturally impotent Nordic "culture".
ROFL
Show me the Swedish Colosseum, Danish public bath and Norwegian Apian way, lol or perhaps Pyramids from Iceland.


The Teutons were NOT mixed with alpines or dinarics, they were the ones who drove them into the mountains in the first place. [/B]

There are no "Teutons" of which you are talking about for ages. Take a look at the modern Bawarians and Austrians. They are not exclusively Nordics, but are superior to Scandinavians culturally for centuries, just like Italians are for millenniums.

[Hermod]

lol
I shall not even mention Nordic military power.

[Hermod]

Originally posted by Ross
I gather, everything was devastated by our forgotten kin - Polabian and Elba Slavs... Slovens of Novgorod have contributed a lot too - in a furious raid with Karelians they've devasted the first Swedish capital/fortress - Sigtuna, never to be restored...

And don't forget, they were conquered by our ansectors and got the Aryan language from them, thou they've bastardized it...

PS. Visited the Vineta site, Hermod?


Also Slavic Wends brought the knowledge of shipbuilding to Scandinavia. If there was no Slavic influence on Vikings they would not even know how to make Drakars which made them so famous.
Vineta site? No. Any links?

[Evolved]

Personal Aryan ideal or for everyone? Individuals are racially different we should have ideals close to our own type. Some people don't have, genetically, the right stuff to reproduce the human type they admire, and when they try to assimilate with that "ideal" group (whatever it is) they do more harm than good. Japanese women admiring Nordic men, for example.

[The Philosopher...]

Hermod you are a bloody fool. Now keep quiet.

Let me tell you a few facts here.

Germany had an army on 4,5.-5 million people.

The 3 Scandinavian countries had a united army on 150 000 - 200 000 man highest.

that's around 1/30.

And Germany mass produced weapons cause they wanted new land territory unlike their Scandinavian counterparts.

Alright look at history before this bombastic coalition and war industry of Germany, and you see countries like Denmark fought with big brother Germany for thousands of years and maintained their territory brave. A country like Sweden under the war was rather self speculative to much, half can be said about the Danes, officially they welcomed the Germans but unofficially the people were concerned, thus reason for the severe sabotage we later saw in Denmark, but Denmark is flat unlike Norway in terrain, what concerns the Norwegian people. We fought and Germany never conquered us, we had small army. You would have seen this war tendency all over Scandinavian if the Swedes & Danes had other governments at the time. If you knew anything about ere-National Socialism you know that many people in the North welcomed it and many were therefore reluctant about fighting their own Germanic brothers (the Germans).

You talk to much boy, especially considering your polish thrash candy store had the second biggest army in Europe at the time.

I hereby excuse we don’t breed like rats.

Let me show you a birth rate annex from 1930, in addition to my brothers up-rise from cheap Polish slander in here.


England, Scandinavian, Germany, France 15-19,9%

Finland, Czech, Hungary 20-24,9%

Spain, Italy, Balkans 25-29,9%

Poland, Ukraine, Rumania 30-40,0%

Russia 40-43,0%

[NordicPower]

Actually the vikings built their own ships in the beginning for fishing. If they indeed did have help from the slavs it wouldn't have mattered because back then they were one and the same race, just different tribes, so it's really a moot point. Besides that, the viking ship was so flexible it was perfect for sailing on the open seas, and also great for landing on coasts where other ships would have needed a harbor (yes including Romand ships). The sail it what really made it master of the oceans though.

http://www.vikingshipcruises.com/images/about%20us/boat001.jpg

[The Philosopher...]

Originally posted by NordicPower88
Actually the vikings built their own ships in the beginning for fishing. If they indeed did have help from the slavs it wouldn't have mattered because back then they were one and the same race,

Dont let this knægt confuse you woman. The ships were build as you said with many purposes, but the ships were not build by slavs or invented by slavs, its amazing how many lies can be squeezed on the fact that Göta Swedes sailed across to Sk. Petersburg and had mobile ships on wheels with them.

[NordicPower]

Well I'm not confused. But even had the people in Russia actually built the ships, they were just from Scandanavia anyway.

But I already know who built the ships. I have read many books about the vikings, and even seen quite a few tv documentaries, and if slavs had built the ships (or even if there was a chance of it) , they wouldn't have hesitated to say that on the show, because of their half anti-viking stance.

Some people sit around inside their houses all day long and so think of all these idiotic lies.

Anyway, I have yet to hear about the great Russian vikings.......x_rofl

[The Philosopher...]

I didn't imply you had your facts wrong woman, but the concern of this guy twisting more views in here was brought to my attention. im tired of cheap Mud boys trying to take the glory of my ancestors. he better not speak so defaming if he ever came to this timberland one day or we have to straighten him out (so much as you can straighten a mud boy out ha ha). His properly making some long post to defend his cheap honour as we are corresponding now. the last thing wouldn't surprise me.

[Chemical Nose]

Originally posted by NordicPower88


Anyway, I have yet to hear about the great Russian vikings.......x_rofl Ever heard of Ross?:Retard x_rofl

[Hermod]

[EDIT] 2 WARNING, Stop spreading disunity.[EDIT]

[NordicPower]

Originally posted by The Philosopher...
I didn't imply you had your facts wrong woman, but the concern of this guy twisting more views in here was brought to my attention.

Oh I know.

His properly making some long post to defend his cheap honour as we are corresponding now. the last thing wouldn't surprise me.

^ Looks like you were right ^